Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peacetrain

(22,877 posts)
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 04:36 PM Feb 2016

A little unasked for opinion.. but cool your jets people

So the CBC has backed Clinton.. Younger women backed Sanders.. etc etc.. and then everyone runs to find some negative story about the other candidate.. There is so much prickly heat going on in here that a can of gold bond powder probably wouldn't hurt..


I mean seriously.. some of you are starting to be a little deranged.. its not about policy differences..but oh my GOD.. how much I hate that other candidate..

Fire away Admiral Nelson..

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A little unasked for opinion.. but cool your jets people (Original Post) Peacetrain Feb 2016 OP
CBC PAC did. Have you been hiding behind that wall all day that you don't know? thereismore Feb 2016 #1
52 people have a pac?? Peacetrain Feb 2016 #4
Yep. Full of white ass lobbyists. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #5
uhhh it was the board of the CBC.. Peacetrain Feb 2016 #10
No - it was the board of the CBC PAC Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #15
Ellison confirms CBC PAC endorsed candidate without CBC membership input Electric Monk Feb 2016 #8
Do you mean the board of the CBC? Peacetrain Feb 2016 #9
This isn't complicated - YES THE CBC HAS A PAC. kristopher Feb 2016 #13
The CBC PAC seems to be made up mostly of lobbyists rurallib Feb 2016 #18
Thank you rural for the link.. Peacetrain Feb 2016 #19
It's primary season. Bring your ammo and get ready to RUMBLE! TwilightGardener Feb 2016 #2
Heck I am in the foxhole most of the time Peacetrain Feb 2016 #6
You're right Dem2 Feb 2016 #3
There are some definite differences between them Peacetrain Feb 2016 #7
Good post alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #11
Thanks.. Peacetrain Feb 2016 #12
I couldn't agree more. Andy823 Feb 2016 #14
One side consistently advances lies smears and distortions and the pearl clutchers say "Both sides" Vincardog Feb 2016 #16
case in point? Peacetrain Feb 2016 #20
Ya bet cha Vincardog Feb 2016 #21
Connie is that you?? Peacetrain Feb 2016 #22
A little shake, a little tingle ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #17

Peacetrain

(22,877 posts)
9. Do you mean the board of the CBC?
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 04:52 PM
Feb 2016

I thought that the board had a meeting and the majority chose to support Clinton..Now I do not know what the other members had to say.. but never thought of the board as a pac..

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
13. This isn't complicated - YES THE CBC HAS A PAC.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:00 PM
Feb 2016

The CBC did not endorse anyone.

The CBC PAC board endorsed HRC.

Confusion gone?

rurallib

(62,421 posts)
18. The CBC PAC seems to be made up mostly of lobbyists
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:19 PM
Feb 2016
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/11/congressional-black-caucus-hillary/

Ben Branch, the executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus PAC told The Intercept that his group made the decision after a vote from its 20-member board. The board includes 11 lobbyists, seven elected officials, and two officials who work for the PAC. Branch confirmed that the lobbyists were involved in the endorsement, but would not go into detail about the process.

Members of the CBC PAC board include Daron Watts, a lobbyist for Purdue Pharma, the makers of highly addictive opioid OxyContin; Mike Mckay and Chaka Burgess, both lobbyists for Navient, the student loan giant that was spun off of Sallie Mae; former Rep. Al Wynn, D-Md., a lobbyist who represents a range of clients, including work last year on behalf of Lorillard Tobacco, the makers of Newport cigarettes; and William A. Kirk, who lobbies for a cigar industry trade group on a range of tobacco regulations.


Much more at link - I happen to regard Lee Fang up there with Matt Taibi for getting the real story.

As for me I think the CBC did themselves a lot of damage by letting the CBCPAC use their good name for cover and confusion. Whoever in the CBC that decided to do that should at a minimum come out and be honest about the endorsement and that it is not supported by the full CBC. Probably technically not a lie but really unethical.

But I would call it a lie.

Peacetrain

(22,877 posts)
19. Thank you rural for the link..
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:41 PM
Feb 2016

When I came on line and read the story it was the board of the CBC.. so pac had me completely confused..

I did not even realize the CBC had a pac..

I will get to the link later.. cooking dinner and just peeking in at the board..

I still think there is just too much hatred of the candidates as opposed to really getting into the weeds of their policies..

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
14. I couldn't agree more.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:00 PM
Feb 2016

The hate is getting terrible here, and it seems that everyday more and more people show up here on DU spewing the hate, and their numbers keep growing. I wonder if Karl Rove has a hand in that?

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
16. One side consistently advances lies smears and distortions and the pearl clutchers say "Both sides"
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:07 PM
Feb 2016

Blah blah blah ...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A little unasked for opin...