Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nightjock

(1,408 posts)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 05:58 PM Feb 2016

Super Delegates 359-8?!? Can the dem party steal this thing?

I was just flipping through tv channels and stopped on Msnbc and saw Hillary has all those "super delegates".

Can the more informed political junkies here help me out with how this happens? I sat on the fence a LONG time before I chose to support Bernie. I truly feel he is going to erase many of Hilary's leads in upcoming states. I have even mentioned (here and to friends) that I feel like we are living through a future Ken Burns documentary.

Please understand I am NOT saying Hillary Clinton would "steal" this thing. I just don't trust the people in charge of the Dem party right now and I am completely dumbfounded that ONE state has had a primary and she has this crazy edge.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Super Delegates 359-8?!? Can the dem party steal this thing? (Original Post) Nightjock Feb 2016 OP
It's Hillary's only REAL firewall. NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #1
+ zillion roguevalley Feb 2016 #10
Yeah she would onecaliberal Feb 2016 #2
He also had the Iowa delegate count at 30 - 21, Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #3
They could also create a brokered convention Renew Deal Feb 2016 #22
Politically unlikely. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #24
Superdelegates are free to change their support at any time prior to the convention. Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #4
Then WHY do they even bother stating a preference now? cascadiance Feb 2016 #7
It's really no different from an endorsement. Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #11
they are mostly asked by Bill Clinton and he can be persuasive. Expect a lot of roguevalley Feb 2016 #13
Because that's where they are currently pledged. When and if they change, that'll change, too. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #12
I think it's one thing to say they've endorsed them, and another to say that the vote has been cast. cascadiance Feb 2016 #16
Superdelegates.... John Poet Feb 2016 #5
The way the party tries to be the UNDemocratic Party, by promoting UNdemocratic votes!!! cascadiance Feb 2016 #6
There's not much of a party worth fighting over. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #8
Yeah, well (if graphically) put. We really have to work even harder than usual to get out the vote. JudyM Feb 2016 #23
That's the way things work. leftofcool Feb 2016 #9
And the people expressing shock and out rage have been Democrats for like five minutes wyldwolf Feb 2016 #15
like the kids at the caucus, not knowing that MOM voters could flip their votes..... bettyellen Feb 2016 #17
The super delegates have always wound up going with the candidate who does best SheilaT Feb 2016 #14
When you look at this page in the New York Times, ask yourself which party appears to want democracy cascadiance Feb 2016 #18
Super delegates can change allegiance. It's not written in stone. Vinca Feb 2016 #19
Superdelegates... moondust Feb 2016 #20
It goes to the question of whether the super-delegates have a right to vote the way they wish Renew Deal Feb 2016 #21
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
3. He also had the Iowa delegate count at 30 - 21,
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:01 PM
Feb 2016

8 of that 30 were superdelegates.


It was a horribly biased report. The Superdelegates don't cast their votes until the convention. The reason they exist is to avoid a brokered convention. If 3 candidates split earned delegates the SDs could put one candidate over the top (presumably the leading candidate).


I think it is extremely unlikely that the SDs will overturn the will of the voters. The candidate with the most earned delegates will most likely be the nominee. If not, the nominee will be seen as illegitimate.


Renew Deal

(81,860 posts)
22. They could also create a brokered convention
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:27 PM
Feb 2016

Because of the candidates are close, the delegates could swing the election one way or another. A candidate would win the election by hundreds of delegates and lose at the convention.

Imagine the chaos if it's close and it is clear that super-delegates pick someone else.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
24. Politically unlikely.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016

The SDs have an investment in the success of the party. Creating an illegitimate nominee is not in their best interest.



Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
4. Superdelegates are free to change their support at any time prior to the convention.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:03 PM
Feb 2016

If Sanders is able to win more delegates in primaries and caucuses, they will not go against the will of the people. They know it would be a disaster for them in the general election if they did that. They are mostly elected officials. They may prefer Hillary but they aren't stupid enough to alienate half their voters.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
7. Then WHY do they even bother stating a preference now?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:08 PM
Feb 2016

That's like standing in front of a voting booth and saying "You should vote for so and so." SAME difference!!!

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
11. It's really no different from an endorsement.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:18 PM
Feb 2016

The way the Clinton campaign counts them as part of her delegate count is really misleading. And they know that.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
13. they are mostly asked by Bill Clinton and he can be persuasive. Expect a lot of
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:20 PM
Feb 2016

talk about them and the electoral college between now and the end.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
12. Because that's where they are currently pledged. When and if they change, that'll change, too.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:19 PM
Feb 2016

It's nothing new and only deemed nefarious because they're not pledged to Sanders.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
16. I think it's one thing to say they've endorsed them, and another to say that the vote has been cast.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:29 PM
Feb 2016

... which is what is happening here when they post those as totals.

It's like saying you've already had the privilege at early voting before everyone else and have done so already, when as noted, these votes could change if the rest of the votes go more for Bernie later, and they don't want to be viewed as voting outside of what most Americans want, especially when their "votes" as delegates count for far more than just another voter's "vote" counts.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
5. Superdelegates....
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:06 PM
Feb 2016

I think there's TOO many superdelegates under current party rules..... They have too much influence in proportion to the party's rank and file. What is it now, roughly a third of the total number required for the nomination?



 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
8. There's not much of a party worth fighting over.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:12 PM
Feb 2016

Just a rotted corrupt corpse poised in front of a corporate feed trough. Sanders is the last shot at restoring traditional Democratic values and bringing fresh blood in. If we fail him, it's all over.

JudyM

(29,250 posts)
23. Yeah, well (if graphically) put. We really have to work even harder than usual to get out the vote.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 09:01 PM
Feb 2016
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
17. like the kids at the caucus, not knowing that MOM voters could flip their votes.....
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:32 PM
Feb 2016

so they yelled at the old guy with the cane. That was brilliant.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
14. The super delegates have always wound up going with the candidate who does best
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:27 PM
Feb 2016

in the primary season. And, no, we haven't had them forever. Only since 1984.

Plus, as has already been pointed out, they are free to change their mind. They are not pledged in the way the delegates selected via caucus or primary are pledged.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
18. When you look at this page in the New York Times, ask yourself which party appears to want democracy
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:34 PM
Feb 2016

... more, Republicans or Democrats, when they say that Clinton has "won" all of those super delegates already, and there are NO superdelegates "won" on the Republican side.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html?_r=1

THIS SHIT TURNS OFF VOTERS FOLKS!!!! It looks blatantly like the system is rigged!

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
19. Super delegates can change allegiance. It's not written in stone.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 06:39 PM
Feb 2016

Once Obama picked up steam they fled Clinton. Secondly, should the Democratic party super delegates overturn the popular vote of rank and file Democrats, it would be the end of the Democratic Party. I would run, not walk, to change my affiliation to Independent.

Renew Deal

(81,860 posts)
21. It goes to the question of whether the super-delegates have a right to vote the way they wish
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 08:23 PM
Feb 2016

If they can then it is not a theft. If they can, the race is likely over already. If people feel they can't, then anything is possible.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Super Delegates 359-8?!? ...