HENRY FUCKING KISSINGER??
I still can't get over last night.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Now you may return to defending a Kissinger admirer. On a "democratic" forum no less. 
Yah...a question mark. It was an innuendo, and you can answer to it. Talk to me about this devastating disease that my father wasted away from.
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
You are back to Kissinger when a DUer lost a father to said disease? 
You are so off topic here.
Now you may return to defending a Kissinger admirer. On a "democratic" forum no less.
Where the fuck did I mention Hill or Kissinger?????????????????????????????????
Mother of god. I posted on your dementia remark and you took this totally off topic.
Never mind, never fucking mind you do not give one shit about my dad. Obviously your candidate does not either. My dad that I lost a year ago does not matter. Got it, loud and clear.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
own lying eyes?
there are others who have a laundry list snap-to-canned responses who are apt to post at someone rather than reply with a reasoned response. I am sure both us have seen all kinds in the last fourteen+ years and know that they come and go.
Btw. Santa Claus is failing to respond to my request also, I put in for my very own 'Jump-to-keyboard Warrior' costume and still nothing yet.
Here is to another fourteen years, hopefully a better fourteen years 
How insensitive of you to the victims of Pinoche and the illegal bombings.
http://www.english.rfi.fr/americas/20130915-looking-remains-pinochets-victims
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/america-keeps-honoring-one-its-worst-mass-murderers-henry-kissinger
She is friends with a mass murderer and we are suppose to "separate" that??
BULLSHIT
Here, Hank is confronted whilst receiving the "Freedom Award"
Only kooks and wackos talk about a "New World Order". It's a conspiracy theory!
The "Chief Diplomats" of the US seen after burying their latest victim
The information comes from documents declassified at the request of the National Security Archive.
They show that Mr Kissinger was eager for the US to stand up to Cuba.
The documents from the Gerald R Ford Presidential Library show that US officials devised plans to attack ports and military installations in Cuba in addition to measures ordered by Mr Kissinger to deploy Marine battalions based at the US Navy base at Guantanamo Bay to "clobber" the Cubans.
-------
"I think we are going to have to smash Castro," Mr Kissinger told Mr Ford in a White House meeting in February 1976, adding Mr Ford should defer action until after the presidential election that November.
"I agree," Mr Ford said.
US contingency plans drawn up on the options warned any military aggression by the US in Cuba could lead to a direct confrontation with the USSR.
"The circumstances that could lead the United States to select a military option against Cuba should be serious enough to warrant further action in preparation for general war," one document said.
The plans were never undertaken, as Jimmy Carter was elected president that year.
Well we need to educate them!
Have them learn to read a book like "The Best and the Brightest".
Have them relive the Viet Nam War.
Criminal Kissinger is what they will find. CRIMINAL!!!!
Teach, learn and put down the test message thingy for a second is my advice!
These books need to be read again and again. The Best and the Brightest was required reading during my first semester as a freshman in college.
Time to put down the text editor and L E A R N!!!
Kissinger’s best answer to Kerry’s question was “for the sake of credibility.” The national security adviser understood that the United States could not “win” the Vietnam War and largely agreed with Kerry that the Americanization of the conflict had been a mistake. But he was adamant that the nation could not be seen to “lose” it either. In a widely noted essay in Foreign Affairs in January 1969 titled “The Viet Nam Negotiations,” Kissinger placed greatest emphasis not on the tangible ramifications of withdrawal but on the amorphous psychological ones:
The commitment of 500,000 Americans has settled the issue of the importance of Viet Nam. What is involved now is confidence in American promises. However fashionable it is to ridicule the terms “credibility” or “prestige,” they are not empty phrases; other nations can gear their actions to ours only if they can count on our steadiness . . . In many parts of the world—the Middle East, Europe, Latin America, even Japan— stability depends on confidence in American promises.
Henry Kissinger’s plan for a staged withdrawal from Vietnam was thus sustained by the logic of keeping up appearances. “We could not simply walk away from an enterprise involving two administrations, five allied countries, and thirty-one thousand dead,” Kissinger observed in his memoir, “as if we were switching a television channel.” More would die to display America’s continued potency to friends and enemies. The nation would not slink away under cover of darkness but depart with all guns blazing.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/18/they_died_for_henry_kissingers_credibility_the_real_history_of_our_vietnam_immorality/
War Pigs
Years ago (yes many) Kissinger was supposed to appear and speak at the State college I was attending at that time. Being he was embroiled in controversy, he dared not show his face and the speaking event was cancelled.
Since this time, the war crimes, etc. have only piled on and why the hell he is not in jail is beyond me.
I guess Kissinger has a permanent Get Out of Jail for life card!
I'd never use him as a reference for anything, much less as a tool to use while campaigning for President.
That said, she must be scraping the bottom of the barrel for WHO'S WHO to be on her list of advocates! 
?zoom=1.5&resize=640%2C323
Jail the criminals! Jail them all!
It is not too late for you Kissinger!!
