24 Hours Later: Has Hillary Released the Goldman Sacs Transcripts Yet?

[Joe the Revelator]

We're waiting.

[Duckhunter935]

1. she is looking into it

[virtualobserver]

2. "it" being the abyss

[ladjf]

3. It doesn't matter. There won't be anything incriminating in those texts. She is smarter than that.

[polichick]

4. If that were true, they would have been released.

[Duckhunter935]

5. love to see some actual video

I know of some has to be out there

[polichick]

7. Me too - tone and emphasis would be telling.

[ladjf]

6. I understand your point. But, my take on it is that they would just rather keep the speeches from

public scrutiny out of fear that there might be something there. Also, it's likely that there are private records like the Romney tape that might surface anyway.

[DamnYankeeInHouston]

12. She has to edit them first to add, "Cut it out."

[Dragonfli]

19. That shouldn't take too long, a little white out

and the phrase used "cut the check" can be changed to "cut it out" in like 1 minute.

[Empowerer]

14. And if/when she releases them and, as usual her detractors can't find anything incriminating in them

they will insist that this is further proof of her corruption because the only reason they aren't incriminating is that she doctored them.

We know this playbook by heart.

[silvershadow]

8. she is still checking with herself. nt

[Live and Learn]

9. But herself keeps changing the answer. nt

[hifiguy]

10. Those will be released to the public

a few years after the heat death of the universe.

Maybe not even then.

[UglyGreed]

11. Maybe they are under here

[Ino]

13. We should demand she releases them before Nevada

Bernie released his medical before Iowa

[frylock]

15. tick-tock

[allthatjazz]

16. The Countdown

http://iwilllookintoit.com

[DURHAM D]

17. Has Bernie released his emails? nt

[Joe the Revelator]

18. Look, a red herring!

[jeff47]

20. She's an incrementalist. She'll get around to releasing them in 2147. (nt)