#ImnotkiddingMaddi trending as ‘urgent’ Clinton email mocked
A desperate-sounding email purportedly received by a woman from Hillary Clinton’s campaign during the New Hampshire primary spawned a flurry of memes and tweets mocking the candidate.
The email from HillaryClinton.com asks that the woman, identified only as Maddi, donate a dollar:
“After tonight’s results roll in, keep this in mind: most of the country casts their primary ballots by the middle of March.
“We absolutely, critically need to make sure Hillary comes out on top in the states that lie ahead.”
But it’s the last line that has people gleefully tweeting:
“I’m not kidding, Maddi, I’m asking you to give $1 right this second.”
Memes aplenty here!
http://blog.sfgate.com/hottopics/2016/02/10/imnotkiddingmaddi-trending-as-urgent-clinton-email-mocked/
= new reply since forum marked as read
it's in very poor taste. Who is the OP about? Oh, that's right.
I can almost guarantee you that if the same had been said about Sen. Sanders it would have been hidden; rightfully so. And a whole lot more people would have have had a whole lot more to say. Something along the lines of homophobic jokes.
I'm usually a 'meh' kinda person, I have a crude sense of humor--in private. I don't find this funny. I take other people's feelings into consideration. Apparently that's isn't a blip on your radar.
Hope you have a great day. 
I think it's kind of funny though how people aren't getting it. The OP may have been about "who" but the conversation was about what? Twitter.
Notice the hashtag?
You're missing the mark here.
But you still miss the point. Go re-read the original OP. You're trying to make said comments about a specific candidate when in fact it is NOT. What does it say again, something about twitter.
Now if you go ahead and realize that #OregonStandoff was trending #1 world wide last night which is what again? Oh ya bunch of RW loons and what was it that people on the Internet did to these RW loons?
Learn to social media.
Any questions?
NOTHING TO DO WITH A CANDIDATE. PERIOD.
Funny how those "small donations" were mocked only a few weeks ago, now they are being chased after 
Why Bernie is gonna smoke this thang.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
I don't know what is behind this OP, but I *DID* get an email from what looked like Hillary's campaign asking for $1.
I still have the email in my inbox.
Or is that just making fun of the fact that she sent it at all?
I don't know.
Here it is:
Okay, look. I'm a person who has castigated the idea of using social media for nonstop mockery for a long time, and I've often gotten a lot of guff for it. Most mockery is petty and mean-spirited, and even using 'most' makes me a bit squicky.
But...that said...
The comment bout the Dollar Menu was too much.
She just needed a McChicken! That dollar was """"""""""""""""""""""""""""critically needed"""""""""""""""""""""""""""!!!
Now I'm off to find more to laugh at. Muhahahaha! 
She's finally figured out that 700 SuperPAC contributors looks reeeeaaaallly bad in contrast to 3 million plus contributors to Bernie!
You can't make this stuff up
...every damn day.
I enjoy them.
During the past few days I was getting three of those $1 emails daily.
One day, it was Bill, Hillary, Chelsea and some strategy guy--all within 24 hours!
All of the wording is so desperate.
I was like...back off man! You aren't getting $1!!
Thanks for being on our team,
Robby
Robby Mook
Campaign Manager
Hillary for America
Last edited Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:37 PM - Edit history (1)
I get about 3 of them per day.
Edit for pics, these are ones so far today.
[link:[URL=
.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]|
[link:[URL=
.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]|
[link:[URL=
.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]|
:large 
.
Last edited Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:51 AM - Edit history (1)
OMG, this is hilarious.
My husband just said, "What on earth are you reading?" He started laughing because I was laughing so hard.
My son just came down from his room, he could hear me all the way upstairs. These are hilarious.
:large 
Great way to end the evening..
"She has to depend on small donations"
I've seen some cognitive dissonance on this board, but this one takes the cake. You honestly believe she relies on small contributions when she's raked in millions from Wall Street and some of the largest corporations on earth?
No one is laughing at your lack of funds because many of us are in the same spot, but I do wonder why you're supporting her if your lack of wealth is an issue. Surely, you can see which candidate gets money from the elite and which gets donations from working people.
(which itself is odd since she never ran for office until the 2000s).
This is 2016. Check your calendar. Bernie himself has raised hundreds of thousands from those same banks. The difference is that Clinton doesn't construct a campaign based on a false claim she repeats multiple times of day for months on end.
Additionally, if we are to believe Open Secrets, Universities and the US Postal Service have pacs or super pacs
that contribute to Sanders. You'll have to forgive me, but the notion that the Postal Service has a pac strains credulity.
That same list included corporations like Microsoft. And I never quite understood how Open Secrets could declare Citibank her leading contributor when under industries financial services ranks much lower on the list, with education and women's groups being near the top.
What is this whole meme about if it isn't how pathetic you all think it is that she needs to ask for $1 donations?
My lack of wealth is precisely why I don't support Sanders. That in combination with the fact I actually care about policy and not just slogans. Now, if thought the most crucial issues facing American were that families making over $250k a year shouldn't have to pay college tuition or their children face the indignity of working 10 hours a week to contribute to that education, I'd be for Sanders all the way.
It sounds too much like a "or else" demand! #ImnotkiddingMaddi
&imgrefurl=
