Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:33 PM Feb 2016

Bernie, when in Flint, Please Mention: NAFTA cost MI auto workers at least 231,752 jobs

Michigan Job Loss During the NAFTA-WTO Period

Find Specific Layoffs Caused by Offshoring and Imports in Michigan


Michigan lost 231,752 manufacturing jobs (or 28.3 percent) during the NAFTA-WTO period (1994-2015), according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.* This figure is for total manufacturing employment, so it takes into account both jobs created by exports and jobs displaced by imports, among other causes of net job change. The percentage of all private sector jobs that are manufacturing jobs in Michigan declined from 24 percent to 16.3 percent during the NAFTA-WTO period.

These are aggregate numbers, but the Department of Labor tracks instances of specific workers at specific workplaces who applied for special benefits for trade-displaced workers. In Michigan, there are 155,683 such workers certified as having lost their job due to imports or offshoring under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program. (Note: This program is difficult to qualify for, and this figure only includes those workers who were certified.)

The Economic Policy Institute found that by 2010, 43,600 jobs had been lost or displaced in Michigan – and about 700,000 in the United States – due to the rise in the trade deficit with Mexico alone since NAFTA was enacted in 1994.


http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=3413
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uponit7771

(90,339 posts)
6. Yeah, what I did learn is when people dodge a question it usually means they're trying to avoid
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:54 PM
Feb 2016

... answering it.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
7. you're the artful dodger here.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:56 PM
Feb 2016

you could have looked it up yourself. It's useless trying to tell you facts since you keep ignoring them.

uponit7771

(90,339 posts)
10. So I'll take your answer to be that Clinton has nothing to do with NAFTA... got it
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:10 PM
Feb 2016

Also,

Hillary Clinton is NOT William Clinton and Hillary is running as Obama 2 not Bill 2 as she has... stated multiple times.

But believe what you wish

amborin

(16,631 posts)
12. hillary is running as ClintonII & She supports the TPP. She's just momentarily saying she's against
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:40 PM
Feb 2016

kath

(10,565 posts)
11. Yes, and they both always kept saying that "with us, you get two for the price of one"
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:18 PM
Feb 2016

She plays it both ways now - tries to take credit for some of the things that occurred during his terms, while ducking away from all of the bad shit (and there is a lot of it).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie, when in Flint, Pl...