Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAsking for a Debate, after working for the least is Machevelian, another example of Chess over issue
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1066 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Asking for a Debate, after working for the least is Machevelian, another example of Chess over issue (Original Post)
orpupilofnature57
Feb 2016
OP
Calling for more debates for months then refusing to participate is hypocrisy
liberal N proud
Feb 2016
#1
Refusing to have the circumstances dictated by the Clinton campaign is not hypocrisy.
Motown_Johnny
Feb 2016
#3
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)1. Calling for more debates for months then refusing to participate is hypocrisy
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)2. It would be, your point?
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)3. Refusing to have the circumstances dictated by the Clinton campaign is not hypocrisy.
You just don't understand that he deserves equal respect in regards to the process.
You and DWS.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)4. Perfectly stated
and exactly what's wrong here.