2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Economic Plans Questioned By Critics With Ties To Wall Street, Hillary Clinton
Four former chairs of the White Houses Council of Economic Advisers on Wednesday questioned the economic plan proposed by Bernie Sanders, as did a prominent Democratic senator. Two of those economists and the lawmaker have something else in common: They have financial ties to Wall Street. The other two letter writers also have ties to Sanders Democratic primary opponent, Hillary Clinton.
Laura Tyson and Austan Goolsbee were two of the signatories on a letter to Sanders criticizing his campaign for touting Professor Gerald Friedmans analysis of his economic proposals. We are concerned to see the Sanders campaign citing extreme claims by Gerald Friedman about the effect of Senator Sanderss economic plan claims that cannot be supported by the economic evidence, the letter said.
While respected economists and liberal columnists have condemned Friedmans paper as far too optimistic, the Financial Times defended it on Thursday, writing that a prolonged period of rapid growth in the U.S. is plausible, with the right policy mix.
Goolsbee and Tyson the latter of whom was a Bill Clinton appointee both work for a financial industry that has faced withering attacks from Sanders. Tyson has held a lucrative seat on the board of directors at Morgan Stanley since 1997, shortly after she completed her time leading the Council of Economic Advisers. In 2013, Morgan Stanley paid Hillary Clinton $225,000 for a speech. The Wall Street mega-bank has been one of Clintons top sources of donations throughout her political career. The same bank employed Clintons top deputy at the U.S. State Department, both before and after his trip through Washingtons proverbial revolving door.
http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/bernie-sanders-economic-plans-questioned-critics-ties-wall-street-hillary-clinton
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Honestly, I don't care what Wall Street says through these revolving door economists....the system is rigged and these economists had their hands on the steering controls of the rigged economy and look where we are.....still outsourcing our best jobs, replacing them with service sector crap, unemployed, underemployed....and racing for the bottom even faster with TPP ,etc.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)would love it.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)boost profits more than taxes. Stock prices would increase and there would be a lot of IPOs. WS benefits from a booming economy, lots of jobs and spending. Looks at the 1990s -- employment and stocks exploded. It cracks me up when I see people implying WS loves to see the world miserable.
Now, at some point, we are going to have to start putting some money aside for people who are truly displaced from an economy that pretty much demands skilled workers, and not much else. But even our ability to do that depends on a good economy.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Notice how the dow falls when oil prices fall and rose when energy prices were high.
They react to corporate profits and nothing else.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)In any event, WS investments are the core holdings of union retirement plans and anyone with an Ira and similar plan.
The market sunk in the depths of recession.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)They love the money flowing in but when the time is right they suck that money out of the system,profit on losses (shorting) and the average person never gets ahead.
mythology
(9,527 posts)None of what is said even remotely refutes the questions raised by people reviewing the Sanders plan.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)The Clintons are the ones who shunned the traditional New Deal values of the Democratic, which helped take this country too far right. BERINE 2016!
Billsmile
(404 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)If walks like an establishment crony and it quacks like an establishment crony ...
jillan
(39,451 posts)At one point during the primary of Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, Goolsbee was alleged to have told Canadian consular officials in Chicago that Obama's political position on the North American Free Trade Agreement was "more reflective of political maneuvering than policy.
Remember that?
Maybe he should put a sock in it.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)That the revolving door is trashing Bernie...and loosing their credibility in the process