2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe "Bernie Bros" Narrative: A Cheap Campaign Tactic
Masquerading as Journalism and Social Activism.
2 examples were found.
1 was a female.
Source: The Intercept
http://theintercept.com/2016/01/31/the-bernie-bros-narrative-a-cheap-false-campaign-tactic-masquerading-as-journalism-and-social-activism/
FEEL THE BERN
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Why do you think Bernie was forced to come out to the public on this?
Could please supply a link or article title.
By forced, do you mean when he was questioned about it in an
interview on the Sunday news shows ???
If so, your definition of forced defers from mine.
Do you think he gave a sufficient answer ???
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Bernie's answer was sufficient but he has been given emails, posts, forum posts and FB posts for months and has done nothing about it. You can't allow your supporters to go around posting things like "Hillary is a bitch" and worse for months then come out and say, "our campaign doesn't condone this" when you have known about it for over 6 months.
SamKnause
(13,107 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Conversely, if you spend your time praising Sanders, you will experience far more anger and vitriol from Clinton supporters.
Now there's a shock. But, yeah, that's how it works. By and large, Clinton fans aren't going out of their way to attack other Clinton fans, Sanders fans aren't going out of their way to attack other Sanders fans. So you end up seeing far more negativity aimed at you, and get that reinforced when you sit around commiserating with like-minded supporters.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)He's also gotten pieces into the mainstream press but he is not a progressive.
http://www.cato-unbound.org/contributors/glenn-greenwald
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)that you have been repeating for years to no end, ever since you decided to defend the surveillance state and demonize Snowden.
Greenwald has in the past written articles against the surveillance state and against the drug war for Cato. Good for him! Money well-spent by them.
Are you for the surveillance state? Are you for the drug war?
intersectionality
(106 posts)The Cato link shows the single article he wrote for them (anti-surveillance, surprise surprise). Then you click on it and notice that their in-house authors have written at least 3 responses countering his article (pro-surveillance). What a joke.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)dsc
(52,162 posts)has had his or her facebook page trashed like the mother of Treyvon Martin did when she had the temerity to endorse Clinton. She was literally told she was responsible for her son's death. Again, no such example, none, can be found. Not a one.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Chathamization
(1,638 posts)supporters (upper level in terms of name recognition). Krugman has made multiple posts about "Bernie Bros," Joan Walsh talks about Berniebots. But I'm not seeing Dean Baker or Robert Reich throw around terms like "Hillbot" or whatever the equivalent would be.
I don't see the insinuations from high-profile Sanders supporters that the vast majority of core Clinton supporters must be women the way I keep seeing the insinuation that the vast majority of core Sanders supporters must be men (In the NYT, The Nation, Vox, The Atlantic, etc.). I'm not seeing Sanders' supporters going on talk shows and saying that Jews who support Clinton are just trying to suck up to the goyim (the way we've been told women who support Sanders are just trying to be around the boys), or that there'd be a special place in hell for them.
I agree that looking at random online comments you can find vile stuff written by supporters of every candidate. But in terms of high-profile supporters, there seems to be a lot more garbage coming from the Clinton side than the Sanders side. Or am I just missing something?
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)It must be some kind of pathological tic.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)are acting like the Bernie Bros are a myth that never existed.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)could you explain it for those of us that don't understand?
Tarc
(10,476 posts)the MRAs are a virulently hateful and misogynistic group of people who gravitate from place to place spreading their "message". They descended upon the video game devs and journalists over a year ago in a mess known as "Gamergate" (links below), and have mounted a sustained campaign of harassment against several women in the industry. More recently they have infested the Sanders campaign because his opponent is a woman. Not all of Sanders supporters fall into this hate group, not by a long shot, but it took Sanders longer than it should have to condemn these people.
Gamergate:
What Is Gamergate, and Why? An Explainer for Non-Geeks
Zoe Quinn: 'All Gamergate has done is ruin people's lives'
MRAs:
Mad Men: Inside the Men's Rights Movementand the Army of Misogynists and Trolls It Spawned
The Toxic Appeal of the Mens Rights Movement
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)does it match very closely with what the polls say. Nor did I see the word Bro, Bernie or otherwise, in either article you linked to, I may have missed it as I did more of a skim than an actual read.
Starting to sound to me like a manufactured and false meme being used by Hillary supporters which wouldn't be a surprise.
I'll await Empowerer's response maybe it will be more enlightening.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Or go to Reddit for 12 seconds.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)about Bernie's failed literary career - a completely dead attack issue?
Thanks, You just demonstrated conclusively that Bernie has absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH MEN'S RIGHTS GROUPS.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)His campaign is addressing it. I don't know why people here are getting so defensive and in such denial about it. Thankfully his staff is much smarter.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)spread by her acolytes.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And again, thankfully his campaign staff knows better than you.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)because there is no such animal.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Are you actually paying attention to what your candidate is saying when he calls out the BernieBros specifically, labels it "crap", and tells them to knock it off?
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)The fact that this tactic was employed by Hillary in 2008 destroys any assertion that "Bernie Bros' are any more real than "Obama Boys" were.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280112658
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Sanders isn't denying the BernieBro problem, he has identified it, accepted that these are people saying bad things on his behalf, and he is calling them out specifically to stop. Sanders is not backpedaling and trying to turn it onto Hillary, as you are doing right now.
I am obviously a Clinton supporter but I admire in Bernie this take-no-bullshit trait, and commend him for doing what he can to rid his base of this tiny yet vocal problem within his camp.
You are doing Sanders a disservice with your misplaced attacks.
frylock
(34,825 posts)by Congress. Arbitrarily and unnecessary.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)Young women are growing increasingly frustrated with the fanatical support of Barack and gleeful bashing of Hillary.
Rebecca Traister
Dana Lossia, a 29-year-old labor lawyer in Brooklyn, describes herself as a pretty big Obama supporter. She worked for a year at Michelle Obamas Public Allies Chicago, where she met Barack a few times. She called him the most inspiring, amazing person, a different kind of politician. Of Hillary Clinton, whom Lossia supported in her Senate runs, Lossia said, I just think shes acted badly during this campaign.
And yet, as Lossia wrote in a recent e-mail, Ive been really bothered by what I perceive as sexism and have spent hours defending
A lot of guys just cant stand Hillary, and its the intensity of their irritation with her that disturbs me more than their devotion to Obama.
This riveting Democratic primary campaign has provided us with its own stock characters: There are the young Daily Show-watching Obama-maniacs getting over their irony addiction by falling earnestly in love with the senator from Illinois. There are the pissed-off second-wave feminists, uptight and out of touch, howling as their dream of seeing a woman in the Oval Office fades. And then there are the young women caught between them.
According to the media script, these cool young customers have embodied their elders worst nightmare of a generation that takes feminisms victories for granted by throwing over Hillary Clinton for her challenger faster than you can say Ive got a crush on Obama. These young women are way over feminism, were told, and perceive gender bias to be an antiquated notion. They are embarrassed and annoyed by the public entreaties of warhorses like Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan. Pressure from their forebears only serves to alienate them from the second wave and drive them further into the disheveled embrace of the Yes We Can! dude down the block.
Continued: http://www.salon.com/2008/04/14/obama_supporters/
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)I hardly ever repond, but your comment really spins me up. I rarely get angry, like once in a blue moon, but I am breathing fire right now!!!
I ain't no fucking men's rights advocate in any way, shape or form. I more appalled by GamerGate and understand it far more intensely and personally than you could imagine.
"The Bernie phenomenon is tied to the Men's Rights Movement"??!!!
HOW FUCKING DARE YOU?!
The Bernie phenomenon is because he's is a fantastic human being, he is an unparalleled civil servant, he knows that the system is rigged, and he ACTUALLY understands the struggles of poor and middle-class Americans. This MOVEMENT IS NOT ABOUT HIM. It's about the future of this nation. It's about my kids. Period.
I'm 50 years old. I AM A WOMAN. I'm a mom. A wife. A Democrat. A yellowdog, bleeding heart liberal, progressive, Democratic Socialist. I worked for Obama's campaign 25 or more hours a week for months-on-end AFTER MY 45-50 hour a week job. I'm a humanist, a feminist, an activist, a retiree, an artist, and a lot more besides.
I was for Bernie LONG before it was cool.
You should realize before you try to tie me, thousands of middle-aged WOMEN for Bernie and MILLIONS of innocent, young millennials of both genders equally -- LIKE MY GROWN KIDS-- to that garbage above, that there are tens of thousands, perhaps MILLIONS of women in my age group who support Bernie OVER Hillary Clinton.
Bernie has some millenials, that is certain. HOWEVER, we are finding in polls that he has JUST AS MANY "women of a certain age" as Hillary does.
For you to fucking deny my existence is BY DEFINITION sexism.
GET IT? FOR YOU TO DENY MY EXISTENCE AND MY SUPPORT FOR BERNIE IS SEXISM.
FOR YOU TO DENY THIS GIGANTIC COALITION OF WOMEN FOR BERNIE IS SEXIST.
FOR YOU TO ASSERT THAT A "REAL" WOMAN CANNOT HOLD CERTAIN VIEWPOINTS OR THAT WE ARE SILLY TO HOLD THEM - IS SEXIST.
We are women.
We are feminists.
We support Bernie so get over it.
I am a Sanders supporter. I'm training to be precinct captain on Saturday.
For you to tie millions of women like me to GamerGate is desperate, ugly, illogical, reprehensible -- all to make some political hay - and is the most TONE-DEAF, out-of-touch thing I've seen in awhile.
Response to Turn CO Blue (Reply #55)
Post removed
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)that every group on earth, especially on the Internet, will have mean and nasty and sexist people among it. So some idiots saying mean things on the Internet are equated with the Bernie campaign, and in the particularly ambitious move by the other poster responding to you, the MRA movement itself! Wow, apparently even "Gamergate" can now be pinned on Sanders. The intent is to create a taint on the campaign that has overwhelmingly won over young women and men in equal numbers.
Read the excellent deconstruction by Greenwald in the OP. At the height of pundits frothing at the mouth about "Bernie Bros" (again, nothing that anyone ever called themselves), they were repeating the same two examples over and over, one of which was by a woman (who didn't even attack Clinton on sexist grounds).
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)The linked articles in that response even admitted that women were a part of the equal rights for men movement.
Then again I never expected a good response from a Hillary supporter, in fact I never expected any response from a Hillary supporter, it's not something they seem to be good at.
I do realize it's derogatory but I still don't understand the Bro part, it's probably a generational thing and it really doesn't matter.
Thanks for your response it did help.
jhart3333
(332 posts)and morphed into an internet meme: Don't taze me bro!
Pretty horrific if you ask me.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)wherever racism is pointed out, the inevitable response is, "What? Where? ... post a link ... I had no idea!" ... and it is, most often, done by the very people that have posted (or "Yepped" the racist thing.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)Stating that younger women can't think for themselves and only support Bernie because of boys, or that they have a special place in hell if they don't support a woman. When is Clinton going to address this?
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)the libertarian Cato institute as well as The American Conservative.
http://www.cato-unbound.org/contributors/glenn-greenwald
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)planet's most influential anti gay bigot. You promote people and things that are decidedly not progressive here all the damn time.
If you are going to post praise of anti gay clergy, you have no standing to be the judge of who is progressive and who can be posted on DU. You post about people who say minority groups are demon influenced and abortion is the murder of cute babies. How is that progressive? You tell us all how March For Life is progressive.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)they did not want these jerks in the campaign.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/07/3746988/bernie-sanders-tells-berniebros-to-knock-it-off-we-dont-want-that-crap/
You see, the Bernie campaign doesn't have to worry about these jerks being part of the Bernie campaign, because these jerks aren't really Bernie supporters.
They are jerks from a different campaign.
See how that works?
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Why did Bernie Sanders himself denounce these people then?
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/07/3746988/bernie-sanders-tells-berniebros-to-knock-it-off-we-dont-want-that-crap/
Not ever criticism of Sanders is a smear.
Ino
(3,366 posts)Here we unabashedly attack smears and myths prevalent on the internet on other sites.
When voices are silenced by the 'cult' and any opposition stonewalled, we must stand up and make our voices bitingly powerful. We are not here to protect the collective web-feelings of the saint/messiah Bernie Sanders and/or Berniebros, the rabid and/or stupid group of followers who are devoid of reality and reason.
So, relax, enjoy the discussion and give/get a dose of reality.
Ino
(3,366 posts)This Jackass Radicals site is populated by Hillary supporters who pretend to be ignorant, racist, sexist Bernie supporters.
For all anyone knows, these Jackass Radicals are the so-called Bernie Bros who post vile things elsewhere.
7962
(11,841 posts)People will post shit claiming to be someone else all the time. The right does it, the left does it. Facebook even admits many of their "members' are fake. Hell, I've had friends who found out they had copycat pages.
I wouldnt put it past some Hillary supporters to fake posts insulting her. Why? Because he's gaining. Bet this wasnt happening when he was polling at 6% nationally
George II
(67,782 posts)Sanders Condemns Bernie Bros
It is a nickname for Sanders supporters who say sexist things about Hillary Clinton or her backers.
Bernie Sanders likes to express appreciation for his grass-roots supporters, but he is not standing by the so-called Bernie Bros.
Jake Tapper asked Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.) about the phenomenon of his backers saying sexist things to supporters of Hillary Clinton, his rival for the Democratic nomination, on CNNs State of the Union on Sunday.
Sanders renounced them unequivocally.
I have heard about it. It's disgusting, Sanders said. Look, we don't want that crap. ... We will do everything we can and I think we have tried. Look, anybody who is supporting me that is doing the sexist things is -- we don't want them. I don't want them. That is not what this campaign is about.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)attack and demean Sanders campaign. Since no one has produced an actual live "Bernie Bro" in person, one can only assume that the propaganda campaign by Hillary and here followers around "Bernie Bros" in general is fantastical. That Bernie disassociates himself and his campaign from this marketing ploy by the Clintons is not surprising. Bernie is letting the world know he condemns personal attacks in his campaign. So, "Bernie Bros" have NOTHING to do with Bernie or his campaign and indeed do not exist as a group, as a type, as a genus, or as a species.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Bernie Sanders has emphatically condemned the "Bros" that are saying, under a guise of supporting him, misogynistic and hateful things against Clinton. He does not want this type of supporters in his corner.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)klook
(12,155 posts)particularly the Michelle Alexander and Ta-Nehisi quotes. Thanks for posting.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I stand with Bernie on this. He does not want that type of support.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)BY IAN MILLHISER FEB 7, 2016 10:21 AM
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) had a terse message for any of his supporters who engage in online harassment: We dont want that crap. He told CNN on Sunday that the so-called Berniebro phenomenon is disgusting and that anybody who is supporting me that is doing the sexist things we dont want them.
The Berniebro phenomenon, where a mob of online Sanders supporters attack politicians and writers who express views critical of the Vermont senator or supportive of his Democratic rival Secretary Hilary Clinton, launched numerous thinkpieces from journalists unfortunate enough to encounter them online. At their worst, Berniebros have accused Clinton supporters of voting based on who had the vagina and have invented novel sexist terms such as clitrash.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/07/3746988/bernie-sanders-tells-berniebros-to-knock-it-off-we-dont-want-that-crap/
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Dirty tricks and smearing are Clinton campaign staples.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Again, Sanders himself has identified the "Bros" as a problem within his campaign and is calling them out specifically to cut the crap.
Your candidate is not attacking Clinton on this so...why are you?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Might as well get the full spectrum of RW talking points
SamKnause
(13,107 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Anyone who might use that term "Bernie Bros" when talking to others, calling them Bernie bros, would be involved in a "cheap campaign" tactic because these people don't exist?
Tarc
(10,476 posts)When Sanders himself has stepped up, publicly and forcefully, to acknowledge that the "BernieBros" are a problem, to denounce them utterly, and wants them out of his side entirely.
Your candidate has taken the high road on this matter. Follow his lead and don't throw him under the bus, please.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Nothing but a political dirty trick operation.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/08/are-the-berniebros-a-problem-of-politics-or-one-of-internet-culture/