OMG!!! 90 Precincts not covered properly

[bkkyosemite]

inadequate coverage...Wants the two camps to recreate the caucus totals. OMG...Polk County mostly!

[NowSam]

1. Impossible

The outcome will forever be in doubt. This is Florida 2000 all over again. Forever in doubt.

[2pooped2pop]

2. How can that be done?

[NRaleighLiberal]

3. What are the ramifications of this? I've read this many times now - but no impact of this.

what are they saying this means? Or may happen?

[bkkyosemite]

6. I don't know. Seems like CNN doesn't know either.

But something is not right with this. Another thing they in another place flipped coins and 3 delegates went to Clinton...WHAT!

[bkkyosemite]

4. CNN said Bernie was about to get on the plane and his staff was talking

to CNN and was very upset! The other guy on CNN said those areas might have been good for Bernie.

[John Poet]

5. Another good argument for doing away with the Iowa Democrats'

caucus process.

It's precinct level delegate system can get pretty unrepresentative of the actual vote.

Because of the way much of Bernie's support was concentrated around college campuses, who turned out huge for him, I think there may have been a lot more "stranded votes" (extra votes beyond those needed for a delegate, so they were "wasted&quot than in the rural areas largely favoring Clinton.

If we had a raw vote total, I think it would show that BERNIE ACTUALLY WON here.

[JEB]

8. That makes sense. eom

[liberal_at_heart]

7. The party is showing just how corrupt it is.

[joshcryer]

10. Or the caucus system is showing how archaic it is.

[Lodestar]

9. I read that the caucus results were MISSING...wha.....?

[hedda_foil]

11. What the eff does not covered properly even mean?