2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWOW! "Hillary is no friend of blacks"...but... "negros are getting in line"...
Last edited Tue Feb 16, 2016, 07:16 PM - Edit history (1)
"I'm tired of being used"....."'This Clinton duo has devastated the Black community"..."You can draw a line from the evaporation of Black wealth back to deregulation of the Clinton years"
Those are the words Kathy Gray Yvette Carnell, Editor of yourblackworld.net
Icon John Lewis Knows on Which Side His Biscuit is Buttered on.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Of course it's not odd at all because she is fearless and doesn't kowtow.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And these corporate Democrats are using voters.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)Talk to people, listen and see where they are coming from and what they need. Not just trot them out every once in a while as campaign bait.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)yall just keep telling me what to do. getting tired of my own dad doing that. he pushes for welfare then whines about it hey yall started welfare who started it.. well the modern version. Reagan did smh. and right now Welfare is still racist. More WHITES (me)I'm not on it her perse than Blacks on on. Think I won't up long ago thanks to Olbermann etc that Conservadem is another term for Blue Dog witch is another term for the Racist Dixie Crats don't forget 1960's and before Democrats were racist to the hilt.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)so-called democrats. but the always get a pass from the nader-haters.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)In the civil rights movement. Was Sanders in the US in 1965?
When you say Hillary was a Republican this was in her high school years and the first time she could vote in a presidential election was 1968. Now on the other hand Sanders was a member of:
Political party
Liberty Union (Before 1979)
Independent (19792015)
Democratic (2015present)
So if it was bad for Hillary to follow her father's lead but changed to Democratic before voting, how is it okay Sanders did not be on a Democrat until 2015. Hillary has been a Democrat for forty eight years. Sanders has not made one year.
Let's be fair on the facts.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)It would seem like this is a radioactive thread or maybe camp weathervane has decided it's best to ignore such a powerful woman.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I may have been around to witness much and know many different people in my 62 years as a white female, but this concerns me.
I don't think the other side ignores this type of declarative statement so easily. Sometimes when truth speaks so clearly to power, it produces corresponding acts that are pretty aggressive.
I guess fear isn't our friend... just a clear, persistent mantra.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)My dog can hear your whistles.
cali
(114,904 posts)Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #19)
pangaia This message was self-deleted by its author.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1965.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)And what does it matter whether he was in the US one year or not. What a stupid question. Was Bill Clinton in the US in 1968? If not, does that disqualify him from being president?
Gang Hillary must be sweating bullets. They are climbing deeper and deeper into the mud barrel.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Neither Sanders nor Clinton were there. The point?
LiberalArkie
(15,728 posts)And you were where?
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,728 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Why start with shyness now?
.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Are you a party person or a principle person. If you are a principle person then why are you throwing around the dates of what parties Bernie belonged to as if that means something about his principles?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)And you should answer.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Ask ten people on the street if they care how long Bernie has been a dem. I think there's MAYBE ten people here that won't shutup about it, but that's about it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'm glad I'm not one of them.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)And tell HER that. Otherwise, Your just talking shit behind her back regarding what she had to say.
Don't be like that, go and tell her, so she has then opportunity to answer back. Anything else would be cowardly and hypocritical.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)When its documented he was in NY at that time
You say this and then have the temerity to state "Let's be fair with the facts"?!
Sooo desperate
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Vermont in 1968.
We can all see what you're trying to insinuate - that Bernie Sanders was at the "socialist" Israeli kibbutz when Lewis was doing his important work.
And that was incredibly brave work! Not even going to try to compare the two
But trying to insinuate that Sanders hasn't cared about Civil Rights since he wasn't in the US (hint hint), is pretty low
cali
(114,904 posts)Response to cali (Reply #36)
pangaia This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)But okay, I'll bite... so what does that mean?
.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Tell me this isn't another birther meme.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)He was born here and never left here.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)3. Rep John Lewis did march in Selma, he got a concussion, it wasn't his only activity
View profile
In the civil rights movement. Was Sanders in the US in 1965?
When you say Hillary was a Republican this was in her high school years and the first time she could vote in a presidential election was 1968. Now on the other hand Sanders was a member of:
Political party
Liberty Union (Before 1979)
Independent (19792015)
Democratic (2015present)
So if it was bad for Hillary to follow her father's lead but changed to Democratic before voting, how is it okay Sanders did not be on a Democrat until 2015. Hillary has been a Democrat for forty eight years. Sanders has not made one year.
Let's be fair on the facts.
Response to Autumn (Reply #23)
pangaia This message was self-deleted by its author.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)but what do these 'facts' have to do with the topic? By the way, where was Sanders outside of the US in 1965? Are you asking or is the question rhetorical?
shawn703
(2,702 posts)Hillary was and still is right-center. Sanders has always been left.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She was a grown adult and the President of that group is always exceptionally vicious as I recall.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)◾Former First Lady and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was elected president of her College Republican chapter at Wellesley College in her freshman year before switching parties due to the war in Vietnam.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Republican
As a freshman in college in 1965-1966 she was not old enough to vote, at that time voting began at 21 years old.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... You know... The drive-by senseless comment made about Bernie Sanders for which you cannot explain in this thread?
What about that, Thinking about?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And she didn't change until way later supposedly because of how her friend Rockefeller was smeared by Nixon. It was just a squabble amongst elites. She saw the tide turning and went with it like she did after 911. No moral high ground.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)He was born in Brooklyn, NY. Left Chicago in 1964 with a degree in political science.
At Univ of Chicago, he joined a few student groups. An anti-Vietnam war one. CORE Congress on Racial Equality was another. He became chairman of CORE. He also had some involvement with Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) - maybe when they chartered a Freedom bus to the March on Washington in Aug 1963.
Hillary was president of the Young Republicans at Wellesley College after her Goldwater days. Then she interned in Washington for some Republicans. Somewhere along the way there, she started to think about things more liberally. I suspect it took her a little longer than she lets on because she remained affiliated with the Republicans for a while as an intern in Washington.
"how is it okay Sanders did not be on a Democrat until 2015"
He was an independent. In an ideal world, he'd probably prefer to run as an Independent. But he feared if he did, he could split the liberal vote and give the White House to the GOP. Agreeing with his point about splitting the vote, the Democrats allow him to run. His positions on issues are pretty liberal - left of where some of the party is.
BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)about the facts, let alone in being fair. Bernie is "cool" - Hillary is not. That's basically their bottom line.
Whatever her previous political affiliation, Hillary Clinton campaigned in Texas in 1972 for Senator George McGovern. She has been a Democrat since at least 1972 and has worked tirelessly for Democratic causes since then.
While in TX in 1972, she helped register Latino voters, among others. Texas in 1972 was not a friendly place for those who were trying to register Latinos. In some places, it may still not be safe. Since then, Hillary has been on the front lines literally everywhere, working for people and causes, even when and where it was physically dangerous for her.
In comparison, Bernie moved to rural Vermont in the late 1960s and didn't become politically active apart from a short period, mostly during his time at the University of Chicago until he ran for office in Vermont in 1971.
Per Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
The 1976 campaign proved to be the zenith of Liberty Union's influence, with Sanders collecting 11,000 votes for Governor and the party forcing the races for Lieutenant Governor and Secretary of State to be decided by the state legislature when its vote total prevented either the Republican or Democratic candidates for those offices from garnering a majority of votes. The campaign drained the finances and energy of the Liberty Union, however, and in October 1977 less than a year after the conclusion of the 1976 campaign Sanders and the Liberty Union candidate for Attorney General, Nancy Kaufman, announced their retirement from the party.
In 1980, Bernie's political career gained traction and eventually got him to where he is today. It has been a good career. He has always been a liberal and taken admirable stands. But his experience has primarily been with and for Vermonters, who have been very fortunate to have him. Vermont is - unfortunately - not representative of the rest of the US, and certainly not nearly as nuanced or complex as the rest of the world. And yes, it was only after YEARS of refusing to run as a Democrat that Bernie finally joined the party - in 2015, only so that he could run for President.
Bernie has been an outstanding Senator. I very much hope that he remains in the Senate where voices like his are sorely needed. But Hillary is my first choice for US President, hands down.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She was one and the president is always vicious and inane. I've met them all. Total scum. I won't say she was. All the college repub presidents were mentally ill men but this is not a badge of honor nor is it just an early adolescent transgression. Ms Rodham was elite money from the get go
bvar22
(39,909 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
Her romance with the Republicans was more than just a "high school" fling.
"Let's be fair on the facts."
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)found the right way this soon.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)and lurched far to the Conservative Right......during Reagan and Bill Clinton.
He made the correct decision in NOT following the ConservaDems over the cliff,
but continued to fight for traditional Democratic Party Values, which is WHY I joined the Democratic Party in the 60s....to advance the policies of FDR (New Deal), JFK, and LBJ (Great Society and Civil Rights.)
Bernie showed solid integrity and consistency over 40 years in NOT following the NeoLibs into Republican Trickle Down Free Trade, de-regulation HELL,
and for THAT, I congratulate him in NOT participating in the ongoing destruction of the New Deal and the Great Society.
[font color=firebrick size=3][center]"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."
--- Paul Wellstone[/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
---bvar22
a mainstream-center FDR DEMOCRAT since the 60s,
who is more than delighted by the number of people waking up to the REALITIES of what passes for the "Democratic Party" today,
and not fearing to point out what has been obvious to those paying attention for over 4 decades.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"He's not really a progressive, or he would've been a Dem all this time!!11"
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)you poll all of its members?
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)I have to get my dog washed . It it wasn't for your "concern" I may have forgotten about it thanks . How low can you go ? We will wait and see . What is your actual point apart from the obvious smearing ?
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)for progress on Civil Rights. That, rightly, pissed a lot of people off at the time. Candidate Obama called the comments "unfortunate" and "ill-advised". http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/13/AR2008011303624.html
Her blatant race baiting campaign of 2008- Hardworking white Americans won't support him; Jesse Jackson won South Carolina, twice; Did you sell drugs to anyone?- is all water under the bridge I guess.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)I have to wonder about the polling, whether the pollsters are reaching those without landlines
maindawg
(1,151 posts)The Dems are using you. They keep you down. You keep voting for the D and what has that gotten you? They might be be right
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)the Establishment Dems are working for.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)There are some non-establishment democrats. At least I hope there are.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)It should be a diary of its own
arcane1
(38,613 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)This sort of logic makes me ill.
6chars
(3,967 posts)which party elected an AA president? oh yeah, us.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it ran with many others. But that was the best of the bunch. My deep appreciation for this person.
kenn3d
(486 posts)People, this is not the same man who fought for equality back in the Civil Rights era. John Lewis is a proud sell-out! He has been like this ever since he decided to not carry on MLK's legacy. Money has taken over John's mind, and he ran off to kiss the feet of his ruling elite masters. He can brag about what he did in the past all he wants, but he surely is not doing anything to help the common people in this poor excuse of a nation. He should never joined one of the corporate parties (the Democratic Party) in the first place!!! John and the Black caucus are all disgraceful sell-outs!
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)But apparently there are some like this "commentator" who believe that black voters are sheep that can easily be led.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)that's a nasty phrase. Yeah, I remember that shit. That kid over there just bought a joint, bring him to heel, lock him up.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)I never heard that awful phrase, "super predator," until Hi11ary said it.
It was disgusting when she said it, and it is STILL disgusting.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)makes it clear that the Clintons seem to think so.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Aren't they telling Democratic candidates that their vote has to be earned? Don't assume it's an automatic?
amborin
(16,631 posts)Response to amborin (Reply #31)
2banon This message was self-deleted by its author.
cui bono
(19,926 posts).
2banon
(7,321 posts)let me check back with a huge apology if that's the case. thanks for pointing it out cui bono.
2banon
(7,321 posts)so i self deleted and thank you again.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I can totally see you thinking someone would say that.
.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Also, WTF was that mocking Lewis's voice about?
AzDar
(14,023 posts)joanbarnes
(1,723 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)and add that some of the flailing posts trying to discredit her....even better.
George II
(67,782 posts)SciDude
(79 posts)and I think her analysis is excellent. I does appear that the Clinton's are calling in all outstanding political debts and trying to ram thought this notion that she is pro-minority. Apparently, she's running as the "first Black woman president."
It's pretty disgusting if you ask me.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)And sad.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)SixString
(1,057 posts)ReallyIAmAnOptimist
(357 posts)More importantly,
it's inspiring to watch so much truth being spoken to power.
Thank you for posting.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)She's right on Hillary Clinton, but she's another Cornel West when it comes to the president.
I like her on some race issues, but her anti-Obama stance does nothing for me.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)her personal animus to get in the way of critical thought. There's thoughtful criticism and then there's downright hate. No thanks.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)but it is clear to me that sanders' best shots at picking up black votes are with young and working-class voters. they aren't as infatuted with clinton, or lewis, or the cbc, and cornel west is not their boogeyman. people who are struggling are not offended by bernie's economic message. nor does staying course offer them any hope.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...has EVER done to help PoC.
PoC were much worse off AFTER Bill Clinton's Administration.
*Welfare Deform
*Mass Incarcerations
*Draconian mandatory sentencing, even for non-violent offenders
*The Biased against PoC "Drug War
*Privatized Prisons
*Free Trade, which destroyed those at the low end of the SES
I have been unable to fathom WHY PoC "owe" the Clintons anything.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)ever gone the distance for PoC?
DirtyHippyBastard
(217 posts)and have yet to get any substantive answer.