Two Former U.S. Presidents Simultaneously Advocate for a Close Family Member as the Next U.S. Pres
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/16/two-former-u-s-presidents-simultaneously-advocate-for-a-close-family-member-as-the-next-u-s-president/
Americans love to mock the British for choosing in the 21st century to live under a monarchy and honor the hereditary succession of a royal family. I enthusiastically participate in that derision. Few concepts are as antithetical to reason and democratic liberty as anointing families that are vested with an entitlement to wield power through dynasty and lineage.
The U.S. officially has no formal royal families, but clearly loves dynastic political power. As the U.S. becomes increasingly oligarchical all of its institutions, including its political ones, dominated by a tiny number of extremely rich families it is natural that all forms of hereditary power will flourish. There are still examples of people from backgrounds devoid of family wealth or influence attaining political power Barack Obama certainly qualifies but its virtually impossible for them to succeed without the overwhelming support of those oligarchical circles.
(snip)
As one would expect, the children of those two families have also enjoyed substantial unearned benefits by virtue of their lineage. Despite no background or experience in journalism, both Jenna Bush and Chelsea Clinton were hired by major American networks as on-air correspondents, joining a slew of others whose sole qualification was being born to powerful parents.
------------------------------
Dynasty's in US Politics are dangerous.