If her speeches didn't praise and worship wallstreet they would have been released by now!!!!

[Logical]

Last edited Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:06 PM - Edit history (1)

She knows it will destroy her!

Smart move hiding them, but it still exposes her.

[yourpaljoey]

1. correct, they would be a feather in her cap

'We all carry some baggage; Hillary owns the luggage store.'

[Jester Messiah]

2. That's what I think as well.

They must be pretty damning if she prefers to let speculation run rampant.

[LanternWaste]

3. Post hoc ergo prompter hoc. The tool of an irrational mind.

Post hoc ergo prompter hoc. The tool of an irrational mind.

(insert non-relevance in space provided free of charge below)

[Logical]

6. LOL, my stalker! I have been missing "repeat subject line guy". nt

[Fumesucker]

9. Propter, not prompter

[libtodeath]

4. Or tell them all the things she will do for them as President.

[farleftlib]

5. K & R

I bet they don't include her famous "Cut it out!" command and Wall St's immediate reversal of their evil ways.

Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't.

[Skwmom]

7. Maybe the minions are still working on the language. n/t

[0rganism]

8. regardless, she should examine and release them all ASAP

doing so most likely won't improve her primary numbers, but it will prevent Republicans (some of whom can legit claim they were present when she gave those speeches) from releasing their own versions during the GE when it can hurt her (and the nation) most.

[Logical]

10. Good point. nt

[TipTok]

11. Not necessarily

The alternative is that it was just a bunch of meaningless filler...

Of course, that is just as damning as it shows that the huge amount of money was for something else and not for any information imparted to the group.

[quantass]

12. BINGO. Clinton and team are quite RABID and would not hesitate to HUMILIATE if they had chance. nt

[UglyGreed]

13. Sometime the simplest

answer is always the correct answer.