Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kennetha

(3,666 posts)
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:44 PM Feb 2016

A key reason young people don’t support Hillary Clinton? They don’t have daughters.


Theories abound about why young voters in general, and young women in particular, do not support Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries. Such speculation will surely intensify after the New Hampshire primary, where Clinton won only 16 percent among 18- to 29-year-olds en route to losing to Bernie Sanders.

Here is one important explanation for why many young Democrats do not support Hillary Clinton: They have not yet parented a daughter.

A key reason young people don’t support Hillary Clinton? They don’t have daughters.
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A key reason young people don’t support Hillary Clinton? They don’t have daughters. (Original Post) kennetha Feb 2016 OP
Lmao horseshit. elehhhhna Feb 2016 #1
statistical analysis -- nothing more, nothing less kennetha Feb 2016 #5
...a lot less, actually. cyberswede Feb 2016 #8
Random bullshit more like elehhhhna Feb 2016 #13
So... right along with lies and damn lies? FBaggins Feb 2016 #32
Sure, but many statistical correlations are meaningless. OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #53
with a heavy implying DonCoquixote Feb 2016 #66
Was that a kitchen sink I just saw go whizzing by? Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #11
It seems like they've gone past the kitchens and into the water closets--now throwing the bowls. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #30
we better start to duck! nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #35
And all the food dust in it. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #71
Next they will be saying it is because we have few than 3 cats per household. nt artislife Feb 2016 #64
More condescending nonsense DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #2
that's just statistical analysis kennetha Feb 2016 #4
Not proving causation derp elehhhhna Feb 2016 #10
And yet they keep doubling down on it Ruby the Liberal Feb 2016 #6
With some Dick Morris too Paulie Feb 2016 #17
Who could forget the toe aficionado? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2016 #41
I did too. How could I not, you're my sig line! Paulie Feb 2016 #49
A lot of young people are delaying family formation because they can't afford it Wig Master Feb 2016 #3
and they can't afford it speaktruthtopower Feb 2016 #24
WOW, do you believe this? More so they don't have daughters due to NAFTA ViseGrip Feb 2016 #7
The comments are priceless Perogie Feb 2016 #9
What a crock of shit. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #12
Bullshit. I have both and sure as hell don't want my sons fighting one of Hillary's wars. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author elehhhhna Feb 2016 #18
Yeegads... Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2016 #15
+1 OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #54
. Autumn Feb 2016 #16
Horse manure farleftlib Feb 2016 #19
Too Funny noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #20
Awwwwew.... R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #21
I'm just barely outside that demographic... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #22
I have a daughter and Choose Bernie NowSam Feb 2016 #23
What crap Carolina Feb 2016 #25
For women? Maybe you should do some research because this shit is embarrassing. bettyellen Feb 2016 #29
Oh really? Carolina Feb 2016 #51
This is a really good post and deserves a response. OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #57
Thanks, OwR Carolina Feb 2016 #60
Agree 100% OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #63
So there is nothing about women because you couldn't find the negative? Both Marian Wright bettyellen Feb 2016 #61
Drivel? Try again. Carolina Feb 2016 #67
I'm not interested in listen to your study of her personal life since it proves you have avoided bettyellen Feb 2016 #72
Pathetic Carolina Feb 2016 #75
Your summary of her career reads like a Lifetime movie. Refute your own inaccuracies before making bettyellen Feb 2016 #82
please make this it's own op DonCoquixote Feb 2016 #65
Well if she fixes the lies about MWE- and maybe add more about Vince Foster and off course bettyellen Feb 2016 #73
Thanks DC! Carolina Feb 2016 #78
such people do nto speak for all Clinton supporters DonCoquixote Feb 2016 #81
c'mon H2O Man Feb 2016 #26
Your heart Fumesucker Feb 2016 #27
"I don't have any facts to back this up...but I will defend to the end of my keyboard islandmkl Feb 2016 #28
Absolute and complete BS. Show me a causal relationship... Yurovsky Feb 2016 #31
Yet again, way off the mark. EmperorHasNoClothes Feb 2016 #33
Aw, those daughters would be millennials. You might want to look at those numbers. Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #34
bs unapatriciated Feb 2016 #36
It's funny as hell that the 'professionals' can't figure out why the youth have turned on the... Shandris Feb 2016 #37
I thought the major MuseRider Feb 2016 #38
Nope. That's not it. I have three grown daughters. Avalux Feb 2016 #39
I don't agree with that Andy823 Feb 2016 #40
Whether or not these changes comes soon gelatinous cube Feb 2016 #44
The gender of the voter doesn't matter, the gender of the voter's children doesn't matter. farleftlib Feb 2016 #42
Sorry, I can't see electing Hillary as a good lesson for girls Dems to Win Feb 2016 #43
bullcrap dana_b Feb 2016 #45
Lol! That's good! I am old and I have daughters and I support Bernie. OH NO! jillan Feb 2016 #46
What you going to toss out next? hobbit709 Feb 2016 #47
This phenomenon only appears to kick in at the granddaughter stage. n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2016 #48
Nah... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #50
Curses! Glamrock Feb 2016 #52
***My two daughters are WHY I support Sanders!*** CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #55
I am an old ady with a daughter--and I support Bernie! nt tblue37 Feb 2016 #56
This is so insulting and condescending dana_b Feb 2016 #58
I have a 26 year old daughter Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #59
Garbage is too nice a word for this post n/t tokenlib Feb 2016 #62
Well, here's the most appropriate response to this post: kath Feb 2016 #87
Young women don't understand young women because they don't have a daughter? jfern Feb 2016 #68
I believe it sums it up dflprincess Feb 2016 #69
This is also why jen63 Feb 2016 #86
What crap. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #70
Won't these young women just be too darn slutty and vote for Sanders? JPnoodleman Feb 2016 #74
I have a daughter, and I support Senator Sanders. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #76
Lame. nt leveymg Feb 2016 #77
I have three grown daughters, Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #79
Interesting. Skinner Feb 2016 #80
I have daughters AND sons formernaderite Feb 2016 #83
Madeline... Is that you? TipTok Feb 2016 #84
I have a teenager daughter and support Bernie. What the heck? Land Shark Feb 2016 #85

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
66. with a heavy implying
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:30 PM
Feb 2016

that people who have less daughters are less responsive to feminism. Gee, looks like someone might have to tell the mothers of these children, many of whom you can find at the Bernie rallies.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
2. More condescending nonsense
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:48 PM
Feb 2016

Telling voters that they are just too stupid and/or naive to really understand Hillary is probably the worst camping strategy since ever.

speaktruthtopower

(800 posts)
24. and they can't afford it
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:26 PM
Feb 2016

because they're paying off loans to the same banks that launched Hillary to the Senate and hire her to speak.

On the other hand they don't want to be sent to Central Asia by a Republican supported by the defense industry and come back maimed.

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
7. WOW, do you believe this? More so they don't have daughters due to NAFTA
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016

and no jobs, big ass loans, AND, they don't know her. When Hillary was running in 08, they were 10 yrs old! When she was first lady, they were busy being born. They don't know the Clinton's and can only look at their record. They don't like what they see. They are not rock stars in their world! Hardly.

Perogie

(687 posts)
9. The comments are priceless
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

My favorite response to the article.....

Voting for Hillary because she is a female is like eating poo because it looks like a Tootsie Roll.

The desperation to get people to like her is so sad

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
12. What a crock of shit.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

Stop vilifying Bernie supporters, you're going to need us if she wins the nomination and the constant deluge of stomach turning propaganda is making me less and less likely to vote for her come November.


Response to PonyUp (Reply #14)

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
19. Horse manure
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:04 PM
Feb 2016

Even with all the "ifs, buts, possiblies, maybes, and could bes" in that article, it still doesn't add up to what the headline claims.

WaPo has been scraping the bottom to shill for Hill lately.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
25. What crap
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016

WTF has HRC DONE?

Sure, she lived through the 'bad old days' ... so did a lot of us. I'm black and in my sixties, so I remember the double whammy of race and gender. Gender is no reason to vote for HER. She's the wrong woman.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
51. Oh really?
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:25 PM
Feb 2016

Maybe you need a refresher on Hillary's history! So for your edification, here goes:

First off, she rode Bill's coattails to power. He had the intellect (Georgetown Univ, Yale Law), charisma and natural ability to connect with people. Sure, she was smart, too (Wellesley, Yale Law), but that's it. After law school, she went to DC to work on the Nixon impeachment committee, but didn't last long in DC because she didn't pass the DC bar. She tells the story that she went to work for the Children's Defense Fund, but isn't it interesting that neither Marian Wright Edelman, it's founder, or Peter Edelman her husband who resigned his Clinton administration post over the Welfare 'Deform' Act have spoken on her behalf.

Anyway, back to the narrative. What did she do after leaving DC... she ran off to Arkansas! She chased after Bill because she recognized his rising star. He became governor and then POTUS and only through him, was she introduced to the nation.

When she ran for POTUS in 2008, she cited her 20 years of experience. Really?! First Lady of AK for 12 years and FLOTUS for 8 years. Oh, and she was a corporate lawyer at the Rose Law Firm where her client was Walmart -- that champion of women -- and where she relied heavily on Vince Foster.

Moving on, she could never have carpet bagged her way to the NY Senate seat had she not been FLOTUS. And her senate record is what? Aye votes for IWR, the Patriot Act and Bush's bankruptcy bill. They sure helped women!

Then there was her abysmal management and nasty conduct during the 2008 primary campaign. She was entitled, she was "in it to win it" and so arrogant that she claimed it would be over by Super Tuesday. But when it wasn't and she was losing, she resorted to the kitchen sink. She praised McCain and derided Obama as someone who gave pretty speeches. Despite the Party urging her to bow out gracefully, she said that she was going to stay in the race through the CA primary because "you never know... remember Bobby Kennedy..." Her insinuation (a rather veiled wish) that Obama might be assassinated like RFK was beyond classless and tasteless. It was evil. And when she finally, gracelessly bowed out, she did so on condition that the Obama people and DNC pay off her campaign debt. Some management skills, just like her Wall Street benefactors who f--- things up and then expect others pay for the disaster created.

As an aside, I was appalled that BHO chose her for SOS, but I think he'd been inspired by Lincoln's team of rivals and wanted to keep her busy and away. In so doing, she couldn't be a quasi-backbencher sniping at him. Yet, in the end, in that position, she was also terrible. Honduras, Libya and Syria are a mess. But HRC, the pro-MIC corporatist, never saw a war she didn't like. And last I checked, war is not good for women, children or men!

Hillary is nothing, and would have been nothing, without powerful men around or behind her. Her experience is largely derived from having married Bill; and her judgment when she has power has been awful.

She is also part of the Clinton legacy (the two for one, the 8 years of experience): DLC, NAFTA, Telecommunications Bill of 1996, Welfare Reform (not), and overturning Glass-Steagall! She and Bill kept Alan Greenspan at the Fed, placed the then Mr. Goldman Sucks Robert Reuben as head of treasury and hired as financial advisor that abominable Wall Streeter Larry Summers (who lost a $billion from Harvard's endowment!). We the people (the little people, lots of women) reaped the whirlwind of the 1999 Commodities Modernization Act which ended Glass-Steagall and which every repuke in the Senate voted for while every Dem -- save one -- voted NAY. But Bill signed it into law anyway, paying no heed to the Dems who said that this law would lead to disaster 10 years hence. Sure enough it did, harming women and families throughout the land. And Wall Street, Hillary's BFF, continues to be such a benefactor for women!

This is HRC's history, so please tell me, WTF has she done that is positive or constructive? She's in it for herself, she plays sexist gender politics, she lies about her alleged record, changes her mind with the political winds, and she is the worst sort of Democrat... a founder of the DLC and a triangulator to her core.

Don't tell me I need to do my homework; take off your rose-colored HRC glasses.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
57. This is a really good post and deserves a response.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:36 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:08 PM - Edit history (1)

I agree she often gets a pass on the fact that most of her experience comes form being "Bill's wife," as if that was some sort of accomplishment of hers.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
60. Thanks, OwR
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:55 PM
Feb 2016

I live in SC and I'm spreading this info far and wide as we approach the SC primary (2/27).

I am so tired of unfounded remarks about Hillary's leadership, experience and record. I am also tired of hearing that she's electable.

I am especially tired of some of my generation of women -- sadly even some of my friends -- who are considering voting for her because just she's a woman and it's about time. WTF?!

Bernie 2016!

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
63. Agree 100%
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:11 PM
Feb 2016

I will not ever vote for someone because they share (or don't share) my gender, sexual orientation, skin tone, whatever.

It is about your principles & actions. Period.

Good luck in spreading the word. I know it is hard.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
61. So there is nothing about women because you couldn't find the negative? Both Marian Wright
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:03 PM
Feb 2016

and Peter Edelman HAVE spoken on her behalf, despite their disagreement on welfare policy.

“CDF is pleased to recognize Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has been a tireless voice for children. She’s brilliant. She cares deeply about children. She perseveres. She’s an incredibly hard worker, and she stays with it. She’s done extraordinarily well in everything she’s ever done. and I’m just so proud of her,” said Marian Wright Edelman, President of the Children’s Defense Fund.

- See more at: http://www.childrensdefense.org/newsroom/cdf-in-the-news/press-releases/2013/honoring-hillary-clinton.html#sthash.r8Y7OHHc.dpuf

“She would have been discovered no matter what happened,” says Peter Edelman, but he gave her one of her first big breaks.

Not sure I want to fact check the rest of it- stopped reading after that drivel about following her man to Arkansas. That is what you come up with when asked about her record on women's issues?
Fuck the lurid gossip and Vince Foster reference, it's RW trash.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
67. Drivel? Try again.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:35 PM
Feb 2016

She went to Arkansas before they were married, so yes, she chased after him. So many women say she could have done anything, been anything on her own and that she made Bill. But au contraire, she is where she is because of him.

Typical to dismiss what doesn't conform to your view! But I am right about her votes, the wreckage she left in her wake at State and her coziness with Wall Street. And you have yet to prove what she's done that illustrates she's a fighter for anyone else beside herself and her ambition.

BTW... that CDF press release is dated 2013!
There have been crickets thus far in 2016!



 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
72. I'm not interested in listen to your study of her personal life since it proves you have avoided
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:14 PM
Feb 2016

learning about her long record of advocacy on women's issues. I called you on your ignorance on her accomplishments, and you posted lies and gossip as 2/3 of your response.
Yeah, as I said, you need to do your homework. If you are going to stump for Bernie you need to have relevant information about the candidate- not back biting personal gossip and veiled references to Vince Foster. That was a real classy little non sequitur.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
75. Pathetic
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:37 PM
Feb 2016

I have called you on your ignorance of facts. You just can't handle the truth. HRC's advocacy consists of speeches and her say so. What has she DONE... enrich herself and pad her resume.

BTW, unlike your empty posts, fellow DUers have recommended that I make mine an OP. I was initially responding to another poster when you stuck your insulting reply in, but answering/refuting your nonsense is a waste of my time.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
82. Your summary of her career reads like a Lifetime movie. Refute your own inaccuracies before making
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:25 AM
Feb 2016

an OP though please. And research the candidates beyond People magazine, please.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
73. Well if she fixes the lies about MWE- and maybe add more about Vince Foster and off course
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

expand on how she had to "follow" her future husband like a geisha, LOL. Yeah, then it will go over real big.
But fix the Edelman lies first.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
78. Thanks DC!
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:47 PM
Feb 2016

Did you notice be's comment that I correct my Edelman lies. What hooey? She cited a CDF release from 2013 that says nothing about the 2016 race. Neither Edelman has yet to come out and publicly endorse HRC. Guess they don't wish to demean and disgrace themselves the way Steinem and Albright (all wrong) have.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
81. such people do nto speak for all Clinton supporters
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:16 AM
Feb 2016

such as some people do not speak for all bernie supporters,

but Lord do those like we have seen (not naming any names of course)show a vicious and outright authoritarian streak, combining all the "how darest thou" of preachers and all the efficiency of Mao's red Guards.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
28. "I don't have any facts to back this up...but I will defend to the end of my keyboard
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:31 PM
Feb 2016

my right to post as much of this crap as I can."

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
31. Absolute and complete BS. Show me a causal relationship...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:34 PM
Feb 2016

you won't, because you can't.

Just more shit being shoveled by the hacks at HRC's secret lair.

EmperorHasNoClothes

(4,797 posts)
33. Yet again, way off the mark.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:36 PM
Feb 2016

THE key reason so many people of all ages don't support is because of what she has said and what she has done. Nothing more, nothing less. Speculative claptrap like this doesn't shed light on anything.

unapatriciated

(5,390 posts)
36. bs
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:39 PM
Feb 2016

I have four children and one is omg female...and guess what both of us, my sister and four daughter-inlaws support Sanders. No that is not a mis-type...I have four daughter-laws.

 

Shandris

(3,447 posts)
37. It's funny as hell that the 'professionals' can't figure out why the youth have turned on the...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:44 PM
Feb 2016

...Establishment. It's like they think my crack about forgetting to tell the youth they were only teasing about all those promises is just a joke or a one-liner instead of a somewhat humorous explanation for a disgusting trend that they did to themselves.

No, it has nothing to do with daughters. It has to do with authenticity. She has none. Few of the Priesthood do.

"In related news, the reason the youth doesn't vote for Hillary is because there are fewer pirates flying the Jolly Roger on wooden boats these days! Check out this graph that shows there are fewer pirates!"

Edit: It also occurs to me, in hindsight, to add that most of them are quite literate at media, since it's been being used to try to control them for years. Unfortunately, they learned your tactics and learned them for a new medium that you can't even begin to grasp. Bad call, sunshine.

MuseRider

(34,111 posts)
38. I thought the major
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:46 PM
Feb 2016

political theater poster was gone for a while?

I don't know how many ways you can frame Bernie or his supporters but I find it very sad that your candidate is so difficult that this is how you have to fight.

Day after day.

There are MANY reasons to dislike Hillary. I don't even have the time to post them all. You cannot make her look good like this. You also cannot change the dialog, if this is indeed one of the reasons perhaps she should have thought about reaching them in ways that were palatable and addressed their concerns rather than addressing everything with a me or an I.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
39. Nope. That's not it. I have three grown daughters.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:52 PM
Feb 2016

I am supporting Bernie because of them - because I want them to actually have a future.

This ridiculous explanation is just another attack on young women. They're not voting for Hillary because they don't trust her.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
40. I don't agree with that
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:58 PM
Feb 2016

I think the main reason younger voters are supporting Bernie is that he has promised them a lot of things, like free college, Medicare for all, higher wages, etc. These are all things that younger voters would be attracted to. They may not realize that those things are not going to come as soon as they think they will. It will take years to get a congress that will help Bernie pass those kind of things, and may not come to be during a two term presidency if Bernie were to win the WH.

gelatinous cube

(50 posts)
44. Whether or not these changes comes soon
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:15 PM
Feb 2016

does not matter to me. I realize that it will not be instantaneous, that it will require time an effort, but every journey starts with a single step. Is the alternative any better? "It's going to take too long/ it's too hard, so let's not try at all". Sorry, but giving up or not trying is hardly an option.
I don't care if I don't get free college. I don't care if I don't get single-payer health care within 8 years. I don't care if I'm not paid $15 for my first full-time job. But I do care if my sons or daughters and everyone else lives in a polluted world, being paid $7.60 and getting loans that will last a lifetime because I never bothered to fight for change. I support Bernie, whether or not I receive immediate benefits from it. I am not the only person who exists, or will exist, and I have a responsibility to them too.

Let's change something. Go Bernie.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
42. The gender of the voter doesn't matter, the gender of the voter's children doesn't matter.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary is a deeply compromised candidate. That is all.

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
43. Sorry, I can't see electing Hillary as a good lesson for girls
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:13 PM
Feb 2016

I don't want to send this message to girls:

Any girl can grow up to be president in America. First step is to find and marry a man who will be president first!

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
45. bullcrap
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:15 PM
Feb 2016

I have a 26 y.o. daughter, I'm a woman, she supports Bernie, I support Bernie, her two best female friends support Bernie, my sister and her daughter support Bernie... I guess we're all sexists!!

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
50. Nah...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

About $400m in corporate contributions during her family's political career.
NAFTA
Subprime lending
Welfare "reform"
PATRIOT Act
Iraq War
PATRIOT Act Part 2
Bank bailouts
Robert Rubin
Larry Summers
John Podesta
Only POTUS candidate in history with an open FBI investigation.
This ludicrous claim that corporate contributions only corrupts the Republicans.
Insulting the intelligence of younger voters.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
55. ***My two daughters are WHY I support Sanders!***
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:36 PM
Feb 2016

Are you flipping kidding me! Clinton means status quo and watching our democracy descend into corporate hell! Sanders is our chance for our daughter to have a decent future!

Many of these young women who are voting for Bernie may very well be mothers!

Some of them may not be mothers, but they are all concerned about the future, for sure--which is why they're Supporting Sanders and running as far from Clinton as they can get!

It's odd. This talking point is suggesting that there's something "off" or deficient about these women because they are for Sanders. An overwhelming 84 percent majority of them are supporting Sanders. There's CLEARLY something wrong with Hillary Clinton!

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
58. This is so insulting and condescending
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:39 PM
Feb 2016

I have an adult daughter, my sister has an adult daughter and my best friend has an adult daughter and we are ALL voting for Bernie! I guess that makes the three of us stupid, anti feminists who are filling our daughters' empty heads with self loathing and sexist rhetoric.

kath

(10,565 posts)
87. Well, here's the most appropriate response to this post:
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:11 AM
Feb 2016



( saw Blazing Saddles (again) on the big screen last week - such a treat!)

jfern

(5,204 posts)
68. Young women don't understand young women because they don't have a daughter?
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

Just LOL at that argument!

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
69. I believe it sums it up
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:39 PM
Feb 2016

Doesn't explain the number of Boomer women I know who have daughters and granddaughters who are supporting Bernie - but I'm sure someone will come up with an explanation.

jen63

(813 posts)
86. This is also why
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 01:55 AM
Feb 2016

Steinem's remark was offensive to me. She not only disparaged millennial women, but also the mothers and grandmothers who raised them. Those young women didn't just appear through a vacuum.

JPnoodleman

(454 posts)
74. Won't these young women just be too darn slutty and vote for Sanders?
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:31 PM
Feb 2016

I mean Gloria Steinem said that young women are literally only able to think about sex and getting laid.

Skinner

(63,645 posts)
80. Interesting.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:00 AM
Feb 2016

It never really crossed my mind that there might be a correlation between having a daughter and supporting Hillary. But I guess it makes sense. Doesn't appear to be an insignificant effect either.

formernaderite

(2,436 posts)
83. I have daughters AND sons
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:36 AM
Feb 2016

and grand babies of both sexes... that's why my wife and I are Both supporting Bernie!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A key reason young people...