Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAgainst Endorsements
This morning I went on Democracy Now to discuss my critique of class-first policy as a way of ameliorating the effects of racism. In the midst of that discussion I made the point that one can maintain a critique of a candidatein this case Bernie Sandersand still feel that that candidate is deserving of your vote. Amy Goodman, being an excellent journalist, did exactly what she should have doneshe asked if I were going to vote for Senator Sanders.I, with some trepidation, answered in the affirmative. I did so because Ive spent my career trying to get people to answer uncomfortable questions. Indeed, the entire reason I was on the show was to try to push liberals into directly addressing an uncomfortable issue that threatens their coalition. It seemed wrong, somehow, to ask others to step into their uncomfortable space and not do so myself. So I answered.
My answer has been characterized, in various places, as an endorsement, a characterization that Id object to. Despite my very obvious political biases, Ive never felt it was really my job to get people to agree with me. My first duty, as a writer, is to myself. In that sense I simply hope to ask all the questions that keep me up at night. My second duty is to my readers. In that sense, I hope to make readers understand why those questions are critical. I dont so much hope that any reader agrees with me, as I hope to haunt them, to trouble their sense of how things actually are.
Its really no different with Senator Sanders. The idea that anyone would cast a vote because of how I am casting my vote makes my skin crawl. It misses the point of everything Ive been trying to do in my time at The Atlantic. The point is to get people to question, not to recruit them into a religion. Citizens are not sheep. They do not need shepherds, and even if they did I would be poorly qualified. I have thought quite deeply about the problem of racism in American society. I have thought somewhat deeply about inequality and the social safety net. I have though only modestly about foreign policy and the environment. And I havent thought much at all about net neutrality. I voted for the first time in 2008, following years of skepticism about electoral politics. Whatever. The point is that this is not the record of someone who should be telling other citizens how to vote....
-Ta-Nehisi Coates
http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2016/02/against-endorsements/462261/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 567 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Against Endorsements (Original Post)
mia
Feb 2016
OP
retrowire
(10,345 posts)1. I respect that! nt
californiabernin
(421 posts)2. Good post! n/t