2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)1. Elect me
2. ???
3. End of racism
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)LexVegas
(6,094 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)have you been thinking about John Lewis this way?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Anyone?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Step 1: Win the primary by declaring all left wing white people who don't vote for her to be evil and racist.
Step 2: Despite what occurred in step 1, we all come together and vote for a candidate that fundamentally disagrees with us on almost every major issue, along with independent voters who will no longer hate and distrust her for some reason.
Step 3: 8 years of status quo Republican-Clinton gridlock
Step 4: No more racism.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)That ought to do it.
olddots
(10,237 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)...should be to get rid of that thinking's effect on others ability to have life liberty and pursuit of happiness within a structure of law
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Ya see, all this complaining about how Sanders' only plan is to restore some semblance of economic justice is that way because IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to legislate racism away.
Let me repeat that: It is impossible to legislate racism away.
So the crying about how Sanders doesn't get it is ridiculous. Because it is impossible to legislate racism away
jfern
(5,204 posts)Oh wait, it's not 1987 any more? Abort abort abort abort!
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I never knew about his official action about the top (4th) large star in Arkansas's state flag until I read about it here, and I couldn't believe it, because I never heard about it at the time, and I was an extremely politically active person in Arkansas in 1987. But I checked up on it, and, damn, he apparently did actually reaffirm what had apparently been tacitly understood by the neo-Confederates in the state since the 1920s-- that the big star above the state's name on the state flag represented the Confederacy. I had always thought it represented the USA.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Nice work, OP
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)All the criticism of Sanders -namely that he SUPPOSEDLY thinks that economic justice is all that is needed to help improve things for POC - suggests that there is some way to legislate racism away.
Sanders knows that economics can be tweaked, legal systems adjusted, but that racism cannot be legislated away.
This thread and the lack of answers is precisely why such criticism is bullshit.
So I ask a reasonable question to the Hillary supporters: If economic justice is not the way to imporve things for POC, then what is this theoretic way in which racism can be directly dealt with by the POTUS?
Surely you have some answer?
Oh, and what is the straw man?
That's 2 questions.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)that a focus on "economic justice" won't help minorities. Nor has anyone said that it's possible to legislate away racism. That's the strawman you're picking on.
The criticism of Bernie has been that his philosophy seems to be that the race problem is really a class problem, and that economic justice will cure the ills that plague minority communities.
Is that what Bernie really believes? I don't know for sure. I suspect that's what he thought at the beginning of the campaign, but I do give him credit for evolving, or at least appearing to evolve.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)There is absolutely no reason to think that other than that.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Maybe you can come to a better understanding if you made a thread that invited conversation rather than confrontation.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)saying it is racism. I have seen that "inference" here too many times. Yeah you can't legislate tone deafness on the internet, you can't give clueless people an empathy transplant.
You can't stop people from making smug little games out of life and death issues. And here it is.
There are actually ways to outlaw and or reduce discrimination. There are actually lots of studies, guidelines for best practices etc, that can guide people in building a better society.
But you actually have to care enough. This OP is a smug refusal to care out of some sort of bitterness. I am disturbed people give this bullshit a pass here, let alone rec it.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)especially when the first Coates article came out. Lottsa DUers arguing that the Sanders agenda was nothing but a white left epic fail when it comes to black lives. Hard trend to miss, a few weeks ago!
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)But that's not how I read the Coates debate at all.
Coates was simply saying that other parts of your agenda aren't necessarily constrained by current political reality, so why are your views on reperations subject to such concerns? I think it was Bernie's supporters that blew Coates out of proportion. I read it as very much a "friendly piece of advice" and was not shocked on the least bit when Coates said he would vote for Bernie.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)like they haven't been for indigenous nations or Japanese Americans. So I didn't think this issue was a good litmus test for whether Sanders supports a pro-black agenda, especially when his stance was no different than the other candidates and President Obama. And I also think it's true that reparations are more divisive than single payer, college access, etc. Also, the timing of the article was right at the start of Sanders' rise and directed at a core DEM constituency. So in a contested election with high stakes, prepare for blowback. A lot of Atlantic readers are also Sanders supporters too.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)If Coates' deceleration that he supports Bernie didn't make his intentions clear, Nothing will
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Notice how on DU Coates' original articles have gotten major traction and discussion, reinforcing the perception that Sanders is the white left's candidate. Comparatively, Michelle Alexander's critique of Clinton gets eye-rolling, and even Coates' interview on Democracy Now gets some traction but mostly yawns. Coates' intentions may have been to give the Sanders platform a healthy challenge from a black left perspective, but the effect has been to reinforce a rather one-sided view of Sanders' policy with regard to a black political agenda.
I know you wanted to end the discussion, so apologies for extending it a bit longer.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Check out his interview on Democracy Now!
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)to reform the private prison industry and the corrupt and violent police departments. There is a great thread on the board right now about Martin Luther King Jr. and how he supported not only social justice but also economic justice and how he even began to realize that to get real change we need radical change in the economic system as well as the social system. I really am beginning to believe that Bernie will never be able to do enough to please certain people.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Your whole THING is to point out that Sanders is some pie-in-the-sky panderer when he speaks to the needs of black people and some uncaring old white guy when he doesn't.
You complain that his economic focus won't eliminate racism. And... you're right! Because racism is an intractable social disease that can NOT be eliminated through legislation by any politician.
You are pissed, my dear, because this thread strikes directly at the unexamined flaws in your uni-directional criticism of Sanders.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Orrex
(63,224 posts)Because every time I do, something like this OP comes along and sets a new standard.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think I've finally stumbled across the lowest common denominator on DU.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)for doing nothing for black lives since he marched in the 60s? It's a political campaign with high stakes. Everyone gets to question candidate policy plans.
Orrex
(63,224 posts)It's a dumb question that satisfies the smug, self-congratulating type, but it's not actually a discussion.
So tell us: what is Sanders' plan to eradicate racism? How will he enact it? I'm sure that you have all the details, so please share.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Feel free to continue your harangue, though. You seem to be enjoying it.
Orrex
(63,224 posts)Thank you for your eager assistance and for making it so easy.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)You earned it!
Orrex
(63,224 posts)jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Plenty of time for a contested primary, focused on the issues as much as possible.
And, a Sanders platform is much better positioned to make a difference on issues of racial equality for a several key reasons: greater access to health and education services (single payer, free college), moving away from policies that create stark wealth divisions (real Wall Street regulation, minimum wage legislation, reducing the influences of Superpacs, the defense and financial lobby, and wealthy individuals over policy, more liberal/left economic thinkers in the administration, a large-scale public works initiative that increases employment and focuses on infrastructure), criminal justice reform (including marijuana decriminalization and increased community policing), and greater participation/engagement of people and communities in the political process (symbolized by the record number of small donors contributing to the Sanders campaign; also symbolized by avoiding divisive racial political statements and actions).
While neither campaign is going to eliminate racism, the policies I see in the Sanders platform can make a difference, and I'm motivated and excited to see these issues brought into a national spotlight like they haven't been even under Obama. I don't see the Clinton platform as being positioned nearly as well to make an impact on racism. But I'll be paying attention to the rest of the campaign in order to see if I'm off base, as I always do. I will continue to do organizing locally for Sanders as well, until or unless the Clinton campaign shows me that it's a better alternative.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)themaguffin
(3,826 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He knows that can't legislate away Racism. A real pragmatist takes the things that can be changed and works on them instead of bullshit about doing away with racism as Hillary does.
THAT is the point.
themaguffin
(3,826 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Good luck.
Nanjeanne
(4,975 posts)Make race such a divisive issue and seeing it happen in the Democratic Party makes me so incredibly sad.
Her desperation to be President has made the Party turn into one I can't even recognize. This tactic is probably the one that has pushed me from holding my nose to vote for her if she is the nominee - to saying thank goodness I live in a blue state so I don't have to pull any lever next to her name.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)This is exactly what is happening. HRC's ambition and hubris will bring us all down. No tactic is too low. Instead of turning that venom against the real racists in this country, she chooses to smear one of our own. Ugly.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Hillary sees PoC as a means to her own ends. Her record on such issues is abysmal, but she gets a free pass. Why? I have no clue.
There is a subset of her PoC supporters that seek to sink Sanders campaign. If they succeed, so be it, but they will be taking the brunt of the consequences if and when that happens, because Hillary Clinton cannot win a general election. They will have made their own bed and they will have to sleep in it. I will feel nothing for them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)but they think it's all about bigotry. and you can't stop people from giving you dirty looks- amiright, bro?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Really. Im just not gonna even act like this is anything unsual anymore. Look at this! I can smh but they'll just educate me on what my head should be doing.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Lay it out for us bettyellen.
IF YOU CAN.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)It just proves what many of us suspected!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)There are filthy, filthy liars here. Muckrakers -it should not surprise me.