2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA key reason young people don’t support Hillary Clinton? They don’t have daughters.
Here is one important explanation for why many young Democrats do not support Hillary Clinton: They have not yet parented a daughter.
A key reason young people dont support Hillary Clinton? They dont have daughters.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)That is a DUzy right there.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Got it.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)rather than explanatory
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)that people who have less daughters are less responsive to feminism. Gee, looks like someone might have to tell the mothers of these children, many of whom you can find at the Bernie rallies.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Telling voters that they are just too stupid and/or naive to really understand Hillary is probably the worst camping strategy since ever.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Haha haha. Pathetic.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)So very Mark Penn-ish.
And stunning.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Hi Ruby!!!
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Was JUST thinking about you the other day. Eerie.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)And you were my first heart given this season.
Wig Master
(95 posts)speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)because they're paying off loans to the same banks that launched Hillary to the Senate and hire her to speak.
On the other hand they don't want to be sent to Central Asia by a Republican supported by the defense industry and come back maimed.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)and no jobs, big ass loans, AND, they don't know her. When Hillary was running in 08, they were 10 yrs old! When she was first lady, they were busy being born. They don't know the Clinton's and can only look at their record. They don't like what they see. They are not rock stars in their world! Hardly.
Perogie
(687 posts)My favorite response to the article.....
Voting for Hillary because she is a female is like eating poo because it looks like a Tootsie Roll.
The desperation to get people to like her is so sad
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Stop vilifying Bernie supporters, you're going to need us if she wins the nomination and the constant deluge of stomach turning propaganda is making me less and less likely to vote for her come November.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Response to PonyUp (Reply #14)
elehhhhna This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Even with all the "ifs, buts, possiblies, maybes, and could bes" in that article, it still doesn't add up to what the headline claims.
WaPo has been scraping the bottom to shill for Hill lately.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Thank you for the laugh. I'll have to tell my two daughters about this article. lol
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)You guys are really trying hard to be relevant.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...and the father of a daughter. GO BERNIE!
NowSam
(1,252 posts)Case closed.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)WTF has HRC DONE?
Sure, she lived through the 'bad old days' ... so did a lot of us. I'm black and in my sixties, so I remember the double whammy of race and gender. Gender is no reason to vote for HER. She's the wrong woman.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)Maybe you need a refresher on Hillary's history! So for your edification, here goes:
First off, she rode Bill's coattails to power. He had the intellect (Georgetown Univ, Yale Law), charisma and natural ability to connect with people. Sure, she was smart, too (Wellesley, Yale Law), but that's it. After law school, she went to DC to work on the Nixon impeachment committee, but didn't last long in DC because she didn't pass the DC bar. She tells the story that she went to work for the Children's Defense Fund, but isn't it interesting that neither Marian Wright Edelman, it's founder, or Peter Edelman her husband who resigned his Clinton administration post over the Welfare 'Deform' Act have spoken on her behalf.
Anyway, back to the narrative. What did she do after leaving DC... she ran off to Arkansas! She chased after Bill because she recognized his rising star. He became governor and then POTUS and only through him, was she introduced to the nation.
When she ran for POTUS in 2008, she cited her 20 years of experience. Really?! First Lady of AK for 12 years and FLOTUS for 8 years. Oh, and she was a corporate lawyer at the Rose Law Firm where her client was Walmart -- that champion of women -- and where she relied heavily on Vince Foster.
Moving on, she could never have carpet bagged her way to the NY Senate seat had she not been FLOTUS. And her senate record is what? Aye votes for IWR, the Patriot Act and Bush's bankruptcy bill. They sure helped women!
Then there was her abysmal management and nasty conduct during the 2008 primary campaign. She was entitled, she was "in it to win it" and so arrogant that she claimed it would be over by Super Tuesday. But when it wasn't and she was losing, she resorted to the kitchen sink. She praised McCain and derided Obama as someone who gave pretty speeches. Despite the Party urging her to bow out gracefully, she said that she was going to stay in the race through the CA primary because "you never know... remember Bobby Kennedy..." Her insinuation (a rather veiled wish) that Obama might be assassinated like RFK was beyond classless and tasteless. It was evil. And when she finally, gracelessly bowed out, she did so on condition that the Obama people and DNC pay off her campaign debt. Some management skills, just like her Wall Street benefactors who f--- things up and then expect others pay for the disaster created.
As an aside, I was appalled that BHO chose her for SOS, but I think he'd been inspired by Lincoln's team of rivals and wanted to keep her busy and away. In so doing, she couldn't be a quasi-backbencher sniping at him. Yet, in the end, in that position, she was also terrible. Honduras, Libya and Syria are a mess. But HRC, the pro-MIC corporatist, never saw a war she didn't like. And last I checked, war is not good for women, children or men!
Hillary is nothing, and would have been nothing, without powerful men around or behind her. Her experience is largely derived from having married Bill; and her judgment when she has power has been awful.
She is also part of the Clinton legacy (the two for one, the 8 years of experience): DLC, NAFTA, Telecommunications Bill of 1996, Welfare Reform (not), and overturning Glass-Steagall! She and Bill kept Alan Greenspan at the Fed, placed the then Mr. Goldman Sucks Robert Reuben as head of treasury and hired as financial advisor that abominable Wall Streeter Larry Summers (who lost a $billion from Harvard's endowment!). We the people (the little people, lots of women) reaped the whirlwind of the 1999 Commodities Modernization Act which ended Glass-Steagall and which every repuke in the Senate voted for while every Dem -- save one -- voted NAY. But Bill signed it into law anyway, paying no heed to the Dems who said that this law would lead to disaster 10 years hence. Sure enough it did, harming women and families throughout the land. And Wall Street, Hillary's BFF, continues to be such a benefactor for women!
This is HRC's history, so please tell me, WTF has she done that is positive or constructive? She's in it for herself, she plays sexist gender politics, she lies about her alleged record, changes her mind with the political winds, and she is the worst sort of Democrat... a founder of the DLC and a triangulator to her core.
Don't tell me I need to do my homework; take off your rose-colored HRC glasses.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:08 PM - Edit history (1)
I agree she often gets a pass on the fact that most of her experience comes form being "Bill's wife," as if that was some sort of accomplishment of hers.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)I live in SC and I'm spreading this info far and wide as we approach the SC primary (2/27).
I am so tired of unfounded remarks about Hillary's leadership, experience and record. I am also tired of hearing that she's electable.
I am especially tired of some of my generation of women -- sadly even some of my friends -- who are considering voting for her because just she's a woman and it's about time. WTF?!
Bernie 2016!
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)I will not ever vote for someone because they share (or don't share) my gender, sexual orientation, skin tone, whatever.
It is about your principles & actions. Period.
Good luck in spreading the word. I know it is hard.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and Peter Edelman HAVE spoken on her behalf, despite their disagreement on welfare policy.
CDF is pleased to recognize Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has been a tireless voice for children. Shes brilliant. She cares deeply about children. She perseveres. Shes an incredibly hard worker, and she stays with it. Shes done extraordinarily well in everything shes ever done. and Im just so proud of her, said Marian Wright Edelman, President of the Childrens Defense Fund.
- See more at: http://www.childrensdefense.org/newsroom/cdf-in-the-news/press-releases/2013/honoring-hillary-clinton.html#sthash.r8Y7OHHc.dpuf
She would have been discovered no matter what happened, says Peter Edelman, but he gave her one of her first big breaks.
Not sure I want to fact check the rest of it- stopped reading after that drivel about following her man to Arkansas. That is what you come up with when asked about her record on women's issues?
Fuck the lurid gossip and Vince Foster reference, it's RW trash.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)She went to Arkansas before they were married, so yes, she chased after him. So many women say she could have done anything, been anything on her own and that she made Bill. But au contraire, she is where she is because of him.
Typical to dismiss what doesn't conform to your view! But I am right about her votes, the wreckage she left in her wake at State and her coziness with Wall Street. And you have yet to prove what she's done that illustrates she's a fighter for anyone else beside herself and her ambition.
BTW... that CDF press release is dated 2013!
There have been crickets thus far in 2016!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)learning about her long record of advocacy on women's issues. I called you on your ignorance on her accomplishments, and you posted lies and gossip as 2/3 of your response.
Yeah, as I said, you need to do your homework. If you are going to stump for Bernie you need to have relevant information about the candidate- not back biting personal gossip and veiled references to Vince Foster. That was a real classy little non sequitur.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)I have called you on your ignorance of facts. You just can't handle the truth. HRC's advocacy consists of speeches and her say so. What has she DONE... enrich herself and pad her resume.
BTW, unlike your empty posts, fellow DUers have recommended that I make mine an OP. I was initially responding to another poster when you stuck your insulting reply in, but answering/refuting your nonsense is a waste of my time.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)an OP though please. And research the candidates beyond People magazine, please.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)It deserves the recs.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)expand on how she had to "follow" her future husband like a geisha, LOL. Yeah, then it will go over real big.
But fix the Edelman lies first.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)Did you notice be's comment that I correct my Edelman lies. What hooey? She cited a CDF release from 2013 that says nothing about the 2016 race. Neither Edelman has yet to come out and publicly endorse HRC. Guess they don't wish to demean and disgrace themselves the way Steinem and Albright (all wrong) have.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)such as some people do not speak for all bernie supporters,
but Lord do those like we have seen (not naming any names of course)show a vicious and outright authoritarian streak, combining all the "how darest thou" of preachers and all the efficiency of Mao's red Guards.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Bless it.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)my right to post as much of this crap as I can."
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)you won't, because you can't.
Just more shit being shoveled by the hacks at HRC's secret lair.
EmperorHasNoClothes
(4,797 posts)THE key reason so many people of all ages don't support is because of what she has said and what she has done. Nothing more, nothing less. Speculative claptrap like this doesn't shed light on anything.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)unapatriciated
(5,390 posts)I have four children and one is omg female...and guess what both of us, my sister and four daughter-inlaws support Sanders. No that is not a mis-type...I have four daughter-laws.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)...Establishment. It's like they think my crack about forgetting to tell the youth they were only teasing about all those promises is just a joke or a one-liner instead of a somewhat humorous explanation for a disgusting trend that they did to themselves.
No, it has nothing to do with daughters. It has to do with authenticity. She has none. Few of the Priesthood do.
"In related news, the reason the youth doesn't vote for Hillary is because there are fewer pirates flying the Jolly Roger on wooden boats these days! Check out this graph that shows there are fewer pirates!"
Edit: It also occurs to me, in hindsight, to add that most of them are quite literate at media, since it's been being used to try to control them for years. Unfortunately, they learned your tactics and learned them for a new medium that you can't even begin to grasp. Bad call, sunshine.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)political theater poster was gone for a while?
I don't know how many ways you can frame Bernie or his supporters but I find it very sad that your candidate is so difficult that this is how you have to fight.
Day after day.
There are MANY reasons to dislike Hillary. I don't even have the time to post them all. You cannot make her look good like this. You also cannot change the dialog, if this is indeed one of the reasons perhaps she should have thought about reaching them in ways that were palatable and addressed their concerns rather than addressing everything with a me or an I.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I am supporting Bernie because of them - because I want them to actually have a future.
This ridiculous explanation is just another attack on young women. They're not voting for Hillary because they don't trust her.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I think the main reason younger voters are supporting Bernie is that he has promised them a lot of things, like free college, Medicare for all, higher wages, etc. These are all things that younger voters would be attracted to. They may not realize that those things are not going to come as soon as they think they will. It will take years to get a congress that will help Bernie pass those kind of things, and may not come to be during a two term presidency if Bernie were to win the WH.
gelatinous cube
(50 posts)does not matter to me. I realize that it will not be instantaneous, that it will require time an effort, but every journey starts with a single step. Is the alternative any better? "It's going to take too long/ it's too hard, so let's not try at all". Sorry, but giving up or not trying is hardly an option.
I don't care if I don't get free college. I don't care if I don't get single-payer health care within 8 years. I don't care if I'm not paid $15 for my first full-time job. But I do care if my sons or daughters and everyone else lives in a polluted world, being paid $7.60 and getting loans that will last a lifetime because I never bothered to fight for change. I support Bernie, whether or not I receive immediate benefits from it. I am not the only person who exists, or will exist, and I have a responsibility to them too.
Let's change something. Go Bernie.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Hillary is a deeply compromised candidate. That is all.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)I don't want to send this message to girls:
Any girl can grow up to be president in America. First step is to find and marry a man who will be president first!
dana_b
(11,546 posts)I have a 26 y.o. daughter, I'm a woman, she supports Bernie, I support Bernie, her two best female friends support Bernie, my sister and her daughter support Bernie... I guess we're all sexists!!
jillan
(39,451 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)there's not much left unless you really want to get nasty.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)About $400m in corporate contributions during her family's political career.
NAFTA
Subprime lending
Welfare "reform"
PATRIOT Act
Iraq War
PATRIOT Act Part 2
Bank bailouts
Robert Rubin
Larry Summers
John Podesta
Only POTUS candidate in history with an open FBI investigation.
This ludicrous claim that corporate contributions only corrupts the Republicans.
Insulting the intelligence of younger voters.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)Foiled by boys yet again!
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Are you flipping kidding me! Clinton means status quo and watching our democracy descend into corporate hell! Sanders is our chance for our daughter to have a decent future!
Many of these young women who are voting for Bernie may very well be mothers!
Some of them may not be mothers, but they are all concerned about the future, for sure--which is why they're Supporting Sanders and running as far from Clinton as they can get!
It's odd. This talking point is suggesting that there's something "off" or deficient about these women because they are for Sanders. An overwhelming 84 percent majority of them are supporting Sanders. There's CLEARLY something wrong with Hillary Clinton!
tblue37
(65,405 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)I have an adult daughter, my sister has an adult daughter and my best friend has an adult daughter and we are ALL voting for Bernie! I guess that makes the three of us stupid, anti feminists who are filling our daughters' empty heads with self loathing and sexist rhetoric.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts).....we both are "feeling the Bern".
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)( saw Blazing Saddles (again) on the big screen last week - such a treat!)
jfern
(5,204 posts)Just LOL at that argument!
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)Doesn't explain the number of Boomer women I know who have daughters and granddaughters who are supporting Bernie - but I'm sure someone will come up with an explanation.
jen63
(813 posts)Steinem's remark was offensive to me. She not only disparaged millennial women, but also the mothers and grandmothers who raised them. Those young women didn't just appear through a vacuum.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I have a son and a daughter and I'm female.
What kind of psychobabble is this?
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)I mean Gloria Steinem said that young women are literally only able to think about sex and getting laid.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But nice try.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)and I support Senator Sanders.
Skinner
(63,645 posts)It never really crossed my mind that there might be a correlation between having a daughter and supporting Hillary. But I guess it makes sense. Doesn't appear to be an insignificant effect either.
formernaderite
(2,436 posts)and grand babies of both sexes... that's why my wife and I are Both supporting Bernie!