Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:35 PM Feb 2016

Anybody see this about the coin toss?

http://cbsnews.com.co/dnc-involved-joint-investigation-clinton-coin-toss-2/

Disclaimer: I didn't realize this wasn't CBS when I posted this. Thanks to the Duers who pointed it out; however, I strongly disagree with the practice of coin toss and the strong arm tactics.

Seems something may be amiss. If everything is above board, then why the strong arm tactics?
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
1. I think you better look over that site again because 1) it's NOT CBS News and 2) there are fake
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:40 PM
Feb 2016

headlines all over the page.

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
5. Thanks, I'll check it out.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:45 PM
Feb 2016

Didn't realize it wasn't CBS. I still don't understand how an election process can be decided by a coin toss. Why bother to vote? Just flip a coin and decide the next POTUS.

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
10. I had no idea
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:51 PM
Feb 2016

that Presidential elections could be decided by a coin toss. This definitely needs to change.

onenote

(42,759 posts)
17. You don't seriously think the outcome of the Presidential election was decided by a coin toss do you
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 07:15 PM
Feb 2016

Do you think the outcome of the caucus decided the election? Bernie doesn't and I doubt Clinton does. With or without the coin flip the outcome of the Iowa caucus didn't decide the election. Hell, it didn't even decide who the Democratic nominee is going to be.

But nice hyperbole.

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
8. I agree.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:48 PM
Feb 2016

Sure could save a lot of time, effort, and money with a coin toss, though. Just flip a coin have the two candidates call it, and Bingo! Instant POTUS!

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
11. Of course it was rigged. Flip a coin 6 times and see. Or if you think winning when the odds are
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:52 PM
Feb 2016

64 to 1 against you is not really that strange then go bet everything you own on GREEN on a roulette wheel. If 64 to 1 is easy to beat then 37 to 1 is a sure thing.

Of course it was rigged.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,195 posts)
18. (Sorry 'bout that.)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 07:19 PM
Feb 2016

But I still can't see how a coin toss has any place in electoral politics, unless it's to determine who goes first in a debate or something like that. A 2-out-of-3-falls wrestling match to determine who gets the delegate would make about as much sense.

Response to dgibby (Original post)

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
16. Weighted coins handed out to every pro Clinton precinct, Clinton people all called their choices
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 07:06 PM
Feb 2016

First and that's how you win Primaries with 6 coin tosses!

I wish she would have kept that coin!

The filth runs deep.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Anybody see this about th...