Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,171 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:33 PM Feb 2016

538:It Gets Harder From Here For Bernie Sanders But New Hampshire couldn’t have gone better for him

Polling has indicated that Sanders trails among nonwhite voters by nearly 40 percentage points nationally. Although no reliable recent polling is available in Nevada, Clinton leads by 30 percentage points in both of our South Carolina forecasts. In the latest Marist College poll, she’s buoyed by a 74 percent to 17 percent lead among black voters. Sanders must cut into that margin if he wants to have any chance in South Carolina or anywhere in the South.

You could already see how Sanders might have problems in Nevada and South Carolina even as he was crushing Clinton in New Hampshire. Despite winning the state by more than 20 percentage points, the best Sanders could manage among registered Democrats was a tie. His large margin came from registered independents who voted in the Democratic primary. You must be a registered Democrat to vote in the Nevada caucuses, though you can register as one the day of the election. In 2008, 81 percent of Nevada caucus-goers self-identified as Democrats. Just 58 percent of New Hampshire voters on Tuesday thought of themselves as Democrats.

Most worrisome for Sanders is his 25-percentage-point loss among New Hampshire Democrats who want to continue President Obama’s policies. Obama’s current job approval rating among blacks nationally is about 90 percent. Sanders will have big problems in South Carolina if he doesn’t do better among voters who like Obama.

The bottom line is that Sanders did very well in New Hampshire, and we can see the outlines of a campaign that can be competitive in the rest of the country. But there is plenty of work for him to do as we move away from the very white states of Iowa and New Hampshire.


http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/it-gets-harder-from-here-for-bernie-sanders/

Bernie needs to find away to embrace Obama and woo registered Democrats.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
538:It Gets Harder From Here For Bernie Sanders But New Hampshire couldn’t have gone better for him (Original Post) hack89 Feb 2016 OP
k/r Dawson Leery Feb 2016 #1
Wonderful RobertEarl Feb 2016 #2
We will know either way after Nevada and South Carolina hack89 Feb 2016 #7
We already know RobertEarl Feb 2016 #9
Right. nt hack89 Feb 2016 #11
How refreshing. That's what a lot of Sanders supporters had suggested just last summer.. frylock Feb 2016 #13
I always knew Super Tuesday was the defining date for determining who the nominee will be hack89 Feb 2016 #16
I'm very much looking forward to it.. frylock Feb 2016 #18
So that's 538's way of saying they were wrong 2 out 2 primaries, right? marble falls Feb 2016 #3
They called both correctly hack89 Feb 2016 #5
What this article fails to mention (at least the extract you published) is that Sanders KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #4
There are 15,000 AA in all of NH - 1% of the population hack89 Feb 2016 #6
Yeah, demographics is not my area of expertise and I'm well aware of the perils KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #8
There is another metric that should concern Bernie hack89 Feb 2016 #10
Nor in Feb. 20 Nevada caucuses where only registered Dems can KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #20
What do you think has spurred all this talk of Superdelegates? frylock Feb 2016 #15
538 is useless kcjohn1 Feb 2016 #12
Since the polls changed significantly over that period hack89 Feb 2016 #14
I'm not kcjohn1 Feb 2016 #19
They're 2 for 2 in forecasting Democratic states so far Godhumor Feb 2016 #17
LOL. They MUST be corrupt calguy Feb 2016 #21
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
2. Wonderful
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:42 PM
Feb 2016

Gone from impossible to >>> gets harder.

In other words 538 doesn't know WTF is going on and is fumbling around trying to find out WTF is happening.

Put simply: 538 is feeling the Bern!

hack89

(39,171 posts)
7. We will know either way after Nevada and South Carolina
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:00 PM
Feb 2016

no point in fighting over it now. We will soon know.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
9. We already know
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie is going to get nominated.

Gone from impossible to just hard. Even 538 can see that.
Bernie is rising and Hillary is going down hill.





frylock

(34,825 posts)
13. How refreshing. That's what a lot of Sanders supporters had suggested just last summer..
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:47 PM
Feb 2016

you know, when Hillary Supporter was taking their victory laps. My, how the times have changed.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. I always knew Super Tuesday was the defining date for determining who the nominee will be
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:51 PM
Feb 2016

something both Hillary and Sanders supporters should have no problem agreeing with.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
18. I'm very much looking forward to it..
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:55 PM
Feb 2016

if a win in such an insignificant state as NH garners Sanders 3.5 million dollars in a 20 hour period, I can't imagine the jack he's going to rake in on 3/2 after soundly defeating Madam Secretary.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
5. They called both correctly
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:55 PM
Feb 2016

they said that Hillary would win IA and Bernie would win NH. That is what happened.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
4. What this article fails to mention (at least the extract you published) is that Sanders
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:48 PM
Feb 2016

lost NH's black vote by only 1% to Hillary (50% HRC - 49% BS). Senator Sanders does not need to win that demographic, merely to replicate his NH percentages. If I were the Clinton campaign, I would be sweating bullets

hack89

(39,171 posts)
6. There are 15,000 AA in all of NH - 1% of the population
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:59 PM
Feb 2016

of which a very small proportion actually voted yesterday. That is a tiny sample to extrapolate to black majority voting populations in the deep south.

Look at the polling in the south. If that starts changing then there is room for Hillary to be concerned.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
8. Yeah, demographics is not my area of expertise and I'm well aware of the perils
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:01 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Wed Feb 10, 2016, 06:40 PM - Edit history (1)

of extrapolating from abnormally small sample sizes (generally speaking). Still, I thought that particular metric was worthy of note.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
10. There is another metric that should concern Bernie
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:09 PM
Feb 2016

an that is his dependence on independents. Independent voters played an outsize role in NH that is not so common in the south.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
20. Nor in Feb. 20 Nevada caucuses where only registered Dems can
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 06:37 PM
Feb 2016

participate. Nevada does allow same-day registration, a fact I'm sure the Sanders field staff will put to good use. I'm not sure what the rules are for the Feb. 27 South Carolina primary.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
15. What do you think has spurred all this talk of Superdelegates?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:49 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary Supporter knows that the so-called PoC firewall has been breached.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
12. 538 is useless
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:39 PM
Feb 2016

For being ahead of trends. In December they had Clinton winning NH at 70%. Right before the vote they had it 99% for Sanders.

So the lesson is that they are useful only right before the vote and they can't really forecast things in the future.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
14. Since the polls changed significantly over that period
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:48 PM
Feb 2016

and all 538 does is aggregate polls, don't see how they can be faulted.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
19. I'm not
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 05:57 PM
Feb 2016

Just objecting to them pontificating months out how Bernie doesn't have a chance when their expertise is only aggregating polls that are only good the closer you are to the voting day.

Real political analysis would be to see couple of months ago that Bernie had a good chance to win NH. Two months ago they were saying Clinton had 70% chance of winning NH.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538:It Gets Harder From H...