Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

awake

(3,226 posts)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:43 PM Feb 2016

When Hillary raises her voice she is charged with "screaming" when Bernie yells no problem

I have never heard of any blow back when Bernie yells but Hillary is held to a different standard. Even though I support Bernie it is clear to see that the media will not look kindly to Hillary raising her voice. Obama had a similar issue where if he came off as upset he would have been called an "angry Black man". It is unfortunate that in 2016 there are double standards. I have noticed that Elizabeth Warren is able to raise her voice with out the same blow back and I am not sure why this is.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Hillary raises her voice she is charged with "screaming" when Bernie yells no problem (Original Post) awake Feb 2016 OP
So Hillary should run an ad, how unfair everyone is being to her. closeupready Feb 2016 #1
I would not think that would help awake Feb 2016 #2
But then, isn't this post pointless? What IS your point? closeupready Feb 2016 #4
on another thread this article was posted and got me thinking awake Feb 2016 #8
It highlights the sexism and hypocrisy and bullying of Sanders supporters. KittyWampus Feb 2016 #26
In pursuit of what, Hillary's nomination? Victim-in-Chief? If she can't take it, closeupready Feb 2016 #31
She's making that point pretty consistently WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #10
I have seen many here complain about Bernie yelling. m-lekktor Feb 2016 #3
Yes here that may be true but not in the main stream media awake Feb 2016 #5
I will take your word for it! I haven't seen much one way or the other on the yelling thing m-lekktor Feb 2016 #11
Please see Post #13. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #14
I read it! m-lekktor Feb 2016 #23
I disagree...to a point Oilwellian Feb 2016 #43
Just wait -- if Elizabeth Warren endorses Hillary Hortensis Feb 2016 #6
when anyone yells, they lose me hollysmom Feb 2016 #7
Poor persecuted Hillary. earthside Feb 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #16
There's just something about Hillary's voice. Vinca Feb 2016 #12
Hillary needs a good voice coach. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #18
Exactly. She's not a bad person, but she ends up coming off just the opposite. Vinca Feb 2016 #25
Comments about looks, voice, clothing, etc. hurt female candidates, while not hurting males. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #13
Bernie's hair was an issue till he owned it and made it part of a logo awake Feb 2016 #19
Bernie's hair wouldn't have affected him anyway, without his ownership--a weird societal thing. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #28
Undoubtedly true. earthside Feb 2016 #22
True. Her direct action will reflect negatively. But attention needs to be drawn to this phenomenon. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #29
Women, in general, put more stock in how they dress nichomachus Feb 2016 #36
Michelle Obama was/is not running for office. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #41
Some voices are more pleasing to the ear NowSam Feb 2016 #15
Happens to anyone who is habitually quieter and raises their voice to be heard Fumesucker Feb 2016 #17
Yes the media will have a double standard treestar Feb 2016 #20
Interesting. H2O Man Feb 2016 #21
No problem for Madam President at meetings with her cabinet. oasis Feb 2016 #24
Yep. While I think she is actually hampered by a mildly unpleasant voice... Orsino Feb 2016 #27
Bullchit. They both yell. senz Feb 2016 #30
That is false. He regularly gets criticised for shouting cali Feb 2016 #32
I had not noticed thoes awake Feb 2016 #33
Thanks. intheflow Feb 2016 #37
This ^ nt retrowire Feb 2016 #44
Boo Hoo! n/t RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #34
I don't find her voice irritating, sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #35
Ahhh, its a Jewish thing. Maybe its tied to failing hearing or something. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #38
Joe Scum did exactly that last week. He remarked on HRC's voice and the very next CTyankee Feb 2016 #39
The Problem For Clinton Is Her Voice Doesn't Seem Grounded DrFunkenstein Feb 2016 #40
IMO, it is the pitch. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #42
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
4. But then, isn't this post pointless? What IS your point?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:48 PM
Feb 2016

I'm not understanding why you started this thread.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
31. In pursuit of what, Hillary's nomination? Victim-in-Chief? If she can't take it,
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:11 PM
Feb 2016

then she needs to withdraw from the race.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
3. I have seen many here complain about Bernie yelling.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

"I don't like being yelled at" etc. when somebody complains about Hillary yelling it is SEXISM though.

awake

(3,226 posts)
5. Yes here that may be true but not in the main stream media
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie gets a pass while Hillary is attacked, now the media will attack Bernie for being a "Radical Solicits".

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
11. I will take your word for it! I haven't seen much one way or the other on the yelling thing
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:52 PM
Feb 2016

in the media, just the DUer comments in regards to it!

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
23. I read it!
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:03 PM
Feb 2016

We can make fun of fat Rush limbaugh and Trumps ridiculous hair and it doesn't effect them like it does women according to this. I appreciate you directing me to your post. I will absorb this for a bit.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
43. I disagree...to a point
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 05:15 PM
Feb 2016

Usually, when someone yells at me and tells me we can do something together that is positive, I can handle it. But if someone yells at me and says we can't do something positive, it's a real turn off. It doesn't matter what gender they are in that scenario.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
6. Just wait -- if Elizabeth Warren endorses Hillary
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

she'll be seen as yet another traitor and be stood against the same wall as Hillary.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
7. when anyone yells, they lose me
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:51 PM
Feb 2016

and I can tell you,I could not watch the debate because both seemed to be yelling, I read the transcript instead.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
9. Poor persecuted Hillary.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:52 PM
Feb 2016

Actually, it isn't that Hillary raises her voice, it's that the tone and inflection indicate a kind of desperation ... in verbal communication nuance matters.

For me, when Hillary's eyes get big and her voice gets loud, it's an indication that she is telling a fib.

Response to earthside (Reply #9)

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
12. There's just something about Hillary's voice.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:53 PM
Feb 2016

She's quite likable when she speaks in a normal tone of voice. It usually happens for about 5 minutes into an event, then she morphs into the person who gives me flashbacks to my late stepmother . . . and that's not a good thing. One of the pundits made the observation that she doesn't have a natural talent for politicking and always seems uncomfortable in her own skin. I think that's what the problem is. Bill was a natural. Obama was a natural. Bernie's a natural. Elizabeth Warren is a natural. I guess that's why they can raise their voices and not seem phony the way Hillary does.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,719 posts)
18. Hillary needs a good voice coach.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:56 PM
Feb 2016

It's possible to speak loudly and intensely without sounding forced or like you are screaming. It's just a matter of learning how to control your breath and not tensing up your vocal cords. A voice coach could help her. I don't think it's a matter of personality as much as just not knowing how to speak strongly but comfortably - which some people can do naturally but she can't. Her "normal" voice is OK; it's her fortissimo voice that needs work.

TheBlackAdder

(28,205 posts)
13. Comments about looks, voice, clothing, etc. hurt female candidates, while not hurting males.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:53 PM
Feb 2016

.


Gendered attacks, like those, are deliberately used in the media and in campaigns.


We've seen it with Geraldine Ferraro, Sarah Palin, and Hillary Clinton. They talk about clothes, eyeglasses, hair style, their voice, and use terms like scornful, shrewish, harpie, beautiful, feminine, etc. all to drive electability down.


Rutgers-Eagleton Center for American Woman and Politics, as well as other researchers, found a 5% reduction in electability when mentioning anything POSITIVE or NEGATIVE about the looks or personal attributes of female candidates. Men are not negatively impacted by these things... just women.


http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/


.

awake

(3,226 posts)
19. Bernie's hair was an issue till he owned it and made it part of a logo
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:56 PM
Feb 2016

And do not forget Marcos "boots"

earthside

(6,960 posts)
22. Undoubtedly true.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:00 PM
Feb 2016

But whining about is not going to garner votes for a woman candidate.

As Hillary herself would say: Deal with reality!

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
36. Women, in general, put more stock in how they dress
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

So it's only natural that people pay attention to it.

Men, generally, wear what amount to "uniforms." Watch the debate. Men will be dressed in a dark suit, striped tie, and black shoes. But then, look at anything in society. Men are wearing their uniforms. Women try to dress differently, to attract attention, and to be unique. God forbid that two women show up -- especially at a society event -- wearing the same outfit.

This invites comment and critique. Watch a red-carpet show. When was the last time anyone ever asked a man "Who are you wearing?" Most women are asked. You can claim that's sexist, if you want, but most women would be devastated if no one paid any attention to the outfit -- especially when she spent a lot of money on it and spent an afternoon picking out just the right shoes to go with it.

And before anyone gets too bent out of shape, just remember all the gushing talk about Michelle Obama -- even here on DU -- about how beautiful she is, now classy she dresses, how her hair is gorgeous. Was that all sexist? I don't think so.

So, this is pretty much how society works. The fact that it spills over into the political sphere is natural.

TheBlackAdder

(28,205 posts)
41. Michelle Obama was/is not running for office.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:44 PM
Feb 2016

.


Regardless of how you try to paint this construct, the damage to a woman is there.

Female politicians know this dynamic too, and would rather not have that as part of the discourse. While the men go right to the topics, the female candidates are first told how pretty or ugly they look, and then they might move to substance, but most of the time, their 20-30 seconds are used up.

It is used in the media and online to trivialize a woman, much like mentioning why a female politician is running when there are children in the house--to evoke subconscious gender thoughts. The media and political campaigns know there damage is inflicted on a candidate receiving such attention.


Missing are the comments of a 'shrill' or 'cackling' voice. They are often followed by insinuations of a dowager or shrew.


Yet, conscious or not, the loss of 5% point of electability when these things occur is what's at question.


.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
15. Some voices are more pleasing to the ear
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

than others but of course it is individual preference. I think I don't mind Bernie getting Lout because when he does he is speaking truth to power.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
17. Happens to anyone who is habitually quieter and raises their voice to be heard
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

People who are always loud get away with it, it's part of who they are.

It's mostly loud people who don't know this.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
20. Yes the media will have a double standard
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:57 PM
Feb 2016

White men can do whatever and don't have to deal with these things.

H2O Man

(73,558 posts)
21. Interesting.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

Recommended.

I have heard (on tv) people make note of Bernie's speaking loudly. But it doesn't compare to the amount of negative attention that results when Hillary speaks loudly. A large part of that, in my opinion, is rooted in sexism. And part of it is due to some people attacking Ms. Clinton for anything and everything she says or does.

oasis

(49,388 posts)
24. No problem for Madam President at meetings with her cabinet.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:03 PM
Feb 2016

Right now, she's in campaign mode. I met her at book signing (2003-2004?) she had a most amiable, gracious disposition and a soothing voice tone.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
27. Yep. While I think she is actually hampered by a mildly unpleasant voice...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:06 PM
Feb 2016

...the "screaming" and "screeching" charges are just sexist.

intheflow

(28,476 posts)
37. Thanks.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

I was going to post all of these but you saved me from searching for them again.

I'll say that posts saying Clinton screetches or is shrill are sexist because those are terms that have historically been used about women. But screaming isn't one of those terms. To wit: the Dean Scream, Munch's painting The Scream depicts a male, "screaming" is used to describe the vocal technique used in most heavy metal and punk music (dominantly male genres), etc.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
35. I don't find her voice irritating,
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:34 PM
Feb 2016

but each of us has a different level of tolerance.

However, I found Perot's voice a bit much to
listen to, but it did not seem to hurt his
campaign. jmo.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
38. Ahhh, its a Jewish thing. Maybe its tied to failing hearing or something.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

Whoa! I can hear the alerts being typed all the way here in Santa Fe.

Well, here's another: Some of my best friends are jews. Hell, almost all of them are. Go figure.

Oh, and I married a Puerto Rican Baptist girl (shocked the hell out of my HibernoAmerican family) so how can I earn an alert by that? Hell. Puerto Rican girls (baptist or not) are HOT. How about that? Anti Semetic, racist and sexist all in one shot. Enjoy!

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
39. Joe Scum did exactly that last week. He remarked on HRC's voice and the very next
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:11 PM
Feb 2016

clip of Bernie's was also loud and Joe said nothing. I support Bernie but if we're going to harp on HRC's voice, we have to do it for ALL of the candidates.

DrFunkenstein

(8,745 posts)
40. The Problem For Clinton Is Her Voice Doesn't Seem Grounded
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:23 PM
Feb 2016

She comes off like a bad actor who is unable to embody the character from within.

In music, there are people like, say, Kurt Cobain who can sing from a genuine place, and people who don't have the courage of their convictions.

Bob Dylan didn't have a "good voice," but you believed that he meant every word he said/mumbled.

I don't doubt Clinton when she says that she envies how "natural" her husband has been at public speaking. I'm sure Clinton comes off as much more sincere in an intimate setting, but on the stump she sounds (in my humble opinion, of course) like a hack.

Elizabeth Warren believes what she says, so raising her voice doesn't come off as a calculation.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
42. IMO, it is the pitch.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:47 PM
Feb 2016

Her higher pitched voice sounds more like a scream while Bernie's lower pitched voice sounds more like a yell.


Call it sexist if you want, but it is the sound that is being made which people are commenting on. Not her gender.




Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When Hillary raises her v...