Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chances of military intervention (%), Hillary VS. Bernie. Go! (Original Post) Bonobo Feb 2016 OP
Can't predict Hillary UnBlinkingEye Feb 2016 #1
Oh not at all. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #6
Hillary: 100% and Bernie: 0% onehandle Feb 2016 #2
Wouldn't they both be 100% since either one will inherit multiple ongoing interventions? Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #3
the bernie who wants the F-35 staged in Vermont and votes for war appropriations yr after yr lol nt msongs Feb 2016 #4
Ha ha ha, it's like sending out embossed invitations to the Silly Convention! nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #5
Ask yourself, what would Cheney / Rumsfeld do? MauriceLawrence96 Feb 2016 #7
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
6. Oh not at all.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 01:22 AM
Feb 2016

This is one of the few matters of conviction with her. You can rely on a neocon approach.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. Hillary: 100% and Bernie: 0%
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 01:02 AM
Feb 2016

Not because Hillary will start a military intervention, but because Bernie will never be President.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
3. Wouldn't they both be 100% since either one will inherit multiple ongoing interventions?
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 01:06 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary would be more aggressive with the military options though.

msongs

(67,438 posts)
4. the bernie who wants the F-35 staged in Vermont and votes for war appropriations yr after yr lol nt
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 01:16 AM
Feb 2016
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Chances of military inter...