Iowa Democrats reviewing some caucus precinct results

[Shemp Howard]

It looks like the Iowa Democratic Party officials have changed their minds. From the article:

But as errors are being discovered, the final tally is being changed, party officials confirmed to the Des Moines Register on Friday.

"Both the Sanders and Clinton campaigns have flagged a very small number of concerns for us, and we are looking at them all on a case-by-case basis," Iowa Democratic Party spokesman Sam Lau told the Register

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/02/05/iowa-margin-between-clinton-sanders-shifts-errors/79877898/

[Duckhunter935]

1. ALL of them need to be reviewed

[HereSince1628]

3. Human endeavors often include err, any election result so close as this

needs double checking.

It's not about being a sore loser, it's about -preventing- people from having doubts that lead to said soreness.

[Shemp Howard]

4. The ball is in Bernie's court now.

If the Iowa party officials are being honest about following up on complaints, then Bernie's team needs to flag every last suspicious vote count. And if that ends up taking in the whole state, then so be it.

[Duckhunter935]

5. no, it should be up to the

Iowa democratic party to ensure full and accurate counts with all of the candidates.

[Ferd Berfel]

2. Not reviewing them means

not every vote counts.

Right?