Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:04 PM Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton tweaks her 'safe, legal and rare' abortion mantra

Is Hillary Clinton recalibrating her position on abortion as she seeks the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination?

It sure looks that way. In her last presidential run in 2008, Clinton said that she thought abortion should be “safe, legal and rare, and by rare, I mean rare.” She added that abortion “should not in any way be diminished as a moral issue,” and portrayed the choice to have an abortion as a wrenching one for “a young woman, her family, her physician and [her] pastor.”

But questioned on Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” about a claim by Sen. Marco Rubio that “she believes that all abortions should be legal, even on the due date of that unborn child,” Clinton replied: “You know, I’ve been on record for many years about where I stand on abortion, how it should be safe and legal and I have the same position that I’ve had for a very long time.”

So what happened to “rare”?

<snip>
It's likely that Clinton’s sharpening of her pro-choice stance will help her in the Democratic primaries. It might not be such an asset in a general election — in which (assuming she’s the nominee) she might rediscover “rare.”


<snip>

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-hillaryclinton-abortion-campaign-20160209-story.html

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton tweaks her 'safe, legal and rare' abortion mantra (Original Post) cali Feb 2016 OP
Come on cali. are you serious? nt ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #1
Fact. She used the safe, legal and rare mantra for over 20 years cali Feb 2016 #4
Hillary was called out for that language years ago. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #10
President Barack Obama has evolved on many issues like gay marriage. ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #11
What does Obama have to do with this issue? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #14
I don't think anythings wrong when you encourage people to use birth control. ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #16
Do you think it's acceptable to pander to anti-choice zealots, support a ban on late term abortions beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #20
Can you stop putting words in my mouth. ty. nt ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #21
I didn't, I asked you a question. Can you please answer it? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #23
Nope, last time when this happened, you got my post hidden. Nice try. nt ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #25
What? The last time I asked you a question I got your post hidden? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #26
Ok, I see you didn't deny it. nt ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #28
Deny what? I have no idea what you're talking about. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #29
Fine, I'll take the bait. ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #30
That wasn't my alert and I have no idea why it was hidden. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #32
So, you agree that hide wasn't warranted? Are we friends again? nt ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #34
Your definition of "friends" must be different than mine. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #37
Are you going to answer my questions now? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #44
Wow! I'd love to see the results on that one. one_voice Feb 2016 #38
It was 4-3 :/. nt ProudToBeLiberal Feb 2016 #39
I can't figure out some of the jury results. one_voice Feb 2016 #42
I'll post some of the 7-0 results from my alert stalkers, perhaps we can compare notes. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #40
What? one_voice Feb 2016 #41
Were you not implying that the poster was unfairly targeted? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #43
No, I wasn't. I said I'd like to see the one_voice Feb 2016 #47
Oh, yeah. If, god forbid (shudder) she wins the nomination, the word "rare"will come back so fast it kath Feb 2016 #22
So... Political expedience has spun to include third-trimester abortion. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #2
I would venture that haikugal Feb 2016 #5
It's just her I don't trust. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #24
She knows it isn't the support for choice she wants us to believe it is. haikugal Feb 2016 #35
It takes me a little while to get my thoughts down. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #36
"And pastor"? arcane1 Feb 2016 #3
Yeah that’s gross dorkzilla Feb 2016 #7
Is the issue that there are many religions that don't have pastors? el_bryanto Feb 2016 #15
Singling out pastors is what seemed odd to me. arcane1 Feb 2016 #17
Seriously? lol. I know of only one group who take issue with Clinton on this issue. nt. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #6
Then you ain't lookin too hard azurnoir Feb 2016 #9
I suspect Hillary tweaks many things depending on who she is addressing azurnoir Feb 2016 #8
like Bernie urging firemen to set aside the abortion issue, because their pocketbooks? bettyellen Feb 2016 #18
Link? azurnoir Feb 2016 #31
"He also seems willing to put some of those ongoing inequalities ahead of women’s rights... bettyellen Feb 2016 #46
and what was wrong with what Bernie said? at least HE addressed the issues there may be azurnoir Feb 2016 #48
you may not give a shit about a woman's right to control her body- but for me..... bettyellen Feb 2016 #50
he did not minimize anything he said Dems should put their differences aside and work together azurnoir Feb 2016 #55
I know, he was for Planned Parenthood before he bashed them last month. bettyellen Feb 2016 #57
so you're saying he is against women's reproductive rights now? azurnoir Feb 2016 #62
What's wrong with that? Did he try to find "common ground" with anti-abortion zealots? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #49
because she is trying to get them to accept more birth control- when sadly- bettyellen Feb 2016 #52
Wrong, she was promoting religious based abstinence-only programs. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #53
"the jury is still out on the effectiveness of abstinence-only programs. " bettyellen Feb 2016 #56
There is no common ground with religious nuts when it comes to abstinence-only education. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #59
Maybe she can get Barstool Palin to stump for her.. frylock Feb 2016 #63
Yeah she's the poster child for them. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #64
You mean he's asking voters to set aside their differences and vote Democratic? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #45
He did not make my civil rights a priority over their paychecks. bettyellen Feb 2016 #58
How did he not make "your" civil rights a priority? When did he vote against them? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #61
Good, I have long wanted her to drop the "rare". The Democratic Party platform did in 2008. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #12
I know, this is a good thing. bettyellen Feb 2016 #19
it's good to drop the "rare", but who doesn't think it will be back in a flash if she should get the kath Feb 2016 #54
If that happens, I will definitely hold her accountable as well. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #60
Please use the excerpt tag, and post a link to the source. Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #13
Cali-it is shameful that you are questioning Hillary's stance on Abortion-Leave that to the riversedge Feb 2016 #27
Why is she above reproach? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #33
River, that's bulloney. I posted a factual article cali Feb 2016 #51
“a young woman, her family, her physician and pastor.” ljm2002 Feb 2016 #65
will she disengage from The Family? MisterP Feb 2016 #66

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
10. Hillary was called out for that language years ago.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:25 PM
Feb 2016

She also pandered to anti-abortion zealots, supported a ban on late term abortions and promoted abstinence-only education. Her tune will change again if she wins the nomination.

She is a weathervane.

ProudToBeLiberal

(3,964 posts)
11. President Barack Obama has evolved on many issues like gay marriage.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:27 PM
Feb 2016

Why are you applying a double standard to Hillary Clinton?

ProudToBeLiberal

(3,964 posts)
16. I don't think anythings wrong when you encourage people to use birth control.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:29 PM
Feb 2016

That falls in line with the rare safe and legal argument. I support plan b and other contraceptives.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
20. Do you think it's acceptable to pander to anti-choice zealots, support a ban on late term abortions
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:32 PM
Feb 2016

and abstinence-only education?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
29. Deny what? I have no idea what you're talking about.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:41 PM
Feb 2016

How does asking you a question lead to a hidden post?

And coming from someone who admits they alert constantly and posts the results don't you think such false accusations are a tad bit hypocritical?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
32. That wasn't my alert and I have no idea why it was hidden.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:46 PM
Feb 2016

Why do you think answering the above questions will lead to a hide?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
37. Your definition of "friends" must be different than mine.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:51 PM
Feb 2016

Since I don't know why your post was alerted or hidden I can't speculate. Perhaps they thought you were making things too personal.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
47. No, I wasn't. I said I'd like to see the
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:04 PM
Feb 2016

results on that hide. Questioning one hide doesn't imply someone is being targeted.

If that were the case I'd have implied half of DU was being targeted at some point.

My perspective is fine, thank you.

kath

(10,565 posts)
22. Oh, yeah. If, god forbid (shudder) she wins the nomination, the word "rare"will come back so fast it
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:33 PM
Feb 2016

Will make your head spin.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
2. So... Political expedience has spun to include third-trimester abortion.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:07 PM
Feb 2016

I'm pro-choice, but even I think third trimester, you're encroaching upon shaky ground without good reason. Hm.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
5. I would venture that
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:15 PM
Feb 2016

A third trimester wouldn't be done without good reason...why don't you trust women?

Hillary will bring back the rare when it suits her.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
24. It's just her I don't trust.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:35 PM
Feb 2016

Wasn't the best way to phrase that thought, I suppose. No doubt you're right about the third-trimesters, just trying to make sense of why drop it when she's been saying it so long.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
35. She knows it isn't the support for choice she wants us to believe it is.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:50 PM
Feb 2016

It's all good...thanks for fleshing out your thoughts!

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
36. It takes me a little while to get my thoughts down.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:51 PM
Feb 2016

Specially on what feels like essentially "second Monday". Thanks for not jumping down my throat about it, though

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
15. Is the issue that there are many religions that don't have pastors?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:28 PM
Feb 2016

Or that she mentioned that some would consult with a religious figure at all?

Bryant

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
17. Singling out pastors is what seemed odd to me.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:30 PM
Feb 2016

I imagine it can be a tough situation for other religions as well.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
18. like Bernie urging firemen to set aside the abortion issue, because their pocketbooks?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:30 PM
Feb 2016

He went there. And is motivating many people not through any exalted views on justice, but by money.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
46. "He also seems willing to put some of those ongoing inequalities ahead of women’s rights...
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016

.... at least in front of certain audiences. In a recent speech before members of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Sanders said:

'I know that there are differences in this room on abortion, on gay marriage, on guns, whatever it may be. Fine, let’s have our differences. But when it comes to whether or not our kids can go to college, whether or not we’re going to make it easier for workers to join unions, whether or not we’re going to have a trade policy which creates jobs in this country or whether it creates jobs in China, whether or not college is affordable, whether or not all Americans are entitled to health care as a right, let us stand together and not be divided.'"

the whole article is really good.

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2015/06/03/matters-bernie-sanders-doesnt-talk-race-gender/

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
48. and what was wrong with what Bernie said? at least HE addressed the issues there may be
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:08 PM
Feb 2016

differences not so much with Hillary

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
50. you may not give a shit about a woman's right to control her body- but for me.....
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:13 PM
Feb 2016

minimizing that concern is fucking beyond the pale. money does not trump civil rights issues in my book, never will.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
55. he did not minimize anything he said Dems should put their differences aside and work together
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:22 PM
Feb 2016

the rest is your own rather hyperbolic spin

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
62. so you're saying he is against women's reproductive rights now?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:44 PM
Feb 2016

you do realize your link was from last June?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
49. What's wrong with that? Did he try to find "common ground" with anti-abortion zealots?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:12 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton Seeking Shared Ground Over Abortions

ALBANY, Jan. 24 - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton said on Monday that the opposing sides in the divisive debate over abortion should find "common ground" to prevent unwanted pregnancies and ultimately reduce abortions, which she called a "sad, even tragic choice to many, many women."

In a speech to about 1,000 abortion rights supporters near the New York State Capitol, Mrs. Clinton firmly restated her support for the Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide in 1973. But then she quickly shifted gears, offering warm words to opponents of legalized abortion and praising the influence of "religious and moral values" on delaying teenage girls from becoming sexually active.

"There is an opportunity for people of good faith to find common ground in this debate -- we should be able to agree that we want every child born in this country to be wanted, cherished and loved," Mrs. Clinton said.

Mrs. Clinton's remarks were generally well received, though the audience was silent during most of her overtures to anti-abortion groups. Afterward, leaders of those groups were skeptical, given Mrs. Clinton's outspoken support for abortion rights over the years.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/25/nyregion/clinton-seeking-shared-ground-over-abortions.html
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
52. because she is trying to get them to accept more birth control- when sadly-
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:17 PM
Feb 2016

even that is a contentious idea among the RW. She is actually working pro-abortion there, and not gutlessly shoving the issue aside, as if it lacked importance? It ain't easy in our political climate- and it is tempting to take the easy way out and ask to table it.

I will guess you don't have half the concerns about the supreme court that I do either.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
53. Wrong, she was promoting religious based abstinence-only programs.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:19 PM
Feb 2016

And that wasn't the only time:

Teen abstinence is the right thing to do

Reaffirming her support for what used to be called teen celibacy Hillary reminded us that the point is to find out if it works. This is how Senator Clinton put it, in a paragraph I never saw quoted in the press.

"Research shows that the primary reason that teenage girls abstain is because of their religious and moral values. We should embrace this--and support programs that reinforce the idea that abstinence at a young age is not just the smart thing to do, it is the right thing to do. But we should also recognize what works and what doesn't work, and to be fair, the jury is still out on the effectiveness of abstinence-only programs. I don't think this debate should be about ideology, it should be about facts and evidence--we have to deal with the choices young people make, not just the choice we wish they would make."

Source: The Case for Hillary Clinton, by Susan Estrich, p. 55 , Oct 17, 2005

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Families_+_Children.htm


I will guess you don't have half the concerns about the supreme court that I do either.


The day you have more cred on abortion rights than me is the day you can question my dedication.

Bernie is better on this issue, he never supported bans on late term abortions or abstinence-only education. He trusts women - period.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
56. "the jury is still out on the effectiveness of abstinence-only programs. "
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:25 PM
Feb 2016

" I don't think this debate should be about ideology, it should be about facts and evidence--we have to deal with the choices young people make, not just the choice we wish they would make."

She is trying to talk sense into religious zealots who are firmly anti- abortion. That is politics. She has tirelessly and vocally advocated for expanding women's reproductive health care.
When Bernie tells Firemen no one should worry their little heads about women's civil rights- it is in a whole other context. He did not have to set aside the fight for women's civil rights like that.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
59. There is no common ground with religious nuts when it comes to abstinence-only education.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:28 PM
Feb 2016

Those programs lead to pregnancies, stds and shame young women for being human.

How anyone can defend them is beyond me.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
64. Yeah she's the poster child for them.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:13 PM
Feb 2016

Unfortunately unintended pregnancies aren't the worst thing that Will happen to kids who don't practice safe sex, AIDS and cervical cancer will kill many.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
61. How did he not make "your" civil rights a priority? When did he vote against them?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:31 PM
Feb 2016

When did he ever not support women's rights?

Obama asked Republicans to support him, he called them Obamacans, did he not make "your" civil rights a priority too?

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
12. Good, I have long wanted her to drop the "rare". The Democratic Party platform did in 2008.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:27 PM
Feb 2016

And I take politicians to task who use it.

kath

(10,565 posts)
54. it's good to drop the "rare", but who doesn't think it will be back in a flash if she should get the
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:20 PM
Feb 2016

Nomination?
Her "stance" on issues is always highly variable, depending on whom she is addressing.
Weathervane to the max.

riversedge

(70,273 posts)
27. Cali-it is shameful that you are questioning Hillary's stance on Abortion-Leave that to the
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:37 PM
Feb 2016

Republicans.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
33. Why is she above reproach?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:47 PM
Feb 2016
Late term abortion only if life or health are at risk

Q: Are there circumstances when the government should limit choice?

LAZIO: I had a pro-choice record in the House, and I believe in a woman’s right to choose. I support a ban on partial-birth abortions. Senator Moynihan called it “infanticide.” Even former mayor Ed Koch agreed that this was too extreme a procedure. This is an area where I disagree with my opponent. My opponent opposes a ban on partial-birth abortions.

CLINTON: My opponent is wrong. I have said many times that I can support a ban on late-term abortions, including partial-birth abortions, so long as the health and life of the mother is protected. I’ve met women who faced this heart-wrenching decision toward the end of a pregnancy. Of course it’s a horrible procedure. No one would argue with that. But if your life is at stake, if your health is at stake, if the potential for having any more children is at stake, this must be a woman’s choice.

Source: Senate debate in Manhattan , Oct 8, 2000

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Abortion.htm


Fyi "partial birth abortion" is a right wing term.
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
51. River, that's bulloney. I posted a factual article
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:16 PM
Feb 2016

about her position and how what she is choosing to emphasize has changed.

I am not questioning anything. Shameful of you to put words in my mouth.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
65. “a young woman, her family, her physician and pastor.”
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 07:48 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton's words conjure up an image of a Rockwell-esque America, where young women can discuss such matters with their family, and actually have either a regular physician or pastor. Certainly that is often not the case.

Apart from that, if the choice is "a wrenching one" for not just her, but for "her family, her physician and pastor", then what happened to "the woman's choice, period, end of sentence."?

Furthermore, it artfully leaves out any reference to the father, be it a boyfriend, husband, or other less savory possibilities. Well maybe that is how it should be, legally, if our principle is that it is the woman's choice, period.

But the carefully chosen words are effective -- they paint a picture of a secure America, a place where young women are wrapped in the bosom of a caring and orderly family and society that will take care of them, pat pat, there there, rock-a-bye baby... and don't forget the end of that dark lullaby...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton tweaks he...