Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

youceyec

(394 posts)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:20 PM Feb 2016

Quinnipiac Poll Showing Sanders Closing gap is crap, totally biased!

Its an outlier!

PPP poll shows clinton with 21 point lead. Both polls are after Iowa. Pretty much cover same days.

Q poll is notoriously biased against HC. Just look at their Iowa poll. They were only polling firm that at the very end showed Sanders winning.

PPP poll:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_20416.pdf

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quinnipiac Poll Showing Sanders Closing gap is crap, totally biased! (Original Post) youceyec Feb 2016 OP
Polls showing your candidate to be ahead are biased and crap. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #1
And PPP has consistently been biased against Bernie. HerbChestnut Feb 2016 #2
Quinnipiac had Bernie winning Iowa. PPP had Hillary winning Iowa. Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #11
PPP had Clinton +9 kcjohn1 Feb 2016 #14
Cali, that's not how statistics works. HerbChestnut Feb 2016 #26
K & R Iliyah Feb 2016 #3
What? I've never heard or read that Quinnipiac leans R. Link. cali Feb 2016 #8
PPP was among least accurate kcjohn1 Feb 2016 #17
You do realize that Quinipiac's polls were accurate in Iowa while PPP's were not? Bjorn Against Feb 2016 #4
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #5
PPP is correct the record, David Brock, so that cancels that out. Try again litlbilly Feb 2016 #6
Well, that explains it. Gravis is also crap polling. AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #7
Gravis is even worse, you are correct litlbilly Feb 2016 #10
Sorry to break it to you, but the Reuters/Ipsos national poll today said the race was tied as well. reformist2 Feb 2016 #9
They dont want to read those polls, they dont put Hillary up by 40. litlbilly Feb 2016 #12
quinnipiac had Bernie winning Iowa, yet Hillary won. Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #15
Quinnipiac's poll showed Bernie with 49% of the vote in Iowa Bjorn Against Feb 2016 #22
You call that a win? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #23
You keep posting this and you keep being proved wrong. Is that embarrassing for you? last1standing Feb 2016 #32
The Ipsos poll has African Americans at 7% and included Republicans and Independents. Metric System Feb 2016 #19
We must not rest. Dawson Leery Feb 2016 #20
Ipsos/Reuters Poll (February 4): BlueStateLib Feb 2016 #33
My response to these polls is always the same BainsBane Feb 2016 #13
Maybe you could volunteer to serve drinks at her meeting with Bain Capital. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #21
I door knock and phone bank. BainsBane Feb 2016 #28
its not an opposition restorefreedom Feb 2016 #30
It presumes no such thing BainsBane Feb 2016 #31
the way the m$m has portrayed it restorefreedom Feb 2016 #35
Probably an outlier. PPP has been very favorable to Clinton though. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #16
Heh. Oh wait, you're serious? nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #18
Let's be nice. I honestly think Hillary fans are having a rough time of it. reformist2 Feb 2016 #24
Do you trust Five Thirty Eight? Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #25
No youceyec Feb 2016 #27
While your "crap" epithet is certainly convincing, merrily Feb 2016 #29
Was Q biased against Hillary when it showed her leading by 30 in Dec? HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #34

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,735 posts)
1. Polls showing your candidate to be ahead are biased and crap.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:22 PM
Feb 2016

Polls showing my candidate to be ahead are totally accurate.

Isn't that how that works?

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
2. And PPP has consistently been biased against Bernie.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:22 PM
Feb 2016

The point of these polls is to note the trends. Bernie is gaining on Hillary across the country.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
11. Quinnipiac had Bernie winning Iowa. PPP had Hillary winning Iowa.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:31 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary won Iowa.

Which one is more accurate?

You do the math.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
14. PPP had Clinton +9
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

Q had Bernie +3. Result was 0.2+ Clinton. Who is closer?

Q could actually be accurate b/c popular vote was not released. We were told before Bernie voters were concentrated thus he could lose delegate count even if he won the popular vote.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
4. You do realize that Quinipiac's polls were accurate in Iowa while PPP's were not?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:26 PM
Feb 2016

Quinnipiac's Iowa poll was within the margin of error of the final results, PPP's poll showed Hillary with a eight point lead which was inaccurate.

Quinnipiac is a more accurate pollster than PPP.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
9. Sorry to break it to you, but the Reuters/Ipsos national poll today said the race was tied as well.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:31 PM
Feb 2016

Also, the PPP polls are suspect. They had Hillary +8 in Iowa the day before the caucus. Oops.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
22. Quinnipiac's poll showed Bernie with 49% of the vote in Iowa
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:42 PM
Feb 2016

He got 49% of the vote just as Quinnipiac predicted. They did not call a winner, their poll showed a very close race and it was a very close race which ended within Quinnipiac's margin of error.

PPP on the other hand did not predict a close race, they showed Hillary winning by eight points which was outside the margin of error.

Quinnipiac was right about Iowa and PPP was wrong.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
32. You keep posting this and you keep being proved wrong. Is that embarrassing for you?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:38 PM
Feb 2016

Or is NoHope Hillary's lack of decency and shame catching amongst her supporters?

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
33. Ipsos/Reuters Poll (February 4):
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:42 PM
Feb 2016

Ipsos/Reuters Poll (February 4): Core Political Approval
Thursday, February 04, 2016

Democratic Primary

Hillary Clinton remains solidly in the lead among Democrats nationwide, with 54% of Dem registered voters.
•Sanders (39%) remains in second place among Democratic voters.

General Election Matchups

In hypothetical 2-way general election matchups between Trump or Cruz vs. Sanders or Clinton, the Democrats are leading all matchups.
•Clinton performs the strongest against either Republican at +8 vs. Trump and +10 vs. Cruz among all registered voters.
http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7132

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
13. My response to these polls is always the same
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

We shall have to see what the polling averages show.

However, no one should be lulled into complacency by polls. This will be a tough primary fight. Bernie has tons of money and is mounting a formidable opposition. It's up to all of us who support Hillary to get out and volunteer for the campaign.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
21. Maybe you could volunteer to serve drinks at her meeting with Bain Capital.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/hillary-clinton-postpones-fundraiser-financial-services-218708#ixzz3zAA1rv16

^snip^


Clinton postpones another financial-services fundraiser
Under fire from Sanders, she delays events hosted by leaders of BlackRock, Bain Capital affiliate.


The postponed fundraisers are an issue for Hillary Clinton who is struggling to match Bernie Sanders’ powerful grassroots fundraising.


By BEN WHITE 02/03/16 06:27 PM EST

NEW YORK -- Hillary Clinton has postponed another fundraiser with financial services executives amid heavy criticism from rival Bernie Sanders that she is too close to Wall Street.

Clinton will no longer attend an event in Boston scheduled for Friday that was to be hosted by Jonathan Lavine, managing director of Bain Capital affiliate Sankaty Advisors, sources close to the matter said.


The event has not been canceled but will now be held sometime after the New Hampshire primary, which takes place Feb. 9. It is the second such postponement in the last two weeks. The Clinton campaign last week said a New York City event that was set for Thursday with executives from investment management firm BlackRock would now be held Feb. 16th.


BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
28. I door knock and phone bank.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:57 PM
Feb 2016

Maybe you should ask Bernie about the drinks at Abbey Rockefellers house? Or how he and Jane liked their fundraising soirées on Martha's Vinyard and Palm Beach with reps from Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/sanders-democratic-fundraisers/index.html

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
30. its not an opposition
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:19 PM
Feb 2016

its a campaign

an opposition presumes the one being opposed has an inherent right to the position being sought.

you may not have meant it that way, but some actually believe that. just wanted to clarify for those folks that it is a legimate campaign. its not an opposition, its not an insurgency, its not a rebellion.

its a campaign.

have a nice evening

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
31. It presumes no such thing
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:33 PM
Feb 2016

op·po·si·tion
ˌäpəˈziSH(ə n/
noun
resistance or dissent, expressed in action or argument.
"there was considerable opposition to the proposal"
synonyms: resistance, hostility, antagonism, enmity, antipathy, objection, dissent, disapproval, criticism, demurral; More
a group of adversaries or competitors, especially a rival political party or athletic team.
noun: the opposition
synonyms: opponents, opposing side, other side, other team, competition, opposers, rivals, adversaries; More
the principal political party opposed to the one in office.
noun: Opposition; noun: the Opposition; noun: the opposition

The term political opposition is an exceedingly common phrase. Your free association is not a dictionary of the English language.

You're quite right it isn't an insurrection or a revolution, it's a political campaign for a member of the political elite who seeks to rise to the head of the political establishment from its seat in the Oval Office.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
35. the way the m$m has portrayed it
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:26 AM
Feb 2016

as an insurrectionist campaign, they seem to have a different view. but i wanted to make sure to exclude you, since i did not think you meant it in that way. it annoys me that the chris matthews's of the world see it that way, though

cheers

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
16. Probably an outlier. PPP has been very favorable to Clinton though.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:35 PM
Feb 2016

PPP had her winning Iowa by 8 just a couple days before the caucus. Clearly they were wrong.


Nobody should freak out over one poll. We are just now starting to see the full impact from Iowa. Then it will take a few more for the impact from the debate. Then more for the impact from the New Hampshire vote that hasn't even happened yet.


Things will look different in a week, so lets not freak out over one poll.







reformist2

(9,841 posts)
24. Let's be nice. I honestly think Hillary fans are having a rough time of it.
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:44 PM
Feb 2016

I think they know something is wrong.

Uncle Joe

(58,366 posts)
25. Do you trust Five Thirty Eight?
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:49 PM
Feb 2016

Because they give Quinnipiac University a B+ rating and your PPP poll a B-.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/


Thanks for the thread, youceyec.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. While your "crap" epithet is certainly convincing,
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:16 PM
Feb 2016

analyzing the methodology and/or track record/reputation of Quinnipiac polls might be far more convincing. Just a suggestion.

Most polls showed Hillary handily defeating Sanders in Iowa. That didn't happen. What does that make those polls?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Quinnipiac Poll Showing S...