Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:12 PM Feb 2016

How Iowa Went Wrong For Hillary Clinton

How Iowa went wrong for Hillary Clinton
Her vaunted field organization performed as expected. But she didn't.
By Glenn Thrush and Annie Karni
02/02/16 03:17 AM EST

DES MOINES – Monday night was Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign in miniature – it began with high hopes of a doubt-eradicating victory and ended with that same old anxiety, an inch beyond the jaws of an underdog.

Clinton’s frustrating second Iowa campaign started with a puckish, incognito cross-country trip in April in her “Scooby Van” meant to emphasize her softer side after eight years out of retail politics. It ended here with a full-throated Bernie Sanders–style vow to challenge “the status quo,” intended to make her palatable to progressives who demand a hard-edged approach to income inequality.

Iowa wasn’t just supposed to be a tentative first step in Clinton’s inevitable march to the Democratic nomination, it was meant to be the cornerstone of a rebuilt political persona – and her national team was built from Iowa outward, with a foundational goal of winning here, and winning big.

But nothing is ever easy with Hillary Clinton – especially not here - and her inability to ride a first-class ground organization to a decisive triumph underscores the candidate’s weakness and the lack of a message that resonates with primary voters. For months, the Republican side of the aisle has been filled with drama and uncertainty – yet in the end it was a 74-year-old, wild-haired democratic socialist who has muddied a contest that was supposed to be predictable.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/hillary-clinton-iowa-performance-218607#ixzz3z4CsJkYd

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Iowa Went Wrong For Hillary Clinton (Original Post) John Poet Feb 2016 OP
That, my friends, is how bare victory becomes resounding defeat leveymg Feb 2016 #1
She won. Any positive territory for a candidate dominating nationally is a win. onehandle Feb 2016 #2
The media loves Hillary! Metric System Feb 2016 #3
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #4
Clinton won PoC vote by 25%... What went wrong in IA with Sanders? uponit7771 Feb 2016 #5
If Clinton won that demographic by ONLY 25 percent, John Poet Feb 2016 #6

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. That, my friends, is how bare victory becomes resounding defeat
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:19 PM
Feb 2016

It'always self-inflicted defeat with her. It's what she does. Would be truly disastrous in a President and Commander in Chief.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
6. If Clinton won that demographic by ONLY 25 percent,
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 12:51 AM
Feb 2016

then Sanders picked up a lot of ground with them there, since national polls have showed him much further behind than that.

I expect you know that.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How Iowa Went Wrong For H...