2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sander's problem with Democrats
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/02/sanderss-party-problem/460293/leftofcool
(19,460 posts)They don't want to work with him and he can't pull out enough established Dems to win a GE if he is nominated. Young people can not overcome the rest of the Party.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Do I like the rest of those establishment hacks? Meh... not so much.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)how will members of congress work with him when he says there all "bought" which is true.
that's if he can win the GE. the repubs will go after him with the "socialist" thing. they'll scare people and we might get trump.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)You end up with gridlock. I would say it's gonna be gridlock regardless. Look at Obama, a moderate guy with a lot of Republican-esque policies and it has been gridlock ever since the Republicans took over the House of Reps. At least we would not have to worry about Sanders conspiring with the GOP to shove something like TPP or NAFTA down our throats.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Gotta make friends. Calling everybody corrupt or bought and sold does not make them want to help in any way. I'll call my rep and stupid senators myself if I don't like what he tries. Politics is a TEAM sport.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)On an interpersonal level and a teamwork level. People actually trust him. Known for being reasonable and consistent, if a bit eccentric.
But most there disagree with his politics.
And it scares many of them, for many reasons.
Do you believe that those who ARE corrupt need to go?
(To jail)
Bernie isn't trying to make friends.
How about the jolly.neocons and their gleeful torture fetish?
They all know he's an honest man. The rich & corrupt are the ones fighting him hardest, trying to brainwash and scare people.
You don't see this? It appears as an enormous elephant in the room. Even dressed in a donkey costume, it's hard to miss.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Many disagree with his rhetoric and single minded view. Too black and white. Lack of nuance. Sure of his rightness and insulting at times. Refusal to compromise. Bashing the democratic party.
Do the corrupt need jail? Sure, but we would damn near all be there. Crimes need to be prisecuted and if no crimes are in evidence I ignore most charges of corruption. People love to yell corruption.
Bernie needs friends to get one damn iota of his agenda passed. He needs to learn to make friends to get the minority vote. We will not come to him as you can see. At this rate he'll reach her in minority voters by 2018. If candidates do not try to make friends with us they seem to lose elections. We come hard for our friends.
Neocons. Yeah. They are who they are. We have torture in our prisons. Called solitary. SHU.
The rich and corrupt are not stunting Bernie. They are rich. And corrupt. And he had no FRIENDS to help him rein anybody in.
I see. I see a side trying to call everybody corrupt and diss the party and dissing anybody who don't want bernie. They have issues with whole segments of the base, they really seem to hate Obama.
The man in the donkey suit? Hmm? Cause he just started being a dem or what? Funny. Yes. Just because one dresses up in a donkey suit dont make them a democrat.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)But it's 180° from all I've read, and not believable as written. You are describing a figment of your imagination.
Unless you want to provide an authoritative source for your claims?
You and I also have opposite views, i think, on the meaning of Democrat. And democracy, what that means. The vision and hope for America -- what that was all about.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/07/16/bernie-sanderss-limited-appeal-even-to-democrats/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/10/30/bernie-sanders-lacking-congressional-endorsements/74883526/
http://msmagazine.com/blog/2016/01/19/why-is-bernie-yelling-at-me/
http://lansingcitypulse.com/article-12189-the-trouble-with-bernie.html
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Sure the system is corrupt and broken, but you've got to keep everyone happy. Want to fix campaign reform? Sure we all want that, but hey we can't change it too much, because it might cost senator x support from his major donors and we need his vote. And congresswoman x relies on support from that corporation for her reelection, got to make sure we don't shake the boat. Cause hell, we all want change, but you gotta have friends you see....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I find this fascinating.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)✨Shame, shame on the abandonment of honesty.
It's highly creepy to me that Hilary affects people this way, as I perceive.
Do you not see the dishonesty drip-drip dripping out of her campaign, from all directions?
Or you don't mind it, bc everybody lies in politics?
I don't see her moral compass, nor a woman who knows what she believes. Too many disconnects.
The creative distortion of truth has been a longtime practice for both Clintons. They're good at it.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)There is 85 million of us.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)That is the reason for the virtual tie in IA.
boomer55
(592 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)to not like him are great indications of how much he is disliked.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)in SC and NC too!
QC
(26,371 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)The guy can't work with anyone. Sheez!
NWProf
(51 posts)Basically this article was a compilation of every Hillary talking point that has appeared on DU against Bernie. If you read below the article, you will find that most of the comment writers were solidly against the author's hit piece. They point out that the author really doesn't know Bernie because there are so many falsehoods in the article.
This time there really are no 'Droids in the car.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
Check out the link...
Hillary Clinton rakes in money from fossil fuel interests
http://grist.org/climate-energy/hillary-clinton-rakes-in-money-from-fossil-fuel-interests/
.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)I know actual socialists, who have been socialist since before this 2015, who don't support him. The consensus is that if he did manage to win the GE, he will walk straight into the buzzsaw of a GOP congress. And that he is too focused on his own ideology and agenda to be a good partner on much of anything else.
I know some who see him as way too far right for them. Non starter. And his personality.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And, his personality if fine. He's dogged but he does care a lot about the people he serves.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They're all Stalin to me. Politicians are not our buddies. I do not love them (except Obama). I do not trust ANY OF THEM. They pander. They use. They lie! They are politicians. Is one better than the other? Meh.
But who would hire me? She would. Boom. C. Final answer. Givememymoneyz.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Exactly! Thank you.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)the difference between socialist and democratic socialist to you.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)ask someone to explain the difference between a bandwagon and actual political commitment to you. Or the difference between good political debate and... whatever it is you just did.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And then complained that one of them shows insufficient commitment to accomplishing the other's goal. They have different goals. That's why they are different political philosophies.
"Randianism does not have enough commitment to Marxist goals!!!"
I pointed out that Sanders has issues on the left as well as with the regular party Dems. He does not play well with others, so many activists on the left prefer Clinton. She might be more conservative, but she knows how to listen. The end result for most issue activists (unless your issues align exactly with the candidate's) is better with politicians like that than it is with ideologues who are overly committed to their personal vision.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Your claim is that socialists are unhappy that a democratic socialist is not sufficiently socialist....so they're going to vote for the unabashed capitalist.
Yeah....that makes plenty of sense.
Activists are unhappy with ideologue politicians who do not support or even acknowledge the validity of their issues and experience. And in some cases actively attack their people for any perceived slight.
Holy moly the immigration activists I know are PO'ed after that accusation of "press hit" against a DREAMer activist.
And trust me, activist know all about incrementalism and compromise. You gotta see the big picture and trust that the arc of history is bending toward justice, otherwise is gets too depressing for words.
On the ground, no one really cares what you ideology is anyway, if you are a good ally and fighter. Sanders is perceived as neither.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Before he started running for POTUS
jeff47
(26,549 posts)democratic socialist and socialist.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)By voting with them hundreds of times and raising money for them.
And guess what MANY THOUSANDS of Democrats LOVE him.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)because he doesn't have enough black staff for you to vote for him.. lol..
I'm not surprised that a lot of people want to keep the corrupt machine greased... I am surprised that people like yourself that think all politicians are crooks ALSO think a candidate is better if a bunch of crooks want to help him get elected...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I like to see diversity not just hear woofing.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)you're the easiest target anyone ever had... which isn't great for America, but it helps someone like Hillary...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)For me, anyway. If I want to turn a black voter to Hillary? It really should NOT BE SO EASY. But it is. Show a few things, say a few things, ask a few questions, hint here hint there, abracadabra! Shoulda kept me on team Bernie. Glad it didn't work out between me and tha bern. I like this side better.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)#anecdote
#lol
#whoyagunnabelieve
Guess what? I actually believe you!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)#cometojesus
#democraticsocialismisgood
#feelthebern
I remember my Bernie days. Seems like only yesteryear that I was full bernin.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)plus, yeah we're better on the issues
bravenak
(34,648 posts)All kinds of snacks and they're nice to me and give me extra to take home. Even special secret brownies that make you extra happy. And they have bank accounts so they give them out FREE. Like Bernie. All they want is for me to say, I'm with her, and BOOM! Friendly convo and delicious snacks. They love me! I have been promised that theres more where that came from. One says she will make prime rib and call me to come get a share, socialism, ummm. Delicious! Hillarypeeps know how to feed ya!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)#sucksforyoubsmeetups
#bspotbrownierecipe (2016 recs on allrecipes.com!)
#bestchiliever
They don't invite me. Hillpeeps took pity on my lonely self.
I'd get kicked out for being too 'unruly'. Like poor marissa jenae. I snatch mics and shit.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)We're at the local stuff. Barbershops, churches, NAACP, etc
Wish you were here
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)[img][/img]
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)[img][/img]
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I think I woulda been just like you if I stayed with tha bern.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Makes her look horrible, TBH.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)They don't like getting reamed for taking the bribes
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We shall reward them as always. And it was ever thus.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)It's not like Bernie would have had a choice had they laid down the gaunlet long before now. Where was Bernie going to go? The GOP. As one man, one vote, he wouldn't have had any power over anyone to force himself on either party. Now it seems there is a major problem to include, the issues of the open and closed caucuses. I know here is California, you have to vote your Party in the primary. This was designed to prevent outsiders from crossing over to manipulate the vote in the Primary. You can vote for anyone in the General.
The fact that Bernie doesn't like the Dems and the Dems don't like Bernie should have forced a settlement of this issue before now. Never before, has a situation given such credence to the statement, "I don't belong to any organized political party. I am a Democrat."
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Leiberman comes to mind.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They knew he'd fizzle out after NH. Damn near a prophecy.
I think they did it to say 'see lefties! We gave you a shot!' And they did.
Now they can't say the party won't let them run candidates.
Beating him is the only fair thing to do. Beating him badly is better.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Yeah... that's smart.
She'll lose for a variety of reasons, but one of them will be because many Bernie supporters, namely independents, fed-up Democrats and moderate Republicans, won't be so motivated to come out for Hillary.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Won't win big but will win.
Would I get out of my wonderful memory foam bed to go to the polls for Bernie? I hope so. If he wins you better contact me on the day of to remind me, yo. I be bullshitting if I don't feel it.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)As for independents, many whom are former members of the GOP, I could see them crossing over and voting for Hillary, particularly if the nominee is Trump, who would be viewed as a loose cannon.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)EVERY REPUBLICAN. She's practically their anti-Christ.
My fear is that, if she is our nominee, we'll get a lot of "meh" on our side, while the opposition will be completely galvanized to come out en masse, foaming at the mouth, to vote for WHOEVER is their nominee, even if they have to hold their noses (which many will need to do) and vote for Trump or Cruz -- because to a Republican, ANY Republican is better than ANY Democrat, and ESPECIALLY Hillary.
But that's just the feeling I get from the people around me in my red state.
===================
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)I'm convinced that Clinton cannot handle the duties of the President of the United States, because she is a follower, not a leader.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)We're taking our party back from the corporatists whole stole it. Preferably by ballot, but pitchforks and torches if necessary.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)I'm wondering just how large the pitchfork mob that couldn't win an election, would be.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Almost sad we won't get to see it. Sure it would be a spectacular ten minute show.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)mcar
(42,368 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Health insurance premiums with out the assistances of Obamacare. Thirty three cents would be left for me to provide housing, food and utilities. It is tax I can not afford. Talk about cutting our wages. Even if minimum wages was increased one would have a salary of $600 weekly, pay $462 in taxes and be left with $138 to provide for myself. Now this does not add up for me.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That's why his message is convoluted.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...on how tax brackets work. Bernie's tax plan is the same progressive system we have now just with more brackets, ending at higher rates, but no one would pay 77% of their income total. That's insane.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...from the Hillary camp. That kind of thinking will only perpetuate her untrustworthiness in people's eyes and what will lead to her eventual defeat in the GE...should she get there.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I don't want to help him. Honestly.
Rocky the Leprechaun
(222 posts)Enjoy the bubble that you apparently entered awhile ago and never left. The truth is, Bravenak, is that you are a coward and a defeatist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...do you even know how tax brackets work?
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)all of my 63 years. Nope. No problem at all. Now I do have a problem with Democrats who talk like Democrats but vote like republicans.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Unless he plans on walking legislation down to congress and forcing Mitch Mcconell and Paul Ryan to quiver with fear. I think Paul Ryan does PX90 and ol Mitch looks like a dirty fighter.
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Yes. Him? Not so much.
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1038992
Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time
Harry S. Truman
Read more at: http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1038992
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You think we defer to him in selecting our candidates?
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)populist agenda that the majority of the American people want. My guess is most will get on board.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)establishment ones don't like him. It's really weird the way ordinary people, otherwise known as the 99%, seem to like him.
Someone like him who shakes up the status quo is very threatening to those who are highly invested in the status quo.
Plus, of course, Bernie has been in Congress for how long? So of course he hasn't any experience in working with Congress.
Articles like this are simply a sign of how desperate the establishment is getting.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Well that takes care of any yes votes on his legislation that Mitch and Paul won't put up for a vote anyways.
rosesaylavee
(12,126 posts)happens if they do not nominate him if he wins the primary election.
I, for one, will leave the Democratic Party if they try this next summer. I am very unhappy now with the way the DNC Chairwoman has been running the debates. I do not feel that there has been impartiality. This is a silly idea. Hopefully they are not truly considering it.
And what this journalist is not considering is what an energized Democratic electorate would do on election day. If Senator Sanders is the nominee, all boats would rise for the Democrats. And it would prove that we are indeed a big tent.
Mike Nelson
(9,961 posts)...according to a couple of posts replying to me. I asked, and was told he now identities as a Democrat. So, I believe the Democrats would rally for him, instead of Hillary, if he should win the Democratic nomination.
Did not consider many Democrats already in office may dislike Bernie... I suppose that may be true. After all, he mainly ran against Democrats. Still, I expect the Democrats to support their nominee.
I do agree, with the author, that Bernie would likely be paralyzed by Congress, should he win. Agree also, it's unlikely and would hand full control of the US Government to the Republican Party.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We have never had a non democratic new democratic nominee. And not one who attacked the party for years. I am just not seeing people giving full support, nothing beyond lip service to ideas. Probably run ads against him in the off year
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)I mean, nobody important is endorsing him! Nobody important gives him financial support! Nobody important shows up to hear him speak.
I wanna know too!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)its time to take action!
Gothmog
(145,486 posts)From the article cited in the OP
Sanders and his supporters see the party support for Clinton as evidence that the establishment is against him. But there are two other interpretations. What party leaders necessarily care about is winning the next election. They look at the electability of the presidential candidate as it affects the electoral prospects of candidates at all levels, including their own. The endorsement primary is a symptom of deep anxiety about what Sanders would do to the entire partys fortunes in November.
The lack of support for Sanders among elected Democrats may also reflect his lack of support for them. During 2015, Clinton raised $18 million for other Democratic candidates, while Sanders did no fundraising for them at all. Those are just last years numbers. The difference in party fundraising between them going back decades would surely be even more dramatic. After all, before this campaign began, Sanders was emphatic that he was not a Democrat.
Sanders has left a long trail of denunciations of the Democratic Party. He began on the revolutionary left; in 1980, he served as an elector for the Socialist Workers Party, founded by Leon Trotsky and committed to nationalizing major industries. In 1989 he said the Democrats and Republicans were in reality, one partythe party of the ruling class. That year he wrote an op-ed in the New York Times describing the two parties as tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum since both subscribed to what he called an ideology of greed and vulgarity. As the Republican Party has moved to the right, Sanders has said the Democrats are better, but he has refused to run as a Democrat and continued to insistas late as the 2012 electionthat he is not a Democrat because the party fails to support the interests of workers.
That part explains his soon to be loss. Team sport.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)on the ENTIRE Democratic party would be used against other Democrats no matter who they are and how they voted or what their constituency is.
The whole myth that Sanders would make sweeping changes hinges on his getting more Democrats elected.
His long list of attacks on the entirety of the Democratic Party would ensure that is impossible.
He is an ideologue using demagoguery to stir up people with anger and making promises with no achievable path.
If he weren't an ideologue maybe he'd have been more specific, maybe he would have qualified his statements.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)I have a real problem with people who are quite comfortable with corruption and inequity just as long as they are getting theirs.