Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,280 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:29 PM Oct 2012

After last night, it looks like Romney could win ...

... an Oscar. I'm still trying to narrow down the categories; can't find the word "unctuous" in any of the requirements. But acting is, after all, basically a form of lying, and Mitt could qualify for a bunch of categories on the basis of the sheer volume, as well as the sheer brazenness, of his lies.

After all the goofy campaign speeches, the off-the-cuff malaprops, and the general cluelessness of the last 18 months seven years, perhaps he could garner a special award for "character actor most out of character". Mister "betcha $10,000", Mister "my horse gets more tax deductions than your small business", Mister "my job is not to care about those people", suddenly emerged, as if from some Dickensian visitation by the Ghost of Elections to Come, as a warm, fuzzy, God-bless-us-every-one softie who is soooooo deeply concerned about the little guy that, goshdarn it, he's just gotta win the Presidency so he can help those poor folks! It was almost convincing, and maybe some low-information voters bought it. But they were a lost cause anyway.

I can see from a quick scan of today's headlines that a lot of people didn't buy it, though. "Obama wins on facts" about says it all. But maybe Hollywood can deliver a nice consolation prize for the Mittster.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After last night, it looks like Romney could win ... (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Oct 2012 OP
LOL treestar Oct 2012 #1
Reagan was also a "good actor" nt flamingdem Oct 2012 #2
Ah ha ha ha Romney isn't even a good actor... Kalidurga Oct 2012 #3
yeah he lost that tan somehow and looked deranged or maybe hopped up lunasun Oct 2012 #5
it is not acting if you can make yourself believe that yuou can say anything KurtNYC Oct 2012 #4
Actually, lying is lying, an action done by one party to another without consent. Bluenorthwest Oct 2012 #6

treestar

(82,383 posts)
1. LOL
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:31 PM
Oct 2012

You've got me wondering - how low information is a low info voter? Like low info enough not to have heard the 47% tape? Anyone who knows of that knows Rmoney is trying to overcome it and probably wouldn't believe him.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
3. Ah ha ha ha Romney isn't even a good actor...
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:38 PM
Oct 2012

Really he looked constipated, why I am the only one to bring that up I don't know. But, he seriously looked like he was in pain and had drank a case of Red Bull, ok maybe he had to pee. I don't know, but he looked like he was in pain. He had some seriously weird expressions through out the debate and he looked like he was about to cry several times. I wish we had screen shots of all those debate faces. And that is not to mention he lied, he lied a lot. He lied even after he was gently corrected. He even alluded to the facts once and then quickly got back on track to lie again, contradicting himself in the process. I don't know what debate the pundits were watching, but it clearly wasn't the same one I was watching.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
5. yeah he lost that tan somehow and looked deranged or maybe hopped up
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:57 PM
Oct 2012

you could be right .
I was thinking Lasix like they use in horse races
Lasix has significant potential to alter and enhance racehorse performance.
How ironic the term
Is he out on the trail today? he looked jacked after 5 mins. in to debate or just........nutty
you are not alone
he should have a least kept the tan even though prime audience was not brown
do not want him in a national crisis or a world crisis calling the shots

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
4. it is not acting if you can make yourself believe that yuou can say anything
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:41 PM
Oct 2012

regardless of what you have said for years or three minutes ago or whenever.

It is not acting -- it is Romnesia.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
6. Actually, lying is lying, an action done by one party to another without consent.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 01:03 PM
Oct 2012

Acting and other performace based arts engage in what is known as 'willful suspension of disbelief'. There is not just consent on the part of the watchers, but active energy spent to buy into the story being told. So yelling lies at high volume lacks the all important will of the watcher to belive that story. A liar tries to sell you on something, an actor asks you to sell it to yourself. Almost everyone in today's culture can tell the difference at 20 paces. Benefit of mass media, that.

People are very much used to dishonesty and distortion of facts presented with utmost conviction by hucksters and salespeople of the less scrupulous sort. What Mitt did last night is what people watch out for in a person who is trying to sell them something. Nervous, loud, aggressive, free with the fallacies and short on details that can be varified. It is harder to sell people the Brooklyn Bridge than some think.
Then again, back when he was doing Broadway, Woody Allen said "Acting is shouting." So there you go.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»After last night, it look...