2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’ Political Revolution Is Off to a Slow Start
Sahil KapurFebruary 11, 2016 12:31 PM PST
He has pledged to mobilize millions of new Americans to transform politics, but so far, Democratic turnout is down.
Bernie Sanders pitch to Democrats is that all the new voters he'll energize will compel Congress to support the transformative programs they want, like single-payer health care and free college tuition.
I think what we need, when I talk about a political revolution, is bringing millions and millions of people into the political process in a way that does not exist right now, the Vermont senator told MSNBC in an interview set to air Thursday.
The first tests are in, and the signs of a revolution at the ballot box are scant. Rather than a surge of the previously disaffected, Democratic turnout was down in the first two states to hold contests in the nomination raceby 28 percent in Iowa and 13 percent in New Hampshire.
In Iowa, 172,000 Democrats took part in the party caucuses. The number in 2008 was 240,000. In the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday, 251,000 Democrats voted. The number in 2008 was 288,000.
In other words, the grassroots enthusiasm, vast small-dollar donations, and massive crowds at Sanders rallies so far hasn't translated into historically greater voter turnout for his party.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-02-11/bernie-sanders-political-revolution-is-off-to-a-slow-start
lunatica
(53,410 posts)What else do they expect?
Only us political junkies really know about him now. I'd say New Hampshire is just a taste of things to come.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)...is not bringing out large numbers. She is limping along regarding individual votes.
I'm good with Bernie's turnout numbers.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)By Super Tuesday we will know how turnout goes.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)...I'm a patient person.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... bigger smackdown than 22 points.
He lost PoC in NH too but by a lot smaller margin ... still lost.
It aint going to look pretty here on out
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... "millions and millions of people" getting together to enact change, what I hear is, "You guys start the revolution, and I'll be glad to lead you when you get it together."
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Hell, he couldn't get SP passed in VT... FREAKING VT!!!!
That told me all I needed to know; he's a rock thrower... the type of guy to holler at the cab driver for not driving through stop and go traffic fast enough.
Another big tell tale his revolution was marketing is BLM...
Instead of embracing the people who were sitting across bridges stopping traffic to get the cops to stop murdering certain people with relative little cause his first response to pull away from them until it looked bad.
If he was the revolutionary the first time he saw them come together he would have gotten them structure or direction for structure so they can get legislation passed.
Sanders was no were around in presence ... its funny how running for president brings out these little details about people
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)When one turns on the heat to a pot of water, it doesn't instantly boil does it?
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)BS has consistently spoken about this idea that he can't accomplish anything without "millions and millions" of people getting together and demanding change.
What he hasn't spoken to is where he fits into the piece - other than to "be there" when everybody else gets their act together.
It's kind of, "Start the revolution without me, and I'll be right behind you."
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)That the word 'we' isn't part of the Clinton supporters' vernacular, and especially Clinton herself.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... is that Bernie is waiting for "millions and millions" of people to do the leading, while he does the following.
The other problem here - and it's a rather consistent one - is that BS supporters can't answer simple questions about Bernie's plans without saying, "But what about her?"
The "millions and millions" meme is Bernie's, not Hillary's. Why is it that his supporters can't speak to that topic - and many others - without redirecting the conversation to what Hillary is or isn't doing?
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)That people have to be mature and civil with their questions and the ensuing discussions.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... that horse left the barn a very, very long time ago.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)Not a chance.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Please post the timetable.
An avalanche also starts slowly.
As does a tidal wave.
A volcano.
An earthquake.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)foreseeable future.
So the revolution begins and 10's of millions of Millennials March for free college and health care.
But the repub House holds firm for the next eight years.
Will there be more disillusioned young folks then there are now?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)It is Hillary that is off to a slow start.
seaotter
(576 posts)This one seems ahead of that schedule.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)...slaughter come Super Tuesday.
Oh, that wasn't what you meant, was it? I'm sorry. I never did read propaganda the way it was intended for me to consume it.
PS: I'm sure it's just a total coincidence that this hit piece is run by a guy who says he'll try to crack the Party if Bernie wins. Is your messaging truly that transparent, or do your media managers just suck that unbelievably bad?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Right?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)I say it's off to a very good start...
TheBlackAdder
(28,208 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)and not upholding her end of the bargain. What else would explain losing over 17k votes from her last New Hampshire rodeo? No message equals no support.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Bernie got more votes in the NH primary than any Democrat since Kennedy.
Hillary's numbers were paltry.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)That also set the expectations bar pretty high. Yet another optics failure that didn't need to happen, yet pressing the false meme went on and on.
This optic failure seems to be in line with all of the other elements of the BS campaign attempting to create false and eventually failing optics. Using the logo of 3 organizations pretending endorsements, false claims of union membership, not to mention the data theft, BLM, etc.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)The downturn in NH voter turnout can be mostly attributed to Clinton's turning off 17,000 of her 2008 supporters. The rest can be attributed to DWS's bizarre debate schedule.
Plus, after 8 long years of Dubya, a surprise Obama victory in Iowa, the 2008 Democratic turnout was the highest turnout ever in New Hampshire history for either party.
The biggest turnouts in NH Democratic primary
1) 2008 Democratic primary (287,556).
2) 2016 Democratic primary (250,974)
3) 2004 Democratic primary (219,787)
Arazi
(6,829 posts)And that was before New Hampshire!
That's a brilliant start for a revolution