Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:55 AM Feb 2016

With 88% of the vote tallied, Hillary is now leading Bernie in New Hampshire

New Hampshire:

Bernie 13 delegates

Hillary 15 delegates

15 > 13

---------------

The only thing that matters is the delegate count. As of 1am et and 88% of the vote counted, Hillary is leading in the New Hampshire delegate count:

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-02-09#NH-Dem

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With 88% of the vote tallied, Hillary is now leading Bernie in New Hampshire (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 OP
You gotta pull a win out this election, don't you? CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2016 #1
Nah. I'm just getting started. nt Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #3
what is "I'm just getting started. nt" nt? iAZZZo Feb 2016 #37
"nt" means "no text"--which means there is no message in the post, just the title. nt tblue37 Feb 2016 #67
thank you tblue37 for "nt" explanation iAZZZo Feb 2016 #93
Oh, and "eom"="end of message"=same thing. eom tblue37 Feb 2016 #68
thank you tblue37 for added "eom" = "nt" iAZZZo Feb 2016 #94
You are quite welcome--for both. nt tblue37 Feb 2016 #97
It means this: PonyUp Feb 2016 #89
So basically, Bernie would need 90% of the vote to overcome the Superdelegate advantage... reformist2 Feb 2016 #75
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #83
Why can't you accept that a lot of people don't like Bernie...n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #86
Super delegates. JRLeft Feb 2016 #2
Which are used for spin only at this point. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #60
Not when they are purchased, Hilary don't rent shit, not with all the money she has. /nt Dragonfli Feb 2016 #72
Maybe, but I don't see SD's overriding the voters. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #90
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #4
Perfect. Nt Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #15
Ah, fair weather friends! eom. Bad Thoughts Feb 2016 #5
Pure B.S. if that delegate count is correct. bobGandolf Feb 2016 #6
Yes...from CNN OnlinePoker Feb 2016 #13
Fail. PowerToThePeople Feb 2016 #7
If that makes you sleep better rufus dog Feb 2016 #8
The NYT says 13-9 Bernie Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #9
Actually it's 15-9 Bernie jfern Feb 2016 #22
Ah, thanks. Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #84
You gotta learn to read the fineprint. basselope Feb 2016 #10
How Many Super-Delegates Running for Public Office Do You Think Will Switch to Democratic Socialist Stallion Feb 2016 #16
It depends on how the rest of the Primaries go. Ace Rothstein Feb 2016 #24
How many do you think will vote for a candidate who's LOSING the popular vote in the party... cascadiance Feb 2016 #30
In the West, South and Midwest? Not a Problem Stallion Feb 2016 #32
I don't disagree with you often, but since most "super" delegates came out before the primary Dragonfli Feb 2016 #73
To quote the cli tons and the dnc SwampG8r Feb 2016 #78
Nobody Should Want To Run With A CORPORATIST! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #80
The poster has been around long enough to know that. n/t leftupnorth Feb 2016 #18
Has a convention taken place only you are aware of? Have those super delegates cast their vote? Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2016 #11
Really? And oh for F's sake! And damn! nt 7wo7rees Feb 2016 #12
Can't just let him have this... we gotta read this deranged shit... whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #14
You mean kinda like when Hillary won Iowa and people here questioned the win? Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #19
Bernie just beat her 60-38. You can't question that. jfern Feb 2016 #21
He didn't need any coin tosses to do it, either Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #28
You do realize Bernie actually won those coin tosses Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #36
but she didnt win lancer78 Feb 2016 #43
super delegates nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #17
I'm pretty sure the DNC doesn't want a repeat of Chicago '68 HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #61
OMG, the denial in this OP is epic jfern Feb 2016 #20
I'm trying to unconfuse myself here. Peace Patriot Feb 2016 #47
Bernie won pledged delegates 15-9 jfern Feb 2016 #50
You do know that super-delegates can change their mind don't you. I predict they will in mass Live and Learn Feb 2016 #23
It's as if you think Hillary would ever Kall Feb 2016 #25
Hahaha, is there a reason you didn't post the NH voting results jkbRN Feb 2016 #26
The New Hamshire voting results are at the link Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #33
Such a sad little poster. morningfog Feb 2016 #27
Very true HassleCat Feb 2016 #29
The NYT says that Bernie has 13 and Hillary has 9 Lorien Feb 2016 #31
I think we should keep this kicked. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #34
That would be up to me since I created the thread. Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #38
How so? Kick. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #39
Come on....you're smarter than that Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #40
Oh you mean you can delete it right? Bonobo Feb 2016 #41
Another devolving OP. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #45
I won't, but I have the option Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #46
Sure. It's currently Sanders 13 to Hillary 9. So you're wrong. Kick. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #48
Read my op again and also click the link. Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #49
Kick. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #52
So you can't point to anything in my OP which is inaccurate? Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #54
Sorry, I did below. Sanders is ahead 13-9 in the NH Primary. Kick. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #56
Exactly that. Flame bait. morningfog Feb 2016 #71
Must be that Wall Street math n/t left-of-center2012 Feb 2016 #35
Those SD's are not going to Bernie. Dawson Leery Feb 2016 #42
Just Like Tea Party & Grover Norquist Tax Pledges... A "Loyalty Oath" Hamstrings Politicians. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #44
Because they want to lose their own elections? jeff47 Feb 2016 #91
Come on. I thought YOU were more intelligent than that. Bonobo Feb 2016 #51
Cool story bro, here's a picture of a bunny with a pancake on it's head Matariki Feb 2016 #53
Cold comfort there, Cali Dem: A more resounding electoral ass-kicking I cannot recall alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #55
Well...why didn't they let Hillary supporters have their night when she won Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #59
She barely won Iowa, and she just got trounced in NH noiretextatique Feb 2016 #64
Go to the back of the class. cali Feb 2016 #82
That's the long game TSIAS Feb 2016 #57
Kick. Kalidurga Feb 2016 #58
Kick for exposure of silliness. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #62
49 TIMES. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #63
Do you really think saying that it doesn't matter if the "little people" vote for the other guy, tblue37 Feb 2016 #65
Kick nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #66
If HRC did any worse, she would have pulled behind Vermin Supreme, yet still getting 6 delegates. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #69
Biggest margin ever in a NH Dem primary. mhatrw Feb 2016 #70
I'm so happy that you are skilled in your numbers... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #74
*Clears throat* vercetti2021 Feb 2016 #76
Oh God, please don't start the Superdelegates Are Evil arguments.... moriah Feb 2016 #77
to quote Jim Mora: 'You think you know, but you don't know....and you never will." islandmkl Feb 2016 #79
Ack. Sad. Your epic meltdown is something cali Feb 2016 #81
Awesome!!!!!! n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #85
New Hampshire voted for Bernie. If the super delegates go against them, we can say this election is B Calm Feb 2016 #87
The front page of the NYT... speaktruthtopower Feb 2016 #88
Even when we win the vote we lose the election. And that's why we need a revolution. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #92
It's 15-9 my dear Duer. Fearless Feb 2016 #95
Welp, THERE's democracy in action. hifiguy Feb 2016 #96
15 Bernie, 9 Hillary. Those delegates you claim are committed are just committed at this point. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #98

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
75. So basically, Bernie would need 90% of the vote to overcome the Superdelegate advantage...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:36 AM
Feb 2016

Kind of makes the whole primary process look a bit un-democratic, no? Maybe even, oh what's the word.... rigged?

Response to reformist2 (Reply #75)

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
60. Which are used for spin only at this point.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:02 AM
Feb 2016

The majority of SD's will go with the voters choice at the convention.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
90. Maybe, but I don't see SD's overriding the voters.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:10 AM
Feb 2016

It would be the end of the SD's and an implosion of the party. They value power more than they do Hillary.

Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

bobGandolf

(871 posts)
6. Pure B.S. if that delegate count is correct.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:02 AM
Feb 2016

Has anyone else seen this?



New Hampshire:

Bernie 13 delegates

Hillary 15 delegates

15 > 13

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
10. You gotta learn to read the fineprint.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:03 AM
Feb 2016

"HuffPost counts unpledged delegates..."

Those delegates can change (much like they did in 2008 when Hilary lost and they COULD have tried to flip it for her, but instead abandoned ship b/c the majority of the PEOPLE had spoken

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
16. How Many Super-Delegates Running for Public Office Do You Think Will Switch to Democratic Socialist
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:06 AM
Feb 2016

especially in South, Midwest and West-I'm sure they can't wait to run with a Social Democrat at the top of the ticket-maybe some in New Hampshire-I doubt it. This is reality-

Ace Rothstein

(3,163 posts)
24. It depends on how the rest of the Primaries go.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:12 AM
Feb 2016

If Sanders ends up with more votes and Clinton "wins" because of superdelegates then November is going to be a bloodbath.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
30. How many do you think will vote for a candidate who's LOSING the popular vote in the party...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:19 AM
Feb 2016

Do they really WANT to get voted out of office for voting AGAINST a popular democratic choice? FAT CHANCE!

If people WANT a Democratic Socialist, and many would rather have that than the corporatist CRAP we have NOT representing us now in office for either party, they can choose to end their career if they want. Most real democrats won't!

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
73. I don't disagree with you often, but since most "super" delegates came out before the primary
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:33 AM
Feb 2016

I think they are purchased, plain and simple, Hillary has more cash than Thurston Howell III and her corruption is quite well established.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
80. Nobody Should Want To Run With A CORPORATIST!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:07 AM
Feb 2016

A REAL Democrat who has a bit of a European flair economically... should do just fine as the public becomes more fully acquainted with the truth about what Socialist Democratic means.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
19. You mean kinda like when Hillary won Iowa and people here questioned the win?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:08 AM
Feb 2016

Now you see how it can work both ways?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
17. super delegates
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:06 AM
Feb 2016

she took a drubbing and if she takes more of these drubbings, supers will quietly switch.

by the way, let's go down this road, let's say that either of the conventions are actually decided with delegates, overturning popular will... ever heard of Chicago '68? I am sure even the party leaders know this.

I am saying this for BOTH parties, the establishment in both is not precisely happy tonight.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
61. I'm pretty sure the DNC doesn't want a repeat of Chicago '68
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:06 AM
Feb 2016
http://www.history.com/topics/1960s/videos/violence-batters-1968-democratic-convention

And neither to the superdelegates, as they are mostly elected office-holders who have to answer to their constituents on Election Day.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
47. I'm trying to unconfuse myself here.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:39 AM
Feb 2016

Bear with me.

Sanders won 60% of the NH vote, Clinton 40% or a bit less. BUT...

The count is 15 delegates for Clinton vs 13 for Sanders, if "super-delegates" are included, but "super-delegates" are unpledged (can vote for anyone; probably pro-Clinton currently; that can change). (Call them soft-pledged?)

Whereas, in pledged delegates (delegates who must, by the rules, vote for their candidate at the convention on the first round of voting, at least), that's what Sanders won tonight: He won 15 pledged delegates; Clinton won 9 (?).

The super-delegate sum seems absurd and wrong. Sanders got SIXTY PERCENT of the vote! He should END UP with MORE delegates than Clinton.

But, of course, that's what our party oligarchs devised for us back in 1982, in order to undemocratize the Democratic Party. Odd to have a Clinton supporter touting this lack of democracy and unfairness, and creating a false and confusing OP headline after so many people voted, and/or worked so hard, today and this week, for that amazing 60% outcome. But then, maybe she's trying to point out how unfair and wrong it is that Clinton, who lost so big, ends up with more delegates (even if a few are only probable, or "soft&quot ?

That's it, surely! She wants to end the "super-delegate" oligarchy!

jfern

(5,204 posts)
50. Bernie won pledged delegates 15-9
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:46 AM
Feb 2016

The superdelegates will change when they see the writing on the wall like they did in 2008.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
23. You do know that super-delegates can change their mind don't you. I predict they will in mass
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:12 AM
Feb 2016

once they see what the people want. Especially, if they want to keep their own jobs. Those super-delegate chickens ain't hatched yet. I wouldn't count too much on them! Feel the Bern!!!

Kall

(615 posts)
25. It's as if you think Hillary would ever
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:13 AM
Feb 2016

in a million years be able to hold the party together and win a general election, if she used super delegates to override pledged delegates.

That's really cute.

jkbRN

(850 posts)
26. Hahaha, is there a reason you didn't post the NH voting results
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:14 AM
Feb 2016

as well as failing to differentiate between super delegates and delegates attributed to voting?

Yeah, there's a reason--this isn't a spin room.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
29. Very true
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:16 AM
Feb 2016

This illustrates how difficult it is to put the democracy back in the Democratic Party. We have been doing things a certain way for 35 years, and it will be difficult to change direction now.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
38. That would be up to me since I created the thread.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:26 AM
Feb 2016

I have the final decision about whether or not this thread remains kicked because I created it.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
46. I won't, but I have the option
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:36 AM
Feb 2016

That's what I meant when I said I have the final say.

BTW, look at my OP and tell me if anything is actually inaccurate.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
49. Read my op again and also click the link.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:45 AM
Feb 2016

I never distinguished between pledged and super delegates.

So, what in my op is inaccurate?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
91. Because they want to lose their own elections?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:31 PM
Feb 2016

Sanders just beat Clinton by the largest margin in NH primary history.

Those superdelegates won't stay in office long if they go against that.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
55. Cold comfort there, Cali Dem: A more resounding electoral ass-kicking I cannot recall
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:48 AM
Feb 2016

Taunting people with the delegate count when you know full well six of those delegates could switch in a hot minute is very poor form.

Let the winners have their night. They earned it.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
59. Well...why didn't they let Hillary supporters have their night when she won
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:57 AM
Feb 2016

more pledged delegates?

In fact, they're still claiming it was a bogus result. Even right here in this thread.

I suppose I'm returning the favor.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
64. She barely won Iowa, and she just got trounced in NH
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 03:16 AM
Feb 2016

If and when she wins by a 28 point margin, I will give her credit. Not much credit is deserved for Iowa.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
82. Go to the back of the class.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:14 AM
Feb 2016

There is a yuuge difference between winning by a quarter of a percent and winning by 20+ percent.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
57. That's the long game
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:49 AM
Feb 2016

If Clinton continues to struggle to connect, super delegates won't matter at all.

What does it say that 99 % of endorsers are for Clinton, yet some national polls have the race 50/50?

If it makes you feel any better, congratulations on your great triumph in New Hampshire. I hope you are able to celebrate many more evenings of comparable success.

tblue37

(65,393 posts)
65. Do you really think saying that it doesn't matter if the "little people" vote for the other guy,
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 04:02 AM
Feb 2016

because Hillary's got the backing of the power brokers is a good message to harp on, considering the mood of the electorate this campaign season?

That is exactly what has the voters so riled up--i.e., the fact that only those with money and power have any influence on our elected officials, and ordinary people are simply ignored no matter how much effort we put into trying to get our voices heard.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
70. Biggest margin ever in a NH Dem primary.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 05:39 AM
Feb 2016

And you are bragging about the same rigged system that led Clinton to this historic beatdown.

Talk about tone deaf.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
74. I'm so happy that you are skilled in your numbers...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:35 AM
Feb 2016

You should keep that skill set going and keep checking back with everyone, dear.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
77. Oh God, please don't start the Superdelegates Are Evil arguments....
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 07:43 AM
Feb 2016

...

Fine print:

HuffPost counts unpledged delegates who have publicly stated their intent to vote for a candidate.



Aka superdelegates, aka people who many in the party feel make it suck. Please. Stop. They can still change their minds at the Convention if Hillary asks them to, or they feel it's fair because of the rest of the nation voting the other way.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
79. to quote Jim Mora: 'You think you know, but you don't know....and you never will."
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:06 AM
Feb 2016

however...if THAT was a resounding victory for Hillary last night then by all means...celebrate

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
87. New Hampshire voted for Bernie. If the super delegates go against them, we can say this election is
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 10:55 AM
Feb 2016

Republicans to lose.

speaktruthtopower

(800 posts)
88. The front page of the NYT...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 10:55 AM
Feb 2016

had nothing suggesting the magnitude of the Sanders victory or why it happened. Just a graphic with the delegate count from Iowa and NH.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
95. It's 15-9 my dear Duer.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 09:55 PM
Feb 2016

Ignorance of when superdelegate votes are made is laughable at this stage in the game.

Clearly you are misleading on purpose.

Shame on you.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
98. 15 Bernie, 9 Hillary. Those delegates you claim are committed are just committed at this point.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 10:05 PM
Feb 2016

In 08 50 of them shifted from Hillary to Obama in a single day.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»With 88% of the vote tall...