Bernie Sanders won the MOST VOTES EVER in the NH Primary (More votes than any Democrat or Republican

[Skwmom]

Last edited Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:33 AM - Edit history (1)

in the history of the NH Primary). Yet we have these paid corp hacks slamming Bernie for not turning out the vote.

Your journalistic integrity overwhelms me. Is there any bullshit you won't spew for a paycheck?

He received 151,584 votes which was 31% greater than the next closest candidate.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-orlin/bernie-sanders-won-the-mo_b_9228324.html

You REFUSE to disclose the Iowa vote totals for Sanders and Clinton so obviously they don't support your bogus argument against Bernie. (Not that we would trust anything you released based on your conduct to date.)

[AzDar]

1. Unelectable!!

[Betty Karlson]

17. Only in the dreams of 1 % fat cats. eom

[Ferd Berfel]

31. yep, unelectable

[AtomicKitten]

2. Yet by virtue of SIX super delegates, the delegate yield for Bernie's monster win was a tie.

CNN: Hillary Clinton lost to Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire by 22 percentage points, the biggest victory in a contested Democratic primary there since John F. Kennedy. But it looks as though Clinton and Sanders are leaving the Granite State with the same number of delegates in their pockets because Clinton has the support of New Hampshire’s super delegates, these party insiders.

[bjobotts]

14. Yes but superdelgates are the ones who change votes

Since they follow what the people want. She had more than Obama also in super delegates but they all flipped at the convention since the popular vote was for Obama...and Bernie is doing far better than Obama but sites like the Maddow blog with Steve Benen are all out there downplaying Bernie's huge record setting success. According to Thomm Hartmann Bill Clinton said to the MSM..."Release the Cracken" on Bernie and here it comes (this 74 y/o socialist is unelectable) right after he set records winning in NH. Pretty thin. All Polls show he beats all republicans with a greater margin than Hillary...and it's "Democratic" Socialist...like the rest of us since FDR...that's what a progressive is.

[Cheese Sandwich]

3. Not good enough Bernie

[gyroscope]

4. The 1996 Telecom Act marked the beginning of the end

for journalistic integrity. we went from 500 media companies down to 6.
what we have now is little better than state-owned propaganda.

Another disaster compliments of Bill and Hillary.

[Skwmom]

5. They hire either 1. Idiots, or 2. People willing to do anything for a buck. n/t

[H2O Man]

6. Recommended.

Thank you!

[farleftlib]

7. Try as they might to diminish his victory

NH really felt the Bern. K&R.

Journalistic integrity is an oxymoron.

[jkbRN]

8. Yeah I was insanely disappointed that Maddow used that attack

[FourScore]

9. Fringe!!! n/t

[jillan]

10. Did you hear Rachel last nite? Bernie gets more votes than Obama - any candidate since JFK &

she blames Bernie for low turnout!

I think the fumes from all that glue they use on the false eyelashes that she wears daily are seeping into her brain.

[Skwmom]

11. No. Mrs. Selective Outrage has made it clear that she has sold out for her show and paycheck. n/t

[bjobotts]

16. Yes her payacheck depends on having certain opinions

[Skwmom]

30. The firing of Ed Shultz had a real chilling effect.

[WillyT]

12. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!

[Uncle Joe]

13. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, Skwmom.

[onehandle]

15. But there were 30000 fewer voters than in 2008. And NH hardly resembles most states.

Pretty much like saying a candidate that wins in San Francisco can win nationally.

[TheBlackAdder]

19. That's because HRC didn't pull her voters to the polls. In 2008, HRC & SBO drew many!

[cascadiance]

29. And arguably when you have less candidates you will have less votes

When the Dems had Edwards, Obama, and Hillary running, there was more motivation for all voters to vote.

Ask yourself if many O'Malley voters might have stayed home instead of voting. Had O'Malley stilll been running and their voters came out, you'd have had higher vote totals and arguably Bernie could have had similar numbers then.

[George II]

18. Pssst...the population of the United States grows every minute, hour, day, month, year.

Sanders still, in his 35+ year political career, has still never gotten more than 207,000 votes.

[Bryce Butler]

23. Not True...

2012 Vermont Senate election: 207,848 votes

[JonLeibowitz]

27. Nicely done.

[moondust]

20. Thank you.

Was disappointed that Rachel didn't mention this in her nasty little hit job on Bernie's "revolution," citing lower total Democratic turnout in NH and IA.

[SoapBox]

22. Rachel needs the Twitterverse to get on her case.

She needs to hear from the 99%, which she is obviously not involved with...what a crushing disappointment she's become.

[moondust]

25. I guess.

I don't do Twitter so I don't really know how that works. Maybe she's been pressured by the network to toe the corporate line. Maybe they've threatened her. She's obviously very familiar with all the liberal shows they've taken off the air.

[MoreGOPoop]

21. Righteous!

[appalachiablue]

24. K& R. Rachel..so it's confirmed another one bites the progressive dust.

[warrprayer]

28. ...

[warrprayer]

26. You think the one percenters aren't going to

Pull out all the stops against a canidate like Bernie?
Brace yourself for much, much worse.