Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 912 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BOOM! He want there on Romneycare (Original Post)
Jeff In Milwaukee
Oct 2012
OP
Says that covering children up to 26 is already available from the private sector
Jeff In Milwaukee
Oct 2012
#5
Tcbys
(63 posts)1. Good Finally he slamed Romeny on.
polichick
(37,152 posts)2. And now Rmoney is being a dick about it - Rmoneycare good, Obamacare bad.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)3. Obama is counter-punching on bi-partisanship
Excellent.
Does Romney mean that he would repeal Obamacare for the SOLE REASON that it didn't have enough Republican support? Unfortunately, Republicans are stupid enough to believe that.
polichick
(37,152 posts)4. Mitt's really grasping at straws, but yeah, Republicans will buy it.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)5. Says that covering children up to 26 is already available from the private sector
Really? Oh really?
Politifact should have fun with that one.