2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Clinton Campaign is Disgusting
I thought the race baiting in 2008 was bad.
http://theweek.com/articles/567774/hillary-clinton-needs-address-racist-undertones-2008-campaign
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/09/group-tell-clinton-to-stop-race-baiting/
But the stuff coming out today, the favors she's pulling in from people like John Lewis are beyond the pale. Today is the day that she should start to feel some shame, and her supporters should start thinking about what kind of candidate they want to put themselves behind.
Reference this thread by Bigtree (no beef with you Bigtree, I enjoy all of your posts since the M'OM era) http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511201109
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)But, she should feel shame. She should.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Some of it is obviously meant to bait emotional Sanders supporters into looking condescending, racist, angry at blacks, etc. Kind of like the "Berniebros" thing was meant to elicit angry sexist comments which could be used against the campaign. Be careful, is all I'm saying. Don't denigrate African American leaders, be respectful in your disagreements. Bernie is simply going against an entrenched power structure and long-cultivated ties that Hillary is relying on.
cali
(114,904 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)on Sanders, but to do it in an unemotional, reasoned, and respectful way.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)personally, I have a lot of faith in all people to do their best for themselves and this country. Anyone who uses people's greatest fears and their situations for personal gain will find a 'special place in hell' waiting for them. It may not come out the way some intend when the last vote is counted. Be calm. Be patient. Let them scream. Don't feed the flames. Wait for the goodness of the American people to tell the tale.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Vinca
(50,278 posts)Considering the stench on the surface of the Clinton campaign, anything is possible below ground.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)play the part too.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Berniebros hired to trash his name.
The Big Dog is already calling 'them" out.
I don't trust anything anonymous.
Remember, never trust anything you read on the internet tubes......
Sometimes the shit is just too obvious.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Race relations cannot find a solution when we divide one another everytime we try and speak.
And you know what that leads to? Silence.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)They are right there, wallowing in the sewage with her with smiles on their faces.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)It amazes me Lewis doesn't understand this.
Something wrong here....
No way Hillary can make anyone's lives better without a bunch of new faces in the Senate and House.
Her base, the over 70 crowd always votes.
It't the youngsters that will change the course of this country.
Don't have to look to hard to understand these facts.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Lewis fully understands this. It's why he is supporting Clinton. He would like progress, not setbacks. He wants a strong economy, not depression. He want someone with the clout to change things, not someone with no clout, meaningful coalition, respect, or track record of meaningful accomplishments considering the length of Sanders career in politics. Sanders is currently the only career politician running on the dem side. I understand his decision fully. Makes perfect sense.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)John Lewis knows, and has worked with, HRC, personally. He, also, knows, and has worked with, Sabers, personally.
Based on that knowledge, he chooses to side with HRC.
I trust his discernment.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)His civil rights "hero" status from 50 years ago does NOT inoculate him from criticism as a politician. to imply otherwise by shaming people is RIDICULOUS.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I never said Lewis should be inoculated from criticism.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)and yeah I know Bernie is a career politician I am not sure where you got the impression I thought he wasn't.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It's like you just stopped in to debate yourself for a minute.
"I never said Lewis should be inoculated from criticism. "
Should be one of the easiest things to prove. You can't because I simply never said it. Claim what you want. That is on you.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)You are making a one hundred percent false claim directed at me. Nice. lol.
Quote or link?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)peggysue2
(10,831 posts)John Lewis is a Civil Rights Icon. With the scars to prove it. Disrespecting the man is a grave error in judgment by any measure.
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)Tim Russert told me that, according to his sources, Bill Clinton, in an effort to secure an endorsement for Hillary from Ted Kennedy, said to Kennedy, A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)They have been for a long time.
cali
(114,904 posts)TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)How can *anybody* support Clinton with all her awful dirty tricks.
I know the saying 'all is fair in love and politics', BUT, do you
really want a Democratic president who has to resort to such
dirty tricks?
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)The establishment does not desire this change, and they don't seem to
realize yet that even if he loses, it won't be going back the way it was before Bernie
ran.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)You are the one that should be ashamed to drag John Lewis through the mud!
How damned low can the BS campaign get anyway?
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)...he was put through. But that was a bullshit answer by him today and an obvious favor to Clinton. Don't get it twisted.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)He can always back track it a little after the damage is done and say I don't recall him from 50 years ago, or "I never met him."
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)About the implication in his statement that he met the Clintons in the 1960's. Hillary was a Goldwater campaigner. Goldwater voted against the Civil Rights Act.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Sooner than Later.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)I am so very tired of this kind of behavior.
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)Please tell me something that I didn't know.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)but I dont normally whine.. except to my wife.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)ejbr
(5,856 posts)could attempt to slyly besmirch the integrity of someone who was in the fight during difficult times is disgusting.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)ejbr
(5,856 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)I will never ever vote for Hillary Clinton. EVER! The U.S. they helped to shape sucks due to their policies!
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)vote for Clinton. Sometimes, as adults, we must vote AGAINST the greater evil.
senz
(11,945 posts)It is why they amassed a huge fortune, built a formidable power base, and cultivated a reputation for revenge.
They want this thing. They will do anything to get it.
Like all forms of insanity, it is highly disturbing to behold.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)with Hillary and Bill.
Or with Hillary's endorsement by the political arm of the Congressional Black Caucus, almost all of the members of which had already personally endorsed her.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)A Super PAC and a PAC are different entities.
In this case, Hillary was endorsed by the political arm -- the Political Action Committee or PAC -- of the Congressional Black Caucus.
Not an independent "super PAC."
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)pretend to have the final word on this matter. There does seem to be a lot of disagreement even here over whether this was a regular PAC or a Super PAC. The thread linked to below references an installment on Democracy Now:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511199614
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)between a Super PAC and a PAC, and is incorrectly using the terms interchangeably.
But there is no question that the Political Action Committee of the Congressional Black Caucus is a PAC and that it has endorsed Hillary.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)The Caucus members are not involved, were not a part of it or endorse the endorsement. Super or no...it's still a PAC and it's not in any way connected with the members of Congress who are members of the Congressional Black Caucus...as I understand it.
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)Not all CBC members have embraced the Clinton endorsement. Speaking this morning on Democracy Now, Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., a CBC member, said she has not endorsed in Democratic primary, and reminded viewers that the CBC has nothing to do with the CBC PAC, which is a legally distinct entity. NBC Capitol Hill producer Frank Thorp tweeted that Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., was one of two abstentions on the CBC PAC board.
MFM008
(19,816 posts)They will never vote for HRC, really? Is Donald Trump or Ted Cruz or Rubio better? I dont understand, I support Hillary but am reasonable enough to consider Sanders if he is the nominee. I will never NOT vote. That falls into the republicans plans to steal elections. Its MY vote and as much as I hate Sanders is as OLD as he is and is six years older than my dad was when he died and has all these great ideas and will never be able to pay for them because of the gop in congress. I will vote for the DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE. Get with it or really suffer when the gop takes over all 3 branches of government.
Mike Nelson
(9,959 posts)...or, if capable of independent thought, what is it that the Clintons have on him? Personally, I think John Lewis decided to make this statement on his own. He's an adult and knows what he's doing. He clearly added a coda which put down Bernie Sanders, but going after John Lewis for this is a mistake.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,123 posts)Bernie's chastising of negativity toward Hillary falls on deaf ears. He alone among his movement realizes that a Democrat must win and therefore be careful about what you say. It may cone back to bite you.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)democrat. Not with these type of tactics. That's not what I'm about.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)no regard for the future
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)The very thing that Bernie is trying to rid us of....at last.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)The first Big Three for now...Steinham, Albright and now Lewis...have been asked to make fools of themselves. Steinham half-assed apologized, Albright, who knows, and Lewis...time will tell. And, it's only beginning.
What's worse, is it is fodder for comedians and cartoonists. I remember the comedians lamenting how no more GWB would cut into their material. His was out of ignorance and unwittingness. HRC's stunts are out of intelligence and shadiness. It's time Bernie started calling her out...but he doesn't. Just a recap of her unfortunate and circular past record is termed smearing and attack...so she goes on the counter attack.
Voters...experienced, inexperienced, or would-be... Get This.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)AA leaders come out in support of Hillary Clinton and you insult her, and by inference, you insult them too.
Thanks, keep it coming. That will sure bring out voters for Sanders.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)When they are not just insulting the AA Leaders directly.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Do they really think that this is helping their cause?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)this is his 2nd DU drubbing for being an infidel.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)A. Someone claims Bernie is a liar
B. That person happens to be a PoC
C. The person who made the silly allegation is called out for said bullshit
D. Lectures start about how calling out person who made the bullshit claim is racist
It's mind blowing really.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Wasn't Clinton a Goldwater girl at the time he specified meeting the Clintons? I honestly do not understand.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)This thread accuses the Clintons of being disgusting, and yet the only disgusting behavior I've seen today has come from Bernie supporters. This very thread paradoxically proves the point.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)The whole day, one insulting thread after the other against John Lewis and the Black Caucus.
Wow........
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)or just giving an opinion on a campaign gone bad?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Stick around.
youceyec
(394 posts)desperate folks would keep talking about the year 2008 when its actually 2016!