2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Braces for A Hard Look from the Press.
[link:http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-media-campaign/index.html|
CNN:
"It's that old axiom a Chicago alderman once shared with me: 'The higher a monkey climbs the pole, the more you can see his ass,'" David Axelrod, the chief strategist for Barack Obama's presidential campaigns, said of Sanders. "The better you do in this process, the more scrutiny you get. It's the price of success."
Sanders is already starting to pay that price: CNN's Jake Tapper pressed the candidate on Sunday to account for why he opposed Ted Kennedy's 2007 guest-worker program on the grounds that it would bring down wages for Americans only to embrace an immigration overhaul later. The New York Times recently published a report about how Sanders, the Chairman of the Veteran Affairs Committee, was "blinded" by his faith in government and initially dismissed systemic leadership failures at the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Washington Post's Dana Milbank wrote an opinion column on Monday headlined, "Bernie Sanders is no revolutionary."
This is a departure from the coverage Sanders received in January, when he was surging in the polls and threatening to give Clinton a run for her money in Iowa, where he only narrowly lost. Then, the media was largely focused on the enthusiasm surrounding his campaign, the large crowds, and his anti-Wall Street message.
There have been critical stories written about Sanders, to be sure. Several outlets, including CNN, have taken hard looks at some of his more ambitious proposals and fundraising efforts. Last summer, Politico published a story about a child Sanders had fathered out of wedlock -- and the campaign's refusal to really address the issue.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)Didn't McCain get grilled over this?
Who cares?
How many million American families have children born to unmarried parents?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)It will backfire too.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Good Lord.
fried eggs
(910 posts)He described Bill Clinton's behavior as "totally disgraceful and unacceptable." Pot meet kettle.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Of course infidelity wouldn't stop me from voting for a candidate.
6chars
(3,967 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)but he's not running.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Kall
(615 posts)How would you describe it?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)How does that compare to 2 adults having a child? It doesn't!!!
fried eggs
(910 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)the thorough vetting worthy of a strong candidate for the presidential race.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)after all they may not be able to hide their wealth in the Cayman Islands
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)That's presidential politics.
After the lovefest for Obama that made him the front runner, the press got out their magnifying glass and sharpened their knives. Remember Reverend Wright?
They've been doing it to Clinton for years. Now, for better or worse, it's Bernie's turn.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)....taken seriously.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Hardly a 'honeymoon', but whatever. The press should do their job and look into all the candidates voting records, financial partnerships, significant social connections, etc.
Of course trying to make something out of his 40 year old son being born 'out of wedlock' (hello, are you from the past? who says that?) will certainly make them look like idiots.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Says a lot more about them than it does Bernie.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Like run ads with it in Hispanic and other Catholic communities.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)As they have done for years with Clinton.
His son's out-of-wedlock status won't sit well with traditional Catholic families and some minorities.
If Bill Clinton had done the same, he would have never won the presidency.
Politics is a swampland, so toxic that I wonder if anyone can maintain their morality in it.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Response to kstewart33 (Reply #19)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)You're seriously living in the past if you think it will even be an issue. I mean look at the Republican front runner. Nobody cares.
Response to kstewart33 (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Clinton hack.
Where are the audited caucus vote counts????
Until he concedes, Sanders didn't narrowly 'lose' jack shit.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This will be fun to watch!!
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)eh corporate media?
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Now who is believing in unicorns?
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Sure, Sanders must have some flaws that can be blown up into major headlines but, like someone real famous once said, all publicity is good publicity.
And THIS is the Internet age. Lies and crap can be slammed at the speed of light. People like Milbank and other WaPo drones can expect cries of fury to explode when they write their screeds, and it is bad to read that Sanders is no revolutionary? When his proposals are supported by vast majorities of US voters having WaPo complain he isn't a revolutionary, well, what's wrong with that?
And he fathered a kid out of wedlock? In the 60's? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
And the campaign refused to address the issue? FFS what issue?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)of Bernie Sanders and claim it's someone else. That should work well.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)ExPat2Mex
(19 posts)What a farce the pundit political class has become. They scratched their collective asses for months while Sanders, who has been around longer than 90 percent of them, fought to gain name recognition and support.
His message got the support, despite the fact that the NYT and Washington Post decided to ignore him altogether. After Iowa and New Hampshire, the back room boys and girls decided to rework their line of coverage. Mike Royko and IF Stone have been rolling over in their graves.
At 67, I have little patience for the likes of this youthful but obviously ignorant press crowd, which always get it wrong about the rise of the interest in nationalization and socialization of essential services. Health care leads the list, and, regarding this issue, Sanders has taken no prisoners in denouncing the idiotic tactics, chicanery and change of attitude of Hilary Clinton. I commend him for his courage and wisdom.
I remember in 1993 when Bill handed her the reins on health care and she got her chops busted. She has apparently never recovered, so that is that, and we go on. My vote, which was once solidly behind her, is with her opponent. I don't want to walk her talk anymore, because she doesn't seem to have have the will to walk it once in power. She shrivels and makes a political game of it. I am sorry to say that, but it is true; Hilary turned into a phony liberal. I wish she would do the unthinkable: bow out, and leave the door open behind her for Mr. Sanders to bring in the new progressive political change we all need.
MADem
(135,425 posts)You forgot a link--I found one: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-media-campaign/
Sanders has not been truly "vetted" in that horrific and unyielding Court of Public Opinion like other candidates have. Most can play the "asked and answered" card against any indignity or indiscretion.
Sanders cannot because he refuses to respond to press inquiry.