Thomas Frank: Sanders Rises as Americans Reject Establishment Democrats

[berniepdx420]

Veteran observer of American politics Thomas Frank recognizes that it is not just “Hillary the Capable” that Democrats are abandoning in droves for Bernie Sanders, but “the party leadership whose faction she represents as well as the direction in which our modern Democrats have been travelling for decades.”

“In my younger days, the Democratic party seemed always to be grappling with its identity, arguing over who they were and what they stood for all through the 1970s, the 1980s and into the 1990s,” Frank writes in an essay at The Guardian ahead of the release of his new book critiquing the Democratic Party, “Listen, Liberal.”

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/thomas_frank_sanders_rise_is_a_repudiation_20160217

[noretreatnosurrender]

1. lol

I said some of the very same things today in another thread. Thanks for posting.

[Nanjeanne]

2. Thomas Frank - one of my heroes. Brilliant political analyst and historian. And he's funny too!

[99th_Monkey]

3. 3rdWay = Deliberately Turning Away from the Legacy of the New Deal

“What Democrats had to turn away from, reformers of all stripes said in those days, was the supposedly obsolete legacy of the New Deal, with its fixation on working-class people. What had to be embraced, the party’s reformers agreed, was the emerging post-industrial economy and in particular the winners of this new order: the highly educated professionals who populated its clean and innovative knowledge industries.”

[speaktruthtopower]

4. Here's the test on that...

Would Bernie be developing the same momentum against Biden or Kerry?

[Armstead]

7. Yep...But without quite so much of the same personal animosity driving it

[Armstead]

5. It's so ironic that Bernie - who stands up for the working and under classes...

is criticized as "not concerned" while the champion of the "professional class" is portrayed as the sharing and caring one.

[Ferd Berfel]

6. It's suicidal to continue to listen to this:

[seafan]

8. Ripping down the decades-old curtain of Third Way has never felt so good.

Thomas Frank nails it here:

.....“In my younger days, the Democratic party seemed always to be grappling with its identity, arguing over who they were and what they stood for all through the 1970s, the 1980s and into the 1990s,” Frank writes in an essay at The Guardian ahead of the release of his new book critiquing the Democratic Party, “Listen, Liberal.”

“What Democrats had to turn away from, reformers of all stripes said in those days, was the supposedly obsolete legacy of the New Deal, with its fixation on working-class people. What had to be embraced, the party’s reformers agreed, was the emerging post-industrial economy and in particular the winners of this new order: the highly educated professionals who populated its clean and innovative knowledge industries.”

The figure that brought triumphant closure to that last internecine war was President Bill Clinton, who installed a new kind of Democratic administration in Washington. Rather than paying homage to the politics of Franklin Roosevelt, Clinton passed trade deals that defied and even injured the labor movement, once his party’s leading constituency; he signed off on a measure that basically ended the federal welfare program; and he performed singular favors for the financial industry, the New Deal’s great nemesis. […]

That Clintonian consensus, which slouches on in the bank bailouts and trade deals of recent years, is what deserves to be on the table in 2016, under the bright lights of public scrutiny at last. As we slide ever deeper into the abyss of inequality, it is beginning to dawn on us that sinking the New Deal consensus wasn’t the best idea after all.

.....In truth, our affluent, establishment Democrats can no more be budged from their core dogmas – that education is the solution to all problems, that professionals deserve to lead, that the downfall of the working class is the inevitable price we pay for globalization – than creationists can be wooed away from the tenets of “intelligent design”. The dogmas are simply too essential to their identity. Changing what the Democratic party stands for may ultimately require nothing less than what a certain Vermonter is calling a “political revolution”.

Ripping down the decades-old curtain of Third Way has never felt so good.


(Hat tip to DUer berniepdx420)