Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:22 PM Feb 2016

Who said this: "“I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat”?

From Politico:
Can Bernie Sanders Win the Love of a Party He Scorns?
The long, troubled history of Bernie Sanders and the 'ideologically bankrupt' party whose White House nod he now seeks. By Michael Kruse and Manu Raju

You don’t change the system from within the Democratic Party.”

“My own feeling is that the Democratic Party is ideologically bankrupt.”

“We have to ask ourselves, ‘Why should we work within the Democratic Party if we don’t agree with anything the Democratic Party says?’”

(snip)

In that summer’s issue of Vermont Affairs magazine, he called the Democratic Party “ideologically bankrupt,” then added: “They have no ideology. Their ideology is opportunism.”

(snip)

At the Socialist Scholars Conference in New York City in April 1990, he asked, “Why should we work within the Democratic Party … ?” He said at the gathering he was running for Congress that year again as an independent because it would be “hypocritical” of him to run as a Democrat considering the kinds of things he had said about the party.








59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who said this: "“I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat”? (Original Post) CajunBlazer Feb 2016 OP
Are we the same party of the 80's? n/t SheenaR Feb 2016 #1
In Clinton's mind, we are. That woman is stuck in the 20th century. Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #3
I was a Democrat then and I am a Democrat now CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #6
Didn't ask that n/t SheenaR Feb 2016 #10
I stopped giving to the Democratic Party a long time ago. I stayed registered to vote in primary Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #49
The thing is, something like that is music to the ears of people who are to the left of the party as thereismore Feb 2016 #2
Absolutely!! Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #7
The problem is, not to most voters. DanTex Feb 2016 #12
More voters than Democrats. jeff47 Feb 2016 #25
Not sure where the idea that indies are more liberal than Dems comes from. DanTex Feb 2016 #30
Independents are all over the left-right divide. jeff47 Feb 2016 #34
Last I saw, the electorate is about 25% liberal, 35% moderate, 35% conservative, self-described. DanTex Feb 2016 #38
Yeah, the goalposts were clearly in the wrong place. jeff47 Feb 2016 #42
Sanders doesn't talk about labels? Are you kidding? So that bashing Hillary for being "moderate" DanTex Feb 2016 #47
About 1/2 of the Dem voters. You see, Hillary really is a centrist therefore everybody thereismore Feb 2016 #33
In Iowa. And what I don't get is, why is it OK to "marginalize" the Hillary half DanTex Feb 2016 #35
You jumped to a certain conclusion, DanTex. I don't want to marginalize thereismore Feb 2016 #39
That would be that great democratic lion (of a couple of months)*cough* Bernie Sanders*cough* workinclasszero Feb 2016 #4
Jesus H. Christ, find a new meme will you. That bogus one's been beaten to death. HERVEPA Feb 2016 #5
If you can't respond, deflect CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #9
Meh. I prefer to elias49 Feb 2016 #11
It's been responded to a million times already. Uh, and your response was a deflection. HERVEPA Feb 2016 #14
So Bernie, and his minions, want Hillary held to the fire for her statements, MoonRiver Feb 2016 #15
So Bernie, and his minions, want Hillary held to the fire for her statements, workinclasszero Feb 2016 #20
Nailed it! Must be recycling day again. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #18
Well, we do have "Sanders loves the NRA" posts, and "Sanders supporters hate women" posts jeff47 Feb 2016 #26
When you can't discuss issues you head for the compost pile. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #32
I'm fine with this, if it means Bernie's candidacy and election Ron Green Feb 2016 #8
Good. The Democratic Party is not liberal enough for him Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #13
Then he should probably start his own party. randome Feb 2016 #17
It is a 2 party system and he is working within the rules. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #23
Casually throwing away half of the Democratic party is not smart electoral strategy. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #36
That's why Hillary can't win. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Feb 2016 #41
too late. he didn't. deal with it. Hiraeth Feb 2016 #37
My candidate Bernie Sanders Autumn Feb 2016 #16
Mine too!!! A true progressive! beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #19
Yes he is Autumn Feb 2016 #21
... beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #24
I love that! Autumn Feb 2016 #27
The system has no room for two ideologically bankrupt parties. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #22
This is a feature, not a bug. frylock Feb 2016 #28
Poor Bernie. Vinca Feb 2016 #29
Wow! Very disappointing. But it certainly helps to explain a lot. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #31
Shirley you must be kidding? Acting like you never heard this before? HERVEPA Feb 2016 #45
You're pretty much Johnie One Note CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #51
Shirley you jest HERVEPA Feb 2016 #52
He is a PROGRESSIVE. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #40
Who said this: "I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman"? whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #43
I agree with him wholeheartedly Z_California Feb 2016 #44
I have no problem with this. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #46
That's going to leave a mark nt arely staircase Feb 2016 #48
Enough of this baloney that Sanders's represents half of the Democratic Pary CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #50
Bernie is not a liberal. That's true. He's a democratic socialist. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #55
And a Socialist has zero chance of being elected President CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #58
Bernie is more electable than Hillary in a general election Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #59
ME: "Honey? Who said 'I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat'?" NurseJackie Feb 2016 #53
Your mom? (AKA who gives a crap?) AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #54
He has been saying, since forever, that the two parties have drifted closer together, to the point grntuscarora Feb 2016 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #57
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
3. In Clinton's mind, we are. That woman is stuck in the 20th century.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:26 PM
Feb 2016

And so is DINO-Debbie and the rest of the Clinton campaign team.

Nanjeanne

(4,960 posts)
49. I stopped giving to the Democratic Party a long time ago. I stayed registered to vote in primary
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

But I've been disappointed in the Democratic Party for a very long time. It's only that the Republicans are so much worse. But that's no recommendation for the majority of the corporatist Dems.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
2. The thing is, something like that is music to the ears of people who are to the left of the party as
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:26 PM
Feb 2016

a whole. You can score points with this among centrist or corporate Democrats.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
30. Not sure where the idea that indies are more liberal than Dems comes from.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:44 PM
Feb 2016

Is that belief based on a fabricated quote maybe?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
34. Independents are all over the left-right divide.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:51 PM
Feb 2016

From actual communists to neo-Nazis.

They are lumped into the middle by lazy pollsters, because treating independents as a single group effectively averages the views of communists and neo-Nazis (and everyone in between).

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
38. Last I saw, the electorate is about 25% liberal, 35% moderate, 35% conservative, self-described.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:54 PM
Feb 2016

Do you think anyone outside the 25% of self-described liberals (or even a lot of people in that group) are going to be excited about a guy who proudly denounced liberal Democrats for not being liberal enough?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
42. Yeah, the goalposts were clearly in the wrong place.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016
are going to be excited about a guy who proudly denounced liberal Democrats for not being liberal enough?

Well, that would be the reason Sanders talks about policy and not self-applied labels. 'Cause a whole lot of "liberal" policies are actually supported by people who claim to be moderate, or even conservative.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
47. Sanders doesn't talk about labels? Are you kidding? So that bashing Hillary for being "moderate"
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:02 PM
Feb 2016

wasn't a label?

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
33. About 1/2 of the Dem voters. You see, Hillary really is a centrist therefore everybody
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:49 PM
Feb 2016

to the left of her, which is 1/2 of the party, is progressive. That's why we had a 50-50 outcome in IA.

1/2 cannot be easily marginalized.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
35. In Iowa. And what I don't get is, why is it OK to "marginalize" the Hillary half
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:51 PM
Feb 2016

of the Iowa voters and not the Bernie half.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
39. You jumped to a certain conclusion, DanTex. I don't want to marginalize
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:54 PM
Feb 2016

either 1/2. I am sorry you feel that way. It's a good thing we can speak freely, you and I. It's a good thing!

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
4. That would be that great democratic lion (of a couple of months)*cough* Bernie Sanders*cough*
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:27 PM
Feb 2016

And my siggy LOL

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
15. So Bernie, and his minions, want Hillary held to the fire for her statements,
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:35 PM
Feb 2016

but we're supposed to give Mr. Sanders a pass for his? Nope, not going to happen.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
20. So Bernie, and his minions, want Hillary held to the fire for her statements,
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:38 PM
Feb 2016
but we're supposed to give Mr. Sanders a pass for his?


Thats right, seems fair eh?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
26. Well, we do have "Sanders loves the NRA" posts, and "Sanders supporters hate women" posts
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:43 PM
Feb 2016

today on DU.

Guess they're back to fishing for something that might stick.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
32. When you can't discuss issues you head for the compost pile.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:49 PM
Feb 2016

Dig around for something rotten and serve it up on a platter.

In other words, it's Thursday.

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
8. I'm fine with this, if it means Bernie's candidacy and election
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:28 PM
Feb 2016

can reorient the Democratic Party to its position of balance against corporate hegemony.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
13. Good. The Democratic Party is not liberal enough for him
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:33 PM
Feb 2016

and I support that position.


Maybe if we can move the party left, he will be.




 

randome

(34,845 posts)
17. Then he should probably start his own party.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:36 PM
Feb 2016

Not invade another's territory and proclaim he's fighting for our...wait, what does this remind me of? Something to do with...Oregon, I think...
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
23. It is a 2 party system and he is working within the rules.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:39 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary does things that are just barely legal and no Clinton supporter seems to care.

Bernie running as a Democrat is not a problem for most of us.

Your assumption that there is some type of ownership of the Democratic party that is being violated is simply wrong. Bernie is allowed to run as a Democrat, unlike taking over government buildings in Oregon.

The very fact that you equate the two shows how far from reality you are.



Vinca

(50,273 posts)
29. Poor Bernie.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:44 PM
Feb 2016

The Democratic honchos hate him so much they would rather he not run as a Democrat which would guarantee a Republican president.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
45. Shirley you must be kidding? Acting like you never heard this before?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:00 PM
Feb 2016

Do you share some traits with your TV counterpart?

Z_California

(650 posts)
44. I agree with him wholeheartedly
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

And I hope this is the beginning of the repair of the party.

Thank you Bernie for not running as an Independent and splitting the vote allowing the GOP to win. If he doesn't win the Dem nomination he will endorse the Dem nominee because he cares about this country and doesn't want to see the Republicans gain uncontested control.

If the OP suggests these statements somehow disqualify him I say this: I disagree.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
46. I have no problem with this.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:01 PM
Feb 2016

For a long time, the Democratic party has been floundering. There hasn't been much "this is what the Democratic party stands for! This is what the Democratic party will fight for! This is what the Democratic party will not tolerate!".

Back then, Sanders didn't think it was possible to change the party. That didn't stop him from caucusing with and voting with the Democrats in congress. Having an opportunity to become the head of the party will afford him the opportunity to change the party. The situation has changed and like all intelligent people he reassessed his position.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
50. Enough of this baloney that Sanders's represents half of the Democratic Pary
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

In Iowa, yea, probably. In lily white New Hampshire, probably more than half honestly. But in South Carolina and the rest the Southern states, not even close. In fact, nationwide only about 11% of voters describe themselves as very liberal and I can't imagine how few describe themselves as "socialists".

Bernie's political career as an independent could have been successful maybe three states, Vermont and New Hampshire among them. He could not have been elected dog catcher at the time he started running for office in his native Brooklyn.

I know you guys don't believe this, but you are going to see how little Bernie's message resonates in the rest of the country once the primaries have left New Hampshire behind.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
55. Bernie is not a liberal. That's true. He's a democratic socialist.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 07:28 PM
Feb 2016

Liberals support all kinds of daft shit like free trade with China.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
58. And a Socialist has zero chance of being elected President
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:16 AM
Feb 2016

Bernie supporters don't even make up half of all Democrats

Look around DU for instance; many of your Bernie brethren aren't even Democrats. They are only here because of Bernie and when this is over they will go back to voting for the Green Party, the Socialist Party USA, etc. or not voting. Look at the polls of all of the states following NH where Bernie is 20% to 53% behind Hillary. Oh yea, you will say Bernie will convert them, but where are all of your Democratic Bernie brethren in those states right now?

Then consider those those self identifying as Democrats make up just 31% of the voting public, so obviously we are going to need the help independents who make up 42% to win the General election.

You know if Bernie wins the election the GOP spin machine is going drive the Bernie's socialism into the ground. So how do you think independents answer the question: "How would you feel about a candidate for president who described themselves as a socialist?" right now? YouGov Poll: Enthusiastic - 5%, Comfortable - 23%, Somewhat Uncomfortable - 35%, Very Uncomfortable 37%.

So how in the heck is Bernie going to win the general election when 72% of the independents are "Somewhat Uncomfortable" or "Very Uncomfortable" with a Socialist as President. And keep in mind this is BEFORE the Republicans start their attacks on Bernie.

Just wait until all of those independents learn about Bernie's plans to tax the middle class and the Republicans start to drive that home. The wait until the independents learn about Bernie's plans to turn the US into another Denmark. Most Americans will tolerate change, but the run from sudden change.

Forget all of the one on one polls, they mean nothing until the two nominees are selected and vetted and are actually compared to each other by the American people. Then understand that Bernie's chances of being elected President of the United States are essential zero.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
53. ME: "Honey? Who said 'I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat'?"
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 07:23 PM
Feb 2016

MY HUSBAND: "Oh hell, I don't know. Richard Nixon?"



He wasn't trying to be funny, so he really didn't understand why I was laughing so hard at him.

I love him!





Note to Jury: This is just a story about something funny that happened. I'm not comparing Sanders to Nixon. I'm laughing at my husband's response and sharing it with others in the hopes that they might think it's amusing too.

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
56. He has been saying, since forever, that the two parties have drifted closer together, to the point
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 07:41 PM
Feb 2016

there is very little daylight between them.

I agree with him.

I'm an Independent that has joined your party so I can vote for Bernie in my primary. The D Party needs to take a cold, hard look at itself and be honest about what it has become.

He's running as a Dem so as not to be a Nader spoiler. However, he is the best thing that's happened to the Dem Party since FDR.

But, hey, I'm just a "guest in your house", so what do I know.

Response to CajunBlazer (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Who said this: "“I am not...