Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What bank or financial institution made political contributions to Hillary for America? (Original Post) boston bean Feb 2016 OP
Google is your friend 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #1
Really those entities made those contributions? boston bean Feb 2016 #2
Google "banks and financial firms funding Hillary Clinton" 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #5
It is not legal for these entities to make poltical contributions. boston bean Feb 2016 #10
Compromised? How about bought and sold? AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #29
Oh, I get your point now Red Oak Feb 2016 #7
Those were during her career in elected officee. Career tag covers Lucinda Feb 2016 #4
This was like 1-2 weeks ago, ok. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #8
She is running for POTUS. It's a fund raiser. Lucinda Feb 2016 #9
Exactly! It's "politics-as-usual", pay-to-play, grease-my-palm you get your bill passed. nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #11
You do realize that the Republicans will have buckets of money for the GE right? Lucinda Feb 2016 #15
Apparently you missed a link. Hillary shaking-down financial corps. Just 2 weeks ago, 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #19
I read it just fine. I'm assuming you ignored my comments entirely. Lucinda Feb 2016 #21
What over simplified glop. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #27
Money can't buy you love AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #30
I was looking at an article about that 100 million dollar ad buy in New Hampshire earlier Lucinda Feb 2016 #31
And here is a link to the employers of the person donating Red Oak Feb 2016 #3
That is what the person i responded to above. But boston bean Feb 2016 #6
Are you trying to parse the issue of who speaks for the company? Red Oak Feb 2016 #12
You're parsing words & quibbling over minutia. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #13
Do you have some real proof of this? boston bean Feb 2016 #14
I believe a variant of the efficient market hypothesis applies JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #16
You want me to "prove" that BIG MONEY donors influence politicians' positions on issues? 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #17
I want you to prove what you said. Lobbyists. Super pacs. boston bean Feb 2016 #18
Did you even read the POLITIFACT link? Apparently not. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #20
Those entities do not make donations to Hillary for America. boston bean Feb 2016 #22
You don't like what Politifact says, and I don't blame you. but it's the truth. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #23
I care about the fact that those companies cannot legally boston bean Feb 2016 #24
Depends on what your definition of "legally" is. Red Oak Feb 2016 #26
You mean you wish these companies COULD make direct political donations to Hillary? 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #28
Sure Red Oak Feb 2016 #25
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. Google is your friend
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:27 PM
Feb 2016

Citigroup Inc $824,402 $816,402 $8,000
Goldman Sachs $760,740 $750,740 $10,000
DLA Piper $700,530 $673,530 $27,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $696,456 $693,456 $3,000
Morgan Stanley $636,564 $631,564 $5,000
EMILY's List $609,684 $605,764 $3,920
Time Warner $501,831 $476,831 $25,000
Skadden, Arps et al $469,290 $464,790 $4,500
University of California $417,327 $417,327 $0
Sullivan & Cromwell $369,150 $369,150 $0
Akin, Gump et al $364,478 $360,978 $3,500
Lehman Brothers $362,853 $359,853 $3,000
21st Century Fox $340,936 $340,936 $0
Cablevision Systems $336,613 $307,225 $29,388
Kirkland & Ellis $329,141 $312,141 $17,000
National Amusements Inc $328,312 $325,312 $3,000
Squire Patton Boggs $328,306 $322,868 $5,438
Greenberg Traurig LLP $327,890 $319,790 $8,100
Corning Inc $322,450 $304,450 $18,000
Credit Suisse Group $318,120 $308,120 $10,000
https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00000019&cycle=Career

MORE: https://theintercept.com/2016/01/26/hillary-clinton-doing-back-to-back-finance-industry-fundraisers-just-before-iowa/
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
5. Google "banks and financial firms funding Hillary Clinton"
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:31 PM
Feb 2016

Politifact says "Mostly True."
Meme says Hillary Clinton's top donors are banks and corporations, Bernie Sanders' are labor unions
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jul/07/facebook-posts/meme-says-hillary-clintons-top-donors-are-banks-an/

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
10. It is not legal for these entities to make poltical contributions.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:36 PM
Feb 2016

Did you know that?

I work for a company and list my employer. Does that mean my company donated and now Hillary is compromised some how?

Red Oak

(697 posts)
7. Oh, I get your point now
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:33 PM
Feb 2016

It depends on what the definition of "donation" is.

Got it.

You are parsing the issue of what bank and not what bank employee. Good one.

Might even depend on what the definition of "is" is.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
4. Those were during her career in elected officee. Career tag covers
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:31 PM
Feb 2016

the period between 1999 through Mid summer last year for all candidates. And the bulk of those from financial institutions were from individual donors who worked in NYC.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
15. You do realize that the Republicans will have buckets of money for the GE right?
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:48 PM
Feb 2016

And Bernie had better have buckets too if he is the nominee because it is going to be brutal.

And you also realize that all this financial support from those industries comes from her time as a NY Senator? And also that she and Chuck Schumer were a huge part of helping NYC and the financial industry recover quickly after 9/11. Morgan Stanley alone had over 15 floors of Two World Trade. There were many more companies in those towers directly involved in the financial industry.

And as far as bill passing goes, the POTUS is the exec, not legislative. And as I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm told the Republicans hate her, so she wouldn't be able to get congress to pass any greasy bills. So no worries, right?

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
21. I read it just fine. I'm assuming you ignored my comments entirely.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:59 PM
Feb 2016

That's cool. Maybe you can check it out some other time.

I have to do a few things before the debate anyway, and I'm running late!
And I have no problem with candidates fund raising. Money isn't evil. People who use it for evil are.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
30. Money can't buy you love
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:09 AM
Feb 2016

Scott Walker had the whole Koch fortune behind him. How'd he do? Jeb! has $200 million behind him. How's he doing?

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
31. I was looking at an article about that 100 million dollar ad buy in New Hampshire earlier
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 03:47 AM
Feb 2016

and answering a post about Bernie's excellent fund raising lately. I'll share some numbers with you if you are interested.

80% of that 100 million was bought by Republicans. For a primary that will happen in just over a week.

And that 80 million is almost 6 Million dollars MORE that Bernie has raised IN TOTAL ($74,369,254) as of January 31st.

And that - the 100 million dollars, is what was spent for a single primary is a small state. Anyone NOT raising serious cash for this election will not make it to inauguration day. The SuperPACs have to go, but until we can overturn Citizens United, we had better be using the tools at hand.

Bernies Numbers:
https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000528&type=f

The AD Buy:
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-02-03/new-hampshire-flooded-by-100-million-in-political-ads



boston bean

(36,221 posts)
6. That is what the person i responded to above. But
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:33 PM
Feb 2016

Those are individual do ations from persons who happen to work at the institutions.

They were not made by the banks. And i can see you realize that.

But why do you think that because people who work at these large companies who donate mean that the companies they work for own Hillary?

Red Oak

(697 posts)
12. Are you trying to parse the issue of who speaks for the company?
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:40 PM
Feb 2016

Can we discuss the "speaking" fees, too or do you not consider them donations?

I guess those folks that spent a quarter-mil listening to Hillary's wisdom for 30 minutes wanted only those few choice words for their money? Or maybe they wanted more, and found a legal way of paying millions for almost no work so they can pull a chit in later?

Sure would like to get some transcripts of those speeches. Must be some good words there to cost so much.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
13. You're parsing words & quibbling over minutia.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:42 PM
Feb 2016

The big banks fund raise their CEOs and managerial staff to buy elections.
Are they 'playing by the rules' of CU? Well, technically yes.

Are they doing it to buy influence? Well, absolutely. Are you in denial about that?

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
16. I believe a variant of the efficient market hypothesis applies
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:50 PM
Feb 2016

Contributions to further the aims of the company are "priced in" to executives' pay.

Fair to say that plenty of people disagree with this assessment, as they do with the efficient market hypothesis. Of course, there is a lack of hard evidence for both theories.

That's the perspective people have of the system, boston bean.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
17. You want me to "prove" that BIG MONEY donors influence politicians' positions on issues?
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:50 PM
Feb 2016

Are you serious?


So you think huge corporate donations to office holders and candidates is because they are
"generous nice guys" and expect nothing for their money?

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
18. I want you to prove what you said. Lobbyists. Super pacs.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:51 PM
Feb 2016

Ok.

I dont believe you have any proof of a conspiracy regarding individual donations.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
22. Those entities do not make donations to Hillary for America.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:59 PM
Feb 2016

Doesnt matter what you want to read into it or what you want me to read into it.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
23. You don't like what Politifact says, and I don't blame you. but it's the truth.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:05 PM
Feb 2016

which is what Bernie's campaign is also about.

I'm frankly not overly-interested in quibbling over minutia with you any further.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
24. I care about the fact that those companies cannot legally
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:06 PM
Feb 2016

Make political contributions to hillay for america.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
28. You mean you wish these companies COULD make direct political donations to Hillary?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 02:57 AM
Feb 2016

Oh I forgot, that's right.

I remember now. we're all supposed to call these bribes "speaker fees", or "individual donations"
or ANY thing but what it actually IS, and suddenly it's 'not a problem' ... and no one is supposed
to notice orcare.

What the Hell was I thinking?

Red Oak

(697 posts)
25. Sure
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:07 PM
Feb 2016

NAFTA
China in the WTO
TPP
Citizens United
Bank deregulation including investment banking and the savings and lone deregulation (that was an oldie but a goodie)
Search for and look at the recent articles on the donations from big oil just before the export ban was lifted.

The list would be very long.

None of it is in the best interests of the middle class. It is SOP inside the beltway.

Reagan, Bush, BILL CLINTON, Bush lite, even Obama all in on the same disgusting actions. Why did Obama put Geithner in charge of Treasury? or Larry Summers for the NEC. The system is rigged.

Glad to see Bernie trying to at least raise people's awareness of who is really screwing the middle class over. Wealth inequality and the destruction of the middle class did not happen as an accident. It was a greedy planned attack to improve corporate profits. Hillary has been in the thick of it. It was her husband that signed NAFTA. It was Bill that got China into the WTO and really set the ball rolling there. Is Hillary saying she gets a pass and that she had no involvement?

Goldman Sachs' Lloyd Blanfein is right. Bernie's campaign is a dangerous thing. People are starting to truly see that people like Hillary talk a good game, but have not been there for the middle class of America. I can show you all the photos of Hillary hobnobbing with Blankfein, heck even The Donald. Now show me a photo of her on a picket line or meeting with management to save a factory.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What bank or financial in...