Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big-money liberals vow to back Bernie whether he likes it or not (Original Post) speaktruthtopower Feb 2016 OP
game over... he's now as dirty as the rest tk2kewl Feb 2016 #1
At least he didn't have to whore for it Politicalboi Feb 2016 #2
no doubt. tk2kewl Feb 2016 #4
Yes, I agree Politicalboi Feb 2016 #6
Jury results JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2016 #5
WOW! Politicalboi Feb 2016 #9
i took it the way it was intended tk2kewl Feb 2016 #11
Can see both sides of that speaktruthtopower Feb 2016 #15
I don't see it that way at all. Quite the opposite actually. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #10
couldn't agree more tk2kewl Feb 2016 #17
I like "he should publicly request anyone producing ads on his behalf provide full donor disclosure" 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #18
You did not read the article. It say exactly the opposite. cali Feb 2016 #12
He was being sarcastic - he's a Bernie supporter. myrna minx Feb 2016 #13
Oops, my mistake. cali Feb 2016 #14
i was being sacrastic tk2kewl Feb 2016 #16
This article reads like a The Onion piece. Love it! JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #3
It won't be an issue... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #7
He's still against it. Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #8
How do you know that? 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #19
People with money just don't get it. More money doesn't always mean more victories. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #20
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
1. game over... he's now as dirty as the rest
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:05 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:01 PM - Edit history (1)



on edit to avoid confusion i have noticed that on small displays like smart phones the giant Sanders logo in my sig line is hidden
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
2. At least he didn't have to whore for it
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:11 PM
Feb 2016

That makes a BIG difference. He's not making promises behind our backs for money.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
4. no doubt.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:13 PM
Feb 2016

he also still needs to win the primary before this is even a real issue. if i were him i'd also try to get anyone doing this to at least provide full disclosure for all donations

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
6. Yes, I agree
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:19 PM
Feb 2016

He's not promising them anything for money. These are just concerned Dem's who don't want the GOP to take over the entire government.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,369 posts)
5. Jury results
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:18 PM
Feb 2016

On Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:14 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

At least he didn't have to whore for it
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1257738

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Saying Hillary has to "whore" for her monetary support.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:17 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Making a point. Not enough to block.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "Saying" and "insinuating" are not quite the same. A bit of sleaze is common in this primary season.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: nothing wrong with this sentement

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
9. WOW!
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:23 PM
Feb 2016

Thank you guys. We all use that word when it comes to politicians. I wasn't talking about any one candidate.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
11. i took it the way it was intended
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:30 PM
Feb 2016

but i can see how it could be crossing the line when your opponent is a woman

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
10. I don't see it that way at all. Quite the opposite actually.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:29 PM
Feb 2016

Perhaps you were being sarcastic, but in case you weren't and for
the record ...

This is EXACTLY what I was hoping would happen. Bernie's making it very clear
that he is NOT for sale, and that any money donated is totally to advance exactly
what Bernie is saying he's going to do: i.e. his platform in it's entirety.

Not that I agree with all of it (guns), but on balance it's nearly an exact replica of
my own personal priorities and goals for the nation. If I had a ton of money,
but could only give $2700, why should people who have money and support
Bernie's platform in it's entirety be denied the same latitude to USE Citizens United
in an entirely clean way, i.e. in solidarity with We the People's Political Revolution.

I think there's a good case to be made here. Not sure if I'm doing it justice, but
damn .. this could easily make the difference for Bernie. PLUS, it totally destroys
the following Clinton meme, that "Bernie Can't Compete in the GE" due to not
having $uper-pac$.

A number of Hillary Clinton’s fundraisers and donors say that no matter how impressive Sanders’s small-dollar fundraising is — and many are stunned that he has managed to haul in close to $100 million in donations averaging around $30 — they remain skeptical that the small-dollar approach can work in a general election against a Republican nominee backed by numerous tycoons and likely by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch's powerful donor network.


Also, as I understand it, the nurse's union that endorsed Bernie is also pledging to do their
own thing, and i don't think Bernie has quashed that effort.
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
17. couldn't agree more
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:59 PM
Feb 2016

and i suggested that if he should win the primary and big-money wants to go ahead anyway that he should publicly request that anyone producing ads on his behalf provide full donor disclosure...

i will now go back and add the sarcasm tag since you're the second one that misunderstood me

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
18. I like "he should publicly request anyone producing ads on his behalf provide full donor disclosure"
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:08 PM
Feb 2016
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
12. You did not read the article. It say exactly the opposite.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:30 PM
Feb 2016

Fuck. Why not read before commenting?

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
16. i was being sacrastic
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:38 PM
Feb 2016

i scanned the article and have since gone back for a full read. i got the point first time.

in another comment in this thread i said should he make it o the GE it would be wise for Bernie to ask PACs that would consider working on his behalf to provide full disclosure of donors.

i'm with you

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
7. It won't be an issue...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:21 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary will win the nomination and the party will continue with business as usual. The best Sanders can hope for is to use his support base (around 40% of the voters at the moment) to get certain issues locked down for sure, like a guarantee from Hillary that she won't sign TPP and will make sure that SCOTUS nominees intend to overturn Citizens United.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
20. People with money just don't get it. More money doesn't always mean more victories.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:18 PM
Feb 2016

Republicans have been outspending Democrats for a long time. And even before Democrats cozied up to Wall Street Democrats were still winning races. People don't respond to Bernie because of tv ads. They respond to him because he cares. A real life honest to goodness politician who cares. You can't buy that. Even before people knew who he was he was packing speaking engagements. People love Bernie because Bernie loves them.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Big-money liberals vow to...