2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBOOM! Barbara Boxer: Hillary is a progressive EVERY day. Bernie is a Democrat "some days."
Men4Hillary Retweeted
Barbara Boxer ?@BarbaraBoxer 17h17 hours ago
Barbara Boxer Retweeted Alex Seitz-Wald
Hillary is a progressive EVERY day. Bernie is a Democrat "some days."
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Hillary called herself a moderate on September 10, 2015. Yes or no? So Clintonian. So crickets.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Respect for her.
pandr32
(11,584 posts)You had some respect for Sec. Clinton or Senator Boxer?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I don't think she is part of a fan club. I think she is providing her opinion.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)"It would be hypocritical of me to run as a Democrat because of the things I have said about the party." - Bernie Sanders
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)It's not too difficult to show numerous instances of Hillary Clinton changing her mind on progressive issues, supporting and taking money from corrupt mega-corporations, pandering to conservatives and moderates, and so on. She's more progressive now than she used to be, but Boxer making such an obviously untrue statement as a twitter zinger just opens herself and Hillary Clinton up to some very strong criticism that's impossible to hand wave away.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I was 100 percent for Hillary but I am stunned over the VISA situation where a country can sue us for raising the cost of the visa program. How did we get there? I am still stunned.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)And that's just the way she and those of her strata want it. They TELL US what to think - not ASK US what we think. I've had it with being TOLD what to think.
I keep our old lawn mower limping along because I worry about putting a new one on the credit card. Ms. Boxer doesn't have a clue how her lawn gets tended. It takes a real rarity of a person to LIVE in that elevated strata and honestly relate to what life's like here in the trenches. Boxer and Clinton ain't got a CLUE - and neither do a majority of the elite clan they claim allegiance to.
pandr32
(11,584 posts)It is an opinion she has earned from observation. Notice that Sanders has no endorsements from his colleagues in the Senate, and only a couple from the House after they have all observed Sanders working with him for years. They don't see him as a progressive champion or a leader at all.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)I don't agree with a lot of things but the willingness to think has to be applauded.
Me, I don't want a third Obama term but I especially don't want a third Clinton term. If we could get a restraining order to keep him fifty miles from the White House I would applaud the effort.
One point, however: Bernie has raised millions of dollars from small donors. Every dollar is given to help the campaign. Specifically. There are plenty of fund raisers out there for other candidates and groups--my inbox generally contains 75% appeals from both sides (even from Rubio). Money I contribute to Sanders I expect to be used to combat the incredible resources at HRC's command just to win the fight. I am sure that is the same with other people as well.
After 911 (apologies to HRC and Ghouliani for bringing up THAT issue) some of the money donated to Red Cross was used for the on-going benevolent activities of that group. This led to a firestorm. People who had donated for 911 relief efforts were disgusted by the misuse of their money, even if in a good cause. It was just that such good causes were not the reason the donations were made.
Similarly, this campaign.
The irony of using Wall Street money to re-build a Democratic party is not lost on me. Neither, however, is seeing it as being something other than a very good move for anyone but HRC. If we wind up with a Third-way Party, dominated by hedge fund managers, it isn't going to help anyone else.
Sanders has to use all those donations for the reasons they were made. Sounds fair to m.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)That's sustainable stuff that can be worth far more than cash in the right hands.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)I know the author of your linked article. I respect him but he and I have widely divergent views on HRC. He believes either candidate would be acceptable as the nominee, whereas I will never vote for her unless she becomes an actual progressive. Chris must have access to info I'm not aware of, because the Dem Party hasn't done shit in my region. The Bernie people have generated more enthusiasm than anyone in decades with the exception of Obama in 2008.
We are organizing for a long term progressive movement to act locally and regionally. Time will tell if we can be more effective than the Democrats. Of course we will align with them, but unless Bernie is the nominee, I see no rationale for any support or loyalty to the Democratic Party. I say that as a lifetime Democrat.
My contempt is for both political and personal reasons. I'm tired of the institutional racism, the lack of guts by candidates and the lack of a reality based platform. Personally, I am disgusted that the ACA has raised my taxes this year. I will have to pay a penalty this year because I can't afford health insurance. What a steaming pile of bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
riversedge
(70,222 posts)Divide and Conquer seems to his motto lately
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Crickets...
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)What was yesterdays point? Oh yeah, Bernies afraid to debate. (POOF) Vanished into the thin air of reality.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Horrible.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Nobody is 100% anything.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)riversedge
(70,222 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)You gave a rationalization without directly answering my question. That is called deflection. So I ask again.. did Hillary Clinton call herself a moderate on September 10, 2015. All I need is a "yes" or a "no." It's very simple. I will entertain any rationale for her statement after you take a position on my very simple question. Any answer that does not include a yes or no terminates the discussion. I will not ask a third time.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Do you mean it's false, and that's why you called it a meme? Meme is pretty overused these days, and doesn't really indicate the validity of the statement either way.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)jhart3333
(332 posts)Maybe this should be the answer every time.
Omaha Steve
(99,635 posts)Why did she endorse Hillary? $ and a relative. See reply #55.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Remember his words:
"It would be hypocritical of me to run as a Democrat because of the things I have said about the party." - Bernie Sanders
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)it's a horrible experience and he doesn't have Potomac fever like the usual candidate. There is no expediency here. Expediency is trading American and Iraqi blood for a putative shot at the White House.
angrychair
(8,699 posts)If you can find the video of Joel Benonson, Clinton's chief strategist and poller, was on All In with Chris Hayes and Chris was really grilling him about this....his excuse was that she was always a progressive but sometimes had to be a moderate, to get things "done" but she is always a "progressive that gets things done". It was actually a lot more pretzel logic than I make it sound. That interview was full of nuggets like that.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Is she trying to take credit for Obama's successes?
Another lame attempt at using a a Repub tactic of redefining words to undercut you opponent.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)For some reason, he couldn't find it in himself to join the party of fellow Vermonters Leahy and Dean, but now he wants to be that party's Presidential nominee.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)he didn't want to be a spoiler. I became a Democrat again to vote for Bernie, not Hillary.
Z
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)It would have been honest.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He was okay until he challenged Hillary. When he became a threat, he became 'not a Democrat'. You never complained about all the Republicans who became Democrats to run for office, you welcomed them into the 'big tent'. I guess it's only a 'big tent' when it doesn't upset Hillary's plans to become the first woman President.
Z
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)That actually would enable a GOP victory. This way, Bernie is our best shot to win according to every GE poll I have seen for months.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)..so epic fail on that.
And again - the tent is big. Why didn't he come in? Why has he insisted on being I-VT? If he can't see his way clear to being D-VT as Senator, then he should have run as a Green or a Socialist.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)in the polls did it become an issue of his not being a Democrat. No one had a problem with his label for decades. 'Outrage' happened when he started to threaten Hillary's coronation, so all this is just a bogus argument.
Z
frylock
(34,825 posts)You're welcome.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Bill Clinton was the best President in my lifetime. No wars that caused massive losses of American troops; incredibly low unemployment when he left office; and he balanced the budget.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Fire up a binge fest of the West Wing and don't stop thinking about tomorrow.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)He's positively ancient now.
frylock
(34,825 posts)riversedge
(70,222 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)[font color="white"]Then why are you on DU?[/font]
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)He is on the record saying he decided to run as a Democrat because it was necessary and the only responsible way to run. Convenience played no role in his decision because he didn't want to run, but felt it was necessary.
He is the only serious candidate in my lifetime, except for Shirley Chisholm, who doesn't have Potomac fever.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)...but he had to caucus with the Democrats because he had no where else to go.
Now he has ambitions to go to the White House (if that isn't Potomac fever, I don't know what is), and suddenly it's "responsible" of Senator Sanders to go from a political lifetime of being I-VT to D-VT?
Hogwash.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Bernie is not a normal politician. He hasn't been corrupted. He doesn't take bribes. He's running because he is disgusted by what America has become. What part of that don't you get?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)By David A. Fahrenthold July 19, 2015
BURLINGTON, Vt. A few days before Election Day in 1990, the National Rifle Association sent a letter to its 12,000 members in Vermont, with an urgent message about the race for the states single House seat.
Vote for the socialist, the gun rights group said. Its important.
Bernie Sanders is a more honorable choice for Vermont sportsmen than Peter Smith, wrote Wayne LaPierre, who was and still is a top official at the national NRA, backing Sanders over the Republican incumbent.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-nra-helped-put-bernie-sanders-in-congress/2015/07/19/ed1be26c-2bfe-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)the NRA.
And the million deaths that go with those weapons.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)So then Bernie is responsible for that. American deaths don't count? Is that what you are saying?
America's Top Killing Machine
Gun deaths are poised to surpass automobile deaths in the United States this year.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/americas-top-killing-machine/384440/
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)You forgot that part
ENDORSED Bernie Sanders
zalinda
(5,621 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)The health insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industries, the oil industry, the banking industry, and Wall Street.
Oh yeah, she talks about guns a little, but won't do shit about them if elected. Her friends in that 1% club would advise her against it.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Just give it up.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)but he spills a lot along the way. He's no Waterboy with his special backpack.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)They loathe him. Didn't you know this, or are you just being Clintonian?
dpatbrown
(368 posts)those were her EXACT words, so once again she's being less than honest. Unfortunately, my senator (Boxer) is less than candid too. When Clinton thought that it would benefit her to call herself a moderate she did. Now that we have a TRUE progressive giving her a run for her money, she figures she would now try to convince voters, (especially those under thirty) that she too is one. NO! She is not a progressive, not in my dictionary.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)CSStrowbridge
(267 posts)SHE'S A MODERATE, BECAUSE HER POSITIONS ARE HELD BY MOST AMERICANS!
This is not a hard concept to get. Most Americans hold progressive views.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Otherwise, not so much.
Now why should I support that, when Hillary has been a Democrat her entire political career and beyond.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Caucused whither for the last 30 years? Funny how you all did not mind when you got his votes.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)In every direction, I judge people on actions, with everyone there will be some actions I don't like, I choose those who's actions I like the most.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Bernie is more of a Democrat than any Third Way D.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)zalinda
(5,621 posts)lose. Bill Clinton won on a third party election, but there were more Democrats then. Now, Democrats and Republicans combined have only about half of the electorate, give or take a few percentage points. With all the new people that Bernie has brought into the system, the Democrats have the advantage again, but no one says those new Democrats will stick around and vote for Hillary. If he goes third party now, he will not only drag a lot of old Democrats to vote for him, but a vast majority of the new Democrats and some of the Republicans.
Hillary does not have the power. After 25 years, you would think people would know her enough to vote for her enthusiastically but she is struggling against a basically unknown Senator from the tiny state of Vermont.
Z
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Than most Democrats in congress.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)And people should also know that Boxer's daughter married a Rodham... one of HRC's brothers, so her support is also a family matter
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)So many insestuous relationships, it's hard to keep them all straight.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Cough, Goldwater, cough.
I don't hold that against her mind you, but you do her no favors by calling attention to it with ill though out posts like this.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Ohh. lordy in heaven above... come down and smite me before i smite the booby heads with my wand..
On second thought, it's only 10:19 in the am but I think I need a drink
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)If dedication to a particular political party is important to you, then yes Hillary makes more sense than Bernie. However the political party system in the USA simply makes a non Repuke/Democratic Party candidate non viable. That's why Bernie registered as a Democrat in states that have party registration (Vermont doesn't have it) and is running as a Democrat. That's also why (for similar reasons) why The Dumpster (aka Donald Trump) is running for the Repuke Party nomination. The closest we got in modern times is Ross Perot and even then he was under the guise of a political party.
Besides the definition of who is a Democrat or a Repuke is very wide. Why is the former Florida Governor Charlie Crist now a Democrat rather than a Repuke? Would Jill Stein be welcomed into the Democratic Party were she to leave the Green Party? Is Donald Trump a Democrat given his past support of the Clintons, or a Repuke? (then again is Donald J Trump just a persona of Donald Trump, being put on for our electoral entertainment?)
I choose Bernie over Hillary because of his loyalty to his principles over his loyalty to any political party. His principles don't appear to me to have changed a whole lot over the years. Hillary - a bit more flexible. Bernie also to me appears to want to work towards goals I believe are important.
However... Hillary is miles better than anyone running for the Repuke Party nomination, and it saddens me to say that Donald Trump is probably the best of the bunch... I'm convinced Donald J Trump is a persona running for President and that The Donald is much more moderate than he wants to have you believe right now. But Bernie 1st, Hillary 2nd. Jill Stein 3rd.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)labeled herself a moderate.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)They have no issue with the fact that he caucuses with who all these years? Democrats.
They have no issue because the big tent of the Democratic Party includes
conservative dems, moderates and progressives.
Clinton labeled herself a moderate then switched when she thought a progressive
label would help her image and be accepted and go unchallenged.
Bernie has stated from the beginning he would not run third party. The DNC
would be where you take your complaint he should not be running on the
Democratic Party ticket.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)win the Presidency as a Dem
extremely equivalent . . . unless you want to ignore the equivalency (which I am quite confident of)
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Take up your confusion with them.
No one told Clinton to call herself a moderate before she called herself
a progressive.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)no confusion here
a ridiculous issue anyway - whether one is progressive or moderate should be evaluated in terms of specific issues - not some rolled-up brand.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)good with it, but you evidently feel he is a phony...is that correct?
If so, take your concerns to the DNC.
Where as Hillary says she is a moderate at one time in one place
and then is a progressive in another time and place...not so transparent.
I think people can figure out who is authentic and who is not, I agree.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)and I think anyone (Bernie and Hillary included) can be moderate with some issues and progressive with others.
Yep - the folks in Iowa have decided who is authentic.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)That is not how Hillary framed it either time, she gave herself
two different labels on her overall positions.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)good heavens
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)You snipped at the part you wanted in order to deceive. Stop doing that crap.
125. Yea, I guess you missed the way he did that TRANSPARENTLY...to the DNC and they're
good with it, but you evidently feel he is a phony...is that correct?
If so, take your concerns to the DNC.
Where as Hillary says she is a moderate at one time in one place
and then is a progressive in another time and place...not so transparent.
I think people can figure out who is authentic and who is not, I agree.
frylock
(34,825 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)"a ridiculous issue anyway - whether one is progressive or moderate should be evaluated in terms of specific issues - not some rolled-up brand."
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Go, Hillary!
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The Republicans for the last 30 years. He did not did he?
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Since she claimed to be a moderate. That must have been a lie.
Bernie is a progressive every day, which is far more important than some silly party label.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I'm liberal on some issues, more moderate on others and I've NEVER voted republican. Is it liberal to vote to protect the gun manufacturers the way Bernie has? Does that negate him being a liberal? This is the stupidest thing the Bernie folks have tried to date.
Response to leftynyc (Reply #40)
Name removed Message auto-removed
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I'll call myself whatever I damn well please. And really, creating an account simply to tell me to fuck off? That's very flattering.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Explain your logic by responding to the following scenario.
Bobby is mad at Tom and George. He gets into his Chevy truck with his Remington gun and drives towards Tom's house. On the way he spots Tom and George walking down the side of the road. Bobby swerves to the side of the road and hits Tom with his truck killing him instantly but misses George. He then hops out of his truck and shoots George with his Remington gun killing him.
You would let George's family sue Remington but not allow Tom's family to sue GM? Or would you let Tom's family sue GM too?
Seriously please answer this question and let me know your reasoning.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Why is this even an issue?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)As if we all have to believe the EXACT same things in the EXACT same way or someone will whine about it. Like I said, the stupidest argument the Bernie people have tried to date. And I guess it's okay for someone to tell me to fuck off when I disagree.
Edited: I see the moderators took care of the fuck off post to me. Thanks for that as I had no intention of alerting on it.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)pissing match, as it merely highlights the candidates' record ... Bernie can tout his "crying in the wilderness"; while, HRC can tout her progressive ACCOMPLISHMENTS (read: talking vs doing).
In my estimation ... another unforced error.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)As I said before - perhaps not on this thread - plenty of people - maybe even most - are more liberal on some issues, more moderate on others (the way Bernie is NO liberal on the gun issue). That's just life and this "I'm more liberal than you" crap just helps republicans.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that is of little importance for some.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)when people fall in love with the candidate. Always a mistake in politics.
Nay
(12,051 posts)politician has EVER had exactly the same positions as I do. I just go with the one that fits the best and has shown in past actions that he/she fits the best.
And as far as a couple of Bernie's votes on guns -- I couldn't care less, because the one vote was against a very stupid law that wanted to hold gun manufacturers responsible for what gun owners did with their guns. Stupid. Only if the product is defective should mfg be liable. Another reason I don't care about most politicians' gun stances is that, IMO, nothing that can be done legally has any teeth or will lessen gun deaths unless the 2nd Amendment is changed. Ergo, I don't care about gun laws unless we're talking about changing the 2nd.
Until they change the 2nd, we're going to be a gun culture. I don't understand the fetish some people have - I'm not talking about hunters or those who have a gun to protect their home - I'm talking about the ones that have arsenals and search for the black helicopters - I think they're lunatics.
If you asked me my top 10 issues - the supreme court would take up spaces 1-5 - that's how seriously I take it . So either Hillary or Bernie will be fine on that front but I've watched the republicans for decades and they will destroy Bernie - between the socialist label (most Americans couldn't tell you the difference between a communist or socialist to save their lives) and his promise to raise taxes, I really think he would get creamed. He's also too old and far too angry. That's why I'm supporting Hillary.
Nay
(12,051 posts)just wanted to say that, for me, I care very little about gun legislation because the 2nd has to be taken care of before we can get any meaningful legislation. As long as no Dem candidate is a frothing gun nut, I'm OK with him/her.
Although I do consider it a serious problem, nothing can really be done until the 2nd is repealed or changed. I was simply pointing out that NOBODY agrees with any candidate 100% - that's the nature of politics and I'm fine with that (Good Heavens, I still remember the primary wars of 2008 when then Sen Obama supporters were railing at those of us supporting Hillary because Obama WAS SO MUCH MORE LIBERAL. We tried to tell them there was virtually no difference between the two but they had to learn the hard way). If I thought Bernie had even a small chance of getting his agenda through congress, it would be different, if I thought the republicans wouldn't pervert his positions until they're unrecognizable (and with citizens united, they can do that anonymously), that would be different also. But I don't and they will.
I know what's important to me and vote accordingly - that's why I'm a Democrat.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)If not then is it a lie when she calls herself a progressive?
She made no distinction concerning issues.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)The EXACT same way Bernie is more moderate on the gun issue and yet you still call him a liberal, Hillary is liberal on some issues and more moderate on others. This isn't a difficult concept for most people. Calling her a moderate on women's issues is nothing but a lie.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I am staying on topic as you try to change it.
Does she lie when she calls herself a moderate or does she lie when she calls herself a progressive?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)She's a moderate on some issues and progressive on others - just like Bernie. If the topic is guns, Bernie is a moderate, not a liberal. Why are you having trouble with this very simple concept that not everyone is a cartoon version of a liberal?
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I am asking about the accuracy of her statements.
Is she lying when she calls herself a moderate or is she lying when she calls herself a progressive?
She doesn't break it down by issue. She makes these big blanket statements that contradict each other. One is a lie.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)You hear what you want to hear and obviously so enthralled with your candidate that you can't accept nuance. That's entirely your problem. I'm done with you.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)She made no nuanced statement. She made direct statements claiming to be contradictory things.
At least one is a lie.
You may not care about her dishonesty, but others do.
betsuni
(25,531 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)she means the DLC/Third Way model that is merely RepublicanLite, except rhetorically, but definitely in practice...
I forgot where Barbara complained about Bernie caucusing with the Dems all these years...
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)anything to do with today's Republican Party?
FFS.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)does not a Democrat make. I am proud that Bernie won't let a label in the way of his convictions.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)Democrats are MORE progressive than Republicans, but so is Donald Trump.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Hill kills it.
MattSh
(3,714 posts)have at it. You AND Barbara.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Clinton has directed a lot of her attention to opening new markets for the U.S. in the developing world, where China is establishing a significant presence. Chinese companies have poured capital into poor regions of Africa where foreign aid from Washington once gave the U.S. leverage. In resource-rich countries such as Turkmenistan and Afghanistan, U.S. companies have recently lost major contracts to state-subsidized Chinese outfits.
In the global economic order that emerged after World War II, the U.S. and its allies took American dominance for granted. They did not envision China as the second-biggest economy in the world, Clinton says. She doesnt think theres anything wrong with Chinas desire to extend its reach. I dont hold that against them, she says. I just hold it against us if were not out there pushing back.
Shes pressed the case for U.S. business in Cambodia, Singapore, Vietnam, Indonesia, and other countries in Chinas shadow. Shes also taken a leading part in drafting the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the free-trade pact that would give U.S. companies a leg up on their Chinese competitors. The State Department even has had limited success in prying open Chinese markets to U.S. companies. In 2011, after extensive haggling with U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke, the Chinese government allowed Titanic 3D and other Hollywood movies to be shown in Beijing theaters. And that same year, after talks with Clinton, the Chinese relaxed so-called indigenous innovation rules that kept U.S. companies from competing for government technology contracts there. Not that they would ever admit that the Americansthat the secretarysaid this, and therefore [they] changed, says Clinton, whos been careful not to brag too loudly about these deals. A lot of this you cannot claim, because then you kind of force the people on the other side to lose face.
For U.S. companies overseas, a personal appeal from Clinton opens doors and unravels red tape....
Hillary Clinton's Business Legacy at the State Department
She's a conservative who works hard every day for Moneyed Interests.
Not Progressive, its very republican though.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)embassy (he's in the military), so he worked with State people, and that's one of the things they do. The make relationships with the host country and build bridges with US companies. This was under Bush. I'm not getting this.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)And with Hillary, we had her foundation taking money from the very countries & companies she was helping as SoS.
Corruption on steroids. But she's a "Clinton" so like everything else, Democrats are supposed to excuse.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)the host nation and companies, and again, this was under Bush....in 2004.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)They are always there to protect American corporate interests. The interests and security of individual Americans not so much. As a matter of fact they often tell you to look after yourself and not expect much from them.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)If you have a problem you call the embassy, and they will help you out as much as they can....depending of the situation and local laws. My husband only had to deal with lost passports when he had duty (weekends and after hours). All I have to say is that Americans are strange. They go all the way to Europe and go eat at a KFC , and lose or their passport gets stolen....at KFC or Burger King. I just don't get it.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)doing a job. There isn't much of an effort to rescue them. However, if it's an oil exec or other industry important to the MIC endangered they are right there.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Some of the stuff Americans do overseas.... oy.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)She is getting ripped apart on twitter over her comments. Good, she should be. https://twitter.com/barbaraboxer/status/694980415287758848
I am glad she is stepping down this year.
Hey Barb, we see you!
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)fleeing to the U.S. She now supports sending those children back to the murderous conditions she herself helped create. What else would one expect from an erstwhile Goldwater Girl and Rockefeller Republican (at Wellesley)?
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Barbs forgot a few issues and looks like a few folks have different opinions.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Just look at how awful and insulting those tweets are!
cali
(114,904 posts)marriage or they were. And boxer's grandson is Hillary's nephew.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)with Hillary being a moderate on some issues and liberal on others.
Besides I like Hillary better than Bernie which is why she gets my vote. And if I was hesitant at all, after reading all these anti-Hillary comments on DU I would have moved firmly to her side anyway.
So thank you, Berniebots - you have mobilized me even more so to vote for Hillary! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Armstead
(47,803 posts)bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)Forget ethics, forget policy, forget integrity, forget the record, forget the common good or the fate of the earth even - I'm voting for the war-mongering, corporatist, friend of fracking & cluster-bombs because someone said something mean on an anonymous message board.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Vote2016
(1,198 posts)September 10 in Ohio which is on video which gets played side-by-side with the video of faux outrage about her being called a moderate.
This is not as bad as the side-by-side videos about false claims about sniper fire in Bosnia compared with the actual footage, but Clinton does not need MORE examples of side-by-side examples of disingenuous statements.
This is an example of why she starts out with 40% of the voting population saying her dishonesty is her defining characteristic. You cannot win a general election with that. Clinton needs the repair her identification as the most dishonest candidate, and this argument is doubling down on her greatest weakness.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)And here is a "lying compilation" for ease in seeing many of her "inconsistencies" in one short vid~
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)lol
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)n/t
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And I don't generally throw people under the bus. Guess I'll have to to Tweet to her how petty she just sounded.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Wall Street.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Corporate tools, to a man (and woman).
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Instead of Democrats on every day.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I remember when she used to be a liberal.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)he is a game changer and this worries those Democrat who are taking bribes. Ir makes no difference what Party affiliation you have when taking bribes, because you are not working for the people's best interest. If you doing the work of the people, you would be like Bernie and not getting and/or willing to take specual interest money.
Nay
(12,051 posts)roody
(10,849 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,701 posts)Hillary is a progressive when her polls indicate she should say she is.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)proof is in the pudding.
Omaha Steve
(99,635 posts)Not exactly a neutral voice. She owes Hillary BIGTIME!
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/e98/ca/ca002.htm
Boxer in trouble, Clinton and all
LOS ANGELES - Try saying it fast: California Democrat Barbara Boxer is the mother of the sister-in-law of President Clinton's wife.
YOU brought up guns. Snip: And while Feinstein became identified with legislation banning assault weapons, Boxer has failed to link herself to any one issue of similar appeal.
Boxer, meanwhile, has turned to the Clintons for help in raising the $10 million she says she needs to run nonstop TV ads about schools and guns. Hillary Clinton has flown in four times to speak at fund-raising functions, most recently a San Francisco event last week that raised $200,000. The president also appeared with Boxer last week at Los Angeles fund-raising functions - off-limits to news photographers - and will return for another this month.
azmom
(5,208 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....and a centrist. Was she lying?
I'm really, really good with Bernie not being a Democrat.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)nxylas
(6,440 posts)Well, an issue, anyway.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)When they do have power Boxer and others don't seem to want to act. Only when it's time for their own elections do they seem to see problems that they can fix if we keep them in power. They are election time progressives, and compromising pragmatics the rest of the time.
May they all have true progressives running against every one of them.
Work for the people or get the hell out. ALL OF THEM
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Boom!
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)What a pack of lies.
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)Wasn't he a Democrat "some days" as well?
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)So if a person declares themselves to be independent does that mean they can never change that title and become affiliated with one of the two dominate parties? How many times have you ever heard someone say, I belong to the independent party? I would guess not too many, because usually when a person says they are Independent, they don't mean I'm a member of the independent party, they mean I weigh the issues and vote according to my assessment of the situation. Democrats often vote with republicans, and independents often vote with democrats and republicans on certain policies. Bernie Sanders has earned the right to say, I will, because of my past voting record run for president as a democrat, after all, who has he caucused with since becoming a congressman?
If you will remember Joe Liebermann, you will know from his record during his time in congress ran whichever way the wind was blowing, one day caucusing with democrats, the next with republicans and he ran for president as a democrat with less friction than Bernie is getting.
Would you rather have had Bernie Sanders run as an Independent? I don't believe he would have had to do this rigorous primary, and would have IMHO in the end been a Ralph Nader effect in the General. I would say be glad Sanders is running as a democrat, and if he is the preference of the majority of democrats then throw your support behind him and help the democratic party win the White House. It is for sure, those of us who agree with the principals of the democratic party do not want to see a republican in the White House.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Oh, yeah... and she's getting her butt handed to her on Twitter.
riversedge
(70,222 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 4, 2016, 11:55 AM - Edit history (1)
would be the word for so many on-line comment from Sander fans. And what is more shameful is that you laugh and brag about this.
frylock
(34,825 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Not trying to be snarky. I really want to know.
randr
(12,412 posts)that gives the lowest rating numbers for our congressional members.
LexVegas
(6,065 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)I remember when you were a progressive hero on DU, now you're a plutocrat DLC oligarch poopy head. LOL.
OxQQme
(2,550 posts)I want the dozen I sent back.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Whatever that is
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)What, exactly, does democracy mean?
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I guess that today's Democrats are yesterday's RepubliCONs maybe?
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)She wants to keep the status quo.
yellowwoodII
(616 posts)I don't care about labels.
I don't care about gender.
What I care about is integrity.
What I care is about someone who understands that wars hurt us all and some more than others. (Hillary voted for Iraq; Bernie didn't. Either she voted expediently or she exercised poor judgment.)
What I care about is the great disparity between the billionaire class and the rest of us.
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)Going to be really sorry to lose her in the Senate.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Progressives will tell you if Hillary is or is not one of them ...
THIS Progressive has always believed her to be more to the right than I desire ... Willing to sell out the middle class on the holy altar of 'bipartisanship' ...
Bipartisanship - where Democrats try to work with republicans, and where republicans plunge their democratic counterpart's faces into the mud ...
Why is it we always got the shit end of THAT stick?
And THAT'S why we don't care to 'work with the other party' ... Democratic Party weakness has been killing us slowly ... Enough IS enough
amborin
(16,631 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)"Democrat" is merely a title in which the defining content seems to be changing all the time with Hillary and the Party itself.
Meanwhile progressive still means the same thing it's always meant, and Hillary ain't that.
More "Be loyal to the Democratic title!" bullshit.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)whereas Bernie will spend NOT ONE DAY being beholden to Wall Street and other powerful corporate interests.
Bernie is more of a Democrat that Hillary could ever hope to be.
Democrats don't name the founder of the neocon movement (Robert Kagan) as one of their closest advisors. She did so when she was Secretary of State. Democrats don't help the neocons by turning Libya into a failed state that can be easily controlled. That's was Clinton did as SOS. She spearheaded the fall of Libya and converted it into a bastion of failure, suffering and a vacuum for terrorist activity to breed.
The neocons--named Iraq, Iran, Syria and Libya--as countries they want to control and overrun in order to assert United States dominance in the Middle East.
Democrats don't use their position as Secretary of State to cater to the whims of the neocons--the biggest sociopaths on the planet.
merrily
(45,251 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)I guess the Iowa results have left the establishment very uncomfortable.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)You've truly been one of my favorite Senators for a long, long time.
But you're wrong on this...Bernie is just stating what Hill has said in her own words.
Never thought I would say this, but maybe it's good you're retiring while your still ahead.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)I like Barbara Boxer, but the first part of that statement is rediculously hyperbolic, and the 2nd part... well, I'd like to know what she means by that. He chose to be a Democrat rather than destroy the GE as a third party candidate and gave us a more liberal option in the party. He's followed the rules set forth by the DNC despite very legitimate criticisms. In his short time as a Democrat, he's been a better Dem than a pretty good chunk of the party.
Nay
(12,051 posts)why he did what he did, and did it all according to Dem Party rules. He said he would NOT run as a third party candidate because he did not want to split the vote in the GE. He is doing all this -- not for himself -- but for the party and the people as a whole.
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)Is EXACTLY what makes him great.
People > Party.
pandr32
(11,584 posts)One example that stands out, and not mentioned above, is the "nay" vote he gave to deny a tax exemption for married couples that would have benefited lower and middle class families by doubling the tax exemption singles claim--it discriminates against married people who get less of an exemption and with all the expenses of a family...struggle. He talks about our struggling middle class all the time.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)She's gonna get an earful.
hueymahl
(2,496 posts)See, it is easy to call people names and make claims when you don't have to support them.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)the re-election of Duhbya Bush!
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Progressive.......millions from Wall Street/Banks they will want access to her like they did to all others. Change is what is needed not the same thing. Obama promised change then bowed to the Insurance and Pharma...........the change I voted for did not happen. Some small things but he is with TPP and corporate illegal America. Hillary is a Clinton and she is not to be trusted. No more royalty.
I want real change. Only Bernie has the truth in this election.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Gothmog
(145,252 posts)I agree with and stand with Senator Boxer
dragonfly301
(399 posts)Wonder where the progressive leaders of tomorrow will come from? Hint: they aren't Hillary supporters or Boxer supporters or Claire McCaskill or Terry McCaullife supporters. Take a look at the multitude of thousands of young people that attend Bernie's events, go over to his subreddit and witness the young people organizing for him. They are the future of our party, or will be if we let them. Pray that they don't become disenfranchised by privileged, older, corporate sponsored politicians who currently are in power. Bernie is saving the Democratic Party from the cancer that it has become. Boxer should be ashamed of herself.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)katsy
(4,246 posts)In the end,,, regardless of the nominee, Democrats will support our common cause.
I hate primary season. THINK people... there is not one candidate ever that everyone agrees with. No different than families. It's human nature. We aren't carbon copies of one another.
I don't agree with any candidate 100% and yet I am now and forever a democrat. I fucking hate crucifying our own.
I still love boxer and she'll work tirelessly if Bernie is our nominee.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)She's always reminded me a little of Rita Moreno. (Maybe it's just the glasses.) What do you think?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)And the actress admits shell be voting for Democrat Bernie Sanders, who is slightly ahead of Hillary Clinton to win the vote as the frontrunner for his party.
She adds, Bernie is my guy. It was Hillary, but I just love him. I dont know if hell really get to that point, but Im gonna do my best to support the person I think is the very best person for the job.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Zing!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)What matters is the two candidate's records and Bernie's is by far the most progressive and liberal record.
And Bernie embraces and fights for the traditional values and principles the Democratic Party was founded on, the FDR type policies that help the working people. Hillary embraces and fights for the DLC/Third Way values and principles of the Dem Party, the corporate friendly ones and she takes money from the banksters and health insurance industries.
Barbara Boxer is simply wrong about this. It's not the first time she's been wrong.
.
polichick
(37,152 posts)The choice is ours.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Vinca
(50,273 posts)That gives her chosen candidate a chance if she's the nominee. If Bernie was running as a third party candidate he would be a spoiler and the GOP would have an easy win. As for progressive, Hillary has only claimed the title for the last week or so. Before she bragged she was a moderate.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)I love Barbara Boxer, but it would have surprised me 100% more if she had come out in support of Bernie.
No shock here....no shock at all.
intheflow
(28,474 posts)Anyone who tells you different is either a simpleton, lying, or trying to sell you something. Clinton is not a simpleton.
Response to riversedge (Original post)
stopbush This message was self-deleted by its author.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)a man and a woman"
I guess those days don't count.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)We live in a big tent.
Dems2002
(509 posts)I know we're all passionate and partisan voters. Many of us here have been part of local Democratic Clubs and are active as part of the party structure of the Democratic Party. But we are a minuscule portion of the electorate, including the many who just so happen to be registered Democrats.
Over the years, Independents and/or DTS's have become the largest voting block. I think it would have been a disaster for the Democratic nominee had Bernie Sanders chosen to run for President as an Independent, and I'm thankful he didn't choose that path rather than pissed at him for choosing to run as a Democrat, a label I have had my entire life as a registered voter.
But I'm a Democrat because of the values Democrats supposedly have, not because of the Party. In point of fact, I think DC Dems are often as much a part of the problem as the solution, so Bernie and I are in agreement on that front.
I think attacking Bernie for not being a member of the party only hurts him with a minuscule portion of the electorate, while giving him street cred with the rest.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)establishment DEM utterances are important to the Hillary people apparently.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Seth: "Hillary said the word 'progressive' 15 times in the last debate. Does she want to be President or Flo?"