2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDemocratic Delegate Scorecard
From The Cook Political Report
http://cookpolitical.com/story/9258
A useful tool for both camps to use during the primary season:
[IMG][/IMG]
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Good to have in GDP!
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)You provided a very valuable resource, Lucinda!
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)the inevitability meme. It's all Hillary has.
Here's the bottom line, if Hillary does not have a majority of elected delegates by the time of the convention, and uses super delegates to change the outcome (f/k/a the smoke-filled room), she will destroy the Democratic Party and we will end up with a Republican in the White House.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)I present data. You decide.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Where have I heard that one before?
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)I'm open to critique of the Cook Report. They are rather neutral and seem to be simply showing mathematical realities.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)of super delegate totals?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)Bob.
So the OP really was a message to potential Bernie supporters that they might as well stay home because Hillary will resort to smoke-filled room/Tammany Hall anti-democratic "politics" to secure (notice I did not say "win" the nomination even if the people are against her?
THAT is what the OP wanted people to "decide."
Thank you for that ounce of honesty.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)What do you think should happen if the vote is close but neither candidate has the majority needed to win.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)The primary race has messed you up a bit.
Every OP is not some veiled means of decreasing or increasing support. To think that a post would keep people from voting is very off.
Take a break.
Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)that's all you Hillary Supporters got.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Take a time out
We've all had to do it time and again. You are losing sight of who the real enemy is. It's not our candidates or our party
Response to Stuckinthebush (Reply #33)
Post removed
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)You are way off. It's sad
I hope you find your way back to reason and calm. Best of luck to you.
Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)and spend it thinking of how much the country will be so much better with Hillary in charge. Make it your meditation. Om, All is Hillary, All Praise Her Superdelegates!
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Best to you
Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)And all the other fake emotions you can muster.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)This is a blip. This ends. If you really care about Democratic ideas then you will want to be here for the long haul. You can't be here with that attitude for long.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)Did you seriously just call me "unhinged" while hiding over in the Hillary group? I'll tell you what cowboy, IF Hillary ends up with fewer elected delegates by the time of the convention and changes the outcome with super delegates she will end the Democratic Party. There is one number that matters and that is the number of elected delegates. Cook can do all the calculations it wants, but unless Hillary has more elected delegates when she walks in the convention door nothing else matters.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)And you are acting unhinged.
I know not what will happen not do you. But to treat data and speculation as a fight is rather unhinged.
Take a break
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)I guess I could link to your "it's all over" and "super delegates are there to stop popular candidates who dont meet the criteria from the party bosses" posts just to show where you're coming from, but that would seem like piling on.
Have fun in the Hillary group, we'll count the delegates when they come in and then we'll see if the DLC/Third Way has the guts to steal the nomination IF it doesn't work out their way.
See ya.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)No link necessary. I do believe he's done before he started.
But this OP stands on its on. We aren't alwyas fighting when we post in GD-P.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Firstm she won't end up with fewer delegates and these are the Party rules. Deal with it.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Who knew?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)didn't say "Democratic voters."
Order more cigars. The smoke-filled rooms are firing up already.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)when Bernie secures his nomination by winning the pledged delegates.
The superdelegates will not override the will of the voters if they want to stay elected.
The supers will go to Bernie and they should begin right now.
Nevada is Bernie's and so is South Carolina by a squeaker. Then the Super Tuesday firewall will all go to Bernie. No states will give the win to Clinton, but will continue to rapidly lose the magic number needed to secure the nomination.
She will never get it - EVER.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)The situation I am talking about is one where its close and neither candidate has enough to secure the nomination. The superdelegates would then decide who the winner is. What wrong with that?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 15, 2016, 10:46 AM - Edit history (1)
... I don't think he's going to be the nominee.
oasis
(49,389 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Sanders 36
Clinton 32
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_delegate_count.html
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Based on assumptions surrounding demographics of states. They discuss it at the link. It's interesting.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Bernie can afford to do worse in a lot of those states, and then win California.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Ok. Well, there you have it.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)The spread in 2008 was only several hundred, super delegates could have swayed it the other way if they wanted to.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)She can lose if she loses a majority of states by 2.5 to 5%. Very true.
The targets shown give what she needs in a state. Some she needs more some less. Of course this changes after every voting day.
It's a good tool to revisit.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)She cannot rely on a single super delegate.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Here's the scorecard:
Bernie: Iowa; 21 NH: 15
Clinton: Iowa: 23, NH: 9
Total delegates: Bernie 36, Clinton: 31
Bernie is leading in pledged delegates at this time.
You want to confuse people, go confuse the Republicans.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)That's got to suck being a major political reporting outlet.
You might want to let them know how the superdelagates are meaningless.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)They want to be pro-Clinton, sure - let's abuse the superdelegate system.
Let's be clear: Bernie is leading on the pledged delegates at this time. He will continue to gain more pledged delegates, while Clinton starts losing her numbers.
She's both morally and cash-wise broke for her campaign - and she will not even finish this contest without abusing Citizens United and abuse FEC in order to get her power.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Good thing we get to test that hypothesis very soon
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Let's
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Delegates in NH who pledged their support of Hillary before she lost by 21% of the actual vote... think they will stick with her..??? and if they do would you support that ???
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)My candidates have been burned by it in the past, but it's the system. The purpose being that party leaders get more input into nominees. I'm ok with that.
As for NH, I do think that her supers will remain pledged. No reason to unpledge.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)examples please ? Why do you support the Party leaders (establishment) should have more input than the voters..???
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)I choose to be a member. I have every right to not be a member.
In many states there are open primaries which can and have resulted in crossover for purposes of chaos. The super delegates level that field.
kydo
(2,679 posts)voting last all by yourself. And I sat on the pity pot for 3 days after ScreamingMeeme reminded us that generation X'ers are getting screwed. No one is pandering us! Boomers, boy everyone pandered them for their votes. Greatest Generation, yeppers, pandered for votes. Now Millenniums, they get pandered. But Delaware, I feel your pain.