Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
301 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TOWN HALL THREAD PART 2 - HILLARY is UP. Please be kind to each other... (Original Post) bettyellen Feb 2016 OP
Audience is a joke SheenaR Feb 2016 #1
Indeed so Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #4
The audience is stacked, again Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #6
it's rigged. I can't believe how obvious MSNBC is letting that be uhnope Feb 2016 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author uhnope Feb 2016 #93
I can't listen to her. Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #7
I wonder if the fillibuster question was to make her appear more progressive. Gregorian Feb 2016 #13
weird demosocialist Feb 2016 #9
Discussion of Supreme Court nominations brooklynite Feb 2016 #2
Glad she voted against them. elleng Feb 2016 #26
I wish she would have pointed out that only Alito was filbustered karynnj Feb 2016 #108
you can now see stacked audience Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #3
Thought so too. elleng Feb 2016 #5
yeah, no bias there at all.... restorefreedom Feb 2016 #8
Exactly! Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #236
Yep... deathrind Feb 2016 #276
they are making her look silly with this "magic wand" thing. bettyellen Feb 2016 #10
She is avoiding the question SheenaR Feb 2016 #12
I think they both need to be clearer on expectations- with current makeup of 1/3 the govt... bettyellen Feb 2016 #17
Yes she was noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #24
I'm excited to see her. I like these forums that give people more time to answer. nolabear Feb 2016 #11
seems like the mods are giving her the exact same questions... fair enough bettyellen Feb 2016 #14
but will also stacked audience Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #16
Thanks for that. I missed the start. lasttrip Feb 2016 #18
NOOOOO! It can't be! nolabear Feb 2016 #23
She also listened in on Bernie's segment.. frylock Feb 2016 #183
I guess Bernie should choose to go last next time he wins the toss? Ya live and learn. bettyellen Feb 2016 #195
I guess, but, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #235
I'd prefer that each candidate be in an iso booth. frylock Feb 2016 #237
It's an interesting idea. I bet viewership went down after Bernie's hour. I don't see a lot of bettyellen Feb 2016 #244
I like this type of format too DesertRat Feb 2016 #15
DWS alluded to doing non debate style gatherings long before the dog and pony shows started. Skwmom Feb 2016 #19
Vague answer to the terrorist question. Gregorian Feb 2016 #20
Yeah. She basically said someone needs to figure it out. JudyM Feb 2016 #33
So Diaz is letting her reply to Sanders? What is this a one sided debate? What bullshit. Skwmom Feb 2016 #21
Pure bullshit. Punkingal Feb 2016 #27
There's no point in getting upset about it. Avalux Feb 2016 #35
+1 lasttrip Feb 2016 #49
+ 10000 nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #43
Well, I think it's MORE important that she had opportunity to LISTEN to Sanders' answers. nc4bo Feb 2016 #69
So is it clear she heard Bernie's segment? SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #94
She specifically mentioned a question posed by a Hispanic woman to Sen. Sanders. Then proceeded to nc4bo Feb 2016 #125
THAT IS FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #157
Yeah, she called back to a question that Bernie was asked... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #129
That's a lot of words but no answer to the question. azmom Feb 2016 #22
Her first question was not the same as Bernie's first question. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #25
Thanks I missed the start lasttrip Feb 2016 #38
I just missed what she got the boos for. Damned cat! bettyellen Feb 2016 #28
This is so staged. What in the hell kind of Democracy is this. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #29
This is approaching North Korean levels of applause Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #56
Stacked, you say? one_voice Feb 2016 #30
Hey! Clinton got booed! brooklynite Feb 2016 #31
Much smaller crowd there for Sanders in a very close race. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #37
She just...getting booed now...attacked Bernie for attacking Obama, but it failed Gregorian Feb 2016 #32
I missed that Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #72
May have been during a fit of coughing. frylock Feb 2016 #227
Someone should ask her to hack up her speeches next time. n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #279
Hey-ooooo frylock Feb 2016 #280
I have full-throated confidence in her never coughing them up. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #283
Ha Booooooo! corkhead Feb 2016 #34
It's true it's true it's true..unbelievable and vindictive. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #36
The Dem Party is okay with using his honesty and integrity to cover up for the corruption. Skwmom Feb 2016 #40
All she is doing is criticizing Bernie. Punkingal Feb 2016 #42
Yep. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #66
I already voted for Sanders cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #252
Great! SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #259
If she was able to hear Bernie's segment, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #87
Oh my. She is up against Trump on CNN... eom Purveyor Feb 2016 #39
?? bettyellen Feb 2016 #63
Trump is doing a forum w Cooper as I type. nt Purveyor Feb 2016 #194
Oh. I just CAN'T!! LOL. Better you than me, my friend. bettyellen Feb 2016 #197
That will be played often SheenaR Feb 2016 #41
That wasn't pretty. Gregorian Feb 2016 #46
As a woman SheenaR Feb 2016 #50
that was ugly Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #52
me too. gonna check out netflix restorefreedom Feb 2016 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author lasttrip Feb 2016 #44
fuck your question, no answer Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #45
Why doesn't someone ask Hillary how the most polarizing figure in history will get anything passed. Skwmom Feb 2016 #47
I went back and looked at the Bernie thread. Hillary supporters did not dog pile with outrage. nolabear Feb 2016 #48
We are tired of these dog and pony shows which are nothing but stagecraft. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #60
Hillary is acting far different than Bernie and not Presidential at all. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #65
I'm not complaining unless they are unkind to her supporters. bettyellen Feb 2016 #71
Bernie didn't dog pile Hillary. JudyM Feb 2016 #75
I missed the first part of Bernie's portion... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #51
most answers were pivots to part of stump speeches. bettyellen Feb 2016 #59
Exactly. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #114
No. elleng Feb 2016 #74
Why are they both louder tonight? bettyellen Feb 2016 #54
JUST ELECT ME ALREADY! Gregorian Feb 2016 #55
she never expected a fight Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #61
I'm turning this off. Skwmom Feb 2016 #57
You heard the part that agreed with you; why listen to a different point of view? brooklynite Feb 2016 #70
This is attacking this is not a point of view. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #81
because it's not about POVs but about behavior & decency. this is the first time I turned her off. uhnope Feb 2016 #186
I shoulda took my butt to bed but nooooooooo, I up watching this craptasick fake debate. nc4bo Feb 2016 #92
WTF... is this demosocialist Feb 2016 #58
She says, "I won't make promises I can't keep," dchill Feb 2016 #98
Why did she want to deny license to undocument immigrants again? n/t beedle Feb 2016 #62
well, she never answered that Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #67
Because 'it used to be state by state.' elleng Feb 2016 #106
I'm done with her. Done. SheenaR Feb 2016 #64
Ya know, I think she's doing just fine. She's attacking Bernie's positions because he's her napi21 Feb 2016 #68
If a candidate is focused attacking the other it means they are worried that they are going to lose Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #82
thank you for being open minded and kind. two hallmarks of the Dem voter. *hat tip* bettyellen Feb 2016 #86
Calling Bernie not a Democrat was over the line. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #138
Her plan calls for Repubs seeing the error of their ways? beedle Feb 2016 #73
BUSTA Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #76
What in the hell was that?! Nt. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #84
Why doesn't Hillary have to stand up like Bernie? nt flamingdem Feb 2016 #77
She IS standng. nt napi21 Feb 2016 #95
She was the first to confront Trump? SheenaR Feb 2016 #79
Listen here BUSTA!! Avalux Feb 2016 #83
No, that's "Basta" which means "Enough" in Spanish. nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #134
That makes it even funnier because it came off like an insult to Trump. Avalux Feb 2016 #141
It IS an insult. "Basta" used this way means "Enough out of you, jerk". nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #143
Yes I know. And it's not Spanish, it's Italian. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #153
Yes it is Spanish. And it is Italian also. nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #158
It is also Spanish. bettyellen Feb 2016 #270
It's also a clear message to Latinos that she is repudiating Trump for his anti-immigration stevenleser Feb 2016 #152
It's pandering to make up for saying she'd send children back. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #156
No, it's not. nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #159
Sure it is. She's a liar, you even said so yourself. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #160
Nope, it's not. And see my sig line. nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #164
Latino Victory Fund didnt think so when they endorsed her stevenleser Feb 2016 #176
No, that's "Basta" which means "Enough" in Spanish. nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #128
Basta!! firebrand80 Feb 2016 #80
she will not answer that question Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #85
There's no way she will. I hope people get what she's doing. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #89
Do you regret sending children back? SheenaR Feb 2016 #88
She's not answering the question noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #90
Send kids back to send a message? beedle Feb 2016 #91
she has a few times Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #105
transcripts Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #96
she said cut it out Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #97
25 mins until she got a tough question, but she got one. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #99
Now she's LYING. I can't take her bullshit about Wall Street. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #100
Facts noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #101
"I went to Wall St. to tell them they were wrecking the economy" beedle Feb 2016 #102
Did she just say Sanders... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #103
Yes she did noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #110
yep Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #111
No, she's obfuscating again... dchill Feb 2016 #121
She said "private organizations" firebrand80 Feb 2016 #123
If I missed the slight of hand... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #136
You were supposed to. dchill Feb 2016 #151
Desperate reaching on the Goldman transcript issue EndElectoral Feb 2016 #124
The exact same desperate reaching. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #173
No Hillary! Where were you in the 90's when the seeds fior the crash were being planted? Armstead Feb 2016 #104
This is a mixed bag of an audience. bettyellen Feb 2016 #107
She almost said, "You can take that to the bank". SamKnause Feb 2016 #109
Whoa. dchill Feb 2016 #131
I've turned off my T.V. d_legendary1 Feb 2016 #112
Balart lobbed that right over the plate glaeken777 Feb 2016 #132
That questioner is now my hero SheenaR Feb 2016 #113
Absolutely! d_legendary1 Feb 2016 #130
+1 n/t Kittycat Feb 2016 #154
It's always interesting to compare those who are building on experience with those who aren't. nolabear Feb 2016 #115
Thanks for the threads tonight bettyellen lasttrip Feb 2016 #116
Peace! And thanks for being here! bettyellen Feb 2016 #120
She's getting crushed by guy's questions on gay marriage flip flops and Goldman Sachs transcripts EndElectoral Feb 2016 #117
She responded to the gay marriage part which was only the context, not the actual question, JudyM Feb 2016 #126
Wow, did she ever ... I (almost) felt sorry for her. beedle Feb 2016 #145
She said Sanders has given speeches, too. Punkingal Feb 2016 #118
Finger wagging is not very telegenic corkhead Feb 2016 #119
Dropping a lot of names UglyGreed Feb 2016 #122
She's so popular and likable! Avalux Feb 2016 #133
You noticed that too UglyGreed Feb 2016 #140
You mean poppable and liable! dchill Feb 2016 #144
yep, shows how stacked they made it Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #135
Yep stacked to the gills UglyGreed Feb 2016 #142
It's interesting to see the audience give follow up comments. bettyellen Feb 2016 #127
Q on Social Security- needs a "21 century update" what is your plan? H- No privatizing it! bettyellen Feb 2016 #137
Link to the first thread - Part 1? Matariki Feb 2016 #139
here you are! Will add to the OP- thanks! bettyellen Feb 2016 #146
merci! Matariki Feb 2016 #167
weeeellllll bedtime... demosocialist Feb 2016 #147
thank you for being here- and being kind! bettyellen Feb 2016 #148
For the THIRD time she said she'd go after Countrywide and other actors and not just banks! cascadiance Feb 2016 #149
she did not poll test the number Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #150
Emphatic "No" to raising the retirement age. Outlining the needs of physical laborers. bettyellen Feb 2016 #155
Great to hear that. one_voice Feb 2016 #162
I keep hearing Spongebob Squarepants saying, dchill Feb 2016 #161
Thank you Vegas, we're Average Death Age! Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #163
If Hillary was in fact able to listen to Bernie's segment, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #165
She clearly did...she mentioned the woman whose husband was deported. Punkingal Feb 2016 #166
I see...Bernie's answer were a complete surprise. brooklynite Feb 2016 #168
say what? Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #175
Whether she heard his part of the forum or not is irrelevant... brooklynite Feb 2016 #185
It is NOT irrelevant. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #198
Well, it appears she referenced a specific question. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #184
She mentioned the woman in the audience who addressed Bernie bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #171
of course she was Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #172
It wouldn't surprise me, but it sure as hell would sicken me. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #199
Yep. She referenced a question that one azmom Feb 2016 #269
ya know, i don't think it mattered much 0rganism Feb 2016 #291
here is a tough question Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #169
Why are you so wonderful? (n/t) Mike__M Feb 2016 #177
Hillary is killing it. Forceful yet compassionate. stopbush Feb 2016 #170
Do not agree with your first paragraph..agree with your bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #182
Unions would be for Bernie if they had any sense. Punkingal Feb 2016 #191
Former Teamsters member here, supporting Hillary. stopbush Feb 2016 #201
So is Bernie going to raise taxes, or just give away free stuff? frylock Feb 2016 #273
Their MEMBERS, in large part, are. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #209
He flubbed the answers regarding women. I just don't believe he is willing to make a commitment. bettyellen Feb 2016 #267
Over and over Voice for Peace Feb 2016 #277
Yawn. He's boring. We get it. What else have you got, Bernie? stopbush Feb 2016 #278
Lol. He has a lot of people gonna vote for him. Voice for Peace Feb 2016 #282
Interesting - a student who supports her asking about the "trust" issue Merryland Feb 2016 #174
and she did not answer it Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #181
I heard her reply, and thought it was good. She is smeared as "establishment" because she has been bettyellen Feb 2016 #190
I think she's answering difficult questions and can't figure out how anyone thinks otherwise. nolabear Feb 2016 #202
doing stuff yes you have. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #178
the "trust deficit" ouch. she says it's a tie now, and she is focused on results and any reading bettyellen Feb 2016 #179
This event must be being held at a zoo.. dchill Feb 2016 #180
. Purveyor Feb 2016 #188
Barriers, Barriers everywhere nt firebrand80 Feb 2016 #187
Clinton- free comm. college and refinance school debt/Sanders -free public college, and debt releif EndElectoral Feb 2016 #189
CA had free public universities. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #193
Hmmm. One is sincere, dchill Feb 2016 #196
Great point about Social Sec ucrdem Feb 2016 #192
Dumb-ass questioner gets an unintended pie in the face ucrdem Feb 2016 #200
Totally! He had such a regurgitated Bernie campaign question, LMAO! R B Garr Feb 2016 #249
And upChuck was beaming like a proud father. ucrdem Feb 2016 #255
what was the question? LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #266
He asked about her corporate ties and whether she could fairly represent workers. ucrdem Feb 2016 #272
Since when do ALL unions endorse her. And Kittycat Feb 2016 #285
now she supports 15, WTF Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #203
she did not say that. Let;s keep it real. bettyellen Feb 2016 #207
in answering his direction question, she said YES Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #216
She said a quick 'yes,' elleng Feb 2016 #231
so she does for some Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #240
I wouldn't put it that way elleng Feb 2016 #254
either will Bernie Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #262
Honestly- I don't think the minimum shoulld be the same in NY, NJ and Cali. Huge difference in bettyellen Feb 2016 #261
she went straight to the details of states vs Federal and said 12$ in that sentence. You posted bettyellen Feb 2016 #250
Living wage of 15$? Fed minimum to 12$ with states going higher with her support. bettyellen Feb 2016 #204
Yeah, that's bully pulpit is going to work for workers in states with Repub. governors. EndElectoral Feb 2016 #217
Thank you bettyellen! lovemydog Feb 2016 #205
thanks lovemydog- always lovely to see you here! <3 your dog too! bettyellen Feb 2016 #211
Why is Chuck MC-ing this thing ucrdem Feb 2016 #222
$12 BOOOOOO bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #206
all of the unions endorsed her, WTF? Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #208
Exactly !!! SamKnause Feb 2016 #213
Establishment Union leaders -- beedle Feb 2016 #230
Well, the honchos did...... nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #223
more name dropping of the stacked audience Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #210
AFL-CIO is remaining neutral. bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #214
Yea oh there she is oh there he is oh there is my friend oh oh oh bkkyosemite Feb 2016 #221
but the audience is not stacked? Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #228
I guess Bernie Sanders didn't have any supporters to invite? brooklynite Feb 2016 #241
I'm for a $15 minimum wage, that's why I support a $12 minimum wage beedle Feb 2016 #212
lol Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #220
since when is diplomacy about another country "deserving" a presidential visit? Merryland Feb 2016 #224
Set it and forget it. Hillary Ronko Clinton. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #215
let's try to "be excellent" and drop the silly name calling? bettyellen Feb 2016 #226
I am unabashedly in favor of Hillary's support of women's rights. I'm sick of waiting. nolabear Feb 2016 #218
+1 Lucinda Feb 2016 #225
+yep and I SMH when people ask what she has done. bettyellen Feb 2016 #229
Is it your impression that Bernie is not going to do just as much on that as she will? JudyM Feb 2016 #248
It is my impression it is not a big enough priority for him. bettyellen Feb 2016 #253
Asked another way... Do you feel that at the end of 4 years Hillary will have accomplished more JudyM Feb 2016 #271
As a matter of fact, I do. Because it is obviously a big priority. I think Bernie is gun shy about bettyellen Feb 2016 #274
He's been supporting full progressive causes for years. I agree that Hillary has had child welfare JudyM Feb 2016 #281
that's fair. I think a lot of my opinion is formed on how long time Sanders loving friends told me bettyellen Feb 2016 #284
It's expressly part of his platform, bettyellen, check it out: JudyM Feb 2016 #287
That's interesting. Why do you think he has shied away from saying it on TV- twice? Odd that he bettyellen Feb 2016 #288
I don't know about his website, Hillary has continued to change hers a lot. I think they're both JudyM Feb 2016 #289
one major change I see is that Bernie has finally recognized that having a child can put both bettyellen Feb 2016 #290
I may not fully understand what you're saying. If minimum wage is lifted, single payer universal JudyM Feb 2016 #292
well for instance the college thing without tackling how unequal HS education is will still leave bettyellen Feb 2016 #294
Ok, got it. So it's a matter of looking at all this from a full 360 degrees cause and effect stance. JudyM Feb 2016 #296
I think there was a lot of over thoughtlessness initially in that "he helps everyone" bit, as we bettyellen Feb 2016 #297
You're a valuable voice in the DU community, don't go. A lot of us are supremely frustrated. JudyM Feb 2016 #298
I appreciate your take on the garbage. There's a lot of immaturity on display and it is off putting bettyellen Feb 2016 #299
Thank you. JudyM Feb 2016 #300
thanks Judy! It has been great getting to know you! bettyellen Feb 2016 #301
I'm unabashedly opposed to corruption. cali Feb 2016 #251
Your inability to hear me is duly noted. nolabear Feb 2016 #293
Is POTUS rewarding Cuba with a visit too quickly? bettyellen Feb 2016 #219
LOL @ the Castros can't live forever. bettyellen Feb 2016 #232
So Clinton is responsible for Democracy in Myanmar? Dretownblues Feb 2016 #233
Good answer on Cuba flamingdem Feb 2016 #234
She did well. I love seeing people flock around her. Thanks bettyellen! nolabear Feb 2016 #238
thanks you nolabear, my dear! bettyellen Feb 2016 #245
Hillary whined about having a student loan debt for 15 years ... Jarqui Feb 2016 #239
She didn't have student loan debt. There were virtually no student loans back then hedda_foil Feb 2016 #286
Well if the last five minutes is any indication she did great. ucrdem Feb 2016 #242
I like that Telemundo guy José Díaz-Balart. lovemydog Feb 2016 #243
Chuck Todd looks like Alex Jones with a better barber. ucrdem Feb 2016 #247
Not a fan of Todd. But he pushed her to promise to prioritize immigration reform, so that is good. bettyellen Feb 2016 #258
That will play well in Nevada and she probably wanted to say it ucrdem Feb 2016 #263
they all go for the gotcha. except Rachel I think, who tries to examine things in more depth.... bettyellen Feb 2016 #268
MSNBC Help noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #246
and Bernie probably got to make another speech at 10:15 in Vegas. Win-win. bettyellen Feb 2016 #257
On Townhall twitter feed noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #260
lol Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #264
I thought much the same when Bernie was talking about babies in poverty and women's bettyellen Feb 2016 #295
Ralston Tweets Jarqui Feb 2016 #256
he has some great ones Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #265
Thanks for being generally kind to each other everybody on this thread. bettyellen Feb 2016 #275

Response to uhnope (Reply #78)

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
7. I can't listen to her.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:09 PM
Feb 2016

Is Toad going easy on her. Toad: "Secretary Clinton, could you tell us how much your love your country and all the people in it?"

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
13. I wonder if the fillibuster question was to make her appear more progressive.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:11 PM
Feb 2016

If so it didn't work.

brooklynite

(94,608 posts)
2. Discussion of Supreme Court nominations
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:08 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton voted against Alito and Roberts, but respected the process.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
108. I wish she would have pointed out that only Alito was filbustered
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:28 PM
Feb 2016

Roberts and Miers (?) were not filbustered by the Democrats. Alito was very extreme on many issues. Had the filbuster. which both Obama and Clinton did not lead on, succeeded, Bush would have nominated someone else. It is not the same as saying NO ONE will be confirmed.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
183. She also listened in on Bernie's segment..
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:48 PM
Feb 2016

so if the questions are the same, she had time to craft an answer.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
235. I guess, but,
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:59 PM
Feb 2016

Letting the second listen to the first, when the format gives the first no chance to respond, is just plain WRONG. (If that is in fact what happened.)

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
244. It's an interesting idea. I bet viewership went down after Bernie's hour. I don't see a lot of
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:02 AM
Feb 2016

people watching all two hours of it. Except masochists like us.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
19. DWS alluded to doing non debate style gatherings long before the dog and pony shows started.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:13 PM
Feb 2016

Now we know why.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
35. There's no point in getting upset about it.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:16 PM
Feb 2016

I think people are astute enough to see what's going on here, it's way over the top; TOO staged. Bernie shone in spite of the mods and the audience.

It's all good.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
69. Well, I think it's MORE important that she had opportunity to LISTEN to Sanders' answers.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

Now THAT's what I call some real hot bullshit.

Silly me actually thought that each candidate would be blind to the other candidate's answers.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
125. She specifically mentioned a question posed by a Hispanic woman to Sen. Sanders. Then proceeded to
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:30 PM
Feb 2016

Answer the question HER way.

She's a big bullshitter and a fraud as is MSNBC and TELEMUNDO

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
129. Yeah, she called back to a question that Bernie was asked...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:31 PM
Feb 2016

...and of course tried to one up him on it. It's a sham.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
25. Her first question was not the same as Bernie's first question.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:15 PM
Feb 2016

Todd was aggressive with his question to Bernie and as if to apologize to HRC. The audience gave a screaming standing ovation (rigged).

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
32. She just...getting booed now...attacked Bernie for attacking Obama, but it failed
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:16 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie had just explained his position on that, and she must not have heard him.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
227. May have been during a fit of coughing.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:57 PM
Feb 2016

Something's going around. I've been trying to hack up a lung for a couple days now.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
283. I have full-throated confidence in her never coughing them up.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:50 AM
Feb 2016

full-throated.



Sometimes i crack meself up.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
36. It's true it's true it's true..unbelievable and vindictive.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:16 PM
Feb 2016

The dem party was A okay with his running as a dem. I want to throw up excuse me.

Edit: There she goes, she had the opportunity to hear Bernie's questions. She should have been isolated in a Green Room. She is attacking him tonight. Attack Attack Attack. She does not look Presidential.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
66. Yep.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:22 PM
Feb 2016

I had a visceral reaction to that. I wasn't going to vote for her in the primary anyway, but my reaction is now more negative than it was before. I'll vote for her in the general if I have to, but I wouldn't want to "have a beer" with her. And I wouldn't turn my back on her.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
259. Great!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:09 AM
Feb 2016

We have always voted on election day, in part because I don't trust our voting machines to hang on to my vote. Actually, I don't trust them even to count it....

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
41. That will be played often
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:17 PM
Feb 2016

lol she just shouted at the people booing. Turning it off. She's a joke. We are absolutely screwed if she is in the GE

Response to bettyellen (Original post)

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
114. Exactly.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:29 PM
Feb 2016

I would have wished he had answered some questions more directly, much as I like his stump speeches.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
81. This is attacking this is not a point of view.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:24 PM
Feb 2016

It's obvious that she had decided to come out blazing with attacks on Bernie then settle down. It was set up that way. It is obvious to me.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
186. because it's not about POVs but about behavior & decency. this is the first time I turned her off.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:49 PM
Feb 2016

She actually reminds me of a GOP politician mentioning Benghazi when she keeps bringing up the obvious falsehood that Sanders was against Obama. He's rendered that point moot with his answers but she keeps bringing it up because she hopes it will smear him, because her supporters will mindlessly clap every time she does, and because she hopes it will keep black voters from going over to Sanders. It's just low-level politics as usual and I've seen enough of her doing it and can't take no more. I've watched all the debates & town halls and this is the first time I turned her off.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
92. I shoulda took my butt to bed but nooooooooo, I up watching this craptasick fake debate.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:25 PM
Feb 2016

One candidate gets to watch the question and answers of the other candidate.

demosocialist

(184 posts)
58. WTF... is this
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:19 PM
Feb 2016

first three questions were from Clinton supporters... and now she is answering Sanders questions...

dchill

(38,505 posts)
98. She says, "I won't make promises I can't keep,"
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:26 PM
Feb 2016

then she proceeds to make promises she has no intention of keeping.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
68. Ya know, I think she's doing just fine. She's attacking Bernie's positions because he's her
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:22 PM
Feb 2016

opposition now. I'm not so sure the audience is stacked either. Sounds pretty close on the cheers for Bernie as it does for her.

I'm a Bernie supporter but in a forum like this, they both deserve their time.

I think Bernie did a great job. Lets see how Hillary does before damning either one.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
138. Calling Bernie not a Democrat was over the line.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:32 PM
Feb 2016

The party allowed him to run as a Democrat. End of story. So they didn't really expect it to be any contest. Too bad.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
152. It's also a clear message to Latinos that she is repudiating Trump for his anti-immigration
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:36 PM
Feb 2016

positions.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
90. She's not answering the question
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:25 PM
Feb 2016

No answer to question about sending a message. He has to ask twice. No answer again

dchill

(38,505 posts)
121. No, she's obfuscating again...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:30 PM
Feb 2016

She's equating any speech Sanders made to any private group to groveling to the banksters.

dchill

(38,505 posts)
151. You were supposed to.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:35 PM
Feb 2016

In the future, expect obfuscation and triangulation, and then you'll hear what she's really saying.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
104. No Hillary! Where were you in the 90's when the seeds fior the crash were being planted?
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:27 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie was saying more that "Cut it out."

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
112. I've turned off my T.V.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:28 PM
Feb 2016

The questioning sucks, HRC keeps going off tangents and the moderators keep letting her get away with it, and no follow up questions other than the ones that help her (Clinton: I'm gonna work on immigration reform... Balart: You mean in your first 100 days? Clinton: Uhhh....Yeah. Yeah!!!!).

This sucks. I'll watch the rest tomorrow.

glaeken777

(349 posts)
132. Balart lobbed that right over the plate
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:31 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie didn't (and couldn't realistically) give an exact date for winning on that issue.

Hillary's initial answer also left that element open.

Then in comes Balart with the coach-question. "First 100 days?"

Wow. Just... wow. Climb all the way in that tank, Jose.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
126. She responded to the gay marriage part which was only the context, not the actual question,
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:31 PM
Feb 2016

which was SHOW ME THE MONEY (transcripts)

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
145. Wow, did she ever ... I (almost) felt sorry for her.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:34 PM
Feb 2016

but the dishonesty was just too obvious

If that part of the town hall doesn't get played on the various reviews, then we know the fix is in.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
119. Finger wagging is not very telegenic
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:29 PM
Feb 2016

She's even coopting Bernie's helicopter hands.
Turning this shit off

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
149. For the THIRD time she said she'd go after Countrywide and other actors and not just banks!
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:35 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary, how will you do that without going after BANK of America, who has owned Countrywide for a number of years now!!!

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
165. If Hillary was in fact able to listen to Bernie's segment,
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016

this whole thing just became less than pointless. I'd greatly appreciate anyone who could compile a list of proofs of this. If true, I don't know what this is, but it's not journalism.

brooklynite

(94,608 posts)
168. I see...Bernie's answer were a complete surprise.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:44 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton couldn't possibly have known how he'd answer a question.

I guess it's the inconsistency of Sanders' message.

brooklynite

(94,608 posts)
185. Whether she heard his part of the forum or not is irrelevant...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:48 PM
Feb 2016

...she knows what his policy positions and standard messages are...just as he knows hers.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
184. Well, it appears she referenced a specific question.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:48 PM
Feb 2016

I hope someone asks MSNBC/Telemundo.

But thank you for noticing Bernie's consistency....! ;->

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
171. She mentioned the woman in the audience who addressed Bernie
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:45 PM
Feb 2016

regarding her husband being deported for 6 years. She heard what the questions were for Bernie and made no pause to show she did. Disgusting. Should have been in the Green Room and not have been able to hear his questioning.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
269. Yep. She referenced a question that one
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:18 AM
Feb 2016

Of the audience members asked Bernie, and then proceeded to answer the question. WTF

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
291. ya know, i don't think it mattered much
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:20 PM
Feb 2016

it's not like she doesn't know exactly what Sen. Sanders' positions are already, and it's not like he's going to change much.

even without watching his segment, someone as smart as HRC could have guessed approximately the kinds of questions he would receive, and known how he'd respond to any/all of them. hell, with the right makeup and some training in voice acting she probably could have come out there and done the whole thing pretending to be Sen. Sanders without having seen his half at all.

that's one reason i think the bit at the beginning, about Bernie winning the coin toss, is plausible. Sen. Sanders probably did want to go first, partly to inspire this kind of controversy and suspicion without having to do any attacking himself, but mostly to get the viewers earlier before they space out or switch over to Trump/CNN. meanwhile, he just goes out there and says what he would have said anyway. he wouldn't have benefited at all from going 2nd, because he wouldn't be tailoring his responses to rebut HRC's segment anyway -- that's not how he rolls.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
170. Hillary is killing it. Forceful yet compassionate.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:45 PM
Feb 2016

She's good in these situations. Bernie needs to work on coming up with answers that look at questions from a different angle. He says the exact same thing every time. He's geting boring. None of his money lines worked with this audience - they sat on their hands.

Yes - the audience is pro-Hillary. That's Las Vegas - big union town, lots of Hispanics, ie: Hillary's wheelhouse. Sanders supporters are simply denying the reality of the political lay of the land in LV. It isn't Sanders country. Not every place can be Sanders Country like NH.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
201. Former Teamsters member here, supporting Hillary.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:53 PM
Feb 2016

Gave Bernie a close look and was disappointed with his unrealistic plans on how to pay for his policies. I expect the "something for nothing" bullshit from Rs. I don't expect such Reaganesque pandering from Ds.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
273. So is Bernie going to raise taxes, or just give away free stuff?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:27 AM
Feb 2016

Think you guys could settle on one or the other?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
267. He flubbed the answers regarding women. I just don't believe he is willing to make a commitment.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:15 AM
Feb 2016

Both the litmus test including abortion and the question from the feminist were blown off. Little bummed about that.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
277. Over and over
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:33 AM
Feb 2016

"The emperor has no clothes on! HEY! THE EMPEROR HAS-NO-CLOTHES!!"

This is why peope love him.

No longwinded highfalutin namedropping questionavoiding convoluted obfuscations..just the plain truth.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
282. Lol. He has a lot of people gonna vote for him.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:50 AM
Feb 2016

Anyway, it's your own boredom, not Bernie, making you feel that way,
ie you yourself are the boredom generator.

Merryland

(1,134 posts)
174. Interesting - a student who supports her asking about the "trust" issue
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:45 PM
Feb 2016

without anyone noting what a low rating she gets on this specific area. wow, that is bizarre.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
190. I heard her reply, and thought it was good. She is smeared as "establishment" because she has been
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:50 PM
Feb 2016

around for a long time. She was well thought of in NYC as a senator, and reelected with a bigger won one they knew her.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
179. the "trust deficit" ouch. she says it's a tie now, and she is focused on results and any reading
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:47 PM
Feb 2016

of her experience shows that. Arguing that her experience both hinders her image and helps her be more effective.

Her voice is cracking a bit, coughs.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
189. Clinton- free comm. college and refinance school debt/Sanders -free public college, and debt releif
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:50 PM
Feb 2016

Take your pick. Clinton says her plan is better.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
249. Totally! He had such a regurgitated Bernie campaign question, LMAO!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:04 AM
Feb 2016

You can tell how his "question" came right from the Bernie campaign stump speech. Like he cares! I'm so sick and tired of these PHONY talking points. You could see he really thought he got one off, but instead he got embarrassed.

LuvLoogie

(7,014 posts)
266. what was the question?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:15 AM
Feb 2016

Been putting kids to bed and finishing dinner clean up. I popped onto this thread every now and then. Is the 60 Minute Hate over finally?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
272. He asked about her corporate ties and whether she could fairly represent workers.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:26 AM
Feb 2016

She said "all the unions are endorsing me" and got a round of applause. D-A then asked whether she supported $15/hour and she said yes and here's how and why. D-A last seen with this look on his face:





Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
285. Since when do ALL unions endorse her. And
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:17 AM
Feb 2016

Is that endorsement by membership vote or board decision ?

elleng

(130,980 posts)
231. She said a quick 'yes,'
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:58 PM
Feb 2016

and then went into the details, supports a Federal minimum > $12 now, states and locals to $15.

elleng

(130,980 posts)
254. I wouldn't put it that way
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:05 AM
Feb 2016

(I've supported Martin O'Malley,) but rather, as she's done in the past, she recognizes regional issues exist, so won't jump to $15 for all, 'immediately' anyway.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
261. Honestly- I don't think the minimum shoulld be the same in NY, NJ and Cali. Huge difference in
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:12 AM
Feb 2016

cost of living. Huge difference in wealth that is hiring the lower class support staff. It is more doable some places than others.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
250. she went straight to the details of states vs Federal and said 12$ in that sentence. You posted
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:04 AM
Feb 2016

before she actually answered!

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
230. Establishment Union leaders --
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:58 PM
Feb 2016

rank and file are invisible and will no doubt have to work on caucus day.

nolabear

(41,987 posts)
218. I am unabashedly in favor of Hillary's support of women's rights. I'm sick of waiting.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:56 PM
Feb 2016

And I don't want my children and grandchildren to be devalued the way we have always been.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
271. Asked another way... Do you feel that at the end of 4 years Hillary will have accomplished more
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:23 AM
Feb 2016

for women than Bernie will? In consideration also of congressional obstruction that will possibly be greater for her.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
274. As a matter of fact, I do. Because it is obviously a big priority. I think Bernie is gun shy about
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:27 AM
Feb 2016

abortion, the litmus answer just avoided it completely. I think it's not something he has given much thought to. And that he think "raising all boats" is going to be enough. I like that he is finally talking about child care and maternity leave etc, but it all seems pretty new to him.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
281. He's been supporting full progressive causes for years. I agree that Hillary has had child welfare
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:49 AM
Feb 2016

In her portfolio for a long time but look at what she just said this week about compromising on abortion rights... I don't know if she genuinely cares about the plight of poor women as much as Bernie does. Maybe, but I just am mistrustful of her these days.

Thanks again for hosting us all tonight, BettyEllen, you done good!!

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
284. that's fair. I think a lot of my opinion is formed on how long time Sanders loving friends told me
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:00 AM
Feb 2016

that his strategy has always been to avoid "wedge issues" like the plague because then he'd be able to get a lot more conservative voters. and in the context of him up in Vermont, it didn't matter. but there is a certain dismissiveness in this approach, and I think we have both seen it here too- that women (and POC) are just being "used" by TPTB and their advocacy is disrespected (and sometimes out right trashed here) .
I think it sums up a lot of the problems people had when he started stumping and put up his website. We were invisible, and he's only started to really address us. He is still coming off noncommittally, they gave him plenty of chances to say our reproductive rights are important for a SC judge, but I have to wonder if he is afraid of saying it.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
287. It's expressly part of his platform, bettyellen, check it out:
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:39 AM
Feb 2016
"ONLY NOMINATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHO SUPPORT ROE V. WADE AND THE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMEN.
As president, Sen. Sanders will only nominate Supreme Court justices who understand that Roe v. Wade is the law of the land and recognize the rights of women to have access to family planning services."


"EXPAND AND PROTECT THE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMEN.
Sen. Sanders has consistently fought against Republican attacks on the fundamental rights of women to control their own bodies. As president, Sen. Sanders would expand, not cut, funding for Planned Parenthood, the Title X family planning program, and other initiatives that protect women’s health, access to contraception, and the availability of a safe and legal abortion."

https://berniesanders.com/issues/fighting-for-womens-rights/

Over the years he has earned a reputation that he's good to his word, which means something. Plus he's been a strong feminist in voting history, as even Gloria Steinem alluded to years ago, right? So he's got the platform and the history. He's not quite as polished at packaging his position sound bites across the board as others, I agree there. To your point, though, are you willing to consider that there may be a difference between how someone comes across and what their consistency in values, actions and voting represent they'll do?
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
288. That's interesting. Why do you think he has shied away from saying it on TV- twice? Odd that he
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:42 PM
Feb 2016

was asked directly about it and would not just say that. Very strange.

I looked at his website just a week or two after he announced, btw. And after that just once when I heard he had added stuff. This was not there then. Just so you know, I did check it out a few times. And have seen all but one debate and most of the forums as well.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
289. I don't know about his website, Hillary has continued to change hers a lot. I think they're both
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:27 PM
Feb 2016

doing a lot on the fly... figuratively and literally. I've heard Bernie talk like a genuine feminist and a genuine friend to the LGBT community for years. I am thoroughly confident in his earnestness and intention.

I have to say that I also think that, due to his greater familiarity with the inner workings of congress,and his greater respect by its members, that he is going to have a substantially greater ability than Hillary to right what's wrong. That's a big part of why I want him to get the nom. I can't see her getting the votes she needs and I do see her and all of congress being bogged down in endless investigations... Not insignificant.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
290. one major change I see is that Bernie has finally recognized that having a child can put both
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

mom and kid deep into poverty that "raising all boats" won't solve. I think this is a relatively new realization to him, because he preferred not to think about what some here dismiss as "identity" politics. I am glad he is finally talking about it. That dismissiveness really hurt his campaign more than anything. It's galling to hear people accuse you of self interest when their whole issue is around their own paychecks. You can dress it up about corruption but few of these people note that corruption has always been in their back yards as well- and it was hurting others. It had to trickle up to bite them on the ass before it became urgent. SO, I have a cynical point of view about that, I see the self interest there too. I can't have kids, and it's really more about society in the long term than for my own self.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
292. I may not fully understand what you're saying. If minimum wage is lifted, single payer universal
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:53 PM
Feb 2016

healthcare and everything else he talks about happens, that won't help people to afford kids?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
294. well for instance the college thing without tackling how unequal HS education is will still leave
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 04:53 PM
Feb 2016

a lot of people who most need a boost totally out of the equation. kids are graduating HS who barely know how to read or write. free college isn't going to be for them, or for women that have kids or family to take care of. Higher salaries without cheaper childcare/ daycare and parental leave will help all but the poorest. raising all boats sounds good to people who have boats, but it seems they forget that not everyone does.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
296. Ok, got it. So it's a matter of looking at all this from a full 360 degrees cause and effect stance.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:28 PM
Feb 2016

a lot of the dialogue here on DU has been about Bernie only focusing on economics and not on race; you're pointing out is that there's more to economics... Thanks for the discussion. I get it, and actually, FWIW, believe that Bernie will hire the kind of people who will care enough and understand enough to laser in on this.

He's all about pay equity, family leave, universal childcare, and I just found this on the literacy/ k-12 issues: http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-education/#k-12-education

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
297. I think there was a lot of over thoughtlessness initially in that "he helps everyone" bit, as we
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:49 PM
Feb 2016

know that say FDR did not help POC or women nearly as he did white men, because basically we couldn't buy the houses, get the good jobs, etc and and many of our segments of the economy were shut out of social security.

And you had a lot of people who basically did not know that (because it wasn't their problem) lecturing us how they were some sort of golden years. That made some educated voters' jaws drop.

That coupled with the very frequent posts about "low info" or "stockholm syndrome" voters "falling for tactics"- our lives dismissed as mere "identity politics" instead of genuine issues- all by people who never gave much thought about who FDR was actually pulling for. Those ignorant lectures I think were the genesis of the clueless Bernie Bro idea. In my mind, many are just as self-interested and this revolution begins and ends with a pay increase- for them. I'm that cynical, and being summarily dismissed as a rube as was common early on in the campaign (and continues) did not help.

Thanks for listening without anger. There is just way too much hate out here right now to be able to have meaningful conversations at DU these days. I'm one hide away from gone for not hating on Hillary as it is.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
298. You're a valuable voice in the DU community, don't go. A lot of us are supremely frustrated.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:35 PM
Feb 2016

A lot of the hate here is pure garbage. Some people are getting paid by the post. I haven't hidden anyone but I've been thinking I will.
The more of us that have sane conversations the more it'll be a positive impact, so don't give up. Nothing wrong with cynicism but change might come anyway.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
299. I appreciate your take on the garbage. There's a lot of immaturity on display and it is off putting
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:47 PM
Feb 2016

And yeah, I see it in both directions, but I have been called vile names and followed into the AA group to be alert stalked.
Because I will not join in their hate. It's just foolish.
Good on you for being a thoughtful advocate- you'd make Bernie proud.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
300. Thank you.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:55 PM
Feb 2016

I believe they often have nothing thoughtful to say so they sling mud just to be part of the game and keep the posts coming. Honestly I don't see the Bernie peeps as being nearly as bad, but I'm sorry if you're getting the short end of it. I'll look out for ya.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
234. Good answer on Cuba
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 11:59 PM
Feb 2016

She wasn't thrown by Chuckies attempt to drag in the right wing crap, possibly planted there by Jose Diaz Balart.

Jarqui

(10,126 posts)
239. Hillary whined about having a student loan debt for 15 years ...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:00 AM
Feb 2016

Her father owns some drapery businesses. Was wealthy enough to run against Mayor Daley in Chicago

Another Email Mess for Hillary Clinton: These Reveal She Opposed Pro-LGBT Changes at State Dept

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
286. She didn't have student loan debt. There were virtually no student loans back then
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 01:52 AM
Feb 2016

There were Pell Grants, I belie, but only for the neediest. Her father had a major drapery business with lots of big hotel clients in Chicago.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
242. Well if the last five minutes is any indication she did great.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:01 AM
Feb 2016

Tough gig though without a podium or chair . . .

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
247. Chuck Todd looks like Alex Jones with a better barber.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:03 AM
Feb 2016

He takes his Bernie bias way too seriously.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
258. Not a fan of Todd. But he pushed her to promise to prioritize immigration reform, so that is good.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:07 AM
Feb 2016

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
263. That will play well in Nevada and she probably wanted to say it
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:12 AM
Feb 2016

Whenever I see Chuck in action he's trying to catch her in some club-footed gotcha. But I missed it and cant't say for sure

p.s.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
268. they all go for the gotcha. except Rachel I think, who tries to examine things in more depth....
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:16 AM
Feb 2016

when time permits.
Always nice to see you!!

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
295. I thought much the same when Bernie was talking about babies in poverty and women's
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 04:54 PM
Feb 2016

unpaid labor. Nice to know he is capable of learning things.

Jarqui

(10,126 posts)
256. Ralston Tweets
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 12:06 AM
Feb 2016
https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/700528354189901827
Jon Ralston ?@RalstonReports 9 minutes ago

"It's why all the unions have endorsed at me." -- Hillary.

Um, no.

https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/700526832542572544
Jon Ralston ?@RalstonReports 17 minutes ago
"It is obviously troubling that people have questions about me...." Hillary.

https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/700527729133772800
Jon Ralston ?@RalstonReports 14 minutes ago
The Nod.

https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/700528175990767620
Jon Ralston ?@RalstonReports 14 minutes ago
Wal-Mart Bern!
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»TOWN HALL THREAD PART 2 -...