The enduring solidarity of whiteness (Coates)
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/02/why-we-write/459909/
Social exclusion works for solidarity, as often as it works against it. Sexism is not merely, or even primarily, a means of conferring benefits to the investor class. It is also a means of forging solidarity among men, much as xenophobia forges solidarity among citizens, and homophobia makes for solidarity among heterosexuals. What one is is often as important as what one is not, and so strong is the negative act of defining community that one wonders if all of these definitionsman, heterosexual, whitewould evaporate in absence of negative definition.
That question is beyond my purview (for now). But what is obvious is that the systemic issues that allowed men as different as Bill Cosby and Daniel Holtzclaw to perpetuate their crimes, the systemic issues which long denied gay people, no matter how wealthy, to marry and protect their families, can not be crudely reduced to the mad plottings of plutocrats. In America, solidarity among laborers is not the only kind of solidarity. In America, it isnt even the most potent kind.
The history of the very ideas Johnson* favors evidences this fact. At every step, universalist social programs have been hampered by the idea of becoming, and remaining, forever white. So it was with the New Deal. So it is with Obamacare. So it would be with President Sanders. That is not because the white working class labors under mass hypnosis. It is because whiteness confers knowable, quantifiable privileges, regardless of classmuch like manhood confers knowable, quantifiable privileges, regardless of race. White supremacy is neither a trick, nor a device, but one of the most powerful shared interests in American history.
And that, too, is solidarity.
* Cedric, not Lyndon (or, for that matter, Andrew)