Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:02 AM Feb 2016

Sanders Braces for A Hard Look from the Press.

[link:http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-media-campaign/index.html|

CNN:

The post-honeymoon phase is sure to present new challenges for Sanders, who only recently achieved political celebrity and has yet to face a true crucible of critical coverage, campaign strategists and political reporters told CNN. Heading out of the Granite State, the media will look beyond the Vermont Senator's sensational storybook rise and cast greater scrutiny on his record, his campaign tactics and the viability of his proposals.

"It's that old axiom a Chicago alderman once shared with me: 'The higher a monkey climbs the pole, the more you can see his ass,'" David Axelrod, the chief strategist for Barack Obama's presidential campaigns, said of Sanders. "The better you do in this process, the more scrutiny you get. It's the price of success."

Sanders is already starting to pay that price: CNN's Jake Tapper pressed the candidate on Sunday to account for why he opposed Ted Kennedy's 2007 guest-worker program — on the grounds that it would bring down wages for Americans — only to embrace an immigration overhaul later. The New York Times recently published a report about how Sanders, the Chairman of the Veteran Affairs Committee, was "blinded" by his faith in government and initially dismissed systemic leadership failures at the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Washington Post's Dana Milbank wrote an opinion column on Monday headlined, "Bernie Sanders is no revolutionary."

This is a departure from the coverage Sanders received in January, when he was surging in the polls and threatening to give Clinton a run for her money in Iowa, where he only narrowly lost. Then, the media was largely focused on the enthusiasm surrounding his campaign, the large crowds, and his anti-Wall Street message.

There have been critical stories written about Sanders, to be sure. Several outlets, including CNN, have taken hard looks at some of his more ambitious proposals and fundraising efforts. Last summer, Politico published a story about a child Sanders had fathered out of wedlock -- and the campaign's refusal to really address the issue.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Braces for A Hard Look from the Press. (Original Post) kstewart33 Feb 2016 OP
Honeymoon is over bravenak Feb 2016 #1
I wish them luck trying to smear him AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #18
what business is it of anyone's about a child? grasswire Feb 2016 #2
Nobody, but he doesn't give them much to work with so it will have to do. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #4
Love your dog! nt kstewart33 Feb 2016 #10
It NYSkip's dog. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #32
+1. I hope they're stupid enough to go there. n/t winter is coming Feb 2016 #12
Especially when that "child" is in his 40s. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #5
Too bad Sanders weighed in on Bill Clinton's infidelities fried eggs Feb 2016 #21
It is if I was married I would never cheat on my wife. JRLeft Feb 2016 #23
i don't think anyone is suggesting Sanders or Hillary cheated 6chars Feb 2016 #30
I was talking about Bill. JRLeft Feb 2016 #31
oh, he probably did. 6chars Feb 2016 #34
Yeah, I also said it wouldn't stop me from voting for that candidate. JRLeft Feb 2016 #35
He was asked about it. Kall Feb 2016 #27
Not at all the same. A sitting married President and a 22 yearl old intern that he lied about? Live and Learn Feb 2016 #36
22 years old = adult. fried eggs Feb 2016 #42
Yeah, when you are in your 20's too. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #43
When will the press begin vetting Republicans?? That said, it's about time Sanders gets BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #3
Better now than later. Lucinda Feb 2016 #7
I guess the big media corporations are uncomfortable Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #6
No, Bernie is beginning to get the kind of press that front runners get. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #9
Yep. Before they thought he was a "fringe" candidate who was going nowhere. Now he is being.... kerry-is-my-prez Feb 2016 #11
True. nt kstewart33 Feb 2016 #14
What honeymoon? jfern Feb 2016 #8
Well the press went months and months barely saying his name Matariki Feb 2016 #13
Yep just like the folks on DU who made a big deal out of it. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #16
It's not DU folks, the problem is what the Republicans will do with it. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #24
Fair or not, the press will emphasize the negative. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #19
So what AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #38
Seriously. So what Matariki Feb 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #15
Um, Sanders did NOT narrowly 'lose' Iowa. The head of the Iowa Dem Party is a KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #17
Translation: Corporate smear campaign kicks into high gear! AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #20
I don't think I have the stomach for it. When's the honeymoon period over for tRump, SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #26
The Jewish Democratic Socialist who hasn't been vetted. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #25
A hard look by the press is a lot better than being totally shut out of coverage. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #28
What is that already? A 1 year honeymoon? nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #29
Hillary's vetting is on hold until she releases her Wall St. transcripts. n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #33
Maybe they can find a photo Perogie Feb 2016 #37
Did Hillary finally her get her baggage buried? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #39
2016 4th Estate rule: First ignore, then villify ExPat2Mex Feb 2016 #40
LOL at the Chicago alderman's remark. It's true, though. MADem Feb 2016 #44

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
2. what business is it of anyone's about a child?
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:04 AM
Feb 2016

Didn't McCain get grilled over this?

Who cares?

How many million American families have children born to unmarried parents?

fried eggs

(910 posts)
21. Too bad Sanders weighed in on Bill Clinton's infidelities
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:29 AM
Feb 2016

He described Bill Clinton's behavior as "totally disgraceful and unacceptable." Pot meet kettle.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
23. It is if I was married I would never cheat on my wife.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:32 AM
Feb 2016

Of course infidelity wouldn't stop me from voting for a candidate.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
36. Not at all the same. A sitting married President and a 22 yearl old intern that he lied about?
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:50 AM
Feb 2016

How does that compare to 2 adults having a child? It doesn't!!!

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. When will the press begin vetting Republicans?? That said, it's about time Sanders gets
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:05 AM
Feb 2016

the thorough vetting worthy of a strong candidate for the presidential race.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
6. I guess the big media corporations are uncomfortable
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:07 AM
Feb 2016

after all they may not be able to hide their wealth in the Cayman Islands

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
9. No, Bernie is beginning to get the kind of press that front runners get.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:14 AM
Feb 2016

That's presidential politics.

After the lovefest for Obama that made him the front runner, the press got out their magnifying glass and sharpened their knives. Remember Reverend Wright?

They've been doing it to Clinton for years. Now, for better or worse, it's Bernie's turn.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
11. Yep. Before they thought he was a "fringe" candidate who was going nowhere. Now he is being....
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:18 AM
Feb 2016

....taken seriously.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
13. Well the press went months and months barely saying his name
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:23 AM
Feb 2016

Hardly a 'honeymoon', but whatever. The press should do their job and look into all the candidates voting records, financial partnerships, significant social connections, etc.

Of course trying to make something out of his 40 year old son being born 'out of wedlock' (hello, are you from the past? who says that?) will certainly make them look like idiots.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
16. Yep just like the folks on DU who made a big deal out of it.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:25 AM
Feb 2016

Says a lot more about them than it does Bernie.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
24. It's not DU folks, the problem is what the Republicans will do with it.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:33 AM
Feb 2016

Like run ads with it in Hispanic and other Catholic communities.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
19. Fair or not, the press will emphasize the negative.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:29 AM
Feb 2016

As they have done for years with Clinton.

His son's out-of-wedlock status won't sit well with traditional Catholic families and some minorities.

If Bill Clinton had done the same, he would have never won the presidency.

Politics is a swampland, so toxic that I wonder if anyone can maintain their morality in it.

Response to kstewart33 (Reply #19)

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
41. Seriously. So what
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 03:21 AM
Feb 2016

You're seriously living in the past if you think it will even be an issue. I mean look at the Republican front runner. Nobody cares.

Response to kstewart33 (Original post)

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
17. Um, Sanders did NOT narrowly 'lose' Iowa. The head of the Iowa Dem Party is a
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:28 AM
Feb 2016

Clinton hack.

Where are the audited caucus vote counts????

Until he concedes, Sanders didn't narrowly 'lose' jack shit.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
28. A hard look by the press is a lot better than being totally shut out of coverage.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 02:40 AM
Feb 2016

Sure, Sanders must have some flaws that can be blown up into major headlines but, like someone real famous once said, all publicity is good publicity.

And THIS is the Internet age. Lies and crap can be slammed at the speed of light. People like Milbank and other WaPo drones can expect cries of fury to explode when they write their screeds, and it is bad to read that Sanders is no revolutionary? When his proposals are supported by vast majorities of US voters having WaPo complain he isn't a revolutionary, well, what's wrong with that?

And he fathered a kid out of wedlock? In the 60's? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.

And the campaign refused to address the issue? FFS what issue?

ExPat2Mex

(19 posts)
40. 2016 4th Estate rule: First ignore, then villify
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 03:02 AM
Feb 2016

What a farce the pundit political class has become. They scratched their collective asses for months while Sanders, who has been around longer than 90 percent of them, fought to gain name recognition and support.

His message got the support, despite the fact that the NYT and Washington Post decided to ignore him altogether. After Iowa and New Hampshire, the back room boys and girls decided to rework their line of coverage. Mike Royko and IF Stone have been rolling over in their graves.

At 67, I have little patience for the likes of this youthful but obviously ignorant press crowd, which always get it wrong about the rise of the interest in nationalization and socialization of essential services. Health care leads the list, and, regarding this issue, Sanders has taken no prisoners in denouncing the idiotic tactics, chicanery and change of attitude of Hilary Clinton. I commend him for his courage and wisdom.

I remember in 1993 when Bill handed her the reins on health care and she got her chops busted. She has apparently never recovered, so that is that, and we go on. My vote, which was once solidly behind her, is with her opponent. I don't want to walk her talk anymore, because she doesn't seem to have have the will to walk it once in power. She shrivels and makes a political game of it. I am sorry to say that, but it is true; Hilary turned into a phony liberal. I wish she would do the unthinkable: bow out, and leave the door open behind her for Mr. Sanders to bring in the new progressive political change we all need.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
44. LOL at the Chicago alderman's remark. It's true, though.
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 03:45 AM
Feb 2016

You forgot a link--I found one: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/10/politics/bernie-sanders-media-campaign/

Sanders has not been truly "vetted" in that horrific and unyielding Court of Public Opinion like other candidates have. Most can play the "asked and answered" card against any indignity or indiscretion.

Sanders cannot because he refuses to respond to press inquiry.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders Braces for A Hard...