2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWe need Bernie's "political revolution" RIGHT FUCKING NOW!
It can't wait.
Bernie has been in Congress for 25 years and he promises a revolution when he's elected.
Screw that. We need it right fucking now.
Bernie Sanders is a current member of the Senate. He needs to bring his political revolution to the table and get Obama's SCOTUS nominee confirmed in the Senate.
He needs to demonstrate that this "political revolution" is for real.
Not only will it help Obama and the Democratic Party, but it will help his election prospects.
The time is now, Bernie.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)This is far too important an issue to reduce our dignity by being petty.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)californiabernin
(421 posts)The revolution depends on we the people getting out the vote and holding our leaders accountable.
merrily
(45,251 posts)substantive bill or amendment that she wrote, not even either one of her two unconstitutional flag burning bills--and she was a "real" Democrat. Sanders did much better. Among other things he founded the Progressive Caucus the very first year he got to the House.
polly7
(20,582 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)...this week, at least.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... can't sing enough praises about Obama?
He's gone from Obama is weak and rightward and gone from having racilized bomb throwers like Bigga and West in his crew to now it's "just some criticisms" ...
Bernie Sanders, despite what his mouth says, can't throw stones
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but Bernie didn't say Obama was weak.
"Sanders has critiqued Obama and used those words to describe the feelings of Americans, or to describe Obamas policies. But Sanders did not specifically call Obama "weak" and "a disappointment."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/12/hillary-clinton/did-bernie-sanders-call-president-barack-obama-wea/
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... done great with the 2nd most historically gerrymandered GOP congress in US history.
Looking at what Obama has to deal with and looking at what he's against Obama in no way has been weak with congress.
Good or even adequate at times?
No...
Over all weak in negotiations?!!!?!?
That doesn't seam rational
There's little justifying Sanders consummate Obama bashing but now he's clinging to him like static charged clothes.
That's not authentic at all
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)Clinton voted for Dick Durbin alternative plan, which would make it against the law to damage the flag on federal land or with the intent of breaching the peace or intimidation, giving congress another choice instead of going down the constitutional amendment road. Laws can be changed by future congress and the courts, constitutional amendment's are forever
The 66-34 tally in favor of the amendment was one less than the two-thirds required. The House surpassed that threshold last year, 286-130.
The Senate also rejected an alternative put forward by assistant Democratic leader Dick Durbin of Illinois. It would have made it against the law to damage the flag on federal land or with the intent of breaching the peace or intimidation
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-rejects-flag-burning-amendment/
merrily
(45,251 posts)FYI: No constitutional amendment that was the slightest bit controversial has made it through ratification since Eisenhower was President. And, btw, the way to head off an undesirable constitutional amendment is not to save the right the trouble of getting it ratified. Not to mention that her bills were unconstitutional. But, it's all good because she could not get anything she wrote passed anyway. And if the amendment was so close, why couldn't she even get her billed passed? Why not put the bill in place while the amendment was getting ratified (in theory, anyway)?
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)38 state legislatures would of ratified a flag burning constitutional amendment
merrily
(45,251 posts)You added nothing that shows that the flag amendment would have been the one controversial thing to have been ratified in 65 years. Sorry, not buying it. Also, you failed to explain why her bill did not pass if the constitutional amendment were really so close to making it out of Congress and not just kabuki.
Bill Clinton had two tactics to justify the rightist stuff he did. One was to lobby Democrats hard, so he could later claim he had a veto-proof majority. The other was falsely claiming a constitutional amendment was imminent, as he did with DOMA.
Besides, the point is that she couldn't get any bill she wrote passed, not even one the right supposedly desired. Although her making two attempts to pass a patently unconstitutional law is disturbing as well.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)Your campaign moves on those quickly. :golfclap:
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... just as soon as "millions and millions of people" start it for him. He'll then be ready to step in at the appropriate moment.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Barring that, I won't take him seriously.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts).. in response to my posts is beyond childish - but I'm more than happy for you to keep demonstrating that for all to see.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You all can join now for the low low price of 20 easy payments of 19.99.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... his revolution.
If he did this would be a route, I don't think HRC would've jumped in the race
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)provided Obama picks a nominee that will fight for the ideas Bernie is pushing for.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Bernie has brought it to the people, Energizing youth to participate, Exposing MSM for their misinforming us about anything that exposes the 1%, their boss . I think he's doing fine with the Political Revolution by simply including Everyone in the American Dream, which presently is enjoyed by 12% , the 1% and the 11% made up of MSM and the people in government and industry willing to lie, steal, cheat and kill for them .
JudyM
(29,251 posts)Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Do you have a problem with that? Are you saying Obama can't do his job?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Obama will nominate someone, but we need Bernie's "political revolution" to help get the nominee CONFIRMED in the Senate where Bernie is currently a member.
Get it now?
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)We will have a nominee before this is over. Can we count on you now supporting Bernie since you now realize that his revolution is what this country needs?
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The primary and GE process.
Bernie has talked about this quite a bit. That if Bernie continues to win and galvanize support, this will build a coalition of engaged Ameticans that will demand change--led by Sanders as President.
Sanders has repeatedly said that no President can do this alone. "We the People have to demand it." That's the revolution--a president fighting like hell using the leverage of the American people to pass his agenda; our agenda.
I agree with Sanders when he said that Obama had awoken the American people. However, after Obama was elected he said, "I'll take it from here." Obama didn't activate his followers for political change. He chose to work with Republicans and compromise.
Although Obama accomplished a great deal, he did not parlay his crush of electoral support into a force for change.
Sanders intends to do that.
So, Sanders is in the process of building that revolution.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Come on guys ..... let's see the strength of the revolution with millions of people taking to the streets at the command of Bernie Sanders to get Obama's nominee get through the senate confirmation.
Let's go Bernie -- what are you waiting for? Give a command and get your millions of supporters swarm Washington and if it works, I may even vote for you!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)We've heard the talk, let's see some action.
Surely McConnell has a Facebook page.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)As I've been saying all along...all hat, no cattle.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... to march against the GOP obstruction to the point that they wont obstruct then...
Shit... I'd take a hard look
jfern
(5,204 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and condescension.
It's very ugly.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Obama is the President and Biden can work the Senate.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)or are you unwilling to practice what you preach?
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)The worst that can happen is that it doesn't materialize the way you Berners are hoping. The best that could happen is that you'll siphon supporters away from Hillary and Bernie can then defeat her. Let's see that revolution you supporters have been proselytizing for months now.
oasis
(49,389 posts)We're counting on you.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)SamKnause
(13,108 posts)They want full control.
Let's see just how much influence this family, DWS, and the DNC has.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)So where is it? Otherwise, that talk of a revolution is:
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)incremental change.
kath
(10,565 posts)But the appreciation of irony requires at least a reasonably high level of thought processes...
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)8 years of one of the most successful Democratic presidencies in modern history - NOW we need a political revolution.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)8 years of one of the most successful Democratic presidencies in modern history - NOW we need a political revolution.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)program more, Proposed NAFTA on steroids , YES WE ( 99% ) Need an escape from the Political Society made up of MSM , Industry and the scoundrels who woo us with Poetry & Platitudes, and then vote with themselves and 1% in mind . It's a revolution in thinking instead of listening the Chris Mathews of the world, who are sullied with $$$$$ .Yes we do .
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)8 years of one of the most successful Democratic presidencies in modern history - NOW we need a political revolution.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)8 years of one of the most successful Democratic presidencies in modern history - NOW we need a political revolution.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)You suddenly decide he has to do something RFN in the Senate...
Ahhhhh... Here's another moment!
randome
(34,845 posts)...now believe him to be the greatest thing since puppies were invented.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)I like Bernie, but his revolution is a chimera. If he really wanted to bring about a revolution, he should have been building a movement for at least the last 20 years, by helping progressives get elected on all levels of politics. How do you think the GOP got the power they have? They started with school boards.