Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:13 AM Feb 2016

The Clinton Campaign believes the best way to fight Bernie is to destroy his character

and his reputation as a person of, well, honor. An old fashioned term, I know. But it encompasses those qualities for which Bernie is known. Just as importantly, it highlights her reputation as dishonest and lacking in integrity. The goal of Brock and his team of smear elves, is to drag Bernie down a few notches. They don't have to drag him down to her miserable level, just dirty him up. Thus the cheap dishonest attacks claiming he hobnobbed with lobbyists and took corporate money at luxurious DSCC fundraisers.
Thus the cries of hypocrisy. Thus attacking his credibility on his early activism. Thus the innuendo, smears and lies stacked on half truths. This is, after all, a Clinton Campaign. And that is how they roll

I posted on Tuesday night that one figure coming out of the NH exit polls was a huge red light for them: On honesty and integrity, it was 93% for Bernie and 6% for Clinton. It doesn't take any imagination to understand the panic in the Clinton Camp when they saw that. They know how deadly that stark comparison is.

The not him in the photo junket by the MSM reeks of David Brock. And the accusations strike at the heart of Bernie's reputation as a person of great integrity. We on social media pretty much took care of that one, but within the next couple of days there will be a similar slimy attack from Clinton's hired smear merchants.

This is after all, a Clinton Campaign.

210 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Clinton Campaign believes the best way to fight Bernie is to destroy his character (Original Post) cali Feb 2016 OP
Hillary's character is besmirched by Bernie EVERY SINGLE DAY boston bean Feb 2016 #1
implying he is a racist, when he has fought for equality his entire career, restorefreedom Feb 2016 #3
Hillary's done that? Wow! Link? Amimnoch Feb 2016 #27
she is too smart. she has her surrogates do it restorefreedom Feb 2016 #44
Yes, lets not forget Jonathan Capehart Amimnoch Feb 2016 #205
this is sooo rovian. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #206
Calling out = Character assassination, career threats, and insults? Amimnoch Feb 2016 #207
i didn't assassinate anyone's character restorefreedom Feb 2016 #208
Agreed that you didn't. Amimnoch Feb 2016 #209
thanks. no worries. i got the sense that you were upset restorefreedom Feb 2016 #210
This message was self-deleted by its author freedom fighter jh Feb 2016 #47
Clinton used Rep. John Lewis to place a mind set that Sanders was not seen at Civil Rights DhhD Feb 2016 #85
She "uses" one of the greatest civil rights leaders? Amimnoch Feb 2016 #154
Her surrogates have been doing it for months and cali Feb 2016 #173
He has never besmirched her character cali Feb 2016 #4
If Bernie continues to emphasize economic justice over racial justice, like a broken record, that is boston bean Feb 2016 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #8
No its better to keep them poor, and do what Hillary wants to do to help them.............? RiverLover Feb 2016 #19
You don't care about racial justice. You are only using it as a tool to smear. nt Lucky Luciano Feb 2016 #33
pot meet kettle...... boston bean Feb 2016 #34
Exactly. RiverLover Feb 2016 #40
^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #55
Yep. They don't give a shit. They can't find anything real, so they deploy the Rove stategy GoneFishin Feb 2016 #88
Truth. It's been obvious from the start. n/t bvf Feb 2016 #143
the term 'racial justice' is mostly bandied about by people who don't acknowledge the deeper problem islandmkl Feb 2016 #39
And you don't think there is a racial element to income inequality? boston bean Feb 2016 #43
you have a light grasp of the post...i cannot argue in a circle islandmkl Feb 2016 #45
+100000 Paka Feb 2016 #83
Racial and economic justice are flip sides of the same coin. blackspade Feb 2016 #96
He also talks about.. cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #135
No need to lecture me about Sanders.... blackspade Feb 2016 #156
You're actually defending corporate money in politics. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #106
I'm not an absolutist. I understand in today's environment $$ is needed to win an election. boston bean Feb 2016 #109
Sorry, don't piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #115
Nobody, including Bernie, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #193
The "Bribe" IS... To NOT CHANGE ANYTHING! To Preserve ...The Status Quo! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #199
link for "Bernie continues to emphasize economic justice over racial justice"? Jarqui Feb 2016 #126
Take your temperature... You have a fever, I'm sure... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #132
Hillary Clinton voted to privatize Iraqi Oil as Bush said the US was going in to Liberate and DhhD Feb 2016 #134
And Bernie votes to fund all wars, he is such a principled guy.. boston bean Feb 2016 #136
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #140
Was his vote needed to fund the troops? No it was not. He could have stood on principle. boston bean Feb 2016 #141
But if his vote had been needed to fund the troops, would you now be applauding A Simple Game Feb 2016 #151
So he makes political calculations, going against his principle. boston bean Feb 2016 #152
My brother in law was in Iraq twice Kalidurga Feb 2016 #177
Separating racial from economic justice is the broken record Armstead Feb 2016 #144
You should let Bernie know that, since his emphasis is solely on economic solutions of racism. boston bean Feb 2016 #146
You refuse to even hear the many times he has addressed racism directly.. Armstead Feb 2016 #147
The thing is, we all know how money works. We don't need no smoking gun. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #163
Oh please, this old meme again? cui bono Feb 2016 #192
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #6
Why would anyone employ David Brock? Admiral Loinpresser Feb 2016 #9
That is a very fine question. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #194
That is where you are wrong. Hillary besmirched her own character by voting for the IWR, Live and Learn Feb 2016 #13
And with Bernie's long record he has done enought to be besmirched as well. boston bean Feb 2016 #16
Then why did Capehart just destroy his career trying to lie about Sanders? Fumesucker Feb 2016 #20
Cause the pickings on Bernie are pretty slim. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #24
bingo! nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #46
Ding! Ding! Ding! And it shows in their imbecilic smears. GoneFishin Feb 2016 #93
I sincerely doubt Jonathan Capehart has "destroyed" his career over that. boston bean Feb 2016 #25
Of course you care, you were right in the middle of the arguments over it Fumesucker Feb 2016 #28
I was? why don't you go ahead an prove that. boston bean Feb 2016 #30
Like this: Live and Learn Feb 2016 #50
OMG!!!! I wrote the word UTOH! boston bean Feb 2016 #56
It appears you agreed with the OP. That was the first hit on your name and Bernie, photographs Live and Learn Feb 2016 #62
It appears, it appears, it appears....... boston bean Feb 2016 #89
You claimed you weren't there. This is a MFWC argument if I ever saw one. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #92
I claimed what???????????????? boston bean Feb 2016 #95
He/she said you were in the middle of the arguments. You said prove it. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #98
The singular word "utoh" proves I was in the middle of arguments???? boston bean Feb 2016 #100
Are you asking me why nobody replied to your ridiculous comment? nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #102
I'm asking you to prove the false allegation in question, which boston bean Feb 2016 #103
Actually, I did and the other member probably doesn't have so much time to waste. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #105
keep 'em coming. This evidence you post will soon make it clear to all boston bean Feb 2016 #107
You made the false allegation. You claimed you stayed out of the fray. But you didn't. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #110
Two posts puts me right in the fray. Come on, you can do better than that. Find some more posts. boston bean Feb 2016 #112
Sorry, I have helped you enough for one day. I have better things to do. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #120
figured. boston bean Feb 2016 #121
It is easy to see why you like Hillary so much. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #202
You need more hearts so I'll give you one. Ligyron Feb 2016 #84
The 'wife'? You mean the woman who was married to Rappaport for 5 years several decades ago and who Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #167
They really are. cali Feb 2016 #97
The sad thing is that I'm afraid he *hasn't* destroyed his career. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #195
There's always Fox. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Feb 2016 #200
Has he? Why keep them secret? Elaborate please, share the wealth of your knowledge. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #22
And in reality, the cost to her is pretty fucking low. Not getting to be POTUS is really not Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #108
Very low indeed. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #114
Project much? Katashi_itto Feb 2016 #15
Hillary's new slogan: Vote for me because I am besmirched. Helen Borg Feb 2016 #23
Pretty sure that would fit Bernie a bit better. EVERYONE IS OUT TO GET HIM! boston bean Feb 2016 #26
No longer inevitable, now Hillary is running on fumes, really... Helen Borg Feb 2016 #31
Well, you could just say she is copying Bernie again........ boston bean Feb 2016 #32
Not everyone, just Republicans and a few loyalists. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #52
Naw, I liked "No we can't" SmittynMo Feb 2016 #76
It's their official line even! Hydra Feb 2016 #203
Hillary besmirched her own character. backscatter712 Feb 2016 #36
And Bernie is the best! He aint never done a thing that could be questioned, EVER! boston bean Feb 2016 #37
Nobody's claiming Bernie's perfect. backscatter712 Feb 2016 #38
he just hangs with people who create death machines, and brings jobs to his people boston bean Feb 2016 #41
Wait, wut? Who does he hang out with? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #54
here you go. boston bean Feb 2016 #61
He's at a meeting not "hanging around" or "hobnobbing" with him. When did they spend time together? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #63
+10 eom Karma13612 Feb 2016 #72
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #64
You are a creep. boston bean Feb 2016 #66
He's gone, sorry you had to see that. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #68
As you know it is not the first time that has been posted to me. boston bean Feb 2016 #69
It's the same troll who's been posting shit like that for years. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #70
right. boston bean Feb 2016 #71
Bean, he's "hobnobbing"? That's not hobnobbing! This is hobnobbing..... marble falls Feb 2016 #159
He is sitting there TALKING to them - not getting PAID to talk to them, jillan Feb 2016 #164
Henry Kissinger, killer of millions. Vacation friend of Hillary. Bohunk68 Feb 2016 #57
Really. That almost makes me physically ill. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #196
Bernie isn't a victim, he is a politician. stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #51
Danny Lyon isn't a poltician, he's the target of poltiical operatives Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #169
Yep. Cavalier disregard. Worse than going after Bernie. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #197
Besmirched in what way? blackspade Feb 2016 #91
Reminds me of how Republicans cry foul when confronted with their own words. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #104
Anything to win. Clinton would sacrifice the GE if it helps her win a primary. eom Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #113
She should do anything she can to win. I have no problem with that. boston bean Feb 2016 #117
Then she is shortsighted. The GE is important: we cannot afford to lose it Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #122
If Bernie won't do everything he can to win, why do you support him? boston bean Feb 2016 #123
Because leadership is about doing the right thing even when the wrong thing Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #127
You are going to be extremely disappointed if he ever wins, cause he will never ever live up to that boston bean Feb 2016 #128
Vote for Clinton: she is sub-standard! Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #129
And Bernie won't ever compromise on ANYTHING I don't want him to boston bean Feb 2016 #133
Let's compare, shall we? Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #149
Great post, but you left out welfare "reform" Jim Lane Feb 2016 #153
You are right. I suppose I left out a few more items. Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #174
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #130
If there is no difference, then what are we voting for? boston bean Feb 2016 #131
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #137
So it seems there are two big reasons not to support Bernie. Jim Lane Feb 2016 #155
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #124
Clearly. frylock Feb 2016 #190
Thank you! Well said ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #148
Victimhood. It's what's for dinner. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #157
agree mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #162
Amen!! uponit7771 Feb 2016 #175
Hillary's "character" is besmirched by her own past words and actions. frylock Feb 2016 #189
Six infants die in this country before they reach 1 year of age for every 1,000 live births. rhett o rick Feb 2016 #201
and that will be high on the list of reasons for their undoing. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #2
that's how the clintons roll.....always have, always will bowens43 Feb 2016 #7
There is a history there. In the 90s the Clinton campaign kneecapped Jerry Brown with rumors. bklyncowgirl Feb 2016 #48
Wow, I didn't know about this. Karma13612 Feb 2016 #78
I wish you'd do an op on this. cali Feb 2016 #101
Me too. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #198
And try to convince America that SHE is actually the liberal standard bearer. What a joke she is. peacebird Feb 2016 #10
Clinton shall NEVER convince me RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #67
Not this Bernie supporter. SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #82
I once heard a TV talking head say she looks bad just standing next to him AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #11
So very Republican of her. Cobalt Violet Feb 2016 #12
Maybe it was just Capehart oberliner Feb 2016 #14
It was not. cali Feb 2016 #17
How do you know this? oberliner Feb 2016 #18
Because simultaneously it was Frizell and Tweety cali Feb 2016 #21
They could have pursued this in support of Hillary oberliner Feb 2016 #58
his partner/husband works for them restorefreedom Feb 2016 #49
How do you know this? oberliner Feb 2016 #60
my mistake. he USED to work for clinton restorefreedom Feb 2016 #87
OK oberliner Feb 2016 #90
it was someone else who claimed he worked for the campaign, i don't know who it was restorefreedom Feb 2016 #99
His SO works for the Hillary campaign. Don't you think there is any pillow talk? Vincardog Feb 2016 #182
Used to oberliner Feb 2016 #184
IT is what they do, learn form history or be doomed to repeat it Vincardog Feb 2016 #186
If the two candidates were republican, perhaps ad hominum/personal attacks would have some influence no_hypocrisy Feb 2016 #29
I don't think dem voters are particularly immune from any human behavior. HereSince1628 Feb 2016 #79
The Clintons have no character. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #35
How are the Clintons culpable in this? oberliner Feb 2016 #74
Would you blame an attack dog or its' owner? Vincardog Feb 2016 #183
Human beings are not dogs oberliner Feb 2016 #185
Do you stick your fingers in your ears so as not to hear anything bad about Hill? Vincardog Feb 2016 #187
I came up with: No Way Third Way Hillaray. Thought it Karma13612 Feb 2016 #80
Clinton still fails to see her own weakness. RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #42
when and if bernie fails to be elected it will be his fault no one else. stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #53
I admire your unwavering support, but don't understand how good people can back corruption, inc. RiverLover Feb 2016 #59
Don't tell anyone but, stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #77
LOL Its our little secret, then. RiverLover Feb 2016 #94
Because they can't move her trust and likability numbers up, they try to take Sanders' down GreatGazoo Feb 2016 #65
She's demonstrating what she'd be like as President too. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #73
Well said. CentralMass Feb 2016 #86
Nixon in a pant suit Doctor_J Feb 2016 #119
I just can't trust her Neana Feb 2016 #75
Its the Clinton's default play... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #81
I think they have figured out that it's the ONLY approach that might work Doctor_J Feb 2016 #111
Never in my life did I think I would see a Democrat Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #116
So telling the truth about Sanders is a bad thing dlwickham Feb 2016 #118
And what truth is this? Beowulf Feb 2016 #145
Really dlwickham Feb 2016 #161
I see. Beowulf Feb 2016 #166
The truth could bite you on the ass dlwickham Feb 2016 #178
Very mature. Beowulf Feb 2016 #179
You're amusing dlwickham Feb 2016 #191
Your posts appear to have been made by a textbook troll, Maedhros Feb 2016 #204
Definitions: Truth-that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #171
That sounds like a lesson Sanders fans should learn dlwickham Feb 2016 #176
Big issue is bait. PatrynXX Feb 2016 #125
All of this stupid Bernie vs. Hillary stuff is just mental masturbation at this point Politicub Feb 2016 #138
Hillary had a choice to make just like in 2008 krawhitham Feb 2016 #139
K & R Awknid Feb 2016 #142
They have looked and looked... and Bernie came clean yourpaljoey Feb 2016 #150
they used Obama's 3rd-grade and kindergarten essays MisterP Feb 2016 #172
Only because they can't destroy his policies. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #158
this is it amborin Feb 2016 #160
says who, I haven't seen any of that treestar Feb 2016 #165
So did you find that photo of Hillary landing under sniper fire yet? Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #170
Made you look. cali Feb 2016 #180
Good luck Fearless Feb 2016 #168
You mean like Andy823 Feb 2016 #181
Brought up precisely to smear Bernie's integrity and because they believed his early activism was a Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #188

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
1. Hillary's character is besmirched by Bernie EVERY SINGLE DAY
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:16 AM
Feb 2016

He aint some shining light, that shines only pureness and good.

I hope she actually does hold him to some account. That's how the process works.

Promise the moon and when your opponent asks how you will do it, claim they are an oligarch out against the people they've been working for their entire adult life.

That is base politics, and Bernie aint above it.

So, GO HILLARY. Bernie isn't a victim, he is a politician.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
3. implying he is a racist, when he has fought for equality his entire career,
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:19 AM
Feb 2016

has nothing to do with how to pay for a program. its an ugly smear. period.

but that is what brock does best....l

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
44. she is too smart. she has her surrogates do it
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:27 AM
Feb 2016

you know, that slimeball brock.....

oh and lets not forget jonathan "its not bernie" capehart.....who will,sacrifice his career to portray bernie as a liar and poser....

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
206. this is sooo rovian.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 10:16 AM
Feb 2016

a writer who perpertrates a falshood, and when confronted with the facts, obnoxiously doubles down. oh a writer who just happens to be the partner of someone who used to work for clinton at state.

and we are not supposed to call him out because he happens to be gay and black?

wow, the depseration of the clinton campaign is creating a deafening roar.



 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
207. Calling out = Character assassination, career threats, and insults?
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 10:33 AM
Feb 2016

Whod've thunk?


First, let's examine the "falshood"
You have 4x alumni who knew both Bruce and Bernie, and who claimed that it was actually Bruce.
You have the roommate, and best man from Rapport's wedding claiming it was Bruce.
You have the widow of Rapport also claiming that she believed it was her husband.
You have a Sanders Spokesperson who says that the campaign isn't positive it was Sanders.

You have a photographer who says it definitely was Sanders.

At the VERY least there was enough evidence to provide very reasonable doubt if it was or wasn't Sanders.
You'd think that Sanders, if his memory is working, could take one look at that photo, and go "yes, that was me right there, not Bruce". I know I can look at photo's from decades past, and even from my childhood and go "yes, that's me" with 100% certainty. Especially photo's that were part of the larger events in my life.

You might want to change your name here mate. One of the Key freedoms of the first amendment is the Press. You obviously aren't for it.

Tolerance is not part of supporting what you agree with. It's only applicable in your behavior on the things you don't.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
208. i didn't assassinate anyone's character
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 12:08 PM
Feb 2016

i said he needed to retract and that it is pretty crappy of him to double down when confronted with the facts (the photog who took it said it was bernie and was positive)

and freedom of speech applies to all of is, so i think i will hang on to my name

bernies campaign has come out and said they are 100 percent confident it was him.

and if capehart is going to use his position at the wp to push one candidate while slamming another, without disclosing his bias, he better be ready for the apporopriate criticism that will result

have a bernie day!



 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
209. Agreed that you didn't.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 12:23 PM
Feb 2016

At least I haven't seen anything at all from you doing it.

However there's a TON of evidence of it being done by fellow supporters of yours that are. On here. On Twitter. On facebook.

If my post came across as laying that on you directly, please accept my sincere apology. I do make an honest effort not to lump everyone into one basket.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
210. thanks. no worries. i got the sense that you were upset
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 12:28 PM
Feb 2016

at the overall tone of the issue. there is a lot of stuff flying for sure. i really try and stick to issues and not persons. i don't always succeed, but the primary season will be long..plenty of time for mistakes and corrections on all sides

and this

peace, Amimmoch


Response to Amimnoch (Reply #27)

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
85. Clinton used Rep. John Lewis to place a mind set that Sanders was not seen at Civil Rights
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:22 AM
Feb 2016

events of the past so he wasn't there and Sanders is lying about his Civil Rights activities. In my opinion, Lewis conflated the presence of Bill and Hillary Clinton but never that of Bernie Sanders in the Civil Rights Movement when Lewis said that the Clinton's were present but not Sanders. Was Sanders present at the 2004 event?

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/congressman-john-lewis-endorses-hillary-clinton-n440201


Last week, February 2016, Lewis was seen and heard giving his support to H Clinton for the D-Nomination for President when he actually gave his endorsement, months earlier, on July 30, 2015. Seems like Lewis and the Clinton campaign decided to set up a Swift boating and derogatory character assignation.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
154. She "uses" one of the greatest civil rights leaders?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

So it's your summation that Rep John Lewis is not a man of his own mind, and his own opinion?

I guess the 84% of the rest of the Congressional Black Caucus who also has endorsed Hillary are likewise just pawns in her game?

How about the rest of the 158 Congressional Representatives that have endorsed her are likewise brainwashed? I guess the 2 representatives, this man with such a long and distinguished history in congress was able to pull are the only ones immune to her evil super powers of persuasion?

Ridiculous.

However if such an absurd affirmation was in any way correct, it would seem to me that someone who can pull that much stroke and had that great power to convince would be the one to pick when it comes to getting things done? In particular with the upcoming replacement of Scalia.

Especially when we know that this is what a Clinton SCOTUS appointment looks like:


 

cali

(114,904 posts)
173. Her surrogates have been doing it for months and
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016

so has her campaign. David Brock ring a bell?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. He has never besmirched her character
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:20 AM
Feb 2016

He has continued to talk about the inequities in our society as he has always talked about them. If that throws light on Hillary that is unfavorable, that her own fucking fault and her own problem.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
5. If Bernie continues to emphasize economic justice over racial justice, like a broken record, that is
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:26 AM
Feb 2016

is his "own fucking fault and his own problem". People can and should discuss it, because it is an issue that affects them and provides insight into how his policies would work for those who face these problems.

And YES he does besmirch it each time he talks about her taking campaign donations. Without a lick of proof that she has EVER done anything untoward as quid pro quo.

He is very good at painting himself as some sort of very pure politician, and anyone who doesn't do it his way is the enemy.

Response to boston bean (Reply #5)

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
19. No its better to keep them poor, and do what Hillary wants to do to help them.............?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:57 AM
Feb 2016

Ads maybe?

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
88. Yep. They don't give a shit. They can't find anything real, so they deploy the Rove stategy
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:26 AM
Feb 2016

of attacking his strength of fighting for an even playing field for everybody, rather than increasingly tilting it more and more toward the top 0.01%.

Bernie wants EVERYONE to get a fair shot at an education and a decent life. What a bastard.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
39. the term 'racial justice' is mostly bandied about by people who don't acknowledge the deeper problem
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:23 AM
Feb 2016

Martin Luther King, Jr. , Memphis, Tennessee, March 1968 speaking to the striking sanitary workers...

"Now our struggle is for genuine equality, which means economic equality. For we know now, that it isn't enough to integrate lunch counters. What does it profit a man to be able to eat at an integrated lunch counter if he doesn't have enough money to buy a hamburger? What does it profit a man to be able to eat at the swankest integrated restaurant when he doesn't even earn enough money to take his wife out to dine? What does it profit one to have access to the hotels of our cities, and the hotels of our highways, when we don't earn enough money to take our family on a vacation? What does it profit one to be able to attend an integrated school, when he doesn't earn enough money to buy his children school clothes?"


you cannot 'cure' racism but you sure as hell can cure economic inequality

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
45. you have a light grasp of the post...i cannot argue in a circle
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:28 AM
Feb 2016

you understand and promote what you think...and I will do likewise...

while you are at it...offer your suggestion(s) at how to eliminate racism throughout the society...

you work on that...I'll work on getting the minorities and disadvantaged economic equality...

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
96. Racial and economic justice are flip sides of the same coin.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:34 AM
Feb 2016

And, no, economic justice is not the only thing he has talked about.
But you know this, even though this is Clinton's current 'attack' du jour.

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
135. He also talks about..
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:07 AM
Feb 2016

our corrupt campaign financing,
the tax system that allows corporations and wealthy Americans to pay less than their share,
criminal justice reform
the right to healthcare and so much more.

Bernie Sanders is not a one issue candidate.

And as far as the Bernie Sanders has no foreign policy experience. Well, lots of presidents had no foreign policy experience. I think we don't have to look back very far to find presidents that had no foreign policy experience when they first took office - Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The important thing is whether you have a good record on foreign policy experience once you have some. Hillary has foreign policy experience but exactly what has she achieved and did she do a good job on foreign policy? There are some of us who aren't exactly impressed with her foreign policy experience.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
156. No need to lecture me about Sanders....
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 12:17 PM
Feb 2016

I was specifically responding to BB's post about economic and racial inequities.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
109. I'm not an absolutist. I understand in today's environment $$ is needed to win an election.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:50 AM
Feb 2016

So, until that day changes, I am not going to make Hillary out to be some monster, when there isn't one iota of evidence she has ever been bribed or voted in a fashion as quid pro quo.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
115. Sorry, don't piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:53 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary's a corporate tool, bought and paid for. The receipt takes the form of those lucrative speaking fees; the goods delivered were Iraq and a bunch of pro-corporate legislation. Sufficient evidence has been obtained, at least so far as the Voters' Court goes.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
193. Nobody, including Bernie,
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:21 PM
Feb 2016

ever said she was influenced directly. Saying she takes corporate cash is only a smear if you think it is. If you think it's OK, then Bernie pointing it out should be irrelevant to you.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
199. The "Bribe" IS... To NOT CHANGE ANYTHING! To Preserve ...The Status Quo!
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 12:23 AM
Feb 2016

Because that is the way the powers that be like it... They are amaking out just fine the way things are. How's that working for most of the rest of us? WE want fucking BIG change... They want things kept the same. Hillary is compensated by the powers that be to NOT change a GD thing... Money up front... Money and position after. THAT IS HOW "THINGS" WORK!

Jarqui

(10,126 posts)
126. link for "Bernie continues to emphasize economic justice over racial justice"?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:02 AM
Feb 2016

Economic justice is a part of racial justice. I'll let feelthebern.org explain that to you:
http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-racial-justice/

US Poverty Today
Blacks 27%
Latinos 25%
Other 15%
Whites 10%

Unemployment today
Blacks 10.x%
Whites 4.x%

To paraphrase MLK, he said that there wasn't a lot of point to desegregating hotels and restaurants if blacks couldn't afford them. It's hard to argue convincingly against that basic logic.

Economic justice doesn't mean one ignores discrimination, discrimination in voting rights, discrimination in housing, substandard education for blacks, racial disparities and inequalities in healthcare, disproportionate incarceration of blacks, disproportionate shooting of unarmed blacks by police, etc, etc, etc - all the other racial issues.

Combined with the above link, Bernie covers a bunch of them here:
https://berniesanders.com/issues/racial-justice/

Economic justice is a big deal because it helps or reduces many of the above issues:
poverty
unemployment
helps overcome substandard education for blacks for some blacks
substandard education for blacks because more can afford education
racial disparities and inequalities in healthcare because more can afford healthcare
disproportionate incarceration of blacks because more blacks can afford to eat rather than committing crimes to get by
disproportionate shooting of unarmed blacks by police is likely to be reduced because more will be in school or in jobs - off the street
discrimination in voting rights would be improved because more can afford photo ID or whatever to get over the hurdle in front of them

If blacks got similar pay & similar employment as whites and we did nothing else, that would be enormous and help blacks with reduction of nearly all the other issues. It's the only issue on the list that has such a wide impact. Bernie is absolutely right to give it a high priority.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
132. Take your temperature... You have a fever, I'm sure...
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:06 AM
Feb 2016

I think you have "besmirch fever" !1!!!1!1!!111!

And YES he does besmirch it each time he talks about her taking campaign donations


DhhD

(4,695 posts)
134. Hillary Clinton voted to privatize Iraqi Oil as Bush said the US was going in to Liberate and
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:06 AM
Feb 2016

corporatize, a sovereign country. Clinton and her revolving door team set up the corporatization and fascism of the National Oil Industry of Mexico while Sec. of State.

Check with WikiLeaks. And check with WikiLeaks about what US Energy Corporations got the Oil contracts from the Right Wing Corporate Mexican Leadership. TPP is Clinton's gold standard, after NAFTA.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
136. And Bernie votes to fund all wars, he is such a principled guy..
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:08 AM
Feb 2016

And he loves the $$ from the MIC rolling into his state of VT.

Response to boston bean (Reply #136)

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
141. Was his vote needed to fund the troops? No it was not. He could have stood on principle.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:14 AM
Feb 2016

He didn't. He likes to say he doesn't support war, when in fact he does every single time.

He also voted the 2001 AUMF, which to this very day is used to give authority for more military action.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
151. But if his vote had been needed to fund the troops, would you now be applauding
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 11:00 AM
Feb 2016

his standing on principle if he voted against the funding?

Truth be told Bernie can never win in your eyes, anything he does will not be right from your slanted perspective. As with your complaining about his vote to fund the troops, you agree with the funding, you just disagree with the person who voted to fund them.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
152. So he makes political calculations, going against his principle.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 11:01 AM
Feb 2016

Welcome to the world of politics.

Now, try to hold every politician to the same standard.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
177. My brother in law was in Iraq twice
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 04:18 PM
Feb 2016

His son and my nephew was in Afghanistan. I will not vote for any Democrat that would be willing to let them hang in their with no means to do their jobs even if I disagree with them being sent there and I don't particularly like their jobs.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
144. Separating racial from economic justice is the broken record
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:17 AM
Feb 2016

It's a weird kind of anti affirmative action.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
146. You should let Bernie know that, since his emphasis is solely on economic solutions of racism.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:19 AM
Feb 2016

And barely does he address the issue of racism keeping wages low.

But whatever, keep on keeping on.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
192. Oh please, this old meme again?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:20 PM
Feb 2016

Then again... say it with me now...

Bernie has been fighting for civil rights his entire adult life.

To try to minimize it by attempting to separate social justice from economic justice is simply a way for you to justify backing the corporate candidate who is beholden to Wall Street and health insurance companies.

We all know Bernie is for social justice. To continue to claim he is not, or that he not for it enough, is complete and utter bullshit.

.

Response to boston bean (Reply #1)

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
13. That is where you are wrong. Hillary besmirched her own character by voting for the IWR,
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:51 AM
Feb 2016

calling children to heel, stumping for her husband on NAFTA, Welfare Reform and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement and advocating for fracking, Welfare Reform and the TPP. Not to mention taking money from corporations, private prisons and Super-pacs.

Bernie uses her own record very sparingly and usually only in answer to her own vile and often untrue attacks against him.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
16. And with Bernie's long record he has done enought to be besmirched as well.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:53 AM
Feb 2016

What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

this is politics.

Why make your candidate appear so ineffectual that if he loses it was a conspiracy of the oligarch? It might make people feel better, but it's bupkis.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. Then why did Capehart just destroy his career trying to lie about Sanders?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:58 AM
Feb 2016

All over a fifty year old picture?

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
25. I sincerely doubt Jonathan Capehart has "destroyed" his career over that.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:02 AM
Feb 2016

Only internet warriors are worrying and listening to this extremely non important, issue. And thinking it makes all the difference in the world for Bernie.

Believe me most people aren't going to base their vote on whether Jonathan Capehart wrote something wrong, especially since the wife is still saying it is Rappaport.

Now, believe me, I JUST DON'T give a shit about it, so don't come back to me with arguments that you think I don't think it's Bernie. I DON'T CARE. Like most people living in the US.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
28. Of course you care, you were right in the middle of the arguments over it
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:05 AM
Feb 2016

Internet warrior that you are...

Clicky, clicky.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
56. OMG!!!! I wrote the word UTOH!
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:41 AM
Feb 2016

LOL

That proves I was right in the thick of it..... This is a joke, right?

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
62. It appears you agreed with the OP. That was the first hit on your name and Bernie, photographs
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:48 AM
Feb 2016

would you like me to go get some more? I can assure you plenty more showed up..

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
89. It appears, it appears, it appears.......
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:28 AM
Feb 2016

I was reacting to a new development.

And please post the many others. If they are as innocuous as the one you posted, I'm in good shape. Proving I DON'T give a shit about this.

You got the links to me saying that?

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
98. He/she said you were in the middle of the arguments. You said prove it.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:35 AM
Feb 2016

Your post was pretty much in the middle. Proving you were there too. See, a MFWC argument?

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
100. The singular word "utoh" proves I was in the middle of arguments????
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:37 AM
Feb 2016

A post where not one single soul replied to it, put me in the middle of arguments?

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
103. I'm asking you to prove the false allegation in question, which
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:44 AM
Feb 2016

you and the original member who made the accusation have provided ZERO evidence of.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
110. You made the false allegation. You claimed you stayed out of the fray. But you didn't.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:51 AM
Feb 2016

Like I said, just another mushroom filled with creme post.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
112. Two posts puts me right in the fray. Come on, you can do better than that. Find some more posts.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:53 AM
Feb 2016

I will especially like you to find the ones that state exactly what I said above, to which a false allegation was made.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
120. Sorry, I have helped you enough for one day. I have better things to do.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:56 AM
Feb 2016

Have to go help Bernie out. Have a good day. And don't step on any more creamy mushrooms.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
167. The 'wife'? You mean the woman who was married to Rappaport for 5 years several decades ago and who
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 01:53 PM
Feb 2016

was not present on the day of the photographs? Where in her lies standing to judge that photo? In knowing Bruce long ago? In not being there at the event?

How does 'the wife's' word have any merit at all, much less merit comparable to that of Lyon? You still might want to read up on Danny Lyon. His photos are source material for much civil rights and social justice history, disparage his integrity you disparage a vast body of very important works.

The wife. But really long estranged from a five year marriage ex wife. Who was not present.

Words mean things.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
22. Has he? Why keep them secret? Elaborate please, share the wealth of your knowledge.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:01 AM
Feb 2016

Ineffectual? He's winning so far.

Are you implying that you guys have been holding back? Do you have something worse that killing hundreds of thousands with the IWR that Bernie didn't vote for? I seriously doubt it. Hillary was wrong and this is the price she is paying for her little 'mistake', among other 'mistakes'.

Feel the Bern!!!!!

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
108. And in reality, the cost to her is pretty fucking low. Not getting to be POTUS is really not
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:49 AM
Feb 2016

end of the world.





Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
31. No longer inevitable, now Hillary is running on fumes, really...
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:12 AM
Feb 2016

So, she may as well try that card, see if it sticks. Bernie's message has been consistent and is resonating, he does not need new slogans.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
36. Hillary besmirched her own character.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:20 AM
Feb 2016

All the criticism she's received about things like her relationship with Kissinger, her pandering, her extremely late LGBTQ rights "evolution", her Iraq War vote, her poor judgment for having that private email server, etc. etc. etc. she brought on herself.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
38. Nobody's claiming Bernie's perfect.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:22 AM
Feb 2016

But he's a decent and honorable man.

And he doesn't pal around with war criminals.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
41. he just hangs with people who create death machines, and brings jobs to his people
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:24 AM
Feb 2016

in VT all proceeds from the MIC. ie the F35 program and Lockheed Martin.

See how this works?

Do I think Bernie is corrupt person, no I don't.

But don't put a standard on one person, that you won't hold another to.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
63. He's at a meeting not "hanging around" or "hobnobbing" with him. When did they spend time together?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:51 AM
Feb 2016

This is just a desperate attempt to claim Bernie is corrupt.

Response to boston bean (Reply #61)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
70. It's the same troll who's been posting shit like that for years.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:58 AM
Feb 2016

Next time alert then pm MIRT and we'll take him out asap.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
164. He is sitting there TALKING to them - not getting PAID to talk to them,
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 01:34 PM
Feb 2016

do you not understand the difference?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
169. Danny Lyon isn't a poltician, he's the target of poltiical operatives
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:03 PM
Feb 2016

A most valuable American, trashed and tarnished. That is not acceptable. But you applaud it.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
104. Reminds me of how Republicans cry foul when confronted with their own words.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:45 AM
Feb 2016

If recalling your past words and deeds and then drawing a contrast makes you think you're being "besmirched", maybe the problem's with you.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
122. Then she is shortsighted. The GE is important: we cannot afford to lose it
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:56 AM
Feb 2016

and definitely not over Hillary's sense of entitlement.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
123. If Bernie won't do everything he can to win, why do you support him?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:57 AM
Feb 2016

I mean what good would it be to support someone who isn't willing to give it their all.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
127. Because leadership is about doing the right thing even when the wrong thing
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:02 AM
Feb 2016

is easier to accomplish. I am rather taken aback that you don't know that. Clinton has shown time and again to be a follower, not a leader, because she will do the wrong thing until doing the right thing has become the last and only option.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
128. You are going to be extremely disappointed if he ever wins, cause he will never ever live up to that
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:03 AM
Feb 2016

standard.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
149. Let's compare, shall we?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:22 AM
Feb 2016
DOMA:

Clinton said: yes Bill do it. Strike this 'compromise' with the GOP.

Sanders said: Mr. President don't do it.

DADT:

Clinton was all for it, because a compromise 'had to be' struck with the GOP

Sanders called it an impugning of the character of thousands of American military personnel.

Marriage Equality

Clinton opposed it as recently as 2013. She only started suporting it after her obstruction rendered her unelectable because of shifting public opinion.

Sanders was right there with the body of consensus within the LGBT rights movement, every step of the way. As mayor of Burlington, he facilitated gay rights marches as far back as the 1980-ies.

Iraq War Resolution

Clinton was all for it, because polls told her that is how she could obtain the presidency in due course.

Sanders voted against it, and warned for the consequences that have, by now, become all too clear and all too atrocious.

TPP

Sanders was always against it, because it will lead to poverty in the United States and detorioration of environmental and labour protection laws.

Clinton calls it / called it / triangulated it a "golden standard".

Fracking

Sanders has warned time and again that we need to move to enegy-independent means of production, and not hazard human health.

Clinton was promoting it across the globe.

Minimum Wage

Clinton would start the negotiations at 12 Dollars an hour, even though that is BELOW living standard.

Sanders would start at 15 Dollars. Maybe he will compromise, but compromising from a strong opening bid is better than compromising from a sub-standard opening bid.

Racial Justice

Sanders has stood with the civil rights movement for four decades. Sometimes he was the ONLY Caucasian congressperson to show up to protest when PoC's voting rights were under threat / being denied. Even now, he is the one with the plan to demilitarise the police, stop the war on drugs (which plays right into the hands of those who want to target communities of colour) and abolish private prisons.

Clinton happily took contributions from the prison industry, which disfavours PoC disproportionally / supports the Death Penalty, which affects communities of colour disproportionally / called minors of colour 'predators who must be brought to heel'.

So yeah, I actually do believe that he won't compromise on anything I care about. Because I know him to be a man of honour and principle. His record informs me of his character and trustworthiness.
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
153. Great post, but you left out welfare "reform"
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

I can just cut and paste what you wrote about DOMA:

Clinton said: yes Bill do it. Strike this 'compromise' with the GOP.

Sanders said: Mr. President don't do it.


Of course, with John Lewis so much in the news of late, we can add that he also opposed the bill, which has turned out to be as bad as he foretold. His statement and an analysis of the consequences can be found here: "John Kasich and the Clintons Collaborated on Law That Helped Double Extreme Poverty"
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
174. You are right. I suppose I left out a few more items.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 04:08 PM
Feb 2016

With Third Way, it is almost impossible to keep track of every wrong turn they take.

Thanks for the addition, and feel free to add more.

Response to boston bean (Reply #128)

Response to boston bean (Reply #131)

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
155. So it seems there are two big reasons not to support Bernie.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 11:21 AM
Feb 2016

One is that a candidate should be willing to do anything to win; Hillary is but Bernie isn't (your post #123).

The other is that Bernie can never live up to that standard of doing the right thing when the wrong thing is easier (your post #128, six minutes later).

Clever argument! Just about any choice Bernie makes can be adduced as support for one prong or the other.

Response to boston bean (Reply #117)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
201. Six infants die in this country before they reach 1 year of age for every 1,000 live births.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 12:54 AM
Feb 2016

That's worse than all modern countries. In fact 38 countries have lower infant mortality rates. I fine it immoral to support the profits of Goldman-Sachs over helping the poor in this country. A vote for HRC is a vote for Goldman-Sachs.

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
48. There is a history there. In the 90s the Clinton campaign kneecapped Jerry Brown with rumors.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:30 AM
Feb 2016

Before the New York Primary Clinton supporters, possibly operatives, were calling into radio talk shows saying that they knew for a fact that Brown was gay leading a frustrated Brown to snarl during an interview with Phil Donahue "Yes I do date girls? Do you want names and phone numbers?" Brown lost New York but his campaign was dealt him the coup-de-grace when a group of anonymous California State troopers went on a news program claiming that the former governor openly tolerated drug use by his rock star friends--including former girlfriend Linda Ronstadt and may have indulged a bit himself. There was something about roaches (of the marijuana variety) found in a bedside soda can.

Mind you there was no direct connection to the Clintons but most suspected that they orchestrated the hit. The novel "Primary Colors" is based on that story. In the novel the target of the smear commits suicide. Fortunately for the state of California Jerry Brown is made of tougher stuff though he did leave politics for a while to get the nasty taste out of his mouth.

Of course in 2008 the Clinton campaign tried to do the same thing to a surging Barak Obama. Smears, innuendo. Pictures of him in Muslim garb turned up. His association with Reverend Wright, etc.

The good thing about this was that by the time the general election rolled around the Clintons had pretty much exposed every possible negative bit of information about Obama. When the Republicans brought it up the reaction was pretty much "Oh crap not this again."

If Sanders can survive the Clintons, he should be able to survive the GOP.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
78. Wow, I didn't know about this.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:08 AM
Feb 2016

But I am not surprised in the least.

As the campaign wears on, I actually am feeling more and more confident that Bernie is made of the right stuff. And like Obama, will be able to tackle not only the Clinton machine, but also the GOP.

And next January, I am taking the day off from work to watch him become POTUS45.

Gnaw on that Hillary and Mitch!

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
10. And try to convince America that SHE is actually the liberal standard bearer. What a joke she is.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:39 AM
Feb 2016

She can Wrap herself in Obama's legacy and spout Bernie's issues all she wants, who would believe a word she says at this point?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
67. Clinton shall NEVER convince me
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:54 AM
Feb 2016

that she, nor her husband are any sort of Liberals. They are opportunists and corporatists.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
11. I once heard a TV talking head say she looks bad just standing next to him
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:47 AM
Feb 2016

And Team Clinton isn't having it.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
14. Maybe it was just Capehart
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:52 AM
Feb 2016

He saw the photo getting play on social media, remembered the article from Time magazine, and tried to be a smartass by "debunking" it without doing any kind of actual reporting or due diligence.

Seems like Capehart is the culpable one here, not the Clinton campaign.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
18. How do you know this?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:56 AM
Feb 2016

Do you have evidence to suggest he was being directed to do this by the Clinton campaign (if that is what you are claiming)?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
58. They could have pursued this in support of Hillary
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:42 AM
Feb 2016

Without being directed by the Hillary campaign itself.

They could just be Hillary fans who wanted to try "get" Bernie of their own accord.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
60. How do you know this?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:45 AM
Feb 2016

On his Twitter feed he says this:

Javier Narvaez
capehart's husband works for the clinton campaign fyi

Jonathan Capehart
Incorrect on both counts.

Do you have evidence to show that he is lying about this?

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
87. my mistake. he USED to work for clinton
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:26 AM
Feb 2016

third paragraph, senior protocol officer under sec clinton

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2012/pdf/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2012-8-22.pdf


an article about the couple referencing his work at state


http://capitolfile-magazine.com/inside-jonathan-capehart-and-nick-schmits-house


but i am sure feels no loyalty at all to his former boss....

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
90. OK
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:28 AM
Feb 2016

But it's one thing to say that this was motivated by being pro-Hillary and another thing to say that it was orchestrated by the Hillary campaign.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
99. it was someone else who claimed he worked for the campaign, i don't know who it was
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:35 AM
Feb 2016

but its like the game telephone...info is easy to screw up going through many hands

orchestrated is hard to define in this context, imo. we have a guy who used to work for sec clinton. his partner goes on a tear with no verifiable info. when confronted with solid info of his "mistake," he doubles down.

were phone calls made by clinton telling him to do this? unlikely. but it would not surprise me to learn that calls were made by clinton surrogates after the piece came out to schmit or even cape-hart himself as to handle the aftermath.

conjecture on my part.

that is the problem with dirty campaigning. there is always the phone call/paper trail/collusion theories that will persist no matter what.

it has been my experience that when something starts to stink, there is usually something there to cause the smell. but such is politics, hey?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
184. Used to
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:23 PM
Feb 2016

Clearly they both like Hillary and that is motivating this.

That does not implicate the campaign itself.

no_hypocrisy

(46,119 posts)
29. If the two candidates were republican, perhaps ad hominum/personal attacks would have some influence
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:06 AM
Feb 2016

but unless policy issues are challenged, democratic voters are likely to stay with their candidates and not change.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
79. I don't think dem voters are particularly immune from any human behavior.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:12 AM
Feb 2016

Generally speaking, personal attacks are rationalized away by people who feel they are just revealing important information about an opponent's character, intelligence, motivations, etc.

Most people never drill very deep into issues and stop at some superficial level of analysis once they have confirmed their preexisting belief/bias. That's particularly easy to see whenever conversation turns to historic votes.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
35. The Clintons have no character.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:19 AM
Feb 2016

It's all about power.

Is Karl Rove secretly on their payroll? Because this is the type of underhanded attack that is his trademark. Undermine your opponents strong points. I've followed Bernie Sanders career for over 20 years. His character has always been beyond reproach. And this attack is Rove and Fox News quality. Very Clintonesque.

I'll repeat a mantra I used back in 2008, and haven't used since.

No Hillary. No. How. No Way!

Bernie is trying to focus on issues and policy. The Clinton campaign is digging through their outhouse, trying to throw anything at him they hope will stick. Anything to distract from their record and corruption.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
185. Human beings are not dogs
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:24 PM
Feb 2016

This guy likes Hillary, wanted to get Bernie, thought this was a good way to do so.

There is zero evidence of the campaign having anything to do with it.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
42. Clinton still fails to see her own weakness.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:24 AM
Feb 2016

Listen to the two of them talk.
Listen for the words, I, me, us and we.
Who uses which words the most.
This tells me something quite revealing about both candidates. This is something I do not think either of them have the ability to change. It's a matter of personality and world outlook.
'Nuff Said.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
59. I admire your unwavering support, but don't understand how good people can back corruption, inc.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:44 AM
Feb 2016

And want more republican policies enacted by a Democrat who only talks like a Democrat, & only in public.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
65. Because they can't move her trust and likability numbers up, they try to take Sanders' down
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:52 AM
Feb 2016

through outright lies and dirty tricks.

In doing so they risk making the gap greater as a new group of people, who were perhaps neutral on HRC's character, come to see her as nakedly and amorally driven, an Earth-scorcher of General Sherman caliber.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
73. She's demonstrating what she'd be like as President too.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:00 AM
Feb 2016

And that's a big "NO SALE".

She wouldn't lie to us then any less than she's lying to us now.

She's demonstrating that she's with the "say anything, do anything" school of politics. And she doesn't seem to grasp the obvious -- that that is exactly what people don't want.

This stuff is really stupid on her part. Add that to the list of negative qualities, it's growing.

 

Neana

(38 posts)
75. I just can't trust her
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:03 AM
Feb 2016

Everything about her seems scripted and phony, and her beliefs about issues change depending on the audience she is talking to.

 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
81. Its the Clinton's default play...
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:14 AM
Feb 2016

Ask of all the women that had the audacity to come forward and claim they were assaulted...

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
111. I think they have figured out that it's the ONLY approach that might work
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:52 AM
Feb 2016

If the campaign is run on the issues, Hillary will lose, big time.

The upside is that the attacks backfire, every time.

Nanjeanne

(4,960 posts)
116. Never in my life did I think I would see a Democrat
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:53 AM
Feb 2016

Creating such racial divisiveness in their own party. There is only one person responsible and that is Hillary Clinton's. She chose this path in a desperate need to win SC. She will continue on this path bringing the tone of the campaign down and creating a rift with people like me who find it more and more difficult to consider voting for her.

But mark my words. When the next brick in her stairway to the Presidency is needed. It's going to be TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS! That will be the Ohio and Pennsylvania strategy.

dlwickham

(3,316 posts)
118. So telling the truth about Sanders is a bad thing
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:54 AM
Feb 2016

So telling the truth about Sanders is a bad thing

Strange world you live in

Beowulf

(761 posts)
166. I see.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 01:51 PM
Feb 2016

You are not going to answer the question. If you want to convince me, you have to do better than "because I told you so."

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
204. Your posts appear to have been made by a textbook troll,
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 04:01 AM
Feb 2016

therefore you go on the ignore list. I encourage others to do likewise, to cut down on your ability to disrupt, distort and distract.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
171. Definitions: Truth-that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:10 PM
Feb 2016

Gossip : casual or unconstrained conversation or reports about other people, typically involving details that are not confirmed as being true.

Learn the difference.

dlwickham

(3,316 posts)
176. That sounds like a lesson Sanders fans should learn
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 04:12 PM
Feb 2016

That sounds like a lesson Sanders fans should learn

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
125. Big issue is bait.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:00 AM
Feb 2016

And I don't think he cares let alone paying attention to the mud. He's Jewish, he's used to it. Just noise.

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
138. All of this stupid Bernie vs. Hillary stuff is just mental masturbation at this point
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:10 AM
Feb 2016

It's about who is going to win and nominate the next Supreme Court justice.

If hell freezes over and Obama gets to nominate someone this year, it still means that more than one justice will most likely retire during the next presidential term.

krawhitham

(4,644 posts)
139. Hillary had a choice to make just like in 2008
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:11 AM
Feb 2016

Either get people to like her more by promoting her views and ideas OR make people like Bernie less by attacking and smearing him and his ideas


She and her campaign has chosen the latter which will alienate Bernie's supports and if she wins doing this many will not vote for Hillary come November. Bernie supporters will feel the Clinton Machine STOLE this from them with slander, smears, & lies. So if she wins the primary we could very well be screwed because it could very well end up costing us the supreme court for 15-20 years and much more.

Now if it is Trump or Cruz I do not think it maters who we run, we win. But if Jeb or Kasich win the primary we have problems because the Clinton campaign has alienated young and independents voters. The Young might stay home or jump ship and the independent voters will simply vote for the GOP guy (they're called independent for a reason).

If she had picked option #1 and won the Bernie supporters would have thought they fought the good fight and just lost to the better campaigner, most would have no ill feelings for Hillary and would for the most part coalesce around her for the General Election run.

But in the end they have decided to go full tilt boogie scorched Earth on Bernie and that decision might cost us all, everything

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
150. They have looked and looked... and Bernie came clean
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:32 AM
Feb 2016

Could not find a single instance of him dipping Susie's pigtails in the inkwell in grade four,
or throwing snowballs at the school bus, or copying from his neighbor during Science 101.
Lord knows they have looked. He has been vetted by the hungriest, most viscous,
best-paid team ever assembled... and He. Came. Clean.
He is ready for the General.

Hillary, on the other hand - well, to quote the Fonz, "Hey Ho!"

treestar

(82,383 posts)
165. says who, I haven't seen any of that
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 01:35 PM
Feb 2016

And if Bernie can't stand the heat, he can stay out of the kitchen. Bernie supporters complain to much about the rough and tumble of elections that is always the case.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
170. So did you find that photo of Hillary landing under sniper fire yet?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

Or is her campaign too busy trying to explain why she preached against LGBT rights for 20 years? Want to play hot kitchen games with your own posts, that's perfectly acceptable under DU rules and it would be fun for me....it's rough and tumble you want, you sure can have it. Just ask.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
181. You mean like
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:11 PM
Feb 2016

What has been going on around here by so many of those who call themselves Bernie supporters? You know, the ones that never say anything if it's not negative towards Clinton, and especially the ones that continue to point out how they will NEVER vote for her if she winds the GE, even though they don't have to admit such things they, seem to love saying it. Do you mean that kind of character assassination?


Uncle Joe

(58,365 posts)
188. Brought up precisely to smear Bernie's integrity and because they believed his early activism was a
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:29 PM
Feb 2016

plus with the African American community, "two birds with one stone."


Thanks for the thread, cali.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Clinton Campaign beli...