With the Big Banks, it's not what they gave to Hillary's campaign, it's what they gave to Hillary!

[reformist2]

Goldman Sachs may have given $800,000 to her campaign, but they gave Hillary $675,000 directly in speaking fees!

Which is the bigger bribe? Probably the one that went right into her checking account.

Sorry, Hillary fans, but the Clintons *are* too close to the Big Banks to be fair and impartial.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. She cannot be impartial due to how close she is to the Big Banks.

Money has a way of doing that.

[earthside]

2. And she's planning on taking money from Bain Capital.

Clinton postpones another financial-services fundraiser
Under fire from Sanders, she delays events hosted by leaders of BlackRock, Bain Capital affiliate.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/hillary-clinton-postpones-fundraiser-financial-services-218708

Clinton will no longer attend an event in Boston scheduled for Friday that was to be hosted by Jonathan Lavine, managing director of Bain Capital affiliate Sankaty Advisors, sources close to the matter said.

The event has not been canceled but will now be held sometime after the New Hampshire primary, which takes place Feb. 9.

Are we sure she is a Democrat?

[CaliforniaPeggy]

3. She is registered as a Democrat.

So, legally, she is.

Ideologically.........I don't know. DINO, maybe?

[studyshare]

4. K&R