2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDemocrats Reject Bernie Sanders’ Plan To Raise Taxes
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on Wednesday, Were not running on any platform of raising taxes, Pelosi said during a press briefing to launch the Democrats yearly issues conference in Baltimore, Md. We do want to have a fairer tax system, and we hope that we can do that this year.
Sanders on Monday acknowledged that his Medicare-for-all healthcare plan would require tax hikes on the middle class.
--------------
Pelosi, who was a crucial force in ushering the Affordable Care Act through Congress in 2009 and 2010, said shes proud of the achievement, citing the millions of uninsured Americans who have gained access to health coverage under the law.
It has achieved the goal of affordable, quality, accessible healthcare for many millions more Americans. It is lowering the cost of healthcare in our country, she said.
Pelosi said the Democrats fought to ensure that the healthcare law included features that are attractive about single-payer, including provisions barring insurance companies from excluding patients based on pre-existing conditions or establishing lifetime limits on coverage. She conceded imperfections in the law and vowed to work on improvements.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/01/28/house-democrats-reject-bernie-sanders-plan-raise-taxes-pay-healthcare.html
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)it must be true?
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)informing us that everything the author and Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) say is automatically correct. If you could just forwards that to me, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you for your help in this matter, sincerely Daleanime.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)having to pay a private company for some access to healthcare.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)But, you know, they're not plutocratic "leaders."
deutsey
(20,166 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)We must have broad-based tax raises to pay for what we need to spend. We just aren't taking enough money now to pay for everything.
enid602
(8,620 posts)Funny. A few months ago, Bernie wasn't even a Dem. Now he's the only one.
Response to Alfresco (Original post)
KingFlorez This message was self-deleted by its author.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)if that makes sense to you, have at it hoss.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I am so happy that you disapprove. Have a nice day.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)not understand, yes. But feel free to mischaracterize me all you want if it makes you happy, sounds like you need it.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I just don't agree with this particular plan, because I think it's merely a transfer in insurance costs, not totally free health care.
I'm sorry I posted, though and I apologize for saying what I said. I wasn't intending to offend anyone, so I will delete the post.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)No, that's not what it is at all. In fact, it's not even about insurance.
It's about having access to healthcare without having to pay a middle man who tries everything he can to keep us for accessing that care, thus reducing their profit.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)Pelosi should be the first to go
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)You'll find that one of the most anti-tax states in the country just voted for Sanders by the largest margin in that primary's history.
Clearly, that means his ideas are wildly unpopular.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Should you really be attacking others about "reading"?
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)bad? Please go to https://go.berniesanders.com and read about his plan in detail and then tell me about these huge taxes we'll have to pay (Employers tax is 6.2& (still pretty damn cheap compared to current premiums.)
click on the right side of page "go to site" and then on the left side are the issues list.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I wonder who runs it!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Now that he took NH by storm it's only going to get worse.
I say bring it.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Does the manure cost extra or is it included?
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)These constant EEK! BERNIE'S GONNA RAISE MUH TAXES!!! ops are short on context and long on fear.
They might work on other websites but DUers are too savvy.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You guys refer to single payer health care, tuition free college and progressive taxes as unicorns, ponies and rainbows.
We call them liberal goals that are worth fighting for.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)hurr durrrrrrr
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)It's like Oscar Wilde all up in here!
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'm tired of them running unopposed, and thus uninterested in earning my vote.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)soon as somebody comes along and actually points out that taxes really do need to be raised on the rich and corporations.
So funny watching them pretend that Bernie's ideas wouldn't actually be saving the poor and middle class money overall.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... doesn't explain how in the heck he's going to get doctors and pharma to accept half of what they're' taking now in payments
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:10 PM - Edit history (1)
Given what is happening to both major parties in recent decades, opposition is to be expected. Welcomed, even, as it clearly labels the neoliberals for future reference.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Honestly, it could be so good if there was a general housecleaning on the waves of this revolt. Because the Dems we have are largely revolting. And I include Ms. Pelosi in there, especially with recent comments.
Yes, I've written her, expressing my views on her views. I hope we find someone better. Just another Dem whose time has passed, in my opinion.
As long as we stand together, there is so much we can accomplish.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)nt
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)It was met with the same response
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Fixed it for you, Al.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Any questions.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Recycling. YAY!for you!
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Our family pays $550 per month for healthcare--through Blue Cross Blue Shield.
Sander's plan ($170 per month) equals a $4,500 savings per year.
Futhermore, everyone in the country is covered. No one has to go broke if they get cancer or have a car accident.
We can join the rest of the world, in which every modernized country has some form of universal healthcare.
The Democrats, including Nancy Pelosi who feign, "This is soooooo, soon hard! We're sorry" need to step aside and let the real Democrats--who don't kow tow to the health-insurance lobbyists--take charge.
We've got this Nancy. Thank you for your concern.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)This part is always left out - that raising the taxes would LOWER their medical payments. And the lower socio economic classes would still pay next to nothing but have MUCH better health care. Hell, some would get it for the first time.
I'm happy for your family and hope that this actually happens for you and everyone who needs quality health care at an affordable price.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)See I dont know why people would reject Bernie Sanders healthcare plan
because a person earning 52,000.00 per year will pay 02.2% payroll tax of $22.00 per week/$1144 per year.
So that is pretty damn cheap insurance.
The reason Republicans are using talking points about raising taxes insinuating the taxes will be unbearable is because they don't want to take away the golden goose Insurance Companies have had all these years..The Blue Dog Democrats would be included in this also.
What Obama care did was to make sure people with pre-existing illness can be insured.
The rest is a formula for insurance companies to increase profits..Since 2009 we have never heard any insurance company complain about Obama care..Its what we could get with promises of "its a start"
For my family the premiums are high and deductibles are high and its almost like a patient has to get sick before 4:30 PM or they are not covered..I think Obama care is not good at all except for the pre-existing coverage and that has probably saved lives.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)$550 are the premiums we pay for a family of four.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)Do you realize that?
Do you think there is a ghost of chance that's going to happen? BY HIS OWN ESTIMATES he needs to double Federal Revenue roughly just to pay for his healthcare payer alone. You really think he's going get all that money from taxing wall street alone? No chance. And most fair minded neutral experts -- I know some here sneer at neutral experts -- say he's underestimating the cost and overestimating the savings by a factor of 2 or 3. This is fantasyland magical thinking.
And we're not even talking about the rest of it.
It ain't happening. Wake up. Stop dreaming. Get to work working for real change, change you can actually believe in and not just dream about.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)If it were impossible, how are the Canadians, French, British etc doing it? Why do I care if I pay 500 a month to Cigna or to the government for a start, even if there are NO savings (an absurdity; simply negotiating pharma prices would save billions)? Tax is a dirty word only for fools. I care about my wallet as much as most. I don't however care about whether spend from that wallet is marked "tax" or "premium".
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Republican Congress to vote with her on? Do tell.
frylock
(34,825 posts)thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:26 PM - Edit history (1)
without being beaten to death. Now they can say they are going to throw the whole program in the dumper and nobody bats an eye.
Not raising taxes was always the Republican's battle cry, now we have Democrats scared of saying anything about raising taxes.
With that said I think Bernie, or whomever is the nominee, will have to be very careful how they talk about this to voters, independents as well as middle class democrats who have not made up their minds, like me.
I am not stupid, I know we can't do what we want to do without increasing taxes, but I want them increased on the wealthy, I want them to pay more into SSecurity as well. I want corporate loopholes closed, I want income that is going overseas to hide to be taxed properly.
A lot of people, Democrats, Independents and Republicans are like us, hanging on by a thread, hoping we don't get sick or the car doesn't die. We are a couple a hundred dollars away from being in big trouble every month. If I thought someone wanted to raise my taxes much I would be working against them like a crazy woman, fighting for my life.
I love lots of things about Bernie, I love his passion, he just can't fund it on our backs like all of the other candidates have before him. Our backs are broken.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Vinca
(50,273 posts)Wonder who's in the pocket of big insurance. Nancy?
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's really that simple. In our system, politicians do the bidding of those who line their pockets.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)On what issues is she going to get the Republican majorities in Congress to vote with her on? Do tell.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)but you're right, it won't happen if we simply elect Bernie and then sit back and do nothing. He can;t do this on his own. We have to bombard the politicians and demand it. We have been guilty of not doing so and of sitting back on our spoils and expecting one person or a few to do the brunt of the work. That never works. I am going to do much better this time and to fight for these things to happen. I hope others do the same.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)They don't really have a say in that.
If the majority votes in a president who promised to raise taxes then guess what? That Democratic Party better follow the will of the people and go the direction we voted for, because guess what? They don't steer this ship, we do.
Truprogressive85
(900 posts)The American People's vote are the only vote that matter politicians are replaceable
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)be forced to resign her position or be kicked to the curb.
What a tool.
What is Pelosi's net worth, btw?
basselope
(2,565 posts)The 100K or so people who gave $$ to Bernie last night alone suggest otherwise.
NiteOwl1
(87 posts)On Mars
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)run against Bernie Sanders huge tax increases.
They will have people making minimum wage convinced he's coming for their wallets/purses
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)NiteOwl1
(87 posts)Sooner or later the taxes will be increased... and the later it is, the more progressive the rate structure will have to be.
Of course, the "flat tax" lie may delude the sheeple into believing that it is great for everyone... while even further increasing the income polarization to the benefit of the wealthiest.
jillan
(39,451 posts)That oughta be good. Especially with millions of Bernie supporters that will have his back during his entire Presidency.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)Take the higher taxes, subtract the premium one formerly paid, and he or she has $5,000 more in his or her pocket. That is the part they keep neglecting to mention. Additionally, a lot of overhead would be erased from having all elements of health care joined together and processed by one entity as opposed to the way it is now. Lastly, Medicare would have the ability to negotiate costs of prescriptions. Americans pay 3 times more for their prescriptions than the rest of the world.
Sam
SalviaBlue
(2,917 posts)Healthcare is too expensive.
LSK
(36,846 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)if you can
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)esteemed leaders want! BUT I hope I don't have to remind everyone how much THEY HAVEN'T DONE FOR US! The cabal of Faux Democrats is now becoming clear. I'm pretty fed up with almost all of them!
But, doesn't change my mind about WHO I SUPPORT!