2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Calls Mitch McConnell’s Stance on Supreme Court Nomination ‘Disappointing’
Hillary Clinton called Senator Mitch McConnells statement that the next president, not President Obama, should appoint a successor to Justice Scalia disappointing and totally out of step with our history and our constitutional principle.
Speaking at a Democratic fund-raising dinner in Denver, Mrs. Clinton denounced Republican presidential candidates and the Senate majority leaders pledge to not allow Mr. Obama to replace Mr. Scalia, who passed away at a West Texas ranch on Saturday. For any of us who needed a reminder of just how important it is to take back the U.S. Senate and hold onto the White House, just look at the Supreme Court, Mrs. Clinton said.
I know that our thoughts and prayers are with the Scalia family tonight and I am also thinking and praying for the future of our country, she said. It is outrageous that Republicans in the Senate and on the campaign trail have already pledged to block any replacement that President Obama nominates
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/13/hillary-clinton-calls-mitch-mcconnells-stance-on-supreme-court-nomination-disappointing/
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,250 posts)any president that is in his/her second term would not be able to nominate any Supreme Court justices because they are already lame ducks.
Unfortunately most of the candidates in tonight's debate got it wrong.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Then when the GOP invariably oppposes them we will have a great issue in the Fall to bolster their participation. Find a left of center but broadly acceptable one...That will push the GOP into a corner. It's a great wedge issue.
DebbieCDC
(2,543 posts)NBachers
(17,120 posts)It's the Hillary Veg-O-Matic. Slice and dice any Hillary statement with ease and simplicity.
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)And you know it, because I'm quite sure you can read for yourself.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)-Hillary Clinton
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)And dicing at times, me included, it should be noted that Hillary did in fact say the word "disappointing". To some, that might seem a bit weak. In this instance I believe she was just trying to be professional and that is commendable.
I followed the link to the NYT article and yup, she did.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Karma13612
(4,552 posts)Response to Karma13612 (Reply #19)
Empowerer This message was self-deleted by its author.
frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)That worked so well with Wall Street, right?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)In fact I am frustrated by your obscurantism, lol.
mcar
(42,334 posts)Is that ok?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It's very frustrating.
mcar
(42,334 posts)I just don't see why it's worth the time or emotional energy to be so negative.
(And I think you mean "write" ).
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)mcar
(42,334 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)That is an unfair insinuation.