Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:16 PM Feb 2016

Democratic Women Senators "Arm Twisting" Warren To Endorse Hillary.

Last edited Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:06 PM - Edit history (1)

Female Democratic senators are privately urging Sen. Elizabeth Warren to formally endorse Hillary Clinton for president.

The lobbying campaign comes as the Democratic race between Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is heating up going into the New Hampshire primary next week.


A group of Democratic ­senators is taking a bus tour of New Hampshire this weekend to stump for Clinton, and they want the liberal Massachusetts powerhouse to get on board. Clinton narrowly defeated Sanders in the Iowa caucuses earlier this week, but the Vermont senator is a heavy favorite to win New Hampshire.

A few of the senators have discussed with Warren the possibility of publicly backing Clinton. However, they’ve been careful not to put a lot of public pressure on their colleague, who is fiercely independent and has a loyal following among progressives.

<snip>

A Democratic aide said the Senate women have been “trying to do a little arm twisting in recent months

<snip>
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/268161-female-senators-urge-warren-back-hillary

94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic Women Senators "Arm Twisting" Warren To Endorse Hillary. (Original Post) cali Feb 2016 OP
I doubt she will. CentralMass Feb 2016 #1
She'll be Sanders's running mate, to carry on the torch in 2020. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #29
I hope not. We need her in the Senate to keep these fools in check. frylock Feb 2016 #32
We need her in the White House in 2020 too. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #34
^^^THIS^^^ valerief Feb 2016 #79
The last thing we need is a ticket of two really old white people from New England. askew Feb 2016 #40
They would be a formidable paring. CentralMass Feb 2016 #67
Too one note, too old. askew Feb 2016 #93
No! Keep Warren in the Senate. Get Robert Reich as VP. valerief Feb 2016 #80
How sad the woman depends on surrogates to go begging for an endorsement. n/t monmouth4 Feb 2016 #2
bawahahahahahahaha. good luck with that. Hiraeth Feb 2016 #3
I would be fine with Warren endorsing Mrs. Clinton bigwillq Feb 2016 #4
Me too, I am surprised this wasn't labeled a cat fight- because women! Give em some time though. bettyellen Feb 2016 #37
Yep. That's definitely going to happen. Also, poor, poor fragile Elizabeth Warren, having Squinch Feb 2016 #87
If she did endorse Clinton it would undermine her standing as a true progressive, NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #5
yes, and we have gotten the message restorefreedom Feb 2016 #38
+ 100 senz Feb 2016 #43
Pressure and arm-twisting has gone on for a very long time and at all levels: merrily Feb 2016 #6
I can almost hear "My wealthy donors will fund a primary challenger" being part of the arm-twisting. arcane1 Feb 2016 #36
Yes, of course. That's how it works. senz Feb 2016 #47
But that doesn't stop Hill supporters from crowing senz Feb 2016 #46
I can't imagine Senator Warren letting her arm be twisted Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #7
That sort of thing would piss me off. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #76
It Really Makes One Wonder What Happened To The Democratic Party Along The Way..... global1 Feb 2016 #8
The status quo has become untenable. Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #13
+1 mmonk Feb 2016 #17
Senator Warren is not beholden to anyone to keep her senate seat (unlike others). NV Whino Feb 2016 #9
Yes I agree Andy823 Feb 2016 #28
bwaahhahaha ok I admit I laughed when I read that JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #10
Spinning around is revolving. winter is coming Feb 2016 #20
Porque no las dos? VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #21
That's certainly a possibility. n/t winter is coming Feb 2016 #22
Why am I not surpised? Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #11
An entire political movement couldn't get her to run for President. And we tried! jillan Feb 2016 #12
DUer Praises Warren, Throws Women Under the Bus! Mike__M Feb 2016 #63
Did you seriously just reply to me with that comment? jillan Feb 2016 #73
Not seriously... Mike__M Feb 2016 #82
Thanks :) I was really taken aback. Tis the silly season. jillan Feb 2016 #86
Well, some of the stuff we can read for real Mike__M Feb 2016 #88
And in the end 99% of us will join hands and work to get our nominee elected in the GE jillan Feb 2016 #92
Results... Major Nikon Feb 2016 #85
lol Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #14
OMG - POLITICS! Blue_Adept Feb 2016 #15
Hillary supporters can dream INdemo Feb 2016 #16
Yet another sign of desperation in full swing at Camp Weathervane. n/t 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #18
Hey! This isnt supposed to be about gender, right? elias49 Feb 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #23
I thought her "cred" came from her votes and her policy work... brooklynite Feb 2016 #24
Oh she does need cred outside MA cali Feb 2016 #33
Warren is a national leader for progressives. senz Feb 2016 #48
It would damage Warren more than it would help Clinton. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #25
Yet Clinton supporters long for it senz Feb 2016 #49
This "first woman president" thing is, IMO, total bullshit and a piss-poor reason to djean111 Feb 2016 #26
Amen to that montanacowboy Feb 2016 #27
Exactly. It's an insult to our gender. senz Feb 2016 #50
Since Clinton has zero credibility at this point, she needs to borrow from one of the most credible. arcane1 Feb 2016 #30
I wonder what tools they have to pressure her with. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #31
Oh lord, I could see that. That's a real-life scenario. senz Feb 2016 #54
She's got girl parts so she must endorse Clinton!!! NightWatcher Feb 2016 #35
Makes me, as a woman, wonder if the females of the Senate Fawke Em Feb 2016 #84
Ah, peer pressure. blackspade Feb 2016 #39
As a woman, there is no woman on the planet who could influence me to CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #41
Sounds like clique mentaltity. Some women cannot tolerate independence in other women. senz Feb 2016 #42
"Warren is the only female Democratic senator who has not endorsed Clinton." CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #44
Only if Clinton wins the nomination senz Feb 2016 #56
I take it she is a friend of yours? CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #58
Her values, principles, and character are well-known by now. senz Feb 2016 #59
Why then did she urge Hillary to run for the Presidency? CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #60
ALL Senate Democratic women told Hill to go for it. "Rah-rah team spirit" senz Feb 2016 #61
Elizabeth Warren is very independent CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #72
So Warren went against her deep seated principals because something would "look strange". bettyellen Feb 2016 #90
It's not against a deep seated principle to join the group in saying "Go for it!" senz Feb 2016 #91
LOL. Marked. This is going to be great. morningfog Feb 2016 #69
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #45
Tell them to piss off and maintain your integrity Sen. Warren. eom Purveyor Feb 2016 #51
I'm going to go out on a limb here fredamae Feb 2016 #52
Haha.... quickesst Feb 2016 #53
That's not surprising. H2O Man Feb 2016 #55
I would be surprised if Elizabeth acquiesced to the arm-twisting. AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #57
At first it sounds like PATRICK Feb 2016 #62
".....and has a loyal following among progressives." Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #64
She doesn't owe HRC an endorsement. Ken Burch Feb 2016 #65
I don't she how Warren, a progressive with such strong principles, oasis Feb 2016 #66
So why isn't she endorsing Bernie? WI_DEM Feb 2016 #68
If she endorses neither (before nominee determined) she can be VP for either. NT Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #75
K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #70
Of that, I have no doubt. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #71
I wish Bernie Sanders had more surrogate events. Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #74
I am coming to an unfortunate conclusion after these discussions Trajan Feb 2016 #77
I think Warren has too much integrity. nt valerief Feb 2016 #78
Why should she? hifiguy Feb 2016 #81
I can't imagine Elizabeth betraying all her progressive supporters by endorsing Clinton. nt Zorra Feb 2016 #83
I thought she already said she would support the Dem nominee. It isn't controversial. bettyellen Feb 2016 #89
alas they really think that a Warren endorsement would make Sanders falter MisterP Feb 2016 #94

TheBlackAdder

(28,205 posts)
34. We need her in the White House in 2020 too.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

.


Regardless of who gets in office, HRC or SBS, we need a new candidate for 2020.


.

askew

(1,464 posts)
40. The last thing we need is a ticket of two really old white people from New England.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:08 PM
Feb 2016

Talk about out of touch. Sanders is going to have to pick a much younger running mate for the same reason McCain did. Sanders is super old and voters are going to want assurances there is a qualified VP in place who isn't ancient. Where McCain went wrong is that he picked an unqualified young VP.

Warren is 66 years old.

I'd guess he picks someone who is younger and likely a woman. Though looking through the choices there aren't a whole lot of younger women in the Dem Party as possible VPs:

Amy Klobuchar is 55 and from the Midwest. She is insanely popular in Minnesota and would be an asset on the stump.

Tammy Baldwin is 53 and from Midwest. That would be something to have a gay VP nominee. Don't see it happening though.

Kristen Gillibrand is 49 but also from the East Coast.



valerief

(53,235 posts)
80. No! Keep Warren in the Senate. Get Robert Reich as VP.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:47 PM
Feb 2016

We can trust him, he's experienced, and he supports Bernie's policies.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
4. I would be fine with Warren endorsing Mrs. Clinton
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:22 PM
Feb 2016

If and when Mrs. Clinton wins the nomination. Same for Bernie in regards to a Warren endorsement.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
37. Me too, I am surprised this wasn't labeled a cat fight- because women! Give em some time though.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:51 PM
Feb 2016

Squinch

(50,950 posts)
87. Yep. That's definitely going to happen. Also, poor, poor fragile Elizabeth Warren, having
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 07:47 PM
Feb 2016

her arm twisted like that. Because, you know, she is a delicate flower and she can't stand up to other people who might disagree with her, so they should never have asked her to endorse Hillary. Because she'll just get all weepy if she decides not to and has to say no.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
5. If she did endorse Clinton it would undermine her standing as a true progressive,
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:22 PM
Feb 2016

so for that reason I think she will not formally endorse, but will just speak around the edges and let her followers figure out who she supports from there.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
38. yes, and we have gotten the message
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

between her statement the other day and her floor speech last week, the only words she hasn't uttered are "i endorse bernie sanders for president of the united ststes."

if she was going to endorse clinton, she would hsve done it earlier while she was still inevitable.

her silence is speaking volumes

merrily

(45,251 posts)
6. Pressure and arm-twisting has gone on for a very long time and at all levels:
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:23 PM
Feb 2016

From a facebook post by New Hampshire State Representative Tim Smith from September 2015


# Yes, there has been enormous pressure to endorse a different candidate, but arm-twisting hasn't worked on me since middle school and did not influence my decision. Hopefully other legislators will see the enormous level of solidarity you have all given and be convinced that it's “safe” to do what's right instead of what's easy. #



Full post and link at http://www.democraticunderground.com/128054423

This is one reason I have not been impressed by the array of endorsements.
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
36. I can almost hear "My wealthy donors will fund a primary challenger" being part of the arm-twisting.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:49 PM
Feb 2016
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
47. Yes, of course. That's how it works.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:21 PM
Feb 2016

We must get money out of the electoral process. It is killing democracy, killing the well-being of an entire people.

(You should consider running for office, arcane1.)

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
46. But that doesn't stop Hill supporters from crowing
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:15 PM
Feb 2016

as if those "endorsements" were based on anything other than self-preservation.

global1

(25,251 posts)
8. It Really Makes One Wonder What Happened To The Democratic Party Along The Way.....
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:25 PM
Feb 2016

to not want a transformational person as their Party nominee. All stops are being pulled out to keep the status quo. Are they really concerned with The People that voted them in to represent us or are they only concerned about themselves and the big money flow to keep their jobs?

I'm sitting here watching all of this happened before my eyes and am saddened for our children and grandchildren that will be stuck living in a 1%er's world.

I'm so disillusioned now it isn't even funny - but it makes me want to work all the harder to get Bernie elected.

Go Bernie!!!

Feel the Bern!!!!

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
13. The status quo has become untenable.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

Any politician espousing the maintenance of the status quo (Clinton first among them) is basing her / his platform on unrealistic expectations.

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
9. Senator Warren is not beholden to anyone to keep her senate seat (unlike others).
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:32 PM
Feb 2016

Therefore, she won't succumb to any arm twisting. If she at some point endorses Hillary, it will be because she believes in Hillary's message.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
28. Yes I agree
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

Although I am sure that some here on DU will claim they held a gun to her head if she does endorse Hillary!

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
10. bwaahhahaha ok I admit I laughed when I read that
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:34 PM
Feb 2016
“I’m hopeful she’ll join us. I’m hopeful she’ll join the revolution that will allow us to come together to elect” the first female president,


Exactly what is revolutionary about Sec. Clinton?
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
11. Why am I not surpised?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:35 PM
Feb 2016

Neither by the establishment efforts and by Warren's refusal. Not downright endorsing Sanders is perhaps the only concession she was willing to make.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
12. An entire political movement couldn't get her to run for President. And we tried!
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:36 PM
Feb 2016

I get the feeling that Elizabeth has a mind of her own

Mike__M

(1,052 posts)
63. DUer Praises Warren, Throws Women Under the Bus!
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 04:57 PM
Feb 2016

When some people say that one specific woman has a mind of her own, what they really mean is that all other women never ever think for themselves.
By making such a plain seemingly non-sexist statement, they prove that all of Bernie's supporters are disgusting, spittle-spewing misogynists!
That's a low blow, so cut it out, because nine-eleven!

(I think I got the logic down, now.)

jillan

(39,451 posts)
73. Did you seriously just reply to me with that comment?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:28 PM
Feb 2016

You are calling me a misogynist? Me? A woman who praises another woman?

Unreal. A new low.

Mike__M

(1,052 posts)
88. Well, some of the stuff we can read for real
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 07:59 PM
Feb 2016

is offensive, and the logic of some of the arguments is insulting.
Not least Secretary Clinton's "shouting" complaint from last Fall. She was right that some people call out "shouting" as a sexist attack, but to accuse Sanders of that is ridiculous--attacking his strong points, as they say. I was pro-Sanders, but not anti-Clinton until she started that.
The "silly season" is really twisty! I should be more careful. But I probably won't be.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
92. And in the end 99% of us will join hands and work to get our nominee elected in the GE
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:27 PM
Feb 2016

Sometimes I have to take a deep breath and remind myself that in the end we all want the same thing.

Being a political junkie during election season should come with warning stickers

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
85. Results...
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:56 PM
Feb 2016

On Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:30 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

DUer Praises Warren, Throws Women Under the Bus!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1140383

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Bernie's supporters are all disgusting, spittle-spewing misogynists? Because I, a woman, praised another woman?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:39 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Borderline, but I decided to err on the side of free speech.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Joking.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Apparently, someone is unable to recognize sarcasm.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter, I don't think you understand that the poster is making a critical comment about the structure of the preceding argument. The poster is not stating those things as a point of belief.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
14. lol
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

I doubt Warren caves to these measures and I give anyone who resists
this bullshit a lot of credit.

Why don't they spend their energy and time telling Clinton to stop
funding her campaign through WS?

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
16. Hillary supporters can dream
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:41 PM
Feb 2016

That ain't gonna happen. As it turns out the women in Congress have never gotten onboard with Warren in her fight for middle class Americans and against the "too big to fail" Banks so yes Hiilary fans you're dreaming.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
19. Hey! This isnt supposed to be about gender, right?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

Democratic Women Senators "Arm Twisting" Warren To Endorse Hillary.

Response to cali (Original post)

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
24. I thought her "cred" came from her votes and her policy work...
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:22 PM
Feb 2016

...and why does she need "cred" with anyone but the voters of Massachusetts?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
33. Oh she does need cred outside MA
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:42 PM
Feb 2016

Why do you think hill wants her endorsement so badly? Because Warren has a ton of cred with progressives across the country, particularly on economic inequality.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
48. Warren is a national leader for progressives.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:25 PM
Feb 2016

Not all positions are circumscribed by man-made power structures and not everyone has to sell out to get ahead.

Seriously, brooklynite.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
26. This "first woman president" thing is, IMO, total bullshit and a piss-poor reason to
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:27 PM
Feb 2016

vote for someone, especially since I hate war, fracking, the TPP, cluster bombs, and H-1B visas. It is abhorrent to me to think that I would overlook all of those things, just to vote for some woman.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
50. Exactly. It's an insult to our gender.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:28 PM
Feb 2016

Contrary to once-popular opinion, we are not all airheads.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
30. Since Clinton has zero credibility at this point, she needs to borrow from one of the most credible.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016

This is fucking embarrassing.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
31. I wonder what tools they have to pressure her with.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

They may have some political dirt on her, who knows. Or may give an implied threat of shunning or withholding future support.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
54. Oh lord, I could see that. That's a real-life scenario.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:34 PM
Feb 2016

Fortunately, these people depend on public support and we, as aware citizens, can apply our own pressure on them. They need us more than they need their group support.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
35. She's got girl parts so she must endorse Clinton!!!
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:48 PM
Feb 2016

And the other people with girl parts are putting pressure on her to do so.


That's a hell of a way to campaign.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
84. Makes me, as a woman, wonder if the females of the Senate
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:55 PM
Feb 2016

are adults because they seem to be acting like a high school clique.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
39. Ah, peer pressure.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:04 PM
Feb 2016

They can't stand independent thinking.

Even if Warren ends up endorsing HRC it will be on her terms not the arm twisters. Shame on them.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
42. Sounds like clique mentaltity. Some women cannot tolerate independence in other women.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:09 PM
Feb 2016

And any female who paid attention during grade school, middle school, high school, college, social organizations, the work force -- and, yes, message boards -- knows exactly what I am talking about.

Self-respecting women resist group think.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
44. "Warren is the only female Democratic senator who has not endorsed Clinton."
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:13 PM
Feb 2016

And mark my words, she will sooner or later.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
56. Only if Clinton wins the nomination
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:41 PM
Feb 2016

and then only in a most perfunctory way, and we would all know how perfunctory it is.

But she will not be pressured and coerced into betraying her own values, which is a good thing, wouldn't you agree, CajunBlazer?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
59. Her values, principles, and character are well-known by now.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:54 PM
Feb 2016

Do you think there might be a way, a little something, that could frighten her and make her do it?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
61. ALL Senate Democratic women told Hill to go for it. "Rah-rah team spirit"
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 04:08 PM
Feb 2016

It was a group letter, very collegial, meant nothing. If Warren had been the only female Dem senator to decline to sign, she would have looked very strange.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
72. Elizabeth Warren is very independent
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:21 PM
Feb 2016

She is not one to follow the leader. She would not sign a group letter unless she believe in its contents. If you disagree you don't know Elizabeth Warren

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
90. So Warren went against her deep seated principals because something would "look strange".
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:02 PM
Feb 2016

I don't buy that.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
91. It's not against a deep seated principle to join the group in saying "Go for it!"
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:12 PM
Feb 2016

It's collegial. It's how you stay in good standing with your peer group.

I'll bet you know that, bettyellen.

Response to cali (Original post)

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
52. I'm going to go out on a limb here
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:31 PM
Feb 2016

I believe Warren shall not be arm twisted. I know I wouldn't, anyway.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
53. Haha....
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:33 PM
Feb 2016

I'm disappointed. I was expecting at least a picture of Elizabeth Warren sitting in a chair sweating, surrounded by the other senators giving her the third degree under bright lights. The title of your post was what got me expecting that.

Instead we get this: "However, they’ve been careful not to put a lot of public pressure on their colleague, who is fiercely independent and has a loyal following among progressives."
A Democratic aide said the Senate women have been “trying to do a little arm twisting in recent months "

Why shouldn't they try and convince Sen Warren to endorse Hillary? They're endorsing Hillary Clinton. I'll bet if the women in the Senate endorsing your chosen candidate were trying to get her to endorse Bernie the wording in your title would be quite different, but then that won't happen because, well, there aren't any.

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
62. At first it sounds like
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 04:14 PM
Feb 2016

the entire woman's caucus. Then it says "a few" whose names are likely eminently guessable. This is neither a surprise or likely to bear any fruit.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
64. ".....and has a loyal following among progressives."
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 05:02 PM
Feb 2016

So far, a well earned following among progressives. As does Bernie Sanders.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
65. She doesn't owe HRC an endorsement.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 05:10 PM
Feb 2016

It isn't a victory for women just to elect someone who is a woman president. By itself, it isn't anything.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
74. I wish Bernie Sanders had more surrogate events.
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:33 PM
Feb 2016

There should a tour with some of these celebrities:
https://berniesanders.com/artists/

...and then a speech by a politician who endorsed him.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
77. I am coming to an unfortunate conclusion after these discussions
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 06:44 PM
Feb 2016

Franken
Baldwin
Wyden

ALL are sullied by the stench of corporate campaign funding ... It's damaging to a person's integrity, to their essential goodness, to receive funds from corporate entities, because what is expected in return is nearly always - ANTI-worker ... ANTI-union ... ANTI-Fair taxation ... ANTI-public education ...ANTI-Social Security ... ANTI- EVERYTHING that regular working families hold dear ....

The whole lot of them need to be thrown out ...

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
94. alas they really think that a Warren endorsement would make Sanders falter
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 01:26 AM
Feb 2016

instead all we'll see is constant armtwisting and blackmail to drive up the ever-so-important ENDORSEMENTS like they're poker chips--one good for 500K votes, another just 10K

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democratic Women Senators...