2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSuperPac contributions are legal bribes.
There's no other way to say it. Hillary Clinton continues to insist that she, as the top hauler of SuperPac money (Dem or Rep), is not influenced by all that cash.
It's insulting that she would expect anyone to believe those words.
Does she really think we are so naive as to not understand that when corps and billionaires donate money, they expect a return on investment? The most powerful aren't going to hand out millions upon millions without a handshake and an understanding that they'll get what they want in the end.
The Supreme Court of this country made it legal for these types of bribes to occur, and Hillary Clinton has exploited it and benefited from it tremendously, with seemingly no misgivings.
That's why when she stands on the debate stage and proclaims she'll go after Wall Street and she's got their number, it shows her for what she is - a disingenuous political tool.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)All you can do is throw it back on Bernie?
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)if Sanders is beholden to nurses due their support, it doesn't really benefit the 1% over everyone else.
there is no super PAC created solely to support Sanderss campaign for president as there is for Clinton
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/clinton-money/
mythology
(9,527 posts)You may want to let Sanders know given that he's taken money from the nurses' super pac. They expect that Sanders being elected would benefit their members.
Super pacs aren't inherently bad.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)So I guess I could justify Bernie's association with them because they're a 'good' Pac; their cause will benefit we the people.
Bottom line though - I want Citizen's United overturned and all SuperPacs made illegal.