Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:57 AM Feb 2016

Having a caucus on Saturday really isn't a great idea.

It disenfranchises Orthodox Jews who can not vote on Saturday.


In fact caucuses in general aren't a really great idea. Caucuses violate the most precious tenets of a democracy, including the secret ballot, one person-one vote, and ease of voting.

I don't want to vote with my boss, my co-worker, my friend, or even my own kin sitting next to me.

That being said, I don't believe a Saturday caucus is inherently favorable or unfavorable to any candidate, in most instances.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Having a caucus on Saturday really isn't a great idea. (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 OP
I am glad my state is NOT a caucus state bigwillq Feb 2016 #1
Imagine the chaos if we elected all public officials that way. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #14
My state has a closed primary. Beacool Feb 2016 #20
My state (CT) is also a closed primary state bigwillq Feb 2016 #21
Me too. Beacool Feb 2016 #22
k&R. n/t thomservo Feb 2016 #2
Saturday morning is better than a week night. boston bean Feb 2016 #3
The SC Carolina Feb 2016 #4
But if it isn't a caucus, absentee voting is allowed Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #8
primaries have more leeway restorefreedom Feb 2016 #10
More than Jews keep Shabbat. Paulie Feb 2016 #5
My mom was Jewish. My dad was a Christian. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #9
The goal now is to work with what we got Paulie Feb 2016 #11
i would love to know if jews consider voting, restorefreedom Feb 2016 #12
I have no idea... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #13
i did bit of googling restorefreedom Feb 2016 #15
re: transportation thesquanderer Feb 2016 #16
thanks for the info restorefreedom Feb 2016 #17
State parties decide what kind of 'caucus' they want to have... John Poet Feb 2016 #6
i am happy to agree with you, dsb, and rec this post restorefreedom Feb 2016 #7
Having only a single day to caucus is disenfranchising Matariki Feb 2016 #18
When you think about it , the caucus is an elitist and exclusionary institution. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #25
I despise caucuses. Beacool Feb 2016 #19
This is one of the reasons I hate caucuses. kiva Feb 2016 #23
it's terrible here in NV b/c Nevada Blue Feb 2016 #24
Doe anyone know how this happened? How Saturday was chosen for the caucus? Was it a state party or Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #26
my state went to caucus TheFarseer Feb 2016 #27
Let's just say wildeyed Feb 2016 #28
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
1. I am glad my state is NOT a caucus state
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:02 AM
Feb 2016

I probably would never vote in a caucus. I work second shift and on weekends. I wouldn't have the time to caucus. I like that my state is a primary state.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
20. My state has a closed primary.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:49 PM
Feb 2016

That's as it should be. If you're not a member of a party, then you have no business voting for the person who will be the standard bearer of that party. For example, if I'm not a registered Republican, why should I be allowed to vote in their primary?

I don't like caucuses and open primaries where anyone can cross party lines to attempt to propel or block a candidate of the opposition. It's not democratic.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
22. Me too.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:23 PM
Feb 2016

If people don't want to have skin in the game, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote in the primaries. They can vote in the general, but they shouldn't have any say in a party's primary.

I attend a Lutheran church. To me it's equivalent as if someone from a Catholic church turns up at a church council meeting and expects to get elected president of the council. Why? That person wouldn't even be a Lutheran, let alone a member of our church. Of course it would never happen, but why is it OK in politics for people who are not a member of a party to have a say on who should be that party's nominee? The election process in this country is just ridiculous.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
8. But if it isn't a caucus, absentee voting is allowed
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:11 AM
Feb 2016

While a caucus requires in person attendance, a primary allows for absentee ballots. Orthodox Jews who wish to vote will be unable to vote in person at a caucus on Shabbat while they can send in their absentee ballot for a primary held on Shabbat.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
10. primaries have more leeway
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:14 AM
Feb 2016

there is all day voting as well as opportunities for absentee ballots. neither is available to caucusgoers. either you show up or you are SOL.

multimday voting and/or mail in ballots for everyone is really what is needed.

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
5. More than Jews keep Shabbat.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:05 AM
Feb 2016

This is the system we are playing in. The goal now is to convince even more people who don't follow it to turn out for Bernie.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
9. My mom was Jewish. My dad was a Christian.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:12 AM
Feb 2016

I am farrrrrrrrrrr from an expert on Jewish law. It would be interesting to know what percentage of Jews are excluded from Saturday voting. I guess you could argue one is too many...

With the caveat I am not an expert on Jewish law I believe there are exceptions when a higher purpose than observance is involved. For instance, an Orthodox Jewish physician can perform life serving surgery on the Shabbat.


I also believe there are exemptions from the prohibition on non-kosher food when the alternatively is literally starving to death.

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
11. The goal now is to work with what we got
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:15 AM
Feb 2016

If the system is exclusionary complaining about it a couple weeks before isn't going to be successful. Getting more people who have the time and ability to be at the caucus, as it stands is the important thing for Bernie.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
12. i would love to know if jews consider voting,
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:15 AM
Feb 2016

which many consider to be a civic duty, would be considered one of those greater good scenerios.

might be.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
15. i did bit of googling
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:31 AM
Feb 2016

and i found the exception regarding the saving of a life, that you mentioned. but nothing yet about civic duty or anything of that nature.

i did find a reference to an orthodox jewish congressperson who cast votes on shabbat as long as they walked to do it. transportation might be part of the issue.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
16. re: transportation
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:58 AM
Feb 2016

Yes, transportation is an issue. As I understand it, observant Jews cannot operate a device (i.e. drive) on the Sabbath. They may be allowed to have someone drive them somewhere, however they are also not supposed to engage in financial transactions, so that precludes most public transit or any other form of transportation you would have to pay for.

So getting back to the topic at hand, for some observant Jews, their ability to caucus in Nevada may depend on whether the caucus location is within walking distance.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
17. thanks for the info
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:21 PM
Feb 2016

i am sure some are within walking distance, but my guess is that most, while close, are probably more than a mile or two from their caucus place, just out of reasonable walking distance

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
6. State parties decide what kind of 'caucus' they want to have...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:11 AM
Feb 2016

The last time Michigan Democrats used a 'caucus' in 2004, we were even able to mail in our ballots. It wasn't like Iowa or Nevada where you had to be there, although polling stations were open for in-person votes throughout the day. Yep, that was always a Saturday too, the years we had them.

It really was only called a 'caucus' because the party rather than the state was running the election. More of a "firehouse primary". Polling places were greatly reduced and usually different from those of a state election.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
7. i am happy to agree with you, dsb, and rec this post
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:11 AM
Feb 2016

also, seventh day adventists are also unable to participate on saturdays, i just learned.

i also agree that caucuses are not workable anymore. they have a number of inherent problems.

as to this particular caucus, unfortunately, with a history making jewish candidate on the ballot, and the 76,000 jews in nevada (not all strictly observant of course), this particular date could be a problem for bernie's support in a state that might be quite close.

in general, they are probably not favorable to a particular candidate in most elections, however. some serious drilling down on surveys about people who are homebound, infirm, or work a lot of hours and their political views would have to be done before any educated guesses could be made.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
18. Having only a single day to caucus is disenfranchising
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:26 PM
Feb 2016

No matter what day of the week it is.

There will always be people who have to work at any given time, hospitals have to stay open, stores stay open, colleges stay open, airports stay open, etc etc

All the people who keep those places open are shut out of this phase of the election.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
19. I despise caucuses.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

Archaic and not democratic in this era.

As for the Saturday issue, I can't recall, has it always taken place on a Saturday? Have Jewish groups filed a complaint about the choice of day?

kiva

(4,373 posts)
23. This is one of the reasons I hate caucuses.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:43 PM
Feb 2016

I'm in Nevada, our caucus is on a Saturday. Ask yourself, who generally works on Saturdays? That would mostly be blue collar folks. So in addition to people with religious issues, people who are housebound because of an illness and people who are out of town for the day, add many working class people to the list of disenfranchised.

In 2008 I saw at least a dozen people leave my caucus location because it was dragging on (disorganization) and they had to get to work. A few more left because their kids were getting bored and loud (again, after a couple of hours not a surprise).

I regard caucuses as one of the most undemocratic part of the voting process (the electoral college is my #1 peeve).

Nevada Blue

(130 posts)
24. it's terrible here in NV b/c
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

this is a freaking service economy.

I have friends who work in casinos who cannot caucus because they have to work. Same with health care professionals.

Caucus excludes all but the rich, the retired, the 9-5'ers, and the young. In Nevada that's a big excluded chunk.

It's a terrible system and directly conflicts with the one person, one vote concept.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
26. Doe anyone know how this happened? How Saturday was chosen for the caucus? Was it a state party or
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 06:12 PM
Feb 2016

DNC decision? Or was it a state legislature initiative to promote voter turnout perhaps?

TheFarseer

(9,323 posts)
27. my state went to caucus
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 06:17 PM
Feb 2016

because they wanted to be cool and important. Now we have to drag a 20 month old to a caucus if we both want to vote. Awesome

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
28. Let's just say
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 06:30 PM
Feb 2016

that having a caucus, period, isn't a great idea. The Saturday part is just icing on the suck.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Having a caucus on Saturd...