2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI've finally made up my mind...I support Bernie Sanders
...I know that the world--or even DU--hasn't exactly been holding its breath in suspense, waiting for me to make up my mind. But I'm a life-long Dem, first voted for McGovern, have worked and supported every Dem since, had ups and downs...(greatest down: the failure of the Udall campaign in 1976. Dammit, he would have been a great President...) And deciding this time has been a bitch. I do respect both Mrs Clinton and Mr Sanders, have felt that Hillary was more "electable", but admired Bernie's passion and his obvious care for the underdog. But the last few days have finally pushed my ass off its perch halfway between the two candidates. I just can't swallow the Clinton machine any longer. The John Lewis business is the last straw. Having a great American all but implying that Sanders is a liar about his past is disgusting, and for me, goes beyond politics-as-usual. This smacks of Nixonian tactics to me. If Hillary wins, as I expect her to, yes, of course I'll support her. But my heart has finally spoken clearly to me, and I'm feeling the Bern...
thereismore
(13,326 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)if you haven't yet, i invite you to check out bernie group. great info there, and lots of positivity!
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)No one knows the whole truth, but from what I can see Bernie is as close to what America needs as anyone I've seen. And I was disappointed when McGovern only won Massachusetts.
femmedem
(8,203 posts)Glad to have you with us.
I argued for McGovern in the 3rd grade class debate!
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Now it's an uphill battle, you willing to volunteer or donate?
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MuseRider
(34,111 posts)it feels good to not be a part of the sliming of others but it feels bad to be the recipient.
We all enjoy being part of this campaign, it is far happier and more fun than any I have been involved in before and it feels just terrific to not be a part of needing to smear others. Bernie Bounce for you.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Although a Mormon from AZ had little chance of winning.
Response to First Speaker (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)Response to First Speaker (Reply #13)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
classykaren
(769 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts).
Response to cui bono (Reply #33)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Hm, can't remember which burger joint that's from...
.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)having problems today?
Response to mdbl (Reply #45)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)She can hardly even get younger women to vote for her.
Your decision to support Bernie is very wise.
creatives4innovation
(98 posts)McGovern was a true American hero. I read his book years ago.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)I expect Bernie to win
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Thank you! You will not regret your decision!
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)you have elected to support the better candidate. I have spoken with many friends today who were on that same fence as you, but have decided to throw their support behind Bernie Sanders. Many had the same fear as you, they just didn't believe Bernie could be elected and feared that we, the democratic party, might lose the White House in the general if he wins the primary. I am of the opposite opinion. I believe we stand a better chance of losing the White House if Hillary wins the primary. That is my opinion of course. As I have said to all the other friends I mentioned, welcome to the family!
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,714 posts)then that would make one.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...reminds me of 2004, when Republicans implied that John Kerry lied about being wounded in Vietnam.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)that sort of shit rubs off on you, I guess
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)Guess that's also why she & Bill seem so nervous of late.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I remember earlier on, when he was playing crowd control at one of her rallies and helped hustle some BLM protesters out the door, but hadn't caught anything more recent.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)====
While a student at the University of Chicago, Sanders was involved in the Congress on Racial Equality and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He also was arrested while protesting segregation.
"I never saw him. I never met him," Lewis told reporters. "I chaired the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee for three years from 1963 to 1966. I was involved in the sit-ins, the Freedom Rides, the March on Washington, the march from Selma (Alabama) to Montgomery and directed the voter education project for six years. I met Hillary Clinton, I met President Clinton."
===
Blus4u
(608 posts)Usually the republicans are great at that.
Peace
MadCrow
(155 posts)Wouldn't it be nice if Bernie's people could find a picture of Bernie during those years and prove to the other side that Bernie was there. Bernie is usually so reticent about his background that there are probably pictures or write-ups somwhere that the public doesn't have access to.
Response to MadCrow (Reply #59)
BeanMusical This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #34)
Contrary1 This message was self-deleted by its author.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Probably can't remember a lot of people who were around him back them. That is the nature of mass movements like the Civil Rights movement.
What puzzles me--and maybe I misunderstood what he says--is that he did meet Hillary and Bill. The implication was that they were there. Of course in 1963 she was still in high school and, like me, a Goldwater kid. Bill was still a dirt poor white trash nobody in Arkansas. I doubt Rep. Lewis saw either of them.
Maybe I misunderstood what he was trying to say.
I could be wrong...
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:14 PM - Edit history (1)
that indicates that he first 'heard of' Bill Clinton in the early 70s, but 'didn't pay attention to him' again until 1988. Which does kind of seem to go against the implications of his quote as I've now seen it posted here.
ETA: Just saw more of the page. He notes that he finally met Bill in 1991. So the implication that he met Bill and Hillary during the civil rights era, while not seeing Bernie, seems to fall flat on it's face, and shows that he was intentionally trying to mislead by putting his lines about meeting Bill and Hillary right after his lines about not seeing Bernie.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)He still deserves a lot of respect for his past courage and decades of solid work for human rights. Palling around with the Clintons seems to have overcome his better judgment in this case is all.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)But, you are right...the implication was that they were there,
The Freedom Rides were in 1961
The Voter Education Project was from 1962-1968
Lewis chaired the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee from 1963 to 1966.
The march from Selma to Montgomery was in 1965
Bill and Hillary met at Yale in 1970 or 71, depending on the source.
dchill
(38,505 posts)sellitman
(11,607 posts)The best.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)It was Clinton's racist dog whistles in '08 that put me on Obamas side.
Duval
(4,280 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)It won't be easy, but we will persevere.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)It will.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)You're in good company that stretches far, far beyond DU. But you'll have the most fun here. Welcome!
debunction.junction
(127 posts)I will never support Clinton. I will hold my nose and vote for her as the lesser of two evils. Hillary is the status quo, and the status quo has destroyed the American Dream.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)MoonchildCA
(1,301 posts)My vote for her will simply be to keep someone, even more far right, out of office. My heart will not be in it.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)nt
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)Well said!
WestSeattle2
(1,730 posts)such donations, I suspect. Casting aspersions on Bernie's character is way out of bounds.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I think "I understand where you're coming from."
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...and I don't think I've ever spent my time better in my life. Had he somehow managed to take the White House, so much would have been different--including no Reagan...*sigh*... Oh--and I apologize for suggesting on another thread that Rufus T Firefly would make a good running mate for Trump. I'm sure it was a different branch of the family...
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I met "ol' second place Mo" and had a (brief) chance to chat with him even though I was still a teenager. (As you know, this was back in the day when you didn't need an Inc. or a Corp. at the end of your name to be able to chat with a presidential candidate.) An impressive, likable, good-humored guy.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)I listened to O'Malley. And would've entertained a plethora of others. But never Hillary. Who can support a proven liar that waged war abroad for oil and weapons companies and here at home on behalf of the mass incarceration complex and banks? It's beyond me. And you have to seriously question what is wrong with people who think that's ok.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)(Sarcasm, of course.)Don't hold that against Abuela Hillary! (More sarcasm!)
Here is the bill: the Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act.
This was a single purpose amendment to a larger defense bill so was not part of an omnibus bill where she could have had mixed goals. This was an act to limit the use and transfer of cluster munitions to those munitions that have a 99% or higher reliability rate, would prohibit use of cluster munitions in areas where civilians are known to be present and would require a cleanup plan of cluster munition remnants if the US used cluster munitions.
Historically, cluster munitions are particularly troubling because they are left in place and affect civilians ... including those women and children that Hillary expresses she is a fighter for. It is a world wide issue and is the subject of numerous diplomatic attempts to take these munitions that affect civilians off the table.
Of all her warlike votes, this may be the worst. There was no progressive or liberal reason for anyone to vote against this amendment. Her vote was either because she is a defense hawk or because she wanted to look like one and not look soft. It is one of the worst weapons in the world. Hillary joined 15 other democrats and EVERY REPUBLICAN iN voting this way. Her democratic company included most of the conservative war democrats in the senate: lieberman, nelson, landrieu, pryor, shumer. Surprisingly it was a Feinstein introduced Amendment which shows that such munitions even concern people who generally are defense hawks.
And for you Clinton lovers who want to associate her fully with Obama. Of course he voted for the Ban because he does not have the war baggage she has. Hillary voted against banning these munitions and there really is no excuse for this vote.
Some links below on cluster bombs and the Bill.
http://forums.gardenweb.com/discussions/2012106/hillary-and-cluster-bombs-is-this-what-we-want
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/21/425303/-Hillary-Clinton-Voted-to-Continue-Cluster-Bombing-Civilians
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251413864
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)kpominville
(330 posts)While I am sure Hillary would be a far better President than anyone running for the Republicans, I have too many fundamental policy disagreements with Hillary. She would leave the "too big to fail" banks, which are bigger now than ever, exactly as they are unless they actually start too collapse, which would be entirely too late. That inability to take on the big banks and wall street is a clear example of their influence on her.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)And it makes this a lot more awkward.
Still, I'm sure the machine is glad he got his mind right.