2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders, a decent man, tells Berniebros to cut the crap
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) had a terse message for any of his supporters who engage in online harassment: We dont want that crap. He told CNN on Sunday that the so-called Berniebro phenomenon is disgusting and that anybody who is supporting me that is doing the sexist things we dont want them.
The Berniebro phenomenon, where a mob of online Sanders supporters attack politicians and writers who express views critical of the Vermont senator or supportive of his Democratic rival Secretary Hilary Clinton, launched numerous thinkpieces from journalists unfortunate enough to encounter them online. At their worst, Berniebros have accused Clinton supporters of voting based on who had the vagina and have invented novel sexist terms such as clitrash.
Meanwhile, the Sanders campaign has engaged in an escalating series of tactics trying to convince the Berniebros to cut it out. Sanders rapid response director asked the senators supporters to chill on Twitter:
See more here: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/07/3746988/bernie-sanders-tells-berniebros-to-knock-it-off-we-dont-want-that-crap/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+matthewyglesias+%28Matthew+Yglesias%29
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Very decent of him to acknowlege the issue an come out against it.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Not being facetious. I am genuinely proud of you.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I don't see what you see.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Democrats should be better than this.
Response to Cary (Original post)
Cary This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)I posted it by accident.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Yet I have been abused here at DU by "Berniebros", and then I am told that this abuse is my own fault.
So I am not happy with Berniebros, generally. I'm sorry if I lumped you in with the hoi polloi, but it's not like there is a lot of decent Bernie Sanders supporters telling people to cut this out.
I don't like the stuff being said about Hillary Clinton. It is unjust and unreasonable and no way for Democrats to act.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)I'm not so certain about his campaign.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)It literally makes women invisible. I haven't seen anyone try to prove that overly zealous Sanders supporters who make negative attacks on some public Clinton supporters are overwhelmingly male. If that is the accusation, then openly say so. If it isn't then why airbrush women out of the picture? That comes pretty damn close to the standard definition of sexism. Literally.
Cary
(11,746 posts)I don't see where sexism has anything to do with that. I don't really care what they call themselves.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)...it was not done by any group associated with the Sanders campaign, nor by any group that has endorsed Sanders (like a Union, or MoveOn etc.) Which means, it the term was coined by some who supported Sanders it was done so by a small number of individuals. I don't know of any Beriebro websites let alone groups.
So for me the question remains - why has a feminist oriented campaign allowed surrogates for it to embrace this kind of language in national media? I don't care what jerks call themselves either, that isn't my point though.
The truth is that passionate support for Sanders is usually associated with a young demographic. Every national pundit repeats that observation with polling data to back it up. One way the young tend to be dismissed is with descriptions of them as being over zealous, passionate without an ability to reason things through yet etc. I seldom see the so called Berniebro phenomena described as representing the behavior of just a tiny fraction of Sanders supporters. Instead the word "some" is used. Well some just as accurately describes 95% as it does 5%. It doesn't take much of a leap in logic to conclude that Berniebros are probaby young and that it is young men only who feel passionately about Bernie
Yes Bernie Sanders was right to condemn abusive postings sent to public Clinton supporters regardless of how few of his real supporters made/make them. But the Clinton camp should disavow use of the term Berniebros also. It is sexist. in two ways. On the obvious level it labels a non gender specific behavior with gender specific terminology. But more important in my mind, it indirectly but clearly in my mind none the less, minimizes the importance of a large sub set of younger women - those who support Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton by large percentages. Since Bernie's support is so clearly linked to the young, a wholesale attack on "some" Sanders supporters, as Berniebros tars young activists in general and relegates young women to the shadows once again.
Sorry to go on so long about this, but this stuff bugs me. The whole problem would not be an issue if condemnations of legitimately deplorable behavior didn't so prominently, inappropriately, highlight gender.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Allegedly from Bernie Sanders.
I'm not going to worry about it. I have seen enough atrociousness, and I have been attacked enough times by low information losers.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)It was coined by an Atlantic author, but is in the same vein as Obama Boys.
http://www.salon.com/2008/04/14/obama_supporters/
Cary
(11,746 posts)Really. I do find it interesting though that Bernie Sanders is being ignored and I am getting all manner of evasion here. Obviously his followers are fair weather friends.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)First, I'm a woman. I've never trolled other women and called them sexist names on social media, so he's not talking to me.
Second, he did come out and condemn anyone who is doing that and asked them to stop.
Third, they don't have to stop because they're not officially part of his campaign and he can't force them to do so (even though they should).
Fourth, Hillary's DIRECT surrogates have made sexist claims.
Fifth, and Hillary didn't tell them to stop - and, in fact, doubled down on those remarks - instead of telling her official surrogates who should be listening to her to stop.
That you can't understand that is telling.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)..and it most definitely wasn't a self-identification. It is meant as a pejorative, but some have taken to calling themselves by the name.
Or at least that's the earliest occurrence of the term that I know of.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/here-comes-the-berniebro-bernie-sanders/411070/
This article was linked to by madfloridian at the time of its publishing back in October of 2015.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251695816
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)This is a good step, but it's about six months late.
Cary
(11,746 posts)But the moving finger writes and having writ moves on. It is a good step. Both sides need to embrace this.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I'm not holding my breath.
Cary
(11,746 posts)I'm not being facetious. I mean respectfully. You feel the way you feel, and I respect that.
But as I said I'm not going to allow any goons to move me one way or another. Mark my words, the people you don't appreciate are and always will be irrelevant. So I will not allow them to affect me one way or the other, because they're not worth it.
We know who they are.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Perhaps I need to rethink things along your lines? Sheesh.
I did put two of them on ignore.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)A lot of the Berniebros on ignore here.
I can only imagine what they are saying to you. Many of them are heavily invested in the idea that the nasty Berniebro is a myth that doesn't exist and is made up by Clinton supporters to hurt Bernie.
If they are attacking you for this OP point them back to the words of their chosen Presidential candidate.
Cary
(11,746 posts)They simply ignore that fact and continue to insist that it is okay for them to be atrocious because Hillary Clinton supporters are atrocious, they say.
Over and over and over.
betsuni
(25,536 posts)Look at them, indeed. So many threads become master baiter contests that have nothing to do with politics or anything.
Cary
(11,746 posts)I always thought we were better.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... that such a thing didn't really exist, and that people were just exaggerating and creating a "boogieman" from their own imaginations.
Now, such claims are obviously false and absurd on the face of it ... we've ALWAYS known they existed and we can plainly see them for what they are and what they do. But now that Bernie has acknowledged that such a phenomenon does indeed exist, I wonder how that will square with all of the hardcore Bernie fans who would have others believe we were just exaggerating.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Or would you?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251772854
Bernie is right to condemn them, but all the BS around here saying they don't exist, or that they are Hillary supporters pretending to be for Bernie bull.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)You knew I was just kidding.
There's no double standard at work here at all. Nope. None.
Cary
(11,746 posts)It's a red herring known as two wrongs don't make a right. Be accountable for yourself.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Be accountable.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)I see one of those sites is satire. Pretty funny stuff. Do you think satire is immoral, illegal, or unethical?
What is your point here? I don't get it.
frylock
(34,825 posts)The admonition to stay in your own lane was a suggestion to clean your own house. You know, glass houses? Beholding the mote that is in your brother's eye and whatnot?
Cary
(11,746 posts)Oh, wait. It doesn't. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
That's the problem, right there.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Hillary tried this shit in 2008 with accusations of mean nasty Obama Boys. Same failed candidate, same failed campaign.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Apparently he said it.
frylock
(34,825 posts)again.
Cary
(11,746 posts)I am to blame.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Pathetic. Truly pathetic.
frylock
(34,825 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)of their poor behavior.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)What you're doing here is engaging in victim-blaming.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Two Wrongs Make a Right
Description: When a person attempts to justify an action against another person because the other person did take or would take the same action against him or her.
Logical Form:
Person 1 did X to person 2.
Therefore, Person 2 is justified to do X to person 1.
Person 1 believes that person 2 would do X to person 1.
Therefore, Person 1 is justified to do X to person 2.
frylock
(34,825 posts)for their poor behavior while ignoring, if not outright DENYING, the existence of poor behavior coming from your side.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)but thanks anyways...
frylock
(34,825 posts)Keep trying. We know the time.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)2 for 2 so far.
frylock
(34,825 posts)It's called gaslighting and it's lame.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Madeline Albright told me I was going to hell because I'm a woman not supporting Clinton.
If that's not sexist, i don't know what is.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Because, I think, if one believes such things, that an official campaign spokesperson casting me to eternal damnation because I don't support Hillary is far worse than some anonymous person on the Internet not directly connected to Bernie's campaign trolling a Hillary supporter and calling her names (especially since one can both block and report that kind of trolling).
Cary
(11,746 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)it's easier for Clinton to be condemned for refusing to control her direct surrogates' hateful speech than it is for Bernie to control anonymous people he doesn't even know.
How hard was that to understand?
Cary
(11,746 posts)Here, where I posted direct quotes from Bernie Sanders, himself, this is a logical fallacy. It doesn't make sense, which is why it is a logical fallacy. It is nothing but cheap, low level evasion.
The desire to evade and not face up to the truth isn't difficult to understand. Anyone with the emotional maturity of a ten year old will do it.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)would know that Clinton can control her own direct surrogates and hasn't while Bernie has asked for civility of people he can't control.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Do you like it when you raise a point and a group of people insists on changing the subject? Is this how you have constructive dialogue?
I guess I stumbled into an alternate universe or something? In my universe it works a little differently.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Bernie says racism and sexism are not welcome. And I completely agree.
But it's so dumb when people act like there's an actual problem with tons of racist sexist bernie bros being too bro.
There's not an actual problem. Hillary Clinton ran a racist campaign on Obama in 2008 and she would do it again if it was good politics.
In conclusion Bernie is better than Hillary and Bernie Bros is a fake meme.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Which part of that don't you understand?
Good grief.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)GO HERE:
https://twitter.com/cnn/status/696341267110883328
he says we don't want racism and sexism around.
which i completely agree with.
note he didn't say anything about whether or not the bernie bro meme is totally fake or not, which by the way it is fake.
Bernie Bros are like bigfoot. I'll believe in them when I see a herd of them together with my own eyes.
One or two jerks on the internet does not a meme make!
Cary
(11,746 posts)So much for you. Buh bye.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)That's a perfect response.
That's the only appropriate response when asked about possible inappropriate behavior from your team.
Again, I'll believe "Bernie Bros" are a problem when I see it with my own eyes and judge it to be a problem, not simply based on a third hand rumor.
I've never seen evidence of Bernie Bros being a problem in real life (or on the internet).
Vinca
(50,273 posts)I did read a post on another site that wondered whether they might be part of a dirty tricks operation to get women to vote for Hillary. I'm glad Bernie spoke out against them, whatever they are.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)We have it on good authority from someone with their own extra special place reserved.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)The issues are the salient issue here, not her gender or her race. The issues-- I may find her voting record reprehensible, but were I to disrespect Secretary Clinton, I'd be doing no better than slapping my own mother in the face. We all came from woman; I fail to see-- even among other Sanders supporters-- I fail to see where someone being a woman is worthy of scorn.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)I don't blame Bernie for how some of his supporters are acting, but it was the right thing to do for him to address it.
I also don't think they're going to stop.
Cary
(11,746 posts)You're right. It isn't political, you know. Some people can't help themselves. It's about character.
I am happy that Bernie Sanders has character. I am not happy that many of my fellow Democrats, if they are Democrats, do not.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)From my point of view that's far, far worse than anything anyone has said here on DU.
Cary
(11,746 posts)And I understand that you feel justified in expressing that hate in any way.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Most of the time I find this stuff more funny than anything else.
Cary
(11,746 posts)You have proven that to me beyond a shadow of a doubt
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)So I'm not going to take this seriously at all.