Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sander's problem with Democrats (Original Post) bravenak Feb 2016 OP
Democrats just don't like him. His colleagues in Congress don't like him. leftofcool Feb 2016 #1
I'm a Democrat and I like him. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #2
that worries me if he's the nominee. DesertFlower Feb 2016 #3
At worst... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #51
Very true. bravenak Feb 2016 #18
First of all, he's one of the best liked members of Congress. Voice for Peace Feb 2016 #75
If he is well liked the endorsements would bear this out. bravenak Feb 2016 #77
No idea what your source is Voice for Peace Feb 2016 #85
The internet, my eyes, his superdelegate totals... bravenak Feb 2016 #89
Don't have any way to visit links at present Voice for Peace Feb 2016 #90
Ok bravenak Feb 2016 #92
Yeah cause you gotta have friends Kentonio Feb 2016 #95
Ohhhh. Go on! bravenak Feb 2016 #96
Those are mightily misinformed claims Voice for Peace Feb 2016 #64
Really? Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #79
Of course, nobody likes him! sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #4
and nobody is going to like him alot more in NH. :) boomer55 Feb 2016 #5
The massive crowds gathering across the nation LWolf Feb 2016 #10
And mostly they won't like him wildeyed Feb 2016 #6
Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded. -- Yogi Berra n/t QC Feb 2016 #7
And he gets all those amendments through because nobody likes him! frylock Feb 2016 #12
Big time hit piece on Bernie NWProf Feb 2016 #8
Glad you loved it. bravenak Feb 2016 #15
Perhaps it's those Democrats with cosy inbred oil (Koch/BP) relationships, like Hillary's Podesta. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #94
It's probably deeper than just the party. wildeyed Feb 2016 #9
Yep. bravenak Feb 2016 #14
If he's too far right, Hillary must be Stalin to them! Fawke Em Feb 2016 #23
Honestly? bravenak Feb 2016 #24
Are you serious? n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #101
"And his personality." NurseJackie Feb 2016 #97
You should probably ask your actual socialist friends to explain jeff47 Feb 2016 #76
You should probably wildeyed Feb 2016 #78
Well, you just lumped together two different political philosophies jeff47 Feb 2016 #98
No. wildeyed Feb 2016 #100
So...incrementalism is now a terrible idea? jeff47 Feb 2016 #102
No. wildeyed Feb 2016 #106
Bernie called himself a Socialist redstateblues Feb 2016 #103
And I guess you'll just have to google the difference between jeff47 Feb 2016 #105
He denounced them EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #11
The ones who he needs to push his agenda don't seem to love him bravenak Feb 2016 #13
It doesn't matter anyway EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #17
He really doesn't bravenak Feb 2016 #19
lol EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #21
And other are even easier. bravenak Feb 2016 #22
How funny! For me it's the same but in Bernie's favor Arazi Feb 2016 #36
LOL! bravenak Feb 2016 #37
Ha, you know it Arazi Feb 2016 #40
Ahh! bravenak Feb 2016 #42
#we'remorefun Arazi Feb 2016 #48
No. They cook better. bravenak Feb 2016 #49
Revealed as never having been to a Sanders meet up ever Arazi Feb 2016 #52
Really? bravenak Feb 2016 #54
Sad. BS parties are happening all the time and LOVE unruly Arazi Feb 2016 #60
I'll come to the next Revolution!! bravenak Feb 2016 #67
K&R BooScout Feb 2016 #16
Hillyes! bravenak Feb 2016 #20
#HillNo Fawke Em Feb 2016 #27
... BooScout Feb 2016 #30
You crack me up sometimes bravenak Feb 2016 #31
#TooEarlyForHillPatrickDay.... Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #80
It's never to early to wear the green! BooScout Feb 2016 #82
It doesn't match her tone.. Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #84
The only problem is with the Coporatists Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #25
Of course not. bravenak Feb 2016 #32
I don't understand how the Dems allowed this problem to get this far. politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2016 #26
He didn't want to be a spoiler, which is more than I can say for some other politicians. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #28
Ha! bravenak Feb 2016 #29
And losing the General. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #33
Prolly won't lose the GE bravenak Feb 2016 #35
It will be damn near impossible to find any moderate Republicans. politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2016 #39
But you know who WILL come to the polls because of Hillary? Beartracks Feb 2016 #62
I'm a Berniecrat. Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #81
Problem, huh? Some of us view it as a rescue operation. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #34
Pitchforks and Torches? kstewart33 Feb 2016 #38
Me too. bravenak Feb 2016 #43
. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #50
Really good points! mcar Feb 2016 #41
I wonder what he would say. bravenak Feb 2016 #45
If my tax rates are raised to 77% it would be much cheaper to pay Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #44
None of it adds up. bravenak Feb 2016 #46
Bravenak, you could at least clear this person up... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #59
I would but it might help Bernie. bravenak Feb 2016 #66
I suppose I shouldn't expect honesty... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #68
I just was honest. bravenak Feb 2016 #70
For the status quo, I see. Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #83
Ha ha ha! bravenak Feb 2016 #87
Good grief, he's never said anything about removing progressive taxation... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #57
Bernie sure doesn't have a problem with me and I have been a Democrat wilsonbooks Feb 2016 #47
He has issues with the ones who he needs to fight for his agenda. bravenak Feb 2016 #53
They will play ball with hillary though? I don't think so. wilsonbooks Feb 2016 #58
The democrats in congress? bravenak Feb 2016 #65
That is what the 2020 Democratic primaries will be about. A through housecleaning. wilsonbooks Feb 2016 #71
What if the rest of us are not interested in getting rid of our reps? bravenak Feb 2016 #73
It will be up to the voters to decide if they want to reelect representatives who obstruct a wilsonbooks Feb 2016 #74
The corporate Democrats and the SheilaT Feb 2016 #55
So? Congress? bravenak Feb 2016 #72
It should worry the DNC what rosesaylavee Feb 2016 #56
Sanders is a Democrat... Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #61
I am unsure they would support him bravenak Feb 2016 #69
Exactly! Why isn't anybody else saying this more often? Turn CO Blue Feb 2016 #86
. bravenak Feb 2016 #93
This is a good article . Sanders has a POC problem Arazi Feb 2016 #63
This section in the article explains why Hillary Clinton has so many endorsement and super delegates Gothmog Feb 2016 #88
Yep. bravenak Feb 2016 #91
His sanctimonious pontificating is toxic to any Democrat running. His past insults KittyWampus Feb 2016 #99
Nailed it KittyWampus! redstateblues Feb 2016 #104
It's weird how he has the same problem with Democrats that I have with many Clinton supporters. mhatrw Feb 2016 #107

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
1. Democrats just don't like him. His colleagues in Congress don't like him.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:26 PM
Feb 2016

They don't want to work with him and he can't pull out enough established Dems to win a GE if he is nominated. Young people can not overcome the rest of the Party.

DesertFlower

(11,649 posts)
3. that worries me if he's the nominee.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016

how will members of congress work with him when he says there all "bought" which is true.

that's if he can win the GE. the repubs will go after him with the "socialist" thing. they'll scare people and we might get trump.

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
51. At worst...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:56 PM
Feb 2016

You end up with gridlock. I would say it's gonna be gridlock regardless. Look at Obama, a moderate guy with a lot of Republican-esque policies and it has been gridlock ever since the Republicans took over the House of Reps. At least we would not have to worry about Sanders conspiring with the GOP to shove something like TPP or NAFTA down our throats.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
18. Very true.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:57 PM
Feb 2016

Gotta make friends. Calling everybody corrupt or bought and sold does not make them want to help in any way. I'll call my rep and stupid senators myself if I don't like what he tries. Politics is a TEAM sport.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
75. First of all, he's one of the best liked members of Congress.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

On an interpersonal level and a teamwork level. People actually trust him. Known for being reasonable and consistent, if a bit eccentric.

But most there disagree with his politics.
And it scares many of them, for many reasons.

Do you believe that those who ARE corrupt need to go?
(To jail)
Bernie isn't trying to make friends.
How about the jolly.neocons and their gleeful torture fetish?

They all know he's an honest man. The rich & corrupt are the ones fighting him hardest, trying to brainwash and scare people.

You don't see this? It appears as an enormous elephant in the room. Even dressed in a donkey costume, it's hard to miss.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
77. If he is well liked the endorsements would bear this out.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:58 PM
Feb 2016

Many disagree with his rhetoric and single minded view. Too black and white. Lack of nuance. Sure of his rightness and insulting at times. Refusal to compromise. Bashing the democratic party.
Do the corrupt need jail? Sure, but we would damn near all be there. Crimes need to be prisecuted and if no crimes are in evidence I ignore most charges of corruption. People love to yell corruption.

Bernie needs friends to get one damn iota of his agenda passed. He needs to learn to make friends to get the minority vote. We will not come to him as you can see. At this rate he'll reach her in minority voters by 2018. If candidates do not try to make friends with us they seem to lose elections. We come hard for our friends.

Neocons. Yeah. They are who they are. We have torture in our prisons. Called solitary. SHU.

The rich and corrupt are not stunting Bernie. They are rich. And corrupt. And he had no FRIENDS to help him rein anybody in.

I see. I see a side trying to call everybody corrupt and diss the party and dissing anybody who don't want bernie. They have issues with whole segments of the base, they really seem to hate Obama.

The man in the donkey suit? Hmm? Cause he just started being a dem or what? Funny. Yes. Just because one dresses up in a donkey suit dont make them a democrat.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
85. No idea what your source is
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:05 AM
Feb 2016

But it's 180° from all I've read, and not believable as written. You are describing a figment of your imagination.
Unless you want to provide an authoritative source for your claims?

You and I also have opposite views, i think, on the meaning of Democrat. And democracy, what that means. The vision and hope for America -- what that was all about.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
95. Yeah cause you gotta have friends
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:31 AM
Feb 2016

Sure the system is corrupt and broken, but you've got to keep everyone happy. Want to fix campaign reform? Sure we all want that, but hey we can't change it too much, because it might cost senator x support from his major donors and we need his vote. And congresswoman x relies on support from that corporation for her reelection, got to make sure we don't shake the boat. Cause hell, we all want change, but you gotta have friends you see....

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
64. Those are mightily misinformed claims
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:12 PM
Feb 2016


✨Shame, shame on the abandonment of honesty.

It's highly creepy to me that Hilary affects people this way, as I perceive.

Do you not see the dishonesty drip-drip dripping out of her campaign, from all directions?

Or you don't mind it, bc everybody lies in politics?

I don't see her moral compass, nor a woman who knows what she believes. Too many disconnects.

The creative distortion of truth has been a longtime practice for both Clintons. They're good at it.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
10. The massive crowds gathering across the nation
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:46 PM
Feb 2016

to not like him are great indications of how much he is disliked.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
12. And he gets all those amendments through because nobody likes him!
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:50 PM
Feb 2016

The guy can't work with anyone. Sheez!

NWProf

(51 posts)
8. Big time hit piece on Bernie
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:41 PM
Feb 2016

Basically this article was a compilation of every Hillary talking point that has appeared on DU against Bernie. If you read below the article, you will find that most of the comment writers were solidly against the author's hit piece. They point out that the author really doesn't know Bernie because there are so many falsehoods in the article.

This time there really are no 'Droids in the car.

TheBlackAdder

(28,211 posts)
94. Perhaps it's those Democrats with cosy inbred oil (Koch/BP) relationships, like Hillary's Podesta.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 03:51 AM
Feb 2016

.


Check out the link...



Hillary Clinton rakes in money from fossil fuel interests


Here’s just a partial list of the fossil fuel–friendly bundlers who raised money for Clinton from April through June:


http://grist.org/climate-energy/hillary-clinton-rakes-in-money-from-fossil-fuel-interests/


Heather Podesta and Tony Podesta have raised $31,150 and $74,575, respectively. The power ex-couple are big-shot Democratic lobbyists. Tony’s brother John is Clinton’s campaign chair and former White House chief of staff to Bill Clinton. Even though John Podesta is considered a climate hawk, Tony and his ex-wife Heather represent fossil fuel companies. Heather’s recent past clients include Marathon Oil and Bill Koch’s Oxbow Carbon, a coal giant, and from 2004 to 2006 she lobbied for Koch Industries. Tony lobbied for BP in the wake of its disastrous Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion, and through last year he represented Golden Pass, a company co-owned by ExxonMobil and Qatar Petroleum that wants to export liquefied natural gas. To be fair, they also work on behalf of renewable fuel companies — Tony represents SolarReserve, a solar power company, and Heather lobbies for the ethanol industry. You might call the Podestas the very embodiment of the Obama/Clinton “all of the above” energy policy.



But the contrast between her and her opponents is clear, and it’s indicative of real policy differences. O’Malley has laid out a set of strong, detailed proposals to combat climate change. These include not just measures Obama has begun taking, like regulating carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act, but ones he hasn’t, like adopting zero-tolerance regulation for methane leaks from oil and gas wells and denying new offshore oil leasing permits. Clinton has not endorsed any stances beyond Obama’s except for charging more for coal leases.



“Hillary Clinton’s position is stuck in the past,” says Jamie Henn, a spokesperson for 350 Action. “We have the tools to transition away from fossil fuels. What about all the jobs lost because of climate impacts? We need a president who is willing to make tough decisions about how to transition our economy in the face of climate risk.”




.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
9. It's probably deeper than just the party.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:43 PM
Feb 2016

I know actual socialists, who have been socialist since before this 2015, who don't support him. The consensus is that if he did manage to win the GE, he will walk straight into the buzzsaw of a GOP congress. And that he is too focused on his own ideology and agenda to be a good partner on much of anything else.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
23. If he's too far right, Hillary must be Stalin to them!
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016

And, his personality if fine. He's dogged but he does care a lot about the people he serves.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
24. Honestly?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:13 PM
Feb 2016

They're all Stalin to me. Politicians are not our buddies. I do not love them (except Obama). I do not trust ANY OF THEM. They pander. They use. They lie! They are politicians. Is one better than the other? Meh.
But who would hire me? She would. Boom. C. Final answer. Givememymoneyz.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
76. You should probably ask your actual socialist friends to explain
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:42 PM
Feb 2016

the difference between socialist and democratic socialist to you.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
78. You should probably
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:25 PM
Feb 2016

ask someone to explain the difference between a bandwagon and actual political commitment to you. Or the difference between good political debate and... whatever it is you just did.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
98. Well, you just lumped together two different political philosophies
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:19 AM
Feb 2016

And then complained that one of them shows insufficient commitment to accomplishing the other's goal. They have different goals. That's why they are different political philosophies.

"Randianism does not have enough commitment to Marxist goals!!!"

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
100. No.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:45 AM
Feb 2016

I pointed out that Sanders has issues on the left as well as with the regular party Dems. He does not play well with others, so many activists on the left prefer Clinton. She might be more conservative, but she knows how to listen. The end result for most issue activists (unless your issues align exactly with the candidate's) is better with politicians like that than it is with ideologues who are overly committed to their personal vision.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
102. So...incrementalism is now a terrible idea?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:48 AM
Feb 2016

Your claim is that socialists are unhappy that a democratic socialist is not sufficiently socialist....so they're going to vote for the unabashed capitalist.

Yeah....that makes plenty of sense.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
106. No.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:03 PM
Feb 2016

Activists are unhappy with ideologue politicians who do not support or even acknowledge the validity of their issues and experience. And in some cases actively attack their people for any perceived slight.

Holy moly the immigration activists I know are PO'ed after that accusation of "press hit" against a DREAMer activist.

And trust me, activist know all about incrementalism and compromise. You gotta see the big picture and trust that the arc of history is bending toward justice, otherwise is gets too depressing for words.

On the ground, no one really cares what you ideology is anyway, if you are a good ally and fighter. Sanders is perceived as neither.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
11. He denounced them
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:48 PM
Feb 2016

By voting with them hundreds of times and raising money for them.

And guess what MANY THOUSANDS of Democrats LOVE him.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
17. It doesn't matter anyway
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:57 PM
Feb 2016

because he doesn't have enough black staff for you to vote for him.. lol..

I'm not surprised that a lot of people want to keep the corrupt machine greased... I am surprised that people like yourself that think all politicians are crooks ALSO think a candidate is better if a bunch of crooks want to help him get elected...

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
21. lol
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:02 PM
Feb 2016

you're the easiest target anyone ever had... which isn't great for America, but it helps someone like Hillary...

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
22. And other are even easier.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:07 PM
Feb 2016

For me, anyway. If I want to turn a black voter to Hillary? It really should NOT BE SO EASY. But it is. Show a few things, say a few things, ask a few questions, hint here hint there, abracadabra! Shoulda kept me on team Bernie. Glad it didn't work out between me and tha bern. I like this side better.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
49. No. They cook better.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:49 PM
Feb 2016

All kinds of snacks and they're nice to me and give me extra to take home. Even special secret brownies that make you extra happy. And they have bank accounts so they give them out FREE. Like Bernie. All they want is for me to say, I'm with her, and BOOM! Friendly convo and delicious snacks. They love me! I have been promised that theres more where that came from. One says she will make prime rib and call me to come get a share, socialism, ummm. Delicious! Hillarypeeps know how to feed ya!

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
52. Revealed as never having been to a Sanders meet up ever
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:56 PM
Feb 2016

#sucksforyoubsmeetups

#bspotbrownierecipe (2016 recs on allrecipes.com!)

#bestchiliever



 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
54. Really?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:58 PM
Feb 2016

They don't invite me. Hillpeeps took pity on my lonely self.
I'd get kicked out for being too 'unruly'. Like poor marissa jenae. I snatch mics and shit.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
60. Sad. BS parties are happening all the time and LOVE unruly
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:07 PM
Feb 2016

We're at the local stuff. Barbershops, churches, NAACP, etc

Wish you were here

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
26. I don't understand how the Dems allowed this problem to get this far.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

It's not like Bernie would have had a choice had they laid down the gaunlet long before now. Where was Bernie going to go? The GOP. As one man, one vote, he wouldn't have had any power over anyone to force himself on either party. Now it seems there is a major problem to include, the issues of the open and closed caucuses. I know here is California, you have to vote your Party in the primary. This was designed to prevent outsiders from crossing over to manipulate the vote in the Primary. You can vote for anyone in the General.

The fact that Bernie doesn't like the Dems and the Dems don't like Bernie should have forced a settlement of this issue before now. Never before, has a situation given such credence to the statement, "I don't belong to any organized political party. I am a Democrat."

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
28. He didn't want to be a spoiler, which is more than I can say for some other politicians.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

Leiberman comes to mind.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
29. Ha!
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:24 PM
Feb 2016

They knew he'd fizzle out after NH. Damn near a prophecy.
I think they did it to say 'see lefties! We gave you a shot!' And they did.
Now they can't say the party won't let them run candidates.
Beating him is the only fair thing to do. Beating him badly is better.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
33. And losing the General.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:26 PM
Feb 2016

Yeah... that's smart.

She'll lose for a variety of reasons, but one of them will be because many Bernie supporters, namely independents, fed-up Democrats and moderate Republicans, won't be so motivated to come out for Hillary.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
35. Prolly won't lose the GE
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:29 PM
Feb 2016

Won't win big but will win.
Would I get out of my wonderful memory foam bed to go to the polls for Bernie? I hope so. If he wins you better contact me on the day of to remind me, yo. I be bullshitting if I don't feel it.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
39. It will be damn near impossible to find any moderate Republicans.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:36 PM
Feb 2016

As for independents, many whom are former members of the GOP, I could see them crossing over and voting for Hillary, particularly if the nominee is Trump, who would be viewed as a loose cannon.

Beartracks

(12,821 posts)
62. But you know who WILL come to the polls because of Hillary?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:09 PM
Feb 2016

EVERY REPUBLICAN. She's practically their anti-Christ.

My fear is that, if she is our nominee, we'll get a lot of "meh" on our side, while the opposition will be completely galvanized to come out en masse, foaming at the mouth, to vote for WHOEVER is their nominee, even if they have to hold their noses (which many will need to do) and vote for Trump or Cruz -- because to a Republican, ANY Republican is better than ANY Democrat, and ESPECIALLY Hillary.

But that's just the feeling I get from the people around me in my red state.

===================

 
81. I'm a Berniecrat.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:57 PM
Feb 2016

I'm convinced that Clinton cannot handle the duties of the President of the United States, because she is a follower, not a leader.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
34. Problem, huh? Some of us view it as a rescue operation.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:26 PM
Feb 2016

We're taking our party back from the corporatists whole stole it. Preferably by ballot, but pitchforks and torches if necessary.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
38. Pitchforks and Torches?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:35 PM
Feb 2016

I'm wondering just how large the pitchfork mob that couldn't win an election, would be.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
44. If my tax rates are raised to 77% it would be much cheaper to pay
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:41 PM
Feb 2016

Health insurance premiums with out the assistances of Obamacare. Thirty three cents would be left for me to provide housing, food and utilities. It is tax I can not afford. Talk about cutting our wages. Even if minimum wages was increased one would have a salary of $600 weekly, pay $462 in taxes and be left with $138 to provide for myself. Now this does not add up for me.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
59. Bravenak, you could at least clear this person up...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:06 PM
Feb 2016

...on how tax brackets work. Bernie's tax plan is the same progressive system we have now just with more brackets, ending at higher rates, but no one would pay 77% of their income total. That's insane.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
68. I suppose I shouldn't expect honesty...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:24 PM
Feb 2016

...from the Hillary camp. That kind of thinking will only perpetuate her untrustworthiness in people's eyes and what will lead to her eventual defeat in the GE...should she get there.

 
83. For the status quo, I see.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:59 PM
Feb 2016

Enjoy the bubble that you apparently entered awhile ago and never left. The truth is, Bravenak, is that you are a coward and a defeatist.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
57. Good grief, he's never said anything about removing progressive taxation...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:05 PM
Feb 2016

...do you even know how tax brackets work?

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
47. Bernie sure doesn't have a problem with me and I have been a Democrat
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:44 PM
Feb 2016

all of my 63 years. Nope. No problem at all. Now I do have a problem with Democrats who talk like Democrats but vote like republicans.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
53. He has issues with the ones who he needs to fight for his agenda.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:57 PM
Feb 2016

Unless he plans on walking legislation down to congress and forcing Mitch Mcconell and Paul Ryan to quiver with fear. I think Paul Ryan does PX90 and ol Mitch looks like a dirty fighter.

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
71. That is what the 2020 Democratic primaries will be about. A through housecleaning.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:27 PM
Feb 2016


http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1038992

Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time

Harry S. Truman

Read more at: http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1038992
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
73. What if the rest of us are not interested in getting rid of our reps?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016

You think we defer to him in selecting our candidates?

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
74. It will be up to the voters to decide if they want to reelect representatives who obstruct a
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

populist agenda that the majority of the American people want. My guess is most will get on board.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
55. The corporate Democrats and the
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:02 PM
Feb 2016

establishment ones don't like him. It's really weird the way ordinary people, otherwise known as the 99%, seem to like him.

Someone like him who shakes up the status quo is very threatening to those who are highly invested in the status quo.

Plus, of course, Bernie has been in Congress for how long? So of course he hasn't any experience in working with Congress.

Articles like this are simply a sign of how desperate the establishment is getting.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
72. So? Congress?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:28 PM
Feb 2016

Well that takes care of any yes votes on his legislation that Mitch and Paul won't put up for a vote anyways.

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
56. It should worry the DNC what
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:04 PM
Feb 2016

happens if they do not nominate him if he wins the primary election.

I, for one, will leave the Democratic Party if they try this next summer. I am very unhappy now with the way the DNC Chairwoman has been running the debates. I do not feel that there has been impartiality. This is a silly idea. Hopefully they are not truly considering it.

And what this journalist is not considering is what an energized Democratic electorate would do on election day. If Senator Sanders is the nominee, all boats would rise for the Democrats. And it would prove that we are indeed a big tent.

Mike Nelson

(9,961 posts)
61. Sanders is a Democrat...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:09 PM
Feb 2016

...according to a couple of posts replying to me. I asked, and was told he now identities as a Democrat. So, I believe the Democrats would rally for him, instead of Hillary, if he should win the Democratic nomination.

Did not consider many Democrats already in office may dislike Bernie... I suppose that may be true. After all, he mainly ran against Democrats. Still, I expect the Democrats to support their nominee.

I do agree, with the author, that Bernie would likely be paralyzed by Congress, should he win. Agree also, it's unlikely and would hand full control of the US Government to the Republican Party.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
69. I am unsure they would support him
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:26 PM
Feb 2016

We have never had a non democratic new democratic nominee. And not one who attacked the party for years. I am just not seeing people giving full support, nothing beyond lip service to ideas. Probably run ads against him in the off year

Turn CO Blue

(4,221 posts)
86. Exactly! Why isn't anybody else saying this more often?
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:16 AM
Feb 2016

I mean, nobody important is endorsing him! Nobody important gives him financial support! Nobody important shows up to hear him speak.



Gothmog

(145,486 posts)
88. This section in the article explains why Hillary Clinton has so many endorsement and super delegates
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:25 AM
Feb 2016

From the article cited in the OP

Party opposition to Sanders is especially strong among Democratic officeholders. In FiveThirtyEight’s endorsement primary, Clinton has a lead over Sanders of 466 to 2. Although endorsements themselves may not matter much in swaying voters, they’re an indication of the depth of party support, which will likely translate into a substantial edge for Clinton among the 712 superdelegates at the Democratic convention unless she stumbles badly in the primaries.

Sanders and his supporters see the party support for Clinton as evidence that “the establishment” is against him. But there are two other interpretations. What party leaders necessarily care about is winning the next election. They look at the electability of the presidential candidate as it affects the electoral prospects of candidates at all levels, including their own. The endorsement primary is a symptom of deep anxiety about what Sanders would do to the entire party’s fortunes in November.

The lack of support for Sanders among elected Democrats may also reflect his lack of support for them. During 2015, Clinton raised $18 million for other Democratic candidates, while Sanders did no fundraising for them at all. Those are just last year’s numbers. The difference in party fundraising between them going back decades would surely be even more dramatic. After all, before this campaign began, Sanders was emphatic that he was not a Democrat.

Sanders has left a long trail of denunciations of the Democratic Party. He began on the revolutionary left; in 1980, he served as an elector for the Socialist Workers’ Party, founded by Leon Trotsky and committed to nationalizing major industries. In 1989 he said the Democrats and Republicans were “in reality, one party—the party of the ruling class.” That year he wrote an op-ed in the New York Times describing the two parties as “tweedle-dee” and “tweedle-dum” since both subscribed to what he called an “ideology of greed and vulgarity.” As the Republican Party has moved to the right, Sanders has said the Democrats are better, but he has refused to run as a Democrat and continued to insist—as late as the 2012 election—that he is not a Democrat because the party fails to support the interests of workers.
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
99. His sanctimonious pontificating is toxic to any Democrat running. His past insults
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:26 AM
Feb 2016

on the ENTIRE Democratic party would be used against other Democrats no matter who they are and how they voted or what their constituency is.

The whole myth that Sanders would make sweeping changes hinges on his getting more Democrats elected.

His long list of attacks on the entirety of the Democratic Party would ensure that is impossible.

He is an ideologue using demagoguery to stir up people with anger and making promises with no achievable path.

If he weren't an ideologue maybe he'd have been more specific, maybe he would have qualified his statements.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
107. It's weird how he has the same problem with Democrats that I have with many Clinton supporters.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:19 PM
Feb 2016

I have a real problem with people who are quite comfortable with corruption and inequity just as long as they are getting theirs.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sander's problem w...